Mental Health in LGBT Refugee Populations

Pre-flight experiences are the traumas that occur in one’s country of origin (see Table 2). LGBT refugees may have lived through years of persecution within their family or broader community. Documented violence includes corrective rape, honor killings, beatings, and imprisonment (9). This abuse can be longstanding, starting in early childhood, or more recent in adulthood. Adults who have suffered childhood sexual abuse, often from family or community members, are at increased risk of depression and anxiety (10). In some cases, individuals abruptly flee their homes due to changes in safety, including threat of exposure and fear of torture or death (11). The threat of violence, having witnessed a partner or friend murdered or tortured, can also trigger the individual to flee. Often, the spontaneous decision to leave means that individuals are not prepared for the journey or do not know where to go next. Patients may present with PTSD (12). In DSM-5, the diagnosis of PTSD incorporates depersonalization, derealization, and negative alterations in cognition (guilt, shame, fear). Presentations can include re-experiencing traumatic events, avoidance of reflecting on trauma hypervigilance, and anxiety. Previous literature has discussed LGBT refugee mental health in relation to disorders of extreme stress not otherwise specified or complex PTSD (13). Originally proposed within the DSM-IV Work Group (14), this was a cluster of symptoms encompassing three non-PTSD posttraumatic disorders: dissociative identity disorder, borderline personality disorder, and somatization disorder. Proponents of complex PTSD suggested that it may better fit with prolonged, interpersonal, and repeated trauma (15). This is included to show that patients may present with a range of conditions that need to be addressed (16). In the long-term, repeated pre-flight trauma may erode a patient’s resilience capacities, that is, how they adapt to future stressors (17).

After leaving one’s country of origin, there are dangers in transit, especially if one must travel through nations with discriminatory laws. Refugees report abuse, imprisonment, and torture after leaving their homes. Additionally, in the initial stages of a humanitarian crisis, LGBT people are more at risk of being excluded from basic protections (18). Beyond access to care and increased likelihood of harm, alienation from government and NGO organizations can affect long-term coping and resilience ability in LGBT individuals. When promises of safety are made and then broken, clinicians have noted lasting effects on the patient’s ability to form relationships and seek help. This is especially troubling given that patients who access community resources and group activity have better outcomes than patients in isolation (19). LGBT refugees may be more marginalized during the process of registration, including scrutinizing documents, detention in gender-segregated facilities, and public reporting of private information. LGBT refugees in detention are at increased risk of violence and sexual assault compared with other detainees (20). Security during asylum seeking is precarious with reports of attacks, as well as harassment by family members and other refugees.

Once a refugee has obtained status or is awaiting a court date, there are mental health challenges that can emerge in his or her new country. One such issue is the concept of “cultural bereavement” (21). This refers to the loss of familiar social structures, values, and even language. Some grieving for this loss can be expected, but symptoms may progress, causing depression. Patients may lose ties to their families and become isolated from communities because of their LGBT identity (Table 2). They may report hypervigilance and anxiety about having their identity being revealed. If they seek support within their cultural community, they risk being ostracized. While considering these factors, clinicians should remember that pre-flight trauma is connected to post-flight trauma. Pre-flight trauma has lasting effects on how the patient views him- or herself and adapts to a new life. In patients who have reported childhood abuse, for example, patients may feel shame, invisible, and “wrong,” having internalized negative perceptions of family and community (22). This affects how the patient approaches therapy and informs how they approach the asylum-seeking process. For example, some individuals may not have considered filing for asylum based on being LGBT or may be resistant to doing so all together.

In the United States, refugee claimants are asked to recount their experiences that led to leaving their country. Reviewers assess an applicant’s story for plausibility, consistency, detail, country of origin information, and corroborating evidence (23). Preparing an application can force patients to revisit trauma and reflect on their identity. In transgender individuals, proof of identity is problematic (24), as some may have transitioned and/or no longer identify as the gender listed on accepted forms of identification. Not all individuals may identify outright as LGBT due to internalized shame or cultural understandings of their sexuality. As such, it is important to be sensitive to these variations when treating patients and assisting in the navigation of the asylum process. There is a one-year filing deadline from the time an individual enters the country, after which patients cannot file a claim. It is important to consider this timeline when preparing a case. When working with survivors of torture, the interviewer should make the purpose of the discussion clear, address cultural and language differences, and be aware of the impact of third parties on testimony. For example, is someone safe to identify as LGBT for asylum if he or she is with family or living within a broader community of refugees from the same area.

As clinicians, we must be aware of our own expectations and assumptions of how LGBT individuals should present. For example, a woman who identifies as lesbian may have been pressured to marry and have children (25). Reading and Rubin (19) highlighted the following priority areas for clinicians to incorporate when working with LGBT refugee applicants: cultural issues, culturally appropriate services related to language and other needs of immigrants, meeting the needs of children, the elderly, and other special groups (see Table 3). The World Psychiatric Association has established similar recommendations (26). In working with patients, it is important to acknowledge cultural differences in understanding identity. The World Psychiatric Association (26) recommends that clinicians access information of specific cultural issues, provide culturally appropriate services related to language and other needs of immigrants, and meet the needs of children, the elderly, and other special. In working with patients, it is important to acknowledge cultural differences in understanding identity.

Understanding the trauma experienced by LGBT refugees allows clinicians to empathize and provide appropriate care. Patients will present with complex histories comprising trauma at home, in transit, and while acclimatizing to their new lives. In working with this community, broader social, cultural, and legal aspects of mental illness should be considered by the psychiatrist to understand the patient’s experience. The role of therapy is two-fold: to navigate the past and prepare the client for the future. Opportunities exist for residents and clinicians looking to assess asylum seekers. For example, the Weill Cornell Center for Human Rights (27) provides resources and training for medical students, residents, and clinicians interested in conducting asylum evaluations. Organizations such as Physicians for Human Rights and HealthRight International provide trainings as well. Finally, psychiatrists have the opportunity to act as advocates for their patients by empowering refugees to navigate the asylum process and make sense of their experiences.