The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
CommentaryFull Access

Clozapine Clinic: The Need of the Hour

Despite advances, psychiatrists continue to struggle with the safe and effective treatment of schizophrenia. Clozapine is a second-generation antipsychotic with a unique D2 dissociation constant, high affinity for D1- and D4-dopaminergic receptors, and potent antagonism of serotonergic and alpha-adrenergic receptors. Unfortunately, many physicians are reluctant to prescribe clozapine due to potentially fatal side effects such as agranulocytosis, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, paralytic ileus, and aspiration pneumonia (1). We would like to call for an increase in clozapine clinics as a possible solution to this problem.

While various guidelines suggest second-generation antipsychotics as the initial pharmaceutical treatment for a first psychotic break, there is no consensus on which antipsychotic is best. Despite consistent evidence of superior efficacy, improved outcomes, and improved morbidity, clozapine is “strikingly underutilized” (2). Studies of physicians’ prescribing practices reveal that only small portions of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia are treated with clozapine (3). Since the introduction of newer second-generation antipsychotics, clozapine use has decreased in the United States, from 11% of the total second-generation antipsychotics prescribed in 1999 to less than 5% in 2002 (3).

Clozapine’s low prescription rate is likely related to its side-effect profile, as previous investigations have reported prescriber fear as a major factor for noninitiation (4). As a result, many clinicians decide to avoid clozapine altogether. Those who prescribe it may be unacquainted with its usage, resulting in treatment errors such as underdosing, unneeded discontinuation, and poor or inadequate side-effect intervention (1).

To further complicate the prescription of clozapine, patients with schizophrenia often have an inherent tendency toward poor adherence. Interestingly, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in first-episode treatment-naive patients with schizophrenia have suggested that clozapine may have superior efficacy in the initial year of treatment, mostly due to greater adherence (5). In another RCT, patients receiving clozapine were also found to remit significantly faster and remain in remission longer than those taking a first-generation antipsychotic (chlorpromazine) (6).

We believe the above barriers to prescription and adherence could be addressed with clozapine clinics. In such clinics, trained staff members have the resources, knowledge, and experience required to provide safer, more closely monitored treatment. Furthermore, clozapine clinics allow for time specifically dedicated to contacting patients and encouraging consistent follow-up. Finally, clozapine clinics can deliver focused supplementary training for psychiatric residents and other medical professionals. These professionals can gain confidence and experience with clozapine prescription in a controlled environment before continuing on to individual practices. Massachusetts General Hospital recently tested this idea and found that a 6-week direct patient contact clinic (along with accompanying curriculum-based instruction) effectively increased knowledge in participating residents (7).

Clozapine clinics can improve multiple facets of schizophrenia treatment. They can expand clozapine’s accessibility, enhance clinician familiarity and competency, and provide better residency training for more effective use among desired communities. These benefits can be used to improve individual patient’s quality of life while playing an important role in the successful treatment of schizophrenia.

Dr. Hughes is a first-year resident in the Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore., and Dr. Singh is a fourth-year resident in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, N.D.

For further details on the use of clozapine, see the articles by Gören et al. in Psychiatric Services.

References

1. Nielsen J, Dahm M, Lublin H, et al.: Psychiatrists’ attitude towards and knowledge of clozapine treatment. J Psychopharmacol 2010; 24:965–971 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

2. Kane JM: A user’s guide to clozapine. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2011; 123:407–408 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

3. Moore TA, Covell NH, Essock SM, et al.: Real-world antipsychotic treatment practices. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2007; 30:401–416 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

4. Cohen D: Prescribers fear as a major side-effect of clozapine. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2014; 130:154–155 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

5. Sanz-Fuentenebro J, Taboada D, Palomo T, et al.: Randomized trial of clozapine vs risperidone in treatment-naive first-episode schizophrenia: results after one year. Schizophr Res 2013; 149:156–161 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

6. Lieberman JA, Phillips M, Gu H, et al.: Atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in treatment-naive first-episode schizophrenia: a 52-week randomized trial of clozapine vs chlorpromazine. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003; 28:995–1003 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

7. Freudenreich O, Henderson DC, Sanders KM, et al.: Training in a clozapine clinic for psychiatry residents: a plea and suggestions for implementation. Acad Psychiatry 2013; 37:2–30 CrossrefGoogle Scholar