Skip to main content
Full access
Letters to the Editor
Published Online: 1 January 2017

Firearm Suicide in the United States From a Broader Preventive Perspective

To the Editor: An often-cited purpose of firearms in the United States beyond sports and hunting is to defend oneself against criminal acts. Indeed, firearms are designed to threaten, injure, or kill. The dilemma is that firearm misuse for other purposes is frequent (Figure 1). As reviewed by Mann and Michel (1) in the October 2016 issue of the Journal, there is considerable evidence for the effectiveness of interventions, such as restrictive laws, to prevent firearm suicide. However, the authors offer a rather pessimistic view concerning the possibility to translate these results into practice, based on two arguments.
FIGURE 1. Causal Chain of Firearm-Related Deaths and Injuries in the United States
a Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (6).
b Data from Fowler et al. (7).
c Data from Truman and Langton (8).
d Data from Planty and Truman (9).
First, suicides are often committed using firearms that are purchased long before suicidal acts, and recent data show that firearms are available in 43% of U.S. households (2), ready for use and misuse. Such ubiquity of firearms suggests an inevitable situation, which seems to be propelled by the second argument: the Second Amendment protecting the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This argument is underpinned by the Supreme Court’s decision upholding this right of each individual. According to Mann and Michel (1), these facts undermine universal prevention efforts and force prevention programming toward targeted restrictions in high-risk populations, such as suicidal or aggressive individuals exposed to firearms.
Withdrawing from universal prevention in favor of high-risk approaches has some considerable limitations. When exposure to a pathogenic agent (firearm availability within the U.S. population) is rather homogeneously distributed and common, the largest number of cases (firearm misuse) happen not in those at high risk but in those with low levels of risk (3). This goes hand in hand with the problem to appropriately predict high-risk persons in the general population. Even though some recent advances have been made in predicting suicide (4), this progress comes only in severely mentally ill populations under clinical observation. Indeed, emphasis on high-risk approaches derives from a clinical view, but it is necessary to keep in mind that population-based prevention efforts have some advantages, such as a larger preventive potential because of control of causes in the whole population. We suggest that prevention of firearm suicide and violence needs to target all aspects along the causal chain of firearm misuse, its societal causes, and individual-level circumstances. An integrated, multilevel approach should therefore address preavailability factors (universal prevention) and postavailability misuse (individual high-risk approach). As long as postavailability strategies such as gun violence restraining orders or enhanced psychological evaluation of high-risk persons (5) are not effective, the universal strategy to reduce firearm availability by law cannot be omitted.
Finally, firearm suicides inherently contain a hypnotic ambiguity because both the intention of suicide and the intention of firearms seem to coalesce into a permissive attitude toward risk behavior. The right to bear arms is a socially constructed pathogenic agent that generates tremendous costs for postavailability preventive programs. Restriction would radically cut all associated costs and be effective.

References

1.
Mann JJ, Michel CA: Prevention of firearm suicide in the United States: what works and what is possible. Am J Psychiatry 2016; 173:969–979
2.
Gallup. Guns. 2013 (http://www.gallup.com/poll/1645/Guns.aspx) (accessed July 27, 2016)
3.
Rose G: Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 1985; 14:32–38
4.
Madan A, Frueh BC, Allen JG, et al: Psychometric reevaluation of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: findings from a prospective, inpatient cohort of severely mentally ill adults. J Clin Psychiatry 2016; 77:e867–e873
5.
Pirelli G, Wechsler HJ, Cramer RJ: Psychological evaluations for firearm ownership: legal foundations, practice considerations, and a conceptual framework. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2015; 46:250–257
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: WISQARS: Fatal Injury Reports, National and Regional, 1999–2014. http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_us.html (accessed July 27, 2016)
7.
Fowler KA, Dahlberg LL, Haileyesus T, et al: Firearm injuries in the United States. Prev Med 2015; 79:5–14
8.
Truman JL, Langton L: National Crime Victimization Survey: criminal victimization, 2014, NCJ 248973. Washington, DC, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2015. http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv14.pdf
9.
Planty M, Truman JL: Firearm Violence, 1993–2011. NCJ 241730. Washington, DC, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2013. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fv9311.pdf

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 77 - 78
PubMed: 28040999

History

Accepted: September 2016
Published online: 1 January 2017
Published in print: January 01, 2017

Keywords

  1. Suicide
  2. Epidemiology
  3. Firearm Mortality

Authors

Affiliations

Nestor D. Kapusta, M.D., P.D.
From the Suicide Research Group, Department for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna; and the School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk., Va.
Robert J. Cramer, Ph.D.
From the Suicide Research Group, Department for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna; and the School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk., Va.

Funding Information

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share