The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Chapter 5.Establishing the Treatment Frame

Contracting, Medication, and Adjunctive Treatments

Sections

Initiation of Therapy | Treatment Contracting: Individualized Aspects | Combinations of TFP and Other Interventions

Excerpt

the initial treatment task after assessment is setting the frame of treatment, the first of a series of tactics of transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP; other tactics are described in Chapter 7, “Tactics of Treatment and Clinical Challenges”). Both the assessment and contract setting precede the initiation of therapy because therapy cannot proceed until clear conditions of treatment are in place (Yeomans et al. 1992). Treatment contracting is carried out by the negotiation of a verbal treatment contract or understanding between the therapist and patient. The contract details the least restrictive set of conditions necessary to ensure an environment in which the psychotherapeutic process can unfold. A treatment contract establishes the frame of the treatment, defines the responsibilities of each participant, and sets the stage for observing the patient’s dynamics in a defined “space.” In essence, the contract defines what the reality of the therapeutic relationship is. It is important that the therapist keep this in mind because the patient’s inner world of object relations will be evident in pressures to distort the real relationship. Because the distortions may be subtle, the therapist must have the reality of the relations anchored in his or her mind as the reference point against which any deviations may be understood. A simple example is the therapist who begins to feel (countertransference) that he is selfish and withholding because he is not available to the patient by phone when the patient is upset at night. Checking his reaction against the part of the contract about communication outside of sessions can remind him that he is not in fact negligent but rather is following the treatment agreement. This reminder can help the therapist understand that his countertransference corresponds to an element in the patient’s internal world that should be discussed.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Institutional Login
  • Sign in via OpenAthens
  • Register for access
  • Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.

    Not a subscriber?

    Subscribe Now / Learn More

    PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

    Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).