Altered Insula Response to Sweet Taste Processing After Recovery From Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa

We studied 14 women recovered from anorexia nervosa, 14 women recovered from bulimia nervosa, and 14 age- and weight-matched healthy comparison women (Table 1). Trained clinicians administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (13) to assess inclusion and exclusion criteria and to characterize lifetime history of comorbid psychiatric disorders (for comorbidities, see the data supplement that accompanies the online edition of this article). Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (14) to assess depression, the Temperament and Character Inventory (15) to assess harm avoidance, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, form Y (16), to assess state and trait anxiety. Women recovered from anorexia nervosa had lost weight purely by restricting their diet and had no history of binge eating or purging. Women recovered from bulimia nervosa had a history of past binge eating and purging behaviors but had never been emaciated and had maintained an average body weight above 85% of ideal body weight. None of the participants had a previous history of both anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Recovered participants were required to have had no restrictive eating or other pathological eating-related behaviors in the preceding 12 months; a stable weight between 90% and 120% of ideal body weight for at least 12 months; regular menstrual cycles for the preceding 12 months; and normal concentrations of plasma β-hydroxybutyric acid glucose and insulin during the evaluation phase, as previously described (8). Comparison women had no history of an eating disorder or any other psychiatric disorder, no history of serious medical or neurological illness, and no first-degree relatives with an eating disorder, and they had been within normal weight range since menarche. All participants had normal menses and were studied during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Participants took no medications within 30 days before the study. After receiving a complete description of the study, all participants gave written informed consent. The University of California San Diego institutional review board approved the study.

Participants were instructed to fast overnight and to arrive at the fMRI facility between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. They received a standardized breakfast of 604 calories before scanning to control for satiety state.

Sucrose and sucralose solutions were delivered with a programmable syringe pump in 1 mL/second stimulations. Participants received 1 mL of either sugar or sucralose every 20 seconds for a total of 120 samples. Sweet tastes were matched for intensity and delivered in pseudorandomized order. (Additional methods, as well as other relevant issues, are described in the online data supplement.)

Scanning was performed on a 3-T GE Magnet, with a three-plane scout scan (16 seconds), a sagitally acquired spoiled gradient recalled sequence (T₁-weighted, 172 slices, thickness=1 mm, TI=450 ms, TR=8 ms, TE=4 ms, flip angle=12°, FOV=250×250 mm, 192×256 matrix interpolated to 256×256), and T₂*-weighted echo planar imaging scans to measure blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional activity during taste stimulation (3.43×3.43×2.6 mm voxels, TR=2 seconds, TE=30 ms, flip angle=90°, 32 axial slices, thickness=2.6 mm, gap=1.4 mm).

Images were processed with the AFNI (Analysis of Functional Neuroimages) software package (afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni/). To minimize motion artifact, echo planar images were realigned to the 100th acquired scan. Additionally, data were time-corrected for slice acquisition order, and spikes in the hemodynamic time course were removed and replaced with an interpolated value from adjacent time points using 3dDespike. A multiple regression model was used whereby regressors derived from the experimental paradigm were convolved with a prototypical hemodynamic response function (AFNI command “waver”), including five nuisance regressors: three movement regressors to account for residual motion (roll, pitch, and yaw), and regressors for baseline and linear trends to account for signal drifts. To account for individual anatomical variations, a Gaussian filter with full width at half maximum 6.0 mm was applied to the voxel-wise percent signal change data. All functional data were normalized to Talairach coordinates.

Single-sample t tests were performed on the main effects of sucrose and sucralose, and statistical maps were thresholded at a p value of 0.005. Both whole-brain and region-of-interest analyses were performed. The whole-brain analysis was thresholded at 2,048 mm³ (32 voxels) and masked to a priori regions of interest implicated in taste and reward processing (see Table S1 in the online data supplement). A threshold adjustment method based on Monte Carlo simulations was used to guard against identifying false positive areas of activation (AFNI program AlphaSim). Voxel-wise percent signal change data were entered into a group-by-condition (sucrose/sucralose) analysis of variance (ANOVA) test thresholded at a p value of 0.05. Percent signal change data from statistically derived regions of interest were used to assess correlation and regression analyses with behavioral data.

To confirm task-related activation of the main neural substrates that are known to process sweet taste (17), we examined activation in response to sucrose stimulation using a stimulus versus baseline voxel-based statistical contrast masked by a priori regions of interest that are engaged by taste circuitry. For all three groups, there was main-effect activation during sucrose administration (Figure 1, Table 2) in the ventroposterior nuclei of the thalamus, anterior insula, and pregenual anterior cingulate (Brodmann’s area 24/32). Main-effect activations were relatively similar for sucralose (Table 2). A whole-brain analysis was performed to investigate which regions outside the predetermined regions of interest also showed activation (data not shown). While the areas largely confirmed the region-of-interest analysis, additional areas of consistent activation were observed extending into the thalamus and in the prefrontal gyrus in the comparison group, and in left and right insula during sucralose stimulation in women recovered from bulimia nervosa (see Table S2 in the online data supplement).

A significant group-by-condition interaction was identified, centered in the dorsal aspect of the right insula (F=10.72, df=2, 51, p<0.001) and the right dorsal caudate (F=8.91, df=2, 51, p=0.001) for a voxel-based ANOVA (p<0.05) masked by a priori regions of interest (Figure 2). Whole-brain analysis provided similar regions (see Table S2 in the online data supplement).

Tastes of sucrose corresponded with significantly decreased right anterior insula activation in women recovered from anorexia nervosa (F=7.79, df=1, 27, p=0.010) and increased activation in women recovered from bulimia nervosa (F=6.12, df=1, 27, p=0.020) relative to the comparison group (Figure 2B, Table 3). A similar activation pattern in response to the sucrose stimulus was observed in the right dorsal caudate. Although activation did not reach significance, it indicated a decreased response in women recovered from anorexia relative to the comparison group (F=3.35, df=1, 27, p=0.079) (Figure 2C, Table 3). Tastes of sucralose also corresponded with a significant decrease in right anterior insula activation (F=4.98, p=0.035) in women recovered from anorexia nervosa relative to the comparison group (Figure 2B, Table 3), while right anterior insula activation was similar between the women recovered from bulimia nervosa and the comparison women. The trend of a decreased right dorsal caudate response in women recovered from anorexia nervosa relative to comparison women (F=3.60, p=0.069) was also seen in the sucralose condition, while women recovered from bulimia nervosa showed a decreased but nonsignificant activation relative to comparison women (Figure 2C, Table 3).

When sucrose was compared with sucralose, women recovered from anorexia nervosa (F=10.13, df=1, 13, p=0.007) and bulimia nervosa (F=8.21, df=1, 13, p=0.013) demonstrated significant differences in the right anterior insula, but in opposite directions (anorexia nervosa: sucrose < sucralose; bulimia nervosa: sucrose > sucralose) (Table 3). The same difference and directionality were observed in the right dorsal caudate when comparing sucrose and sucralose in both women recovered from anorexia nervosa (F=7.91, df=1, 13, p=0.015) and bulimia nervosa (F=5.98, df=1, 13, p=0.030).

There were no significant brain-behavior relationships after correcting for multiple comparisons (see Table S3 in the online data supplement).

Our study demonstrated a trend toward reduced dorsal caudate response to tastes of sucrose and sucralose in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. This parallels the insula findings and is in accordance with previous work showing that women recovered from anorexia had diminished hemodynamic response to tastes of sucrose and water bilaterally in the dorsal caudate, dorsal putamen, and ventral putamen (9). Another study in women recovered from bulimia nervosa (25) showed an exaggerated anterior ventral striatum response for a cream/water contrast compared with women recovered from anorexia nervosa and healthy comparison women. The striatum receives direct inputs from the insula (26, 27), and this path is thought to mediate eating behavior, which may have a direct impact on the types of palatable foods avoided or overconsumed in eating disorders (28). These striatal findings, in conjunction with insula alterations, raise the possibility that there may be a disturbance in the mechanisms translating interoceptive signals into enhanced or diminished motivated eating.

Women recovered from anorexia or bulimia nervosa also showed differences in response to sucrose and sucralose in the right anterior insula and right dorsal caudate. No group showed hypothalamic differences. In the right anterior insula, women recovered from anorexia nervosa showed greater response to sucrose than to sucralose, while women recovered from bulimia nervosa showed greater response to sucralose than to sucrose (data not shown). This suggests that sucralose as a contrast solution distinguished between processing of caloric and noncaloric sweet tastes. In contrast, for comparison women, sucrose was similar to sucralose in the anterior insula, and sucralose showed greater activation in the caudate. A previous analysis of data from healthy subjects (29) supports the speculation (30) that sucrose, through effects on insula signaling, may result in changes of dopamine transmission that could modify the relative association of the energy value of sucrose to its motivational value. These findings raise the possibility that individuals with anorexia or bulimia nervosa have altered balance or sensitivity regarding mechanisms that signal the caloric content of foods as opposed to gustatory pathways that code the sweetness of foods.

The study of eating disorders frequently raises questions regarding cause and consequence: Do neurobiological disturbances cause pathological eating behaviors, or are neurobiological disturbances secondary to abnormal nutrition? Our literature review reveals some consistency of results in ill and recovered individuals with eating disorders, suggesting that these findings could be traits, but there is sparse evidence from direct comparisons using the same design, and no longitudinal studies have been reported. Even if persistent psychophysiological disturbances in recovered eating disorders are “scars,” they are still likely to help us understand the processes contributing to these disorders. These ideas could be tested in children at risk for eating disorders, to see if these neural signatures are predictive of illness development. It should be noted that there are discrepant insula findings in other gustatory studies (31–34) that might be related to anticipatory responses (35) (see the online data supplement). Our study task did not include an explicit expectation phase, which may contribute to some discrepant results across studies. Other fMRI studies of appetite in eating disorders have employed designs that used pictures of food or food words (36, 37). Pictures may elicit different brain responses, so this literature is not examined here. Artificial sweeteners are not identical to sugars in terms of how they activate tongue sweet receptors (38) (see the data supplement). It is possible that a mismatch in sweetness, rather than added caloric content, contributed to the observed differences between sucrose and sucralose. The use of atlas-based region-of-interest analysis may limit the capacity to detect signal in regions where recovered individuals show differences in brain structure (39). Although the Gaussian filter that was applied helps correct for some level of individual differences in brain structure, an attenuated or absent effect may represent a false negative resulting from group deviations from the standardized atlas. While the sample size of each cohort was relatively modest, the findings were robust. Compared with other behavioral disorders, eating disorders are characterized by homogeneous symptoms, so that smaller samples may be adequate to show group differences.

Aberrant function of the right anterior insula, which integrates gustatory stimuli and interoceptive/hedonic signals, may contribute to a failure of higher-order appetitive processes to reach homeostasis and thus lead to pathological eating behaviors. Attenuated anterior insula response in anorexia nervosa and exaggerated insula activity in bulimia nervosa raise the possibility that these disorders comprise, respectively, an overly rigid or highly unstable neural representation of internal feeling states at the junction of feeding and, possibly, emotive decision making. Identifying abnormal neural substrates in these individuals helps to reformulate the basic pathology of eating disorders and offers targets for novel approaches to treatments. It may be possible to modulate the experience by enhancing insula reactivity when individuals with anorexia nervosa engage in eating behavior, or dampening exaggerated or possibly unstable responses to food in individuals with bulimia nervosa. One approach is the use of techniques that might “train” the insular cortex. Studies have shown that healthy subjects can use real-time fMRI to control right anterior insula activity (40). Biofeedback might also be useful since there is evidence that it helps individuals with anxiety disorders observe inaccuracies in perceiving physiological activity or strengthen perception when actual somatic changes occur (41).

It may also be possible to modify existing therapies so they can better target eating disorder psychopathology. For example, it may be possible to behaviorally modulate the insula by increasing the influence of top-down modulation—that is, inhibit the urge to eat in bulimic individuals by employing cognitive training. Alternatively, studies suggest that mindfulness training alters cortical representations of interoceptive attention (42, 43), or a dialectical behavioral therapy approach may be used to promote development of more effective strategies for recognizing, predicting, and constructively managing tendencies to have rigid or unstable responses to stimuli.

From another perspective, if individuals with anorexia nervosa have an overly active satiety signal in response to palatable foods, it may be worthwhile to try strategies such as avoiding highly palatable foods in favor of bland, dilute, or even slightly aversive foods, and perhaps recommending multiple small meals of equivalent daily calories, in order to avoid overstimulation and early satiety. Finally, pharmacological modulation of insular reactivity might increase sensitivity to food in patients with anorexia nervosa or attenuate hyperresponsivity in those with bulimia nervosa. For example, recent studies in healthy subjects (44) show that olanzapine enhances reward response to food in brain reward circuitry and decreases inhibition to food consumption in regions thought to inhibit feeding behavior. In summary, an understanding of the basic pathophysiology of anorexia and bulimia nervosa provides rationales and heuristics to develop improved treatments for these chronic and deadly disorders.