Optimizing the Treatment of Late-Life Depression
Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Late-life depression (LLD) is a major clinical and public health concern. The worldwide prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults age 75 and older is 7.2% (1). With the number of older adults projected to increase from 962 million in 2017 to 2.08 billion in 2050, clinicians around the world should expect to care for many more older adults with depression (2). Depression affects quality of life and the ability to live independently, and it increases mortality (3). Up to 87% of older adults who die by suicide meet criteria for MDD (4), suggesting that effectively treating depression can save lives. Racial, ethnic, and sexual minority older adults face additional challenges. For example, racial minority older adults are less likely than White older adults to have their depression recognized, to receive prescriptions for antidepressants, and to receive specialty mental health care (5).
Clinicians can choose from among a number of evidence-based interventions for LLD, including psychotherapy, bright light therapy, exercise, antidepressants, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and electroconvulsive therapy (6). Antidepressants are modestly effective for LLD, with a response rate of 51% (7). People age 65 and older treated with antidepressants experience less suicidality than those given placebo (8). Older adults are at increased risk of antidepressant side effects, including falls, fractures, blood pressure changes, prolongation of the QT interval (with citalopram), SIADH/hyponatremia, and weight change. A systematic review and meta-analysis of antidepressant trials in older adults found an increased risk of adverse events with serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) relative to placebo, resulting in a number-needed-to-harm of 10 (9). The American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults note that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), SNRIs, mirtazapine, and tricyclic antidepressants—that is, virtually all of the most commonly used antidepressants—are “drugs to be used with caution in older adults” (10). For older adults with mild to moderate depression, the U.S. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Major Depressive Disorder recommends evidence-based psychotherapy (for example, cognitive-behavioral therapy or interpersonal psychotherapy) over antidepressants given such safety concerns; the authors aptly note that it is a misconception that older adults are not good candidates for psychotherapy (11).
Most older adults seek care for depression from their primary care providers. In fact, 12.3% of primary care visits by older adults in 2012 resulted in an antidepressant prescription (up from 9.9% in 2005) (12). SSRIs were most commonly prescribed (63.3%); tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors were least commonly prescribed (13.1% total for the two drug classes) (12). Unfortunately, only 0.2% of primary care visits resulted in a referral to psychotherapy (12).
Antidepressants are associated with risks in older adults—but so is depression itself. Alternatives like evidence-based psychotherapy are often unavailable. This begs the question: In situations where the benefits of an antidepressant outweigh the risks, which antidepressant should a clinician choose?
Choosing the First Antidepressant
In this issue of the Journal, Ishtiak-Ahmed and colleagues (13) advance our understanding of how to select an antidepressant in previously untreated older adults with depression. The authors used data from two national registers in Denmark (one tracking all people born and living in Denmark since 1968 and the other tracking all prescriptions redeemed in pharmacies in Denmark since 1995) to identify patterns of older adults’ antidepressant use for the indication of depression. This group has previously reported a high rate of possible off-label use of antidepressants among older adults in Denmark (14); they also found that 73% of older adults in Denmark who received antidepressant prescriptions had polypharmacy (taking five or more medications), most commonly with other agents acting on the nervous system (89%) (15).
In this study, the authors associated the use of specific antidepressants with treatment outcomes: discontinuation, switching, augmentation, psychiatric care, suicide attempts, falls, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. They included 96,737 older adults who took their first antidepressant for depression between 2006 and 2017. The authors limited the study to the 10 most commonly prescribed antidepressants in Denmark (in descending order): citalopram, mirtazapine, escitalopram, sertraline, mianserin (available in Europe, India, and Australia, but not in the United States or Canada), amitriptyline, venlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, and paroxetine. Sertraline was used as the reference against which other antidepressants were compared because Danish guidelines recommend it as the first-choice treatment for depression. Limitations of the study included the generalizability of the findings to countries outside Denmark and the inability to control for important confounders, such as the severity of depression and the use of alcohol and other substances, and not collecting data regarding the reason for discontinuation (the antidepressant may have been intolerable or ineffective or depression may have remitted, leading a person to choose, not unreasonably, to stop the antidepressant).
During 1 year of follow-up, 43.5% of subjects discontinued their initial antidepressant, 20.4% had their initial antidepressant augmented with a second agent (another antidepressant, lithium, or an antipsychotic), and 4.9% switched to another antidepressant. Overall, those who received prescriptions for sertraline seemed to fare best with respect to the selected outcomes, and those who received prescriptions for venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and escitalopram fared worst. The authors note that a previous study (16) using a different methodology—a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing antidepressants in adults of all ages—instead found that venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and escitalopram were more effective than other antidepressants in head-to-head trials. Surprisingly, Ishtiak-Ahmed et al. found that amitriptyline and paroxetine had better overall outcomes than all except sertraline and citalopram (13). I recommend avoiding amitriptyline and paroxetine in older adults because of their anticholinergic burden and, in the case of amitriptyline, the risk of orthostatic hypotension and cardiac effects. Ishtiak-Ahmed and colleagues ultimately agree with Danish prescribing guidelines that sertraline should be the first choice for treatment of LLD (13).
How does this compare with the existing guidance on selecting an antidepressant? Although not specific to older adults, the aforementioned VA/DoD guidelines state that clinicians should consider patient preference, the side effect profile of the medication, family history of response to antidepressants (i.e., when possible, select an antidepressant that family members have responded to), comorbid medical problems, currently prescribed medications, and cost (11). For patients who have previously been treated with antidepressants, history of prior response can guide treatment choice (11). Patients with current or past hyponatremia should be offered bupropion or mirtazapine, which are less likely than SSRIs and SNRIs to cause or exacerbate hyponatremia (17). For patients with dementia, citalopram has the strongest evidence base (albeit for agitation rather than depression) but is associated with QT interval prolongation (and carries an FDA black box warning about this) (18).
Pharmacogenetic testing raises the possibility of precision medicine in LLD. A systematic review of pharmacogenetic studies of antidepressant response, plasma levels, and tolerability in people age 50 and older found that slow metabolizers at CYP 2D6 had higher plasma levels of relevant antidepressants and required lower doses than normal metabolizers (19). People with the L/L genotype of SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR may be more likely to respond to antidepressants than carriers of an S allele (19). The largest prospective study to date of pharmacogenetics in older adults (N=206) found no difference in depression severity, the primary outcome measure, at 8 weeks in those receiving pharmacogenetics-guided care compared with treatment as usual, although there were statistically significant differences in response rate (29.6% vs. 16.1%) and remission rate (20.1% vs. 7.4%) (20). While these data are promising, additional studies are needed, especially with respect to the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetics.
Improving the Care of Older Adults With Depression
So, where does this leave us? First, primary care providers should screen all their patients who are age 65 and older for depression (21). Although the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations are silent regarding which instrument to use and how often to use it, I recommend using the PHQ-9 annually. Patients who screen positive (e.g., a PHQ-9 score ≥5) should undergo further evaluation to establish the diagnosis, to evaluate the risk of suicide, and to address medical and substance-related issues that could be causing depression, for example, hypothyroidism, obstructive sleep apnea, dementia, alcohol or cannabis use, or medication side effects. Bipolar disorder should be screened for, since the treatment of bipolar depression is very different from the treatment of MDD.
Older adults who are found to have mild to moderate MDD (a PHQ-9 score of 5–14) should be offered evidence-based psychotherapy, namely, cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, problem-solving therapy, or mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (6). Patients with LLD may also benefit from exercise and bright light therapy (22, 23). Patients and their families should be informed of resources like the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline (in the United States).
Clinicians should consider prescribing an antidepressant to older adults with moderate to severe depression (a PHQ-9 score ≥10), carefully weighing risks (falls, hyponatremia, etc.), benefits, and drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. The first antidepressant should probably be sertraline or escitalopram, since these have been extensively studied in older adults, are generally well tolerated, and are unlikely to result in drug-drug interactions (24). Clinicians should educate patients about taking the antidepressant daily and for an adequate duration and about reporting any side effects. Clinicians should start low, go slow, but go—that is, titrate the medication to an effective dose—all the while being attentive to side effects and monitoring treatment outcome.
Many older adults will not tolerate or benefit adequately from the first antidepressant they take. In fact, 11% of Medicare beneficiaries with MDD have failed to respond to two or more antidepressant trials of adequate dose and duration (25). Reasonable next steps include switching to another antidepressant, combining antidepressants (e.g., an SSRI and bupropion), and augmenting with aripiprazole, lithium, or methylphenidate (6). The OPTIMUM study compared five interventions in people age 60 and older with MDD who had not responded to two or more antidepressant trials (26). Adding aripiprazole (starting at 2.5 mg/day, maximum of 15 mg/day) or adding bupropion (starting at 150 mg/day, target dosage of 300 mg/day, maximum dosage of 450 mg/day) to the current antidepressant was most effective (remission rates of 28.9% and 28.2%, respectively). Surprisingly, aripiprazole was better tolerated than bupropion, with subjects having fewer falls. Switching to bupropion, adding lithium, and switching to nortriptyline were less effective strategies (remission rates of 19.3%, 18.9%, and 21.5%, respectively). We have a long way to go in developing the evidence base for a fully fleshed out algorithm for treatment-resistant LLD, including the role of ketamine and esketamine.
Older adults with severe depression, bipolar depression, or an elevated risk of suicide should be referred to a psychiatrist and may benefit from psychiatric hospitalization and/or electroconvulsive therapy. Primary care clinics, federally qualified health centers, and rural health clinics that have not yet done so should consider implementing the collaborative care model, which reduces depression and suicidality in older adults (27, 28).
Changes in public policy and the funding of mental health services will be needed to address the growing number of older adults with depression. Fewer and fewer U.S. psychiatrists—now down to 55%—accept Medicare, the health care insurance that the vast majority of older Americans have (29). Medicare’s low reimbursement rates and high administrative burden may affect psychiatrists’ participation in Medicare and may also decrease the number of physicians interested in primary care or geriatrics (30). Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries have worse depression outcomes than their White counterparts (31). Older adults who live in rural areas or who reside in long-term care facilities have especially poor access to psychiatrists (29, 32). Improving depression outcomes in older adults will require addressing these health care disparities.
The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has recently taken steps to improve access to mental health services for older adults. As of January 2024, CMS will allow marriage and family therapists, mental health counselors, and addiction counselors who also qualify as mental health counselors to enroll in Medicare, potentially expanding the mental health workforce for older adults by up to 400,000 therapists (33). CMS will also cover intensive outpatient services, which could provide depressed older adults an additional level of care between hospitalization and routine outpatient care (33). CMS has acknowledged “that there is a systemic undervaluation of work estimates for behavioral health services” that “could serve as an economic deterrent to furnishing these kinds of services and be a contributing factor to the workforce shortage” (34) but for 2024 has proposed only limited increases in reimbursement for mental health services (33) and no reduction of administrative burden. Congress will have to act to make more substantial changes.
Ishtiak-Ahmed and colleagues highlight the importance of careful selection of the first antidepressant for LLD (13). In addition, we need to make clinical and public policy changes that ensure that all older adults with depression are identified, correctly diagnosed, and offered evidence-based treatment.
References
1.
Luppa M, Sikorski C, Luck T, et al: Age- and gender-specific prevalence of depression in latest-life: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2012; 136:212–221
2.
Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations: World Population Ageing 2017: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/397). New York, United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Highlights.pdf
3.
Fiske A, Wetherell JL, Gatz M: Depression in older adults. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2009; 5:363–389
4.
Conwell Y, Thompson C: Suicidal behavior in elders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2008; 31:333–356
5.
Mansour R, Tsamakis K, Rizos E, et al: Late-life depression in people from ethnic minority backgrounds: differences in presentation and management. J Affect Disord 2020; 264:340–347
6.
Borisovskaya A, Chmelik E, Bryson W, et al: Management of late-life depression and anxiety; in Late-Life Depression and Anxiety. Edited by Walaszek A. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2022, pp 213–302
7.
Gutsmiedl K, Krause M, Bighelli I, et al: How well do elderly patients with major depressive disorder respond to antidepressants: a systematic review and single-group meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:102
8.
Stone M, Laughren T, Jones ML, et al: Risk of suicidality in clinical trials of antidepressants in adults: analysis of proprietary data submitted to US Food and Drug Administration. BMJ 2009; 339:b2880
9.
Sobieraj DM, Martinez BK, Hernandez AV, et al: Adverse effects of pharmacologic treatments of major depression in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67:1571–1581
10.
2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel: American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:2052–2081
11.
Management of Major Depressive Disorder Work Group: VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Major Depressive Disorder, Version 4.0. Washington, DC, US Department of Veterans Affairs, US Department of Defense, 2022
12.
Maust DT, Blow FC, Wiechers IR, et al: National trends in antidepressant, benzodiazepine, and other sedative-hypnotic treatment of older adults in psychiatric and primary care. J Clin Psychiatry 2017; 78:e363–e371
13.
Ishtiak-Ahmed K, Musliner KL, Christensen KS, et al: Real-world evidence on clinical outcomes of commonly used antidepressants in older adults initiating antidepressants for depression: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. Am J Psychiatry 2024; 181:47–56
14.
Ishtiak-Ahmed K, Liu X, Christensen KS, et al: Treatment indications and potential off-label use of antidepressants among older adults: a population-based descriptive study in Denmark. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 37:10.1002/gps.5841
15.
Ishtiak-Ahmed K, Köhler-Forsberg O, Mortensen EL, et al: Concurrent use of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications with antidepressants in older adults: a nationwide descriptive study in Denmark during 2015–2019. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2023; 82:66–74
16.
Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, et al: Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet 2018; 391:1357–1366
17.
Pinkhasov A, Xiong G, Bourgeois JA, et al: Management of SIADH-related hyponatremia due to psychotropic medications: an expert consensus from the Association of Medicine and Psychiatry. J Psychosom Res 2021; 151:110654
18.
Farina N, Morrell L, Banerjee S: What is the therapeutic value of antidepressants in dementia? A narrative review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017; 32:32–49
19.
Marshe VS, Islam F, Maciukiewicz M, et al: Pharmacogenetic implications for antidepressant pharmacotherapy in late-life depression: a systematic review of the literature for response, pharmacokinetics and adverse drug reactions. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020; 28:609–629
20.
Forester BP, Parikh SV, Weisenbach S, et al: Combinatorial pharmacogenomic testing improves outcomes for older adults with depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020; 28:933–945
21.
O’Connor E, Henninger M, Perdue LA, et al: Screening for Depression, Anxiety, and Suicide Risk in Adults: A Systematic Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2023. (Evidence Synthesis No 223). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592805/
22.
Klil-Drori S, Klil-Drori AJ, Pira S, et al: Exercise intervention for late-life depression: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2020; 81:19r12877
23.
Zhao X, Ma J, Wu S, et al: Light therapy for older patients with non-seasonal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2018; 232:291–299
24.
Lenze EJ, Ajam Oughli H: Antidepressant treatment for late-life depression: considering risks and benefits (editorial). J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67:1555–1556
25.
Pilon D, Joshi K, Sheehan JJ, et al: Burden of treatment-resistant depression in Medicare: a retrospective claims database analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0223255 [see erratum, PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249731]
26.
Lenze EJ, Mulsant BH, Roose SP, et al: Antidepressant augmentation versus switch in treatment-resistant geriatric depression. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1067–1079
27.
Unützer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, et al: Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288:2836–2845
28.
Bruce ML, Ten Have TR, Reynolds CF, et al: Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older primary care patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291:1081–1091
29.
Oh S, McDowell A, Benson NM, et al: Trends in participation in Medicare among psychiatrists and psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, 2013–2019. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2224368
30.
Berenson RA, Goodson JD: Finding value in unexpected places: fixing the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1306–1309
31.
Odlum M, Moise N, Kronish IM, et al: Trends in poor health indicators among Black and Hispanic middle-aged and older adults in the United States, 1999–2018. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2025134
32.
Ulyte A, Mehrotra A, Huskamp HA, et al: Specialty care after transition to long-term care in nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:1058–1067
33.
Sheshamani M, Jacobs D: Important New Changes to Improve Access to Behavioral Health in Medicare. Baltimore, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2023. https://www.cms.gov/blog/important-new-changes-improve-access-behavioral-health-medicare
34.
US Department of Health and Human Services: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; CY 2024 Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements; Medicare Advantage; Medicare and Medicaid Provider and Supplier Enrollment Policies; and Basic Health Program. 88 Federal Register 52,262 (August 7, 2023)
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Accepted: 14 November 2023
Published online: 1 January 2024
Published in print: January 01, 2024
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
Dr. Walaszek receives book royalties from American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).