Skip to main content
Full access
Clinical Case Conference
Published Online: 1 December 2023

Recurrent Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis After Mycoplasma Pneumonia Infection

Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
A 19-year-old woman, gravida 1 para 0, at 16 weeks’ gestation presented to the emergency department after several weeks of paranoia, persecutory delusions, confusion, and escalating agitation. Vital signs were normal aside from mild tachycardia (heart rate, 101 bpm). On examination, the patient was noted to have deficits in attention, concentration, and thought process, with no focal neurological deficits. Laboratory tests revealed positive SARS-CoV-2 infection, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (446 mm/hour), and elevated creatine kinase level (449 U/L). The patient was admitted for continued evaluation and management.
On hospital day 1, continuous video-EEG monitoring was initiated, which showed lateralized rhythmic delta activity in the left hemisphere, possibly suggestive of an epileptogenic focus, focal cortical dysfunction in the left hemisphere, and generalized slowing. No discrete seizures were observed. The patient was started on lacosamide 150 mg twice daily, quetiapine 100 mg in the morning and 200 mg at night, and oral lorazepam and olanzapine as needed for agitation. A psychiatric consultation was sought on hospital day 2 for medication recommendations to manage behavior in this patient, who had several complicating conditions, including pregnancy, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and a history of seizures.
Chart review revealed that 2 years earlier, the patient presented to a neurology clinic for hand and lip numbness and dysarthria. Brain MRI with and without contrast showed scattered T2 signal changes with no signal enhancement. An ambulatory EEG showed generalized seizures. She was placed on levetiracetam 1,000 mg daily. Several weeks later, she was admitted to the medical unit of a nearby hospital for mental status changes and seizures. Repeated brain MRI showed T2 hyperintensities that were stable. Laboratory tests were significant for positive Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antigen IgG antibodies, Mycoplasma pneumoniae IgG and IgM antibodies (2,120 U/L) in the serum (but none in CSF), and elevated oligoclonal bands in CSF. During that hospitalization, the patient was treated with valproic acid, high-dose intravenous steroids, and azithromycin for what was presumed to be Mycoplasma encephalitis. Her mental status improved slowly, and 3 weeks later, she was discharged on levetiracetam and valproic acid. Six months later, she self-discontinued both antiepileptics and was lost to follow-up until the current hospitalization.
On hospital day 4, the patient was transferred to intensive care for tachycardia and hypotension. She then developed additional symptoms of catatonia, including immobility, staring, verbigeration, ambitendency, periodic mutism, and automatic obedience, and had a score of 9 on the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale score. Antipsychotics were stopped, and she was treated with intravenous lorazepam. A brain MRI without contrast (due to pregnancy) was obtained on hospital day 6 and revealed nonspecific scattered foci of high signal intensity in the white matter of the cerebral hemispheres bilaterally. Lumbar puncture was performed on hospital day 7, with CSF collected for cytology, culture, glucose, protein, autoimmune panel, angiotensin-converting enzyme, arbovirus, enterovirus, herpes simplex virus, Epstein-Barr virus, varicella-zoster virus, and cytomegalovirus. Results of initial CSF studies were normal aside from elevated oligoclonal bands (4+).
On hospital day 13, the patient started plasma exchange (PLEX), as there was a high enough index of suspicion of autoimmune encephalitis to begin empiric treatment. Notably, the decision was made to bypass high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone because of concerns that it would worsen her tachycardia and agitation. One day after initiation of PLEX, the CSF autoimmune panel returned positive for anti-NMDAR antibodies. The patient was then started on a 5-day course of high-dose methylprednisolone because once the diagnosis was confirmed, it was felt that the benefits of systemic steroids outweighed the risks. A transvaginal ultrasound demonstrated a viable pregnancy and no teratoma on the right ovary; the left ovary was not visualized.
After five rounds of PLEX and intravenous steroids, the patient’s catatonic symptoms improved, but more psychotic spectrum symptoms emerged, including disorganized thinking, internal preoccupation, and auditory hallucinations. Risperidone was started to address her emerging psychotic and perceptual symptoms, and over the next several days, risperidone and lorazepam were adjusted to target her fluctuating symptoms of catatonia and psychosis. Resolution of symptoms after completion of PLEX and steroid courses was slow, which prompted consideration of ECT in the setting of catatonic symptoms that were not robustly responsive to medication management. Both the neurology and psychiatry teams discussed the risks and benefits of ECT with the patient’s family, including her mother, who was serving as surrogate decision maker at that time. The family expressed a consistent preference to wait for continued improvement from medications.
On hospital day 32, the patient’s clinical status had improved enough that she could be discharged home with outpatient psychiatric follow-up. Her treatment plan at discharge included oral lorazepam 3 mg t.i.d. with plans for a slow taper, lacosamide 200 mg b.i.d. for seizure prophylaxis, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusions monthly. Treatment with rituximab was planned for after pregnancy.
Approximately 4 months later, the patient gave birth after a spontaneous vaginal delivery to a healthy baby. Delivery and the immediate postpartum period were uncomplicated. The patient received one course of IVIG postpartum, although in the week before her second scheduled postpartum infusion, neuropsychiatric symptoms reemerged. On the advice of her outpatient team, the patient returned to the hospital and was admitted for another confirmed relapse of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Her presentation during this admission was similar to the previous, with waxing and waning catatonic and positive psychotic symptoms. Imaging again did not reveal malignancy. Catatonia was treated with lorazepam and memantine, without full resolution, and the decision was made to proceed with rituximab to treat the underlying cause (Table 1). The patient’s symptoms remitted after two loading doses of rituximab.
TABLE 1. Criteria for probable anti-NMDA receptor encephalitisa
All three criteria must be met
1. Rapid onset (<3 months) of four of the six following major groups of symptoms:
 Abnormal behavior (psychiatric symptoms) or cognitive dysfunction
 Speech dysfunction
 Seizures
 Movement disorders, dyskinesias, or rigidity/abnormal posturing
 Decreased level of consciousness
 Autonomic dysfunction or central hypoventilation
2. At least one of the following laboratory results
 Abnormal EEG (focal or diffuse slowing, or disorganized activity, epileptic activity, or extreme delta brushes)
 CSF with pleocytosis or oligoclonal bands
3. Reasonable exclusion of other disorders
a
From Graus et al. (3).
Since its formal designation as a disease in 2007, autoimmune anti-NMDA receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis has been increasingly recognized for its neuropsychiatric presentation. It is currently estimated to affect 1.5 million people worldwide each year (1). Common signs and symptoms include rapid onset of autonomic instability, altered level of consciousness (including catatonia), speech and/or movement disorders, behavioral and cognitive dysfunction, and seizures (2). Diagnosis of the disease is confirmed by the detection of IgG antibodies to the GluN1 (NR1) subunit of the NMDA receptor in the patient’s CSF (2). However, because results of this test are often delayed, patients who exhibit characteristic signs and symptoms should be treated presumptively when they meet certain criteria and other reasonable diagnoses have been excluded (Table 2). Detection of antibodies in a patient’s serum, while less sensitive than in CSF, is also diagnostic (3).
TABLE 2. Recommended treatment of anti-NMDAR encephalitisa
TreatmentDosageNotes
First-line treatment
 SteroidsIntravenous methylprednisolone, 1 g/day for 3–5 daysMethylprednisolone used most frequently, followed by prednisolone (16)
 IVIG2 g/kg over 2–5 days
 PLEXVariesSome preference in pregnancy because of ability to remove fetal antibodies as well
Second-line treatment
 RituximabMost evidence for 4 weekly treatments of 375 mg/m2 (4)Safer in pregnancy
 CyclophosphamideMost evidence for 3–6 monthly cycles of 75 mg/m2
Other options for treatment-refractory disease
Oral mycophenolate mofetil
Azathioprine
Methotrexate (16)
a
IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; PLEX, plasma exchange.
Classically, anti-NMDAR encephalitis has been associated with ovarian teratomas, with a predilection for women of reproductive age. However, only about 50% of cases in this population are associated with teratomas, and the percentage is lower in men and in women under age 18 (4). This gap has led to an interest in other etiologies. Infection with several agents, including herpes simplex virus, human herpesvirus 7, SARS-CoV-2, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae, have been associated with the development of anti-NMDAR antibodies in small subsets of patients (5, 6). Unlike patients who have tumors that can be resected, patients with postinfectious anti-NMDAR encephalitis are at higher risk of relapse after their initial symptoms have resolved (4).
The patient we describe here presented at 16 weeks’ gestation with neuropsychiatric symptoms and was diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. No tumor was identified. On chart review, the patient was found to have a history of M. pneumoniae infection complicated by similar neuropsychiatric symptoms. She also experienced a relapse of anti-NMDAR encephalitis after delivery. A literature search regarding M. pneumoniae and NMDAR encephalitis performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE returned a total of three articles, consisting of two case reports and one case series. The case reports described cases in children (ages 9 and 13) where CSF was positive for anti-NMDAR antibodies with concurrent serum studies positive for Mycoplasma IgM antibodies (7, 8). In the case series of 10 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, only two were found to have a teratoma. Of the remaining eight patients, half (40% total) were found to have serologic evidence of M. pneumoniae infection (5).
M. pneumoniae infects an estimated 2 million Americans annually, although the actual number could be higher given the prevalence of subclinical infections (9). Although classically associated with respiratory disease, there are several commonly reported extrapulmonary manifestations, including neurologic disease. CNS involvement is the most common extrapulmonary illness, affecting up to 10% of patients hospitalized with M. pneumoniae infection, through various pathogenic mechanisms, including direct infection, vascular occlusion, and autoimmunity (10, 11). It is proposed that NMDAR autoantibodies after M. pneumoniae infection develop in a manner similar to other known postinfectious neurologic syndromes, such as Sydenham’s chorea and pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections (PANDAS). Specifically, after M. pneumoniae infection, a patient can develop autoantibodies against the neuronal membrane, which, through molecular mimicry, can come to be associated with receptors in the CNS, like the NDMA receptor (10). The number of cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis that develop after M. pneumoniae is unknown, although given the high incidence of infections each year, the severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms that emerge in cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, and the relative paucity of reports on cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis resulting from infections as opposed to tumors, it is important to recognize this as a potential mechanism of disease.
Our patient had developed seizures, behavioral and cognitive changes, and abnormal speech patterns 2 years before presenting to our hospital. At that time, she was found to have both IgG and IgM antibodies to M. pneumoniae in her serum, but not CSF, and was treated with antibiotics and immune suppression for presumed Mycoplasma encephalitis. She received a course of intravenous methylprednisolone, followed by an oral steroid pulse, with symptomatic improvement. A CSF autoimmune panel was not performed. However, reviewing the accepted criteria for probable anti-NMDAR encephalitis presented in Table 1, we suspect that she had anti-NMDAR encephalitis at that time and recovered after being treated with steroids. Supporting this hypothesis is the fact that studies comparing the presentation of infectious encephalitis to that of autoimmune encephalitis find that fever and headache are the most common presenting symptoms for a patient with infectious encephalitis, while seizures, psychiatric symptoms (especially psychosis), language dysfunction, and autonomic instability are all more common in autoimmune disease (6). Our patient’s prior presentation was notable for seizures, auditory hallucinations, agitation, vital sign instability, and speech abnormalities, but there is no record of fever or subjective headaches. Even if her first episode of neuropsychiatric symptoms was due to Mycoplasma encephalitis, rather than an autoimmune encephalitis, the infection still provides a compelling link between past illness and current presentation in this otherwise healthy patient without evidence of malignancy, through the development of postinfectious autoantibodies.
For classic tumor-related cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, treatment with first-line immunomodulation (Table 2) plus tumor resection is typically successful. Because patients with postinfectious symptoms are more likely than those with tumor-related cases to experience relapse, this patient’s history of M. pneumoniae infection has important implications for long-term management (12). Specifically, her treatment plan included rituximab, a second-line immunosuppressant therapy, after pregnancy. This is consistent with the case report of a 9-year-old boy with M. pneumoniae and subsequent anti-NMDAR encephalitis for whom treatment with both high-dose steroids and IVIG failed and who did not have sustained improvement until initiation of rituximab (8). The symptomatic management of neuropsychiatric manifestations of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, even when the diagnosis is confirmed and immunotherapy is initiated, is particularly challenging. Our patient’s psychotic and catatonic symptoms were slow to resolve with medication management using benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and memantine. Although the common and disruptive psychotic and behavioral symptoms associated with anti-NMDAR encephalitis often warrant an antipsychotic trial, there is some evidence that anti-NMDAR encephalitis increases the risk of adverse effects of antipsychotics, such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome and seizures (13, 14). Similarly, catatonic symptoms often warrant treatment with benzodiazepines, which can lead to worsening delirium and hypoventilation. There is a small body of case report literature discussing the safety and efficacy of ECT as an alternative treatment for the neuropsychiatric symptoms of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, including psychosis and catatonia, given its rapid onset of action (1315). As mentioned above, this was discussed with the patient’s family as an option because of the severity and duration of her catatonic and psychotic symptoms, but ultimately not agreed upon. The use of ECT early in a course of treatment for anti-NMDAR encephalitis is an area that warrants further study.
Notably, while SARS-CoV-2 infections have been associated with a myriad of neuropsychiatric symptoms, the patient’s prior illness and onset of presenting symptoms preceded her SARS-CoV-2 infection, so we do not think it was a relevant factor in her course of illness. Likewise, while pregnancy has also been associated with cases of autoimmune encephalitis in women of reproductive age, this too does not explain our patient’s course of illness, since she had episodes before, during, and after pregnancy. The evaluation, management, and outcomes of pregnancies complicated by anti-NMDAR encephalitis are also important but have been well documented elsewhere and are beyond the scope of this article.

Conclusions

Because of prominent neuropsychiatric symptoms of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, including altered mental status, behavioral changes, catatonia, and psychosis, it is critical for psychiatrists to both recognize the clinical presentation and familiarize themselves with its treatment and common etiologies. Importantly, about 77% of patients are first seen by mental health clinicians for their prominent and disabling psychiatric symptoms (2). Although classically associated with malignancy in reproductive-age women, anti-NMDAR encephalitis often occurs without definitive evidence of an underlying cancer. Infections are another common predisposing condition, leading to the theory that in some patients, anti-NMDAR antibodies arise as part of a postinfectious autoimmune process. The case presented here is relevant to psychiatrists because it describes a postinfectious anti-NMDAR encephalitis that potentially arose after M. pneumoniae infection, a relatively common infection in the United States, that is frequently associated with CNS involvement. While most M. pneumoniae infections with CNS symptoms are not cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, this is a severe and treatable sequela of Mycoplasma infection that should be considered in patients with a history of infection and emergence of acute or subacute neuropsychiatric symptoms. It is also important to recognize postinfectious anti-NMDAR encephalitis because it more often requires second- and third-line treatments for sustained symptom management, as compared to cancer-related disease.

References

1.
Ceanga M, Chung HY, Geis C: Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: epidemiological differences and common challenges. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8:716
2.
Kuppuswamy PS, Takala CR, Sola CL: Management of psychiatric symptoms in anti-NMDAR encephalitis: a case series, literature review, and future directions. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2014; 36:388–391
3.
Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, et al: A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:391–404
4.
Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, et al: Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12:157–165
5.
Gable MS, Gavali S, Radner A, et al: Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: report of ten cases and comparison with viral encephalitis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2009; 28:1421–1429
6.
Gable MS, Sheriff H, Dalmau J, et al: The frequency of autoimmune N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis surpasses that of individual viral etiologies in young individuals enrolled in the California Encephalitis Project. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54:899–904
7.
Almuslamani A, Mahmood F: First Bahraini adolescent with anti-NMDAR-Ab encephalitis. Qatar Med J 2015; 2015:2
8.
Venâncio P, Brito MJ, Pereira G, et al: Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis with positive serum antithyroid antibodies, IgM antibodies against Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and human herpesvirus 7 PCR in the CSF. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014; 33:882–883
9.
Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/pneumonia/atypical/mycoplasma/surv-reporting.html
10.
Narita M: Pathogenesis of neurologic manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Pediatr Neurol 2009; 41:159–166
11.
Tsiodras S, Kelesidis I, Kelesidis T, et al: Central nervous system manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. J Infect 2005; 51:343–354
12.
Raja P, Shamick B, Nitish LK, et al: Clinical characteristics, treatment, and long-term prognosis in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Neurol Sci 2021; 42:4683–4696
13.
Warren N, Grote V, O’Gorman C, et al: Electroconvulsive therapy for anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis: a systematic review of cases. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:329–334
14.
Tanguturi YC, Cundiff AW, Fuchs C: Anti-N-methyl d-aspartate receptor encephalitis and electroconvulsive therapy: literature review and future directions. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North America 2019; 28:79–89
15.
Justin Coffey M, Cooper JJ: Electroconvulsive therapy in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis: a case report and review of the literature. J ECT 2016; 32:225–229
16.
Nosadini M, Eyre M, Molteni E, et al: Use and safety of immunotherapeutic management of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antibody encephalitis: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78:1333–1344

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 880 - 883
PubMed: 38037403

History

Received: 6 February 2023
Revision received: 5 April 2023
Revision received: 8 June 2023
Accepted: 20 June 2023
Published online: 1 December 2023
Published in print: December 01, 2023

Keywords

  1. Neuroimmunology
  2. Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry

Authors

Details

Katherine S. Dickson, M.D., M.P.H. [email protected]
University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill (Dickson); Department of Psychiatry (Rosenstein, Sowa) and Department of Medicine (Rosenstein), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Donald L. Rosenstein, M.D.
University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill (Dickson); Department of Psychiatry (Rosenstein, Sowa) and Department of Medicine (Rosenstein), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Nathaniel A. Sowa, M.D., Ph.D.
University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill (Dickson); Department of Psychiatry (Rosenstein, Sowa) and Department of Medicine (Rosenstein), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Dickson ([email protected]).

Competing Interests

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share