The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Sections

Conventional Electroencephalography | Quantitative Electroencephalography | Evoked Potentials and Event-Related Potentials | Magnetoencephalography | Conclusion | References

Excerpt

Clinical electrophysiological techniques provide methods by which to study cerebral function and dysfunction after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Electroencephalography (EEG) was the first clinical diagnostic tool to provide evidence of abnormal brain function due to TBI (Glaser and Sjaardema 1940) and provided the platform on which sophisticated clinical and research electrophysiological techniques were based, including quantitative EEG (qEEG), topographical EEG (also known as brain electrical activity mapping, or BEAM), evoked and event-related potentials (EPs and ERPs, respectively), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and magnetic source imaging. These techniques permit noninvasive measurement of brain activity with temporal resolution superior to that of other functional neuroimaging methods, including positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Arciniegas 2011). Coregistering high-density EEG and/or MEG data with structural neuroimaging (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) enables electrophysiological techniques to “image” brain activity with spatial resolutions comparable to those of fMRI, particularly when interpretation of electrophysiological data is guided by fMRI-determined regions of interest for a particular brain state or function (Im 2007; Inuggi et al. 2010; Lei et al. 2011; Minati et al. 2008).

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Institutional Login
  • Sign in via OpenAthens
  • Register for access
  • Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.

    Not a subscriber?

    Subscribe Now / Learn More

    PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

    Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).