Borderline personality disorder will affect approximately 18 million Americans in their lifetime (
1). The 12-month prevalence of borderline personality disorder in the United States is 1.6% (
2). Roy R. Grinker introduced borderline personality disorder to the academic community in the 1960s, with the first effort to define the syndrome, while Otto Kernberg wrote a series of papers introducing “borderline personality organization” and its treatment to the psychoanalytic community (
3,
4). The
DSM-5 defines borderline personality disorder as “a pattern of instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity” (
5).
There are multiple studies that indicate that childhood maltreatment, specifically sexual abuse, is both commonly reported in and strongly associated with borderline personality disorder, with symptoms of the personality disorder, such as derealization or dysphoria, predictive of childhood abuse (
6–
8). Some speculate that this may just be bias in recall, dependent on the population sampled and its retrospective nature, or whether the child’s difficult temperament led to some form of neglect (
9). However, Johnson and colleagues (
10) found that individuals with a history of childhood physical abuse, sexual abuse, or neglect were four times as likely to have a personality disorder in early adulthood compared with individuals who did not, even when difficult temperament, parental education, and mental health were controlled for. They further suggested that sexual abuse was “associated with elevated borderline [personality disorder] symptoms” (
10). Childhood maltreatment, maladaptive parenting, and biological predisposition are all possible mechanisms that underlie the relationship between childhood maltreatment and borderline personality disorder (
10). The present review aims to highlight the recent research on another possible explanation for an association between childhood maltreatment and borderline personality disorder: epigenetic modifications secondary to early-life stress.
The Relationship Between NR3C1 Methylation and Borderline Personality Disorder
In the first study to show an association between various types of childhood maltreatment and increased methylation of
NR3C1 in humans, Perroud and colleagues (
22) recruited 101 patients from an intensive dialectical-behavior therapy center and found that sexual abuse significantly correlated with
NR3C1 methylation status when compared with non-sexually abused counterparts. The majority of the patients were females (94.06%) in their 30s, who were diagnosed with borderline personality disorder and suffered from comorbid major depressive disorder (73.26%), alcohol use disorder (61.3%), and substance use disorder (51.6%).
Childhood maltreatment was quantified using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). The CTQ assesses five types of self-reported trauma: physical abuse, physical neglect, emotional abuse, emotional neglect, and sexual abuse. The scores are correlated to cut-off points to determine severity: none, low, moderate, and severe.
NR3C1 methylation status was determined by DNA extracted from leukocytes. Perroud et al examined exon 1
F because increased methylation in this location was 1) shown by Oberlander and colleagues (
25) to be a possible link between prenatal maternal mood and an infant’s modified HPA stress reactivity and 2) shown by McGowan and colleagues (
26) to be associated with subsequent decreased hippocampal
NR3C1 gene expression in suicide victims with a history of childhood abuse. The
NR3C1 exon 1
F gene sequence also includes a nerve growth factor inducible protein A (NGFI-A) binding site that regulates gene transcription, but the CpG sites that have been extensively studied do not include this site (
22). NGFI-A is highly expressed in young rodents that received quality maternal care (
27).
There was a positive correlation between the severity of childhood maltreatment (amount and frequency) and
NR3C1 methylation (
22). The CpG sites studied by Perroud and colleagues and McGowan and colleagues had increased methylation in those with childhood sexual abuse (
22,
26). Perroud and colleagues suggested that increased methylation occurred in specific areas located near recognition elements for NGFI-A, since the NGFI-A binding site is upstream of the CpG sites studied, but the significance remains unknown (
22,
25,
26).
For each type of maltreatment, there was significant association with increased methylation. Participants with childhood sexual abuse had increased methylation compared with counterparts who did not; the more severe the abuse, the higher the methylation status (
22). There was also highly significant association between methylation status and emotional abuse (
22). This is important to note because the literature tends to gravitate toward examination of sexual abuse; emotional abuse is an equally important factor and can be just as predictive (
22).
Perroud and colleagues were unable to correlate the degree of methylation to borderline personality disorder severity (
22). Additionally, McGowan and colleagues used postmortem hippocampal samples of suicide victims, while Perroud and colleagues used peripheral blood (
22,
26). Thus, the results by Perroud and colleagues cannot be readily applied to genetic expression in the brain.
Martin-Blanco and colleagues (
23) aimed to correlate methylation status with borderline personality disorder severity. They recruited 281 patients with borderline personality disorder from specialized inpatient units that treat the disorder and examined 1) the genomic DNA extracted from their peripheral leukocytes, 2) their history of previous hospitalizations, 3) their self-injurious behaviors, and 4) their self-reported childhood trauma via the CTQ. They examined the same eight CpG sites (
22,
25,
26). Similar to the study by Perroud and colleagues, the participants were predominantly female (85%), with a mean age of 29 years (
23). The authors found that there was a “significant positive correlation” between
NR3C1 methylation status and childhood physical abuse (
23). There was significant association between methylation of specific sites—CpG 1, 2, and 3—and physical abuse and emotional neglect (p=0.08); methylation of CpG 6 correlated to emotional abuse (
23). Additionally, the authors noted a significant association between methylation and clinical severity as measured by the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines, self-injurious behaviors, and past hospitalizations (
23).
Radtke and colleagues (
24) examined 46 participants, mainly adolescents and young adults, recruited via advertisement and compensated monetarily, and found a statistically significant correlation between methylation of a CpG site (cg17860381) within exon 1
F in lymphocytes, childhood maltreatment, and symptoms of borderline personality disorder. Their statistical analysis indicated that childhood maltreatment and cg17860381 methylation were both significant predictors for the symptoms of the disorder and its intensity; however, they did not detail the specific symptoms (
24).
The Serotonin 3A Receptor 5-HT3AR
The serotonin 3A receptor (5-HT
3AR) has a role in cortical circuit formation, HPA function, and regulation of acute stress-induced HPA activity, and it factors into anxiety, fear, anxiety-related behaviors, and cognition and regulates corticotropin-releasing hormone in the central amygdala (
28,
29). Considering its multifaceted nature, 5-HT
3AR has piqued the interest of researchers.
Perroud and colleagues (
30) also studied 5-HT
3AR and, specifically, the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1062613, leading to a C to T polymorphism, which has been implicated in bipolar disorder (
31). The methylation of multiple CpG sites in the glucocorticoid response element region (CpG3II, CpG2III, CpG5III) has been associated with childhood maltreatment, especially physical abuse, while methylation in other sites (CpG2III, CpG4III) is increased in patients with a history of suicide attempt, previous hospitalization, and substance dependence (
30). These findings suggest that there are multiple receptors affected by epigenetic modification in response to environmental stressors, such as physical abuse, and may contribute to high-risk behaviors.
Furthermore, these epigenetic modifications may be additive, since those with the resultant CC genotype from the rs1062613 SNP demonstrated the highest level of methylation at CpG2III in the presence of childhood maltreatment (
32). This additive effect decreases 5-HT
3AR expression, which functions in emotional processing during stress.