Skip to main content
Full access
Clinical Synthesis
Published Online: 24 April 2020

Depression Comorbid With Stroke, Traumatic Brain Injury, Parkinson’s Disease, and Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnosis and Treatment

Abstract

Depression is common among patients with neurologic disorders, and it has long been considered more difficult to treat than depression in the general population. In this review, the authors consider challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of depression among patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson’s disease, and multiple sclerosis. For each disorder, the authors discuss the epidemiology and time course of depression as well as review the physiologic and psychological etiologies of depression. In addition, for each disorder, they review screening tools and diagnostic considerations, including differential diagnosis; discuss etiological factors, both neurobiological and psychological; and assess evidence for various depression treatments, including pharmacologic, psychosocial, and neuromodulatory therapies. The evidence suggests that depression is common among patients with neurologic disorders and that it is crucial for general psychiatrists to provide treatment for this population.
Depression is common among patients with neurologic disorders, and it has long been considered more difficult to treat than depression in the general population. In this review, we consider challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of depression among patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), Parkinson’s disease, and multiple sclerosis (MS). These are common disorders, and it is crucial for the general psychiatrist to treat patients with comorbid neurologic disorder and depression. Patients with neurologic disease who develop depression may have DSM-5 diagnoses of major depressive disorder, depressive disorder due to another medical condition, other specified depressive disorder, or persistent depressive disorder (1). The studies cited in this review use varying methods, including structured clinical interviews and rating scales, to classify patients as depressed, and treatment considerations are similar regardless of the specific DSM-5 diagnosis.

Stroke

Stroke, or acute loss of blood supply to an area of the brain, affects nearly 800,000 people in the United States each year, and it is estimated that approximately 2.7% of the U.S. population has a history of stroke (2). Risk factors for stroke include age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, smoking, and family history. Physical and cognitive disabilities are common sequelae. Stroke can affect various brain regions, to varying degrees. It is also mechanistically heterogeneous, with both ischemic (87%) and, less commonly, hemorrhagic (13%) etiologies (2). Despite this heterogeneity, poststroke depression has generally been studied as a single entity. The American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Stroke Association (ASA) have published a comprehensive report of recent findings in poststroke depression (3).
Poststroke depression has long been recognized as a common sequela of stroke. The most recent meta-analyses, including more than 20,000 patients, indicate a prevalence of depression of approximately 30% in the year following stroke (4, 5). Poststroke depression is associated with worse stroke outcomes over time, including poorer functional outcomes, disability, poorer quality of life, and increased mortality (3, 5, 6).
Factors associated with development of poststroke depression include more severe neurological deficits, physical disability, anxiety, and prestroke depression. Demographic factors such as age and sex do not appear to predict poststroke depression (5, 7); in contrast, idiopathic depression is more common in women and most commonly onsets in early to midadulthood (8). Stroke patients with a history of depression have a threefold increased risk of poststroke depression compared with stroke patients without a depression history (9). Interestingly, depression itself is a risk factor for stroke, with meta-analyses indicating that depression is associated with a 34%–45% increase in stroke risk compared with the general population (10, 11).
The time course of poststroke depression varies greatly among patients, and of course individual patients can have multiple episodes of poststroke depression. Initial onset can be within several days of, or up to years after, the stroke. In general, poststroke depression appears to be a chronic and relapsing disorder (12). In meta-analyses, the proportion of patients affected at any time poststroke is generally stable at around 30%. It appears to peak at 2–5 months poststroke at 36% (4), and then it drops to between 20% and 30% at 2–5 years poststroke, remaining stable to the 10-year mark. Cumulative incidence of poststroke depression within 5 years of stroke is 39%–52% of total patients affected (4, 5).
Lesion location has historically been considered important in the development of poststroke depression, particularly within the first several months poststroke. Left-sided lesions in the frontal lobe and basal ganglia have been implicated most (13). More recent meta-analyses have yielded less consistent results. For example, Wei et al. (14) found no effect of lesion location, whereas Zhang et al. (15) found left hemisphere lesions associated with increased risk of poststroke depression. Such analyses are complicated by inconsistencies in definition of lesion location, neuroimaging techniques, and timing of imaging and symptom measurement poststroke (13). Certainly, on the level of the individual patient, lesion location currently has little predictive value for development of poststroke depression.
The etiology of poststroke depression is multifactorial, and available evidence strongly suggests contributions from both neurologic factors related to brain damage and psychological responses to stroke-related deficits. Evidence for neurologic factors includes data on lesion location (as discussed earlier); observation of depression seen among patients with stroke-like pathophysiology but without disabling sequelae, for example, diffuse white matter damage (“vascular depression”) and depression after “silent infarcts” or transient ischemic attacks; poststroke depression observed among patients with anosognosia; and animal models of stroke in which depressive-like poststroke behaviors are observed (3, 13). The fact that larger neurologic deficits poststroke are associated with the development of poststroke depression likely reflects a bidirectional relationship between brain damage and reactive psychological response to functional deficits caused by that damage (13).
Diagnosis of poststroke depression can be challenging. In addition to poststroke depression, anxiety, fatigue, apathy, and “emotionalism” (increased lability) are all common poststroke neuropsychiatric syndromes (12) and have potential overlapping symptoms with poststroke depression. Neurovegetative changes, such as psychomotor retardation or agitation, insomnia or hypersomnia, fatigue, and changes in appetite or food consumption, could all be symptoms of poststroke depression or related to other, non–poststroke depression effects of stroke. Neurologic deficits related to stroke, including aphasia or changes in ability to produce facial expressions, can make assessment of particular depression symptoms difficult or even impossible.
Thorough clinical evaluation, including obtaining collateral from caregivers, remains the optimal and preferred method for diagnosis of poststroke depression. However, multiple instruments have been evaluated in their ability to accurately screen for poststroke depression. The nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) has been found to be among the most effective screening tools for poststroke depression in a meta-analysis (16), and it is the recommended screening tool by the AHA and ASA (3). The PHQ-2 (a brief two-item form of the PHQ-9) does not appear to have adequate sensitivity as a screening tool for poststroke depression (16). Multiple stroke-specific screening and assessment instruments exist to more precisely diagnose poststroke depression accounting for various neurologic deficits (17, 18) but are not currently in widespread clinical use.
Inflammatory, genetic, neuroimaging, and neurophysiologic biomarkers are the subject of study in poststroke depression but are not currently predictive at the level of individual patients (19, 20).
Suicide rate among patients who have had a stroke is increased compared with the general population; a recent large study found the rate to be approximately double. Poststroke depression is the strongest predictor of suicidal ideation and behavior among patients who have had a stroke, and large lesions located in the brainstem have also been associated with increased risk (21). Screening for suicide risk is recommended for at least 5 years poststroke (2123).
Antidepressant medication, psychosocial interventions, and neuromodulation have all been studied in the treatment of poststroke depression (24). Overall, as more data accrue over time, recommendations appear to be moving closer to recommending routine treatment of poststroke depression with antidepressant medication. A 2008 Cochrane review did not recommend routine use of antidepressants for poststroke depression (25). However, by 2017, the AHA and ASA stated that 12 trials suggest that antidepressant medications may be effective in treating poststroke depression, but timing, symptom threshold, and particular medications require more study (3). Antidepressant medications do appear to be associated with decreased mortality among patients with poststroke depression in several studies (13).
In one remarkable study, 9 years after the initial 12-week antidepressant randomized controlled trial (RCT), 68% of the treatment group but only 35% of the placebo group had survived, regardless of initial depression and whether depressive symptoms improved (26). The AHA and ASA also found that psychosocial interventions may be helpful in poststroke depression (3). Case studies and series of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) have been reported for cases of severe, refractory poststroke depression with some benefit, although complications have occurred (27). Critical safety considerations for ECT in poststroke depression include blood pressure control and anticoagulation, depending on original stroke etiology (28, 29). Studies of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and other neuromodulatory techniques are in early stages, and such treatments are not yet recommended in clinical practice (3, 24).
In addition to treatment of poststroke depression, antidepressant medications have also been studied for prevention of poststroke depression and overall enhancement of poststroke recovery. A Cochrane Review showed that among patients who had experienced a stroke, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment during the recovery period improved outcomes of dependency and disability, even among patients without depression (30). These analyses were not aimed at preventing or treating depression, but anxiety, depression, and neurologic symptoms all improved with SSRI treatment. Side effects, including seizures, gastrointestinal upset, and bleeding, increased but were not statistically significantly.
Regarding prevention, a recent large multicenter RCT showed that escitalopram started within 21 days poststroke did not prevent poststroke depression; 13% of patients in both the treatment and placebo groups developed depression. However, the medication was very well tolerated (31). The AHA and ASA have stated that further study is needed to determine the timing and duration of potential antidepressant medication and psychosocial interventions to prevent poststroke depression (3). Of note, physical disability predicts poststroke depression, so rehabilitation measures may also help depression (7).

TBI

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke has defined TBI as “a form of acquired brain injury, occur[ing] when a sudden trauma causes damage to the brain” (32). In 2014, there were approximately 2.87 million TBI-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths in the United States (33). Worldwide, 50–60 million TBIs occur annually (34). TBI severity is often clinically classified by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score after injury, with patients with mild TBI (mTBI) scoring 13–15 on the GCS, patients with moderate TBI scoring 9–12, and patients with severe TBI scoring 3–8. Other TBI severity classification schemes include loss or alteration of consciousness subsequent to injury, presence of imaging abnormalities, and presence of posttraumatic amnesia. The majority (80%) of TBIs are mTBI in both overall worldwide (34) and U.S. military veteran (35) populations.
Risk factors for TBI have previously included male sex and younger age; however, in developed countries, as the population ages, the epidemiology is shifting to encompass more older adults affected by falls. Populations particularly affected by TBI include patients with alcohol use disorders or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, those in the military, and athletes (34). Of note, although a TBI may be classified as “mild” or “moderate” on the basis of postinjury GCS, life-long disabling sequelae can still result. Damage can be physical, cognitive, or emotional (36). Damage resulting from TBI can be differentiated into primary damage, caused at the time of the trauma, and secondary damage, occurring in days to years after injury and driven in part by the brain’s response to the primary injury (34).
TBI is commonly followed by a host of neurobehavioral and neurocognitive symptoms. Neurobehavioral symptoms can include depression, mania, anxiety, agitation, irritability, psychosis, pseudobulbar affect, and apathy (37). TBI is associated with subsequent diagnoses of both unipolar depression and bipolar disorder (38). TBI is unique among the neuropsychiatric disorders in this review because posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can often result from the same traumatic etiology as the brain injury (39). In U.S. veterans, TBI is associated with development of depression, substance use disorders, and suicide attempts compared with veterans without TBI (40). Neurocognitive sequelae can include deficits in processing speed, attention, memory, and executive dysfunction (37). Other symptoms, such as headaches and insomnia, can be troublesome for years post-TBI (41).
Prevalence of post-TBI depression varies by severity of injury and population studied as well as by definition of depression. In 11 studies before 2016, major depression as measured by clinical interview ranged from 7% to 63% in the first year after mild to severe TBI (42). Pooled odds ratio in a meta-analysis of 10 studies showed a 2.14-fold risk of developing depression compared with non-TBI control groups (38). In a 2017 meta-analysis, risk factors for development of post-TBI depression were female gender, preinjury depression, and unemployment after injury. Higher admission GCS, but not 24-hour postinjury GCS, was also associated with risk of developing depression (39). Depression after TBI is associated with worse functional outcomes (43).
We highlight several recent large studies of post-TBI depression. A recent large longitudinal cohort study, Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI), followed 1,155 patients with mTBI seen in the emergency department and a comparison group of 230 patients without head orthopedic trauma (44). Moderate to severe depression as measured by the PHQ-9 was found in 8.8% of patients with mTBI compared with 3.0% of patients without head trauma at 3 months postinjury (a statistically significant difference); similar rates were found at 6 months postinjury. Risk factors for development of major depressive disorder were having a psychiatric disorder before the injury, having less education, and being black. Of note, PTSD rates among patients with mTBI were 18.7% at 3 months and 19.2% at 6 months postinjury (compared with 7.6% and 9.8% among control patients without head trauma). Assault or violence as a cause of mTBI was related to a diagnosis of PTSD but not major depressive disorder.
Another large longitudinal cohort study followed 559 patients with complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI (45). Mild to severe depression on the PHQ-9 was found in 31% of patients at 1 month and in 21% of patients at 6 months; overall, 53% screened positive for depression at some time during the year following injury. Factors related to major depressive disorder were younger age, female sex, substance use, and having a psychiatric diagnosis before the injury. A third study used the TBI Model Systems National Database. Among several thousands of patients with mild to severe TBI, mild to severe depression as measured by the PHQ-9 was found in 24.8%–28.1% of patients throughout 20 years of follow-up (46).
Finally, using insurance claims data, Albrecht et al. (47) compared a very large sample of patients with TBI (>200,000) with more than 400,000 control participants without TBI. Depression was defined by any in- or outpatient claims during the study period; patients with pre-TBI depression were excluded. Overall, the adjusted hazard ratio for developing depression after TBI, compared with without a TBI, was 1.83. Male sex, older age, and pre-TBI psychiatric diagnosis were the greatest predictors of a post-TBI depression diagnosis; this finding differs from idiopathic depression in which female sex is a risk factor.
As in poststroke depression, time course is variable in post-TBI depression; predictors of post-TBI depression seem to change with time since injury. To assess patterns of change over time, Bombadier et al. (48) used linear latent class growth mixture modeling of PHQ-9 scores, collected monthly over the first year postinjury, in a cohort of 559 patients with complicated mild to severe TBI. Their model was used to divide patients into four distinct trajectories: low depression (70% of patients); persistent depression (6%); recovery, or early depression that improves (10%); and delayed depression (13%). Interestingly, the recovery group was more likely to have cerebral contusions and was less likely to have severe nonhead injuries compared with the delayed depression group, suggesting possible differential etiology of the depression in these two groups. Singh et al. (49) assessed differential predictors of post-TBI depression at 10 weeks and 1 year postinjury among 690 patients; they found that 10-week postinjury depression was associated with TBI severity and computed tomography (CT) scan abnormalities, whereas 1-year postinjury depression was associated with abnormal CT scan, history of psychiatric diagnosis, alcohol use, and female gender. In a longer-term study that used the TBI Model Systems Database, depression and suicidal ideation at 1 year postinjury were associated with depression and suicidal ideation at 5 years postinjury (46).
The etiology of post-TBI depression may vary, depending on the amount of time that has elapsed since the injury. Early postinjury depression is more likely to be associated with direct injury to brain tissue in regions that regulate mood (50). Hypopituitarism due to direct injury to the pituitary by the trauma may also contribute (51). Later postinjury depression may be more related to the psychological response to other persistent symptoms, such as headache, motor impairment, and cognitive dysfunction, as well as to resulting interpersonal and occupational difficulties (37). Brain changes seen on imaging scans, serum cytokines and growth factors, and genetic data are beginning to provide clues to the disease mechanisms in post-TBI depression (5255).
Diagnosis of post-TBI depression is made with a full clinical evaluation, including collateral from caregivers, depending on the severity of postinjury deficits. The differential diagnosis is broad because multiple other postinjury phenomena have potentially overlapping symptoms with depression. During early postinjury phases, particularly in hospitalized patients, substance withdrawal should be considered. Apathy and pseudobulbar affect may mimic some aspects of depression. Other psychiatric diagnoses of increased likelihood after TBI include PTSD and bipolar disorder (38, 50).
Among the post-TBI population, neuroendocrine abnormalities secondary to hypopituitarism warrant special consideration. Thyroid hormone and growth hormone deficiencies can both occur and can be associated with depressive-like symptoms, so screening is indicated (50). Growth hormone replacement in deficient patients with TBI has been shown to alleviate depressive symptoms (51). Depression scales are appropriate for screening and following progress over time. The PHQ-9 has good evidence for sensitivity and specificity in post-TBI depression (56, 57). Scales designed particularly for the TBI population, such as the Traumatic Brain Injury–Quality of Life scale, have also been developed (58). As in poststroke depression, inflammatory, genetic, neuroimaging, and neurophysiologic biomarkers are actively being studied in post-TBI depression but do not yet offer clinically actionable information at the level of individual patients (37).
Patients with TBI are at increased risk of suicide, particularly when depressive symptoms are present. A Swedish population study found an adjusted odds ratio of 3.3 for death by suicide among people with TBI compared with those without (59). During the first year after injury, a quarter of patients with TBI experienced suicidal ideation, with depression scores being the strongest predictor (60). Over a 20-year follow-up period, between 7% and 10% of patients with TBI experienced suicidal ideation in a given year, with 0.8%–1.7% attempting suicide annually; more than 80% of patients with suicidal ideation met criteria for major depressive disorder (46).
Antidepressant medication, psychotherapy, and neuromodulation have all been studied in the treatment of post-TBI depression. Three recent meta-analyses of medications for depression, including SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and methylphenidate, failed to demonstrate a significant effect of medication in RCTs but did show significant medication effects in single-group studies (6163). This lack of evidence to date from RCTs does not necessarily argue against antidepressant medication treatment of post-TBI depression; it is noted that these patients have benefited from the placebo effect in RCTs and that patients with depression following an mTBI in particular resemble patients with idiopathic major depressive disorder and thus may benefit (64). However, these medications are not without possible adverse effects; SSRIs generally have either absent or negative effects on cognitive and functional recovery in patients with TBI (65), although improvement in isolated cognitive measures even in the absence of significant antidepressant effect has also been demonstrated (66).
Of note, patients with TBI appear to be more sensitive to side effects, so the adage “start low, go slow” for medication dosing applies (41). It is also important to ensure that trials are of adequate dose and duration before abandoning a medication as ineffective (37). Comorbid post-TBI symptoms may guide medication choices; for example, methylphenidate has evidence for efficacy in both depression and cognitive dysfunction, and tricyclics may alleviate post-TBI headaches (41).
Cognitive therapies, including cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness-informed cognitive therapy, delivered by various means (in person, phone, online) have shown promise in the treatment of post-TBI depression (67). Evidence for ECT in post-TBI depression exists only at the case-study level, and there is reluctance to use ECT in a population already at increased seizure risk (68); however, patients with refractory depression may benefit. Several initial studies have shown promise in the use of TMS for post-TBI depression (69, 70); however, risk of seizure with TMS will be an important consideration in any future clinical recommendations.
Several trials have examined pharmacologic prevention of depression after TBI (71), with mixed results. One RCT of 24 weeks of 100 mg of sertraline daily found decreased likelihood of post-TBI depression compared with placebo, with a number needed to treat of 5.9, with minimal adverse effects (72). Another RCT of 3 months of 50 mg sertraline daily found some effect at 3 months (10% depression rate in placebo group vs. 0% in the sertraline group); however, at 1 year postinjury, after the drug was stopped, there was no difference between groups, arguing against prophylactic early administration for longer term prevention (73). It is also important to note that there is evidence for antidepressant-related cognitive dysfunction in patients with TBI who do not have depression (74).

Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease defined by progressive rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor. The diagnostic criteria were recently revised in 2015 (75). The new criteria continue to emphasize bradykinesia either in combination with resting tremor, rigidity, or both. Supportive criteria may include both motor and nonmotor symptoms, such as response to dopaminergic therapy, asymmetric resting tremor, and olfactory loss.
Parkinson’s disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease both in the United States and worldwide, second only to Alzheimer’s disease (76). Overall prevalence ranges from 1–2 per 1,000 (77). Although it is rare before age 50, Parkinson’s disease can reach a prevalence of up to 4% for those ages 85–94 (78, 79). Although some cases appear to be associated with a monogenetic mutation, about 90% of cases are sporadic (76). Several risk factors have been identified, including exposure to pesticides (80) and heavy metals (81). Cigarette smoking appears to have an inverse effect on development of Parkinson’s disease (8284). Research into other risk factors such as diet, alcohol exposure, or sex differences have been inconclusive (76).
Premotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease often predate the formal diagnosis by months or years. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder is the most common prodromal finding in Parkinson’s disease, with 38% of patients developing Parkinson’s disease within 5 years of REM sleep behavior disorder diagnosis and 81% of patients with REM sleep behavior disorder eventually developing a neurodegenerative disease (85).
Depression increases the risk of Parkinson’s disease 2.4–3.24 times in some studies (86, 87). Patients who develop Parkinson’s disease are highly likely to have been treated with an antidepressant up to 2 years before Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, evidence that depression predates motor symptoms and may be a prodromal symptom (88). Current or, to a lesser extent, prior diagnosis of depression has been associated with development of Parkinson’s disease. In a case-control study, current depression diagnosis was associated with an odds ratio of 4.7 of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, whereas depression diagnosed 15 years or more prior was associated with a 1.7 odds ratio of current Parkinson’s disease diagnosis (89). Both increasing age and difficult-to-treat depression are independent risk factors for Parkinson’s disease among patients with depression (87).
Depression has been a presenting symptom of Parkinson’s disease in up to 2.5% of cases, and initial presentation with depression or any nonmotor symptoms has resulted in a median delay of diagnosis of 0.6 years versus patients presenting with motor symptoms (90). There are a variety of risk factors for patients with Parkinson’s disease to develop depression. They include anxiety (91), premorbid history of depression (92), family history of depression (93), cognitive impairment (94), longer duration of illness (95), motor disability and gait as well as balance impairments (96), younger age (97), sleep disorders and restless leg syndrome (98), and female sex (99).
People with Parkinson’s disease may develop multiple phenotypes of depression. There is a 2.7%–55.6% prevalence of major depressive disorder in Parkinson’s disease. Additionally, there is a 13%–34.5% prevalence of minor depression and 2.2%–31.3% prevalence of dysthymia in Parkinson’s disease (99102). It is therefore not atypical for patients to lack the full DSM criteria for major depression but to continue to experience distress because of a spectrum of depressive symptoms. Meanwhile, the rigid-akinetic subtype of Parkinson’s disease, rather than tremor-predominant, has been found to have a higher association with major depressive disorder, although rates of dysthymia have been similar in both subtypes (101).
Patients with Parkinson’s disease and depression experience a variety of symptoms. Chronic neurological illness and depressive illness often share symptoms, such as sleep disturbance and anergia. Patients experiencing depression and Parkinson’s disease showed more anhedonia, rumination, suicidal thoughts, hopelessness, negative cognitions, appetite disturbance, and decreased libido when compared with patients with Parkinson’s disease without depression (103). Attention to these, as well as specifically the nonsomatic, symptoms of depression assist in discriminating between neurological illness and depressive illness.
Risk of suicide among patients with Parkinson’s disease has previously been downplayed in the literature, and at times, some have thought that a neurological diagnosis was protective against suicide. However, a recent systematic review found that a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis was associated with increased suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, although rates varied by country (104). Lee et al. (105) found that the standardized mortality rate (SMR) for suicide was 1.99, or twice the rate expected in the general population. Suicide risk appears to be increased among patients with Parkinson’s disease who are male; who are European American; who are diagnosed as having depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, psychosis, or addiction; and who have a history of suicide attempts (104).
Nazem et al. (106) studied current and past suicidal thoughts and behavior in 116 patients with Parkinson’s disease. In this sample, 4.3% had a lifetime history of suicide attempts; regarding current thoughts of death or suicide, 28.4% had current death ideation, 11.2% had current suicide ideation, and 30.2% had both. They found that more severe depressive symptoms, diagnosis of major depression, psychosis, and history of impulse control disorders were significantly associated with passive or active suicidal ideation. In summary, recent evidence demonstrates increased suicide and high rates of suicidal ideation among patients with Parkinson’s disease. As in the general population, increasing severity of depression and comorbid psychiatric illness increases the risk of suicide ideation and attempts.
Development of depression among patients with Parkinson’s disease is thought to be related to dopaminergic and serotonergic dysfunction. Neuroimaging studies have shown varying results, but both nigrostriatal and extranigrostriatal pathways appear to be involved (107). Some studies have suggested an increase in frontal lobe atrophy among patients with depression and Parkinson’s disease (108), with a decreased metabolism in frontotemporoparietal regions potentially serving as a marker for depression in Parkinson’s disease (109). Inflammation may play a role in Parkinson’s disease depression, with an elevated C-reactive protein demonstrating a correlation with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores among patients with Parkinson’s disease and depression (110). More research into the neuroanatomical and functional correlates of depression and Parkinson’s disease is necessary.
The presence of depression among patients with Parkinson’s disease has a significant negative impact on quality of life; in fact, depression conveys a greater impact on quality of life than motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (111). Depression with Parkinson’s disease is associated with a higher rate of cognitive decline and worsening of activities of daily living (94). Depression among patients with Parkinson’s disease is also associated with a higher frequency of hopelessness, suicidality, and social withdrawal. Patients with depression and Parkinson’s disease are more likely to experience pain than patients with Parkinson’s disease who are not depressed (112). Independent measures of health-related quality of life are also worsened among patients with Parkinson’s disease and depression (111). A large multicenter study demonstrated a high frequency of all nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (98.6%), with the highest frequency being psychiatric nonmotor symptoms (67%). The psychiatric nonmotor symptoms had a significant impact on worsening of quality of life and worsened with disease progression and severity (113).
Detecting depression among patients with Parkinson’s disease is essential for improving prognosis and quality of life. Screening tools are helpful to detect depression, but there have been concerns regarding overlap between neurological and psychiatric symptoms as noted earlier. A review of depressive rating scales by the Movement Disorder Society in 2007 showed efficacy and validity for common instruments, including the 17-item HAM-D, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (114). The American Academy of Neurology found that the BDI, the 17-item HAM-D, and the MADRS were accurate and appropriate for depressive screening among patients with Parkinson’s disease (115). A meta-analysis has shown that the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, in addition to other instruments mentioned earlier, has validity in Parkinson’s disease (116). Consideration of depression in the differential diagnosis of a patient with Parkinson’s disease is difficult for several reasons. Much of clinical practice is focused on the motor, rather than nonmotor, symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Additionally, some families, patients, and providers may struggle to recognize depressive symptoms. Expressions of sadness may be normalized as grief because of the difficulties of a progressive neurological illness.
Treatment of depression among patients with Parkinson’s disease is often successful and leads to improvement in activities of daily living and quality of life over time. Research into Parkinson’s disease–specific treatment modalities, however, is unclear. As with all patients, psychoeducation and psychotherapy, including cognitive-behavioral therapy (117), are essential components of successful treatment. Families and caregivers may also benefit from supportive therapies and treatments. Rehab services including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy are helpful components of an overall treatment plan (118). There is evidence for the utility of SSRIs in treatment of Parkinson’s disease depression (117, 119).
Additionally, there is evidence demonstrating efficacy of TCAs in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease depression (120, 121). There are also some data for dopamine agonists (122). Additionally, rivastigmine (123) and N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists (124) have, in preliminary studies, shown modest effects in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease depression. A 2016 review of ECT in Parkinson’s disease depression reported a robust response to treatment, with more than 90% of patients responding; however, many patients developed confusion or delirium, in some cases requiring treatment discontinuation (125). Other nonpharmacological treatments such as repetitive TMS have inadequate efficacy evidence in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease depression (122).

MS

MS is another common neurological disorder associated with depression, and its prevalence appears to be increasing. A recent study found a prevalence of MS in the United States of 309.2 per 100,000, the highest rate to date in the United States (126). Rates of depression in this population range from 23% to 54%. This prevalence of depression is higher than that seen in both the general population as well as other patients with chronic medical conditions (127). Similar to Parkinson’s disease, earlier onset and greater severity of illness increase the likelihood of developing depression with MS (128). Depression may predate the neurological diagnosis and, in up to 75% of cases, is thought to delay the definitive MS diagnosis (129). Risk factors for MS depression include female sex, age older than 35, family history of depression, current anxiety (130), and high levels of psychosocial stress (131). Presence of psychiatric illness increases the severity of progressive neurological symptom burden (132).
Suicide and suicidal ideation significantly affect people with MS. In a study of Canadian patients with MS, 28.6% of deaths in the sample were by suicide (133). A Danish study found an SMR of 1.83, with the highest risk being in young men (134). A more recent study demonstrated an SMR of almost twice that expected, also with an increase in younger men within the first few years of diagnosis (135). Additionally, severity of depression, social isolation, and alcohol use disorder are associated with increased thoughts of suicide (135).
Although the pathophysiology linking MS to depression has not been fully elucidated, hypointense T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of brain lesions has been predictive of major depression, particularly in the frontal and temporal lobes and their associated connections (136). Disconnection of the hippocampus from several brain networks also may contribute to development of depression among patients with MS (137). In addition, some studies have suggested that MS treatments, including interferon β, have been independently associated with major depression (138). However, further studies have cast doubt on that conclusion (139, 140). These data suggest that depression is likely a consequence of the neurological burden of disease rather than a psychosocial sequela.
Making the diagnosis of depression among patients with MS may be challenging. Symptoms of MS that overlap with symptoms of major depression include fatigue, sleep problems, and cognitive disturbance. Fatigue is the most common symptom of MS, with a prevalence of 80% (141). Therefore, screening tools are quite helpful to detect depression as early as possible. A variety of depression screening tools have been studied in MS, including the BDI, HADS, PHQ-9, MADRS, and HAM-D (142). The American Academy of Neurology recommends use of the BDI in screening for depression (143). Use of a semistructured interview is equally as effective in detecting depression among patients with MS (144).
As with the previous neurological disorders discussed, depression has a significant impact on quality of life among patients with MS (145). In some studies, in fact, it appears to be the primary determinant of quality of life (146). This area has been extensively studied in multiple populations with consistent results (147). The interaction between depression and fatigue also conveys a significant burden on health-related quality of life (148150). Depression also negatively affects caregivers of people with MS, but attention to both members in the dyad may modulate this challenge (151).
Treatment of depressive symptoms in patients with MS is associated with improved adherence to MS treatments (152), quality of life (153, 154), cognitive function (155), reduced fatigue (156), and overall improved prognosis (157). Despite the clear benefits of treatment, there are limited data on specific pharmacological treatments of depression among patients with MS. A Cochrane meta-analysis included only two controlled double-blinded studies (158). Both studies demonstrated mild benefit from both TCA and SSRI treatment but no statistically significant separation from placebo. A variety of open-label studies demonstrated some efficacy with a range of SSRI and TCA medications (142). In another study by Mohr et al. (159), sertraline was found to be equally effective with cognitive-behavioral therapy, and both of them were more efficacious than supportive-expressive therapy. ECT has been studied in this population, but only to the level of case report, and concern has been raised for worsening of neurological function due to ECT by altering plaques or increasing edema (142). Although TMS has been studied in the treatment of cognition and fatigue among patients with MS, there are no articles demonstrating efficacy for the treatment of depression.
Several nonsomatic therapies have shown some benefit for symptoms of depression and psychological distress among people with MS. Mindfulness-based therapies have demonstrated some efficacy in the improvement of mental well-being (160). Patients with MS also have demonstrated better outcomes with training and therapies focused on improving resilience (161). The benefits of exercise in reducing symptom severity among patients with MS and depression are also clear (148, 162). A meta-analysis of depressive treatments showed good response to either psychotherapy or medications for depression, and it found that therapies with a focus on coping skills were superior to insight-oriented therapies (163).

Conclusion

Depression and suicide are more common among patients with stroke, TBI, Parkinson’s disease, and MS than in the general population. Depression in these disorders has both physiologic and psychological etiologies. In all these disorders, depression is currently diagnosed by clinical interview and history rather than biomarkers. Tools such as the PHQ-9 may be useful for screening and following treatment progress. Diagnosis can be challenging because of symptoms that could be due to either the neurologic disorder itself or depression, such as apathy and neurovegetative changes. Premorbid psychiatric conditions, particularly depression, predict depression after neurologic disorder onset. Recommended treatment is generally qualitatively the same as in idiopathic depression, although efficacy data in some neurologic disorders remain equivocal. Of note, many patients with neurologic disease are more sensitive to the side effects of antidepressant medications, so the adage “start low, go slow” applies. Treatment of depression among patients with neurologic disorders is important for prevention of suicide and improved quality of life.

Footnote

Dr. Conroy reports that her spouse was employed by Eli Lilly and Company until 2019. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

1.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013
2.
Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al: Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018; 137:e67–e492
3.
Towfighi A, Ovbiagele B, El Husseini N, et al: Poststroke depression: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2017; 48:e30–e43
4.
Hackett ML, Pickles K: Part I: frequency of depression after stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Stroke 2014; 9:1017–1025
5.
Ayerbe L, Ayis S, Wolfe CD, et al: Natural history, predictors and outcomes of depression after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202:14–21
6.
Bartoli F, Di Brita C, Crocamo C, et al: Early post-stroke depression and mortality: meta-analysis and meta-regression. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9:530
7.
Kutlubaev MA, Hackett ML: Part II: predictors of depression after stroke and impact of depression on stroke outcome: an updated systematic review of observational studies. Int J Stroke 2014; 9:1026–1036
8.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al: Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:593–602
9.
Taylor-Rowan M, Momoh O, Ayerbe L, et al: Prevalence of pre-stroke depression and its association with post-stroke depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2019; 49:685–696
10.
Dong JY, Zhang YH, Tong J, et al: Depression and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Stroke 2012; 43:32–37
11.
Pan A, Sun Q, Okereke OI, et al: Depression and risk of stroke morbidity and mortality: a meta-analysis and systematic review. JAMA 2011; 306:1241–1249
12.
Hackett ML, Köhler S, O’Brien JT, et al: Neuropsychiatric outcomes of stroke. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13:525–534
13.
Robinson RG, Jorge RE: Post-stroke depression: a review. Am J Psychiatry 2016; 173:221–231
14.
Wei N, Yong W, Li X, et al: Post-stroke depression and lesion location: a systematic review. J Neurol 2015; 262:81–90
15.
Zhang Y, Zhao H, Fang Y, et al: The association between lesion location, sex and poststroke depression: meta-analysis. Brain Behav 2017; 7:e00788
16.
Meader N, Moe-Byrne T, Llewellyn A, et al: Screening for poststroke major depression: a meta-analysis of diagnostic validity studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85:198–206
17.
Ojagbemi A, Owolabi M, Akinyemi J, et al: Criterion validity of the “HRQOLISP-E”: a new context-specific screening tool for poststroke depression. Behav Neurol 2017; 2017:6515769
18.
van Dijk MJ, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Hafsteinsdóttir TB, et al: Identifying depression post-stroke in patients with aphasia: a systematic review of the reliability, validity and feasibility of available instruments. Clin Rehabil 2016; 30:795–810
19.
Levada OA, Troyan AS: Poststroke depression biomarkers: a narrative review. Front Neurol 2018; 9:577
20.
Pietra Pedroso VS, Rachid MA, Teixeira AL: Biomarkers in post-stroke depression. Curr Neurovasc Res 2016; 13:163–173
21.
Hong JP, Park S, Ahn SH, et al: Factors associated with post-stroke suicidal death. J Psychiatr Res 2018; 96:135–137
22.
Pompili M, Venturini P, Campi S, et al: Do stroke patients have an increased risk of developing suicidal ideation or dying by suicide? An overview of the current literature. CNS Neurosci Ther 2012; 18:711–721
23.
Pompili M, Venturini P, Lamis DA, et al: Suicide in stroke survivors: epidemiology and prevention. Drugs Aging 2015; 32:21–29
24.
Starkstein SE, Hayhow BD: Treatment of post-stroke depression. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2019; 21:31
25.
Hackett ML, Anderson CS, House A, et al: Interventions for treating depression after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 4:CD003437
26.
Jorge RE, Robinson RG, Arndt S, et al: Mortality and poststroke depression: a placebo-controlled trial of antidepressants. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:1823–1829
27.
Currier MB, Murray GB, Welch CC: Electroconvulsive therapy for post-stroke depressed geriatric patients. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 4:140–144
28.
Allman P, Hawton K: ECT for post-stroke depression: beta blockade to modify rise in blood pressure. Convuls Ther 1987; 3:218–221
29.
Harmandayan M, Romanowicz M, Sola C: Successful use of ECT in post-stroke depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2012; 34:102.e5–102.e6
30.
Mead GE, Hsieh CF, Lee R, et al: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11:CD009286
31.
Kim JS, Lee EJ, Chang DI, et al: Efficacy of early administration of escitalopram on depressive and emotional symptoms and neurological dysfunction after stroke: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4:33–41
32.
Traumatic Brain Injury Information Page. Bethesda, MD, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 2019. www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/All-Disorders/Traumatic-Brain-Injury-Information-Page. Accessed Jan 13, 2020
33.
TBI-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths (EDHDs). Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2019. www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/data/tbi-edhd.html. Accessed Jan 10, 2019
34.
Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al: Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16:987–1048
35.
Greer, N., Ackland P, Sayer N, et al: Relationship of Deployment-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury to Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Depressive Disorders, Substance Use Disorders, Suicidal Ideation, and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review. Washington, DC, Department of Veterans Affairs, 2019
36.
Yamamoto S, Levin HS, Prough DS: Mild, moderate and severe: terminology implications for clinical and experimental traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Neurol 2018; 31:672–680
37.
Polich G, Iaccarino MA, Zafonte R: Psychopharmacology of traumatic brain injury. Handb Clin Neurol 2019; 165:253–267
38.
Perry DC, Sturm VE, Peterson MJ, et al: Association of traumatic brain injury with subsequent neurological and psychiatric disease: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2016; 124:511–526
39.
Cnossen MC, Scholten AC, Lingsma HF, et al: Predictors of major depression and posttraumatic stress disorder following traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2017; 29:206–224
40.
Greer N, Sayer NA, Spoont M, et al: Prevalence and severity of psychiatric disorders and suicidal behavior in service members and veterans with and without traumatic brain injury: systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020; 35:1–13
41.
Quinn DK, Mayer AR, Master CL, et al: Prolonged postconcussive symptoms. Am J Psychiatry 2018; 175:103–111
42.
Scholten AC, Haagsma JA, Cnossen MC, et al: Prevalence of and risk factors for anxiety and depressive disorders after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2016; 33:1969–1994
43.
Hudak AM, Hynan LS, Harper CR, et al: Association of depressive symptoms with functional outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2012; 27:87–98
44.
Stein MB, Jain S, Giacino JT, et al: Risk of posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression in civilian patients after mild traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI study. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76:249–258
45.
Bombardier CH, Fann JR, Temkin NR, et al: Rates of major depressive disorder and clinical outcomes following traumatic brain injury. JAMA 2010; 303:1938–1945
46.
Fisher LB, Pedrelli P, Iverson GL, et al: Prevalence of suicidal behaviour following traumatic brain injury: longitudinal follow-up data from the NIDRR Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems. Brain Inj 2016; 30:1311–1318
47.
Albrecht JS, Barbour L, Abariga SA, et al: Risk of depression after traumatic brain injury in a large national sample. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36:300–307
48.
Bombardier CH, Hoekstra T, Dikmen S, et al: Depression trajectories during the first year after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2016; 33:2115–2124
49.
Singh R, Mason S, Lecky F, et al: Comparison of early and late depression after TBI; (the SHEFBIT study). Brain Inj 2019; 33:584–591
50.
Jorge RE, Arciniegas DB: Mood disorders after TBI. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2014; 37:13–29
51.
Pavlovic D, Pekic S, Stojanovic M, et al: Traumatic brain injury: neuropathological, neurocognitive and neurobehavioral sequelae. Pituitary 2019; 22:270–282
52.
Bodnar CN, Morganti JM, Bachstetter AD: Depression following a traumatic brain injury: uncovering cytokine dysregulation as a pathogenic mechanism. Neural Regen Res 2018; 13:1693–1704
53.
Failla MD, Juengst SB, Arenth PM, et al: Preliminary associations between brain-derived neurotrophic factor, memory impairment, functional cognition, and depressive symptoms following severe TBI. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016; 30:419–430
54.
Hudak A, Warner M, Marquez de la Plata C, et al: Brain morphometry changes and depressive symptoms after traumatic brain injury. Psychiatry Res 2011; 191:160–165
55.
Myrga JM, Juengst SB, Failla MD, et al: COMT and ANKK1 genetics interact with depression to influence behavior following severe TBI: an initial assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016; 30:920–930
56.
Donders J, Darland K: Psychometric properties and correlates of the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2017; 31:1871–1875
57.
Donders J, Pendery A: Clinical utility of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in the assessment of major depression after broad-spectrum traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98:2514–2519
58.
Cohen ML, Holdnack JA, Kisala PA, et al: A comparison of PHQ-9 and TBI-QOL depression measures among individuals with traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 2018; 63:365–371
59.
Fazel S, Wolf A, Pillas D, et al: Suicide, fatal injuries, and other causes of premature mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: a 41-year Swedish population study. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71:326–333
60.
Mackelprang JL, Bombardier CH, Fann JR, et al: Rates and predictors of suicidal ideation during the first year after traumatic brain injury. Am J Public Health 2014; 104:e100–e107
61.
Slowinski A, Coetzer R, Byrne C: Pharmacotherapy effectiveness in treating depression after traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2019; 31:220–227
62.
Kreitzer N, Ancona R, McCullumsmith C, et al: The effect of antidepressants on depression after traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2019; 34:E47–E54
63.
Reyes NGD, Espiritu AI, Anlacan VMM: Efficacy of sertraline in post-traumatic brain injury (post-TBI) depression and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 181:104–111
64.
Silverberg ND, Panenka WJ: Antidepressants for depression after concussion and traumatic brain injury are still best practice. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:100
65.
Yue JK, Burke JF, Upadhyayula PS, et al: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for treating neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders following traumatic brain injury: an evaluation of current evidence. Brain Sci 2017; 7:E93
66.
Fann JR, Bombardier CH, Temkin N, et al: Sertraline for major depression during the year following traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2017; 32:332–342
67.
Liu Q, Li R, Qu W, et al: Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions of depression after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Eur J Pharmacol 2019; 865:172775
68.
Srienc A, Narang P, Sarai S, et al: Is electroconvulsive therapy a treatment for depression following traumatic brain injury? Innov Clin Neurosci 2018; 15:43–46
69.
Hoy KE, McQueen S, Elliot D, et al: A pilot investigation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic brain injury depression: safety, tolerability, and efficacy. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36:2092–2098
70.
Leung A, Metzger-Smith V, He Y, et al: Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS in alleviating MTBI related headaches and depressive symptoms. Neuromodulation 2018; 21:390–401
71.
Clay FJ, Hicks AJ, Zaman H, et al: Prophylaxis pharmacotherapy to prevent the onset of post-traumatic brain injury depression: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36:2053–2064
72.
Jorge RE, Acion L, Burin DI, et al: Sertraline for preventing mood disorders following traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2016; 73:1041–1047
73.
Novack TA, Baños JH, Brunner R, et al: Impact of early administration of sertraline on depressive symptoms in the first year after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2009; 26:1921–1928
74.
Failla MD, Juengst SB, Graham KM, et al: Effects of depression and antidepressant use on cognitive deficits and functional cognition following severe traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2016; 31:E62–E73
75.
Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, et al: MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2015; 30:1591–1601
76.
de Lau LM, Breteler MM: Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5:525–535
77.
von Campenhausen S, Bornschein B, Wick R, et al: Prevalence and incidence of Parkinson’s disease in Europe. European Neuropsychopharmacology 2005; 15:473–490
78.
de Rijk MC, Breteler MM, Graveland GA, et al: Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology 1995; 45:2143–2146
79.
de Rijk MC, Launer LJ, Berger K, et al: Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in Europe: a collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurology 2000; 54(Suppl 5):S21–S23
80.
Priyadarshi A, Khuder SA, Schaub EA, et al: A meta-analysis of Parkinson’s disease and exposure to pesticides. Neurotoxicology 2000; 21:435–440
81.
Jankovic J: Searching for a relationship between manganese and welding and Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2005; 64:2021–2028
82.
Grandinetti A, Morens DM, Reed D, et al: Prospective study of cigarette smoking and the risk of developing idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 139:1129–1138
83.
Paganini-Hill A: Risk factors for Parkinson’s disease: the Leisure World Cohort Study. Neuroepidemiology 2001; 20:118–124
84.
Hernán MA, Zhang SM, Rueda-deCastro AM, et al: Cigarette smoking and the incidence of Parkinson’s disease in two prospective studies. Ann Neurol 2001; 50:780–786
85.
Schenck CH, Boeve BF, Mahowald MW: Delayed emergence of a parkinsonian disorder or dementia in 81% of older men initially diagnosed with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a 16-year update on a previously reported series. Sleep Med 2013; 14:744–748
86.
Leentjens AFG, Van den Akker M, Metsemakers JF, et al: Higher incidence of depression preceding the onset of Parkinson’s disease: a register study. Mov Disord 2003; 18:414–418
87.
Shen C-C, Tsai SJ, Perng CL, et al: Risk of Parkinson disease after depression: a nationwide population-based study. Neurology 2013; 81:1538–1544
88.
Alonso A, Rodríguez LA, Logroscino G, et al: Use of antidepressants and the risk of Parkinson’s disease: a prospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80:671–674
89.
Fang F, Xu Q, Park Y, et al: Depression and the subsequent risk of Parkinson’s disease in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Mov Disord 2010; 25:1157–1162
90.
O’Sullivan SS, Williams DR, Gallagher DA, et al: Nonmotor symptoms as presenting complaints in Parkinson’s disease: a clinicopathological study. Mov Disord 2008; 23:101–106
91.
Cui S-S, Du JJ, Fu R, et al: Prevalence and risk factors for depression and anxiety in Chinese patients with Parkinson disease. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17:270
92.
Starkstein SE, Preziosi TJ, Bolduc PL, et al: Depression in Parkinson’s disease. J Nerv Ment Dis 1990; 178:27–31
93.
Leentjens AFG, Lousberg R, Verhey FRJ: Markers for depression in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002; 106:196–201
94.
Starkstein SE, Mayberg HS, Leiguarda R, et al: A prospective longitudinal study of depression, cognitive decline, and physical impairments in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55:377–382
95.
Cole SA, Woodard JL, Juncos JL, et al: Depression and disability in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1996; 8:20–25
96.
Lee Y, Oh JS, Chung SJ, et al: The presence of depression in de novo Parkinson’s disease reflects poor motor compensation. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0203303
97.
Schrag A, Hovris A, Morley D, et al: Young- versus older-onset Parkinson’s disease: impact of disease and psychosocial consequences. Mov Disord 2003; 18:1250–1256
98.
Rana AQ, Mosabbir AA, Qureshi AR, et al: Restless leg syndrome: a risk factor of higher prevalence of anxiety and depression in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurol Res 2016; 38:309–312
99.
Tandberg E, Larsen JP, Aarsland D, et al: The occurrence of depression in Parkinson’s disease. A community-based study. Arch Neurol 1996; 53:175–179
100.
Allain H, Schuck S, Mauduit N: Depression in Parkinson’s disease. BMJ 2000; 320:1287–1288
101.
Starkstein SE, Petracca G, Chemerinski E, et al: Depression in classic versus akinetic-rigid Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 1998; 13:29–33
102.
Reijnders JS, Ehrt U, Weber WE, et al: A systematic review of prevalence studies of depression in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2008; 23:183–189
103.
Starkstein SE, Preziosi TJ, Forrester AW, et al: Specificity of affective and autonomic symptoms of depression in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53:869–873
104.
Shepard MD, Perepezko K, Broen MPG, et al: Suicide in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90:822–829
105.
Lee T, Lee HB, Ahn MH, et al: Increased suicide risk and clinical correlates of suicide among patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016; 32:102–107
106.
Nazem S, Siderowf AD, Duda JE, et al: Suicidal and death ideation in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2008; 23:1573–1579
107.
Wen MC, Chan LL, Tan LC, et al: Depression, anxiety, and apathy in Parkinson’s disease: insights from neuroimaging studies. Eur J Neurol 2016; 23:1001–1019
108.
Alzahrani H, Venneri A: Cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. J Neurol Sci 2015; 356:32–44
109.
Kim Y-D, Jeong HS, Song IU, et al: Brain perfusion alterations in depressed patients with Parkinson’s disease. Ann Nucl Med 2016; 30:731–737
110.
Lindqvist D, Hall S, Surova Y, et al: Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory markers in Parkinson’s disease—associations with depression, fatigue, and cognitive impairment. Brain Behav Immun 2013; 33:183–189
111.
Duncan GW, Khoo TK, Yarnall AJ, et al: Health-related quality of life in early Parkinson’s disease: the impact of nonmotor symptoms. Mov Disord 2014; 29:195–202
112.
Lin C-H, Chaudhuri KR, Fan JY, et al: Depression and Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genetic variants are associated with pain in Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep 2017; 7:6306
113.
Barone P, Antonini A, Colosimo C, et al: The PRIAMO study: a multicenter assessment of nonmotor symptoms and their impact on quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2009; 24:1641–1649
114.
Goetz CG, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, et al: Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov Disord 2007; 22:41–47
115.
Miyasaki JM, Shannon K, Voon V, et al: Practice Parameter: evaluation and treatment of depression, psychosis, and dementia in Parkinson disease (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2006; 66:996–1002
116.
Goodarzi Z, Mrklas KJ, Roberts DJ, et al: Detecting depression in Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2016; 87:426–437
117.
Bomasang-Layno E, Fadlon I, Murray AN, et al: Antidepressive treatments for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015; 21:833–842
118.
Dupouy J., Ory-Magne, F, Brefel-Courbon, C: Other care in Parkinson’s disease: psychological, rehabilitation, therapeutic education and new technologies. Presse Med 2017; 46:225–232
119.
Cooney JW, Stacy M: Neuropsychiatric issues in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2016; 16:49
120.
Antonini A, Tesei S, Zecchinelli A, et al: Randomized study of sertraline and low-dose amitriptyline in patients with Parkinson’s disease and depression: effect on quality of life. Mov Disord 2006; 21:1119–1122
121.
Devos D, Dujardin K, Poirot I, et al: Comparison of desipramine and citalopram treatments for depression in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Mov Disord 2008; 23:850–857
122.
Seppi K, Weintraub D, Coelho M, et al: The Movement Disorder Society Evidence-Based Medicine Review update: treatments for the non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2011; 26(Suppl 3):S42–S80
123.
Oh YS, Kim JS, Lee PH: Effect of rivastigmine on behavioral and psychiatric symptoms of Parkinson’s disease dementia. J Mov Disord 2015; 8:98–102
124.
Vanle B, Olcott W, Jimenez J, et al: NMDA antagonists for treating the non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Transl Psychiatry 2018; 8:117
125.
Borisovskaya A, Bryson WC, Buchholz J, et al: Electroconvulsive therapy for depression in Parkinson’s disease: systematic review of evidence and recommendations. Neurodegener Dis Manag 2016; 6:161–176
126.
Wallin MT, Culpepper WJ, Campbell JD, et al: The prevalence of MS in the United States: a population-based estimate using health claims data. Neurology 2019; 92:e1029–e1040
127.
Goldman Consensus Group: The Goldman Consensus statement on depression in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2005; 11:328–337
128.
Chwastiak L, Ehde DM, Gibbons LE, et al: Depressive symptoms and severity of illness in multiple sclerosis: epidemiologic study of a large community sample. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:1862–1868
129.
Byatt N, Rothschild AJ, Riskind P, et al: Relationships between multiple sclerosis and depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011; 23:198–200
130.
Gay M-C, Bungener C, Thomas S, et al: Anxiety, emotional processing and depression in people with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2017; 17:43
131.
Skokou M, Soubasi E, Gourzis P: Depression in multiple sclerosis: a review of assessment and treatment approaches in adult and pediatric populations. ISRN Neurol 2012; 2012:427102
132.
McKay KA, Tremlett H, Fisk JD, et al: Psychiatric comorbidity is associated with disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2018; 90:e1316–e1323
133.
Sadovnick AD, Eisen K, Ebers GC, et al: Cause of death in patients attending multiple sclerosis clinics. Neurology 1991; 41:1193–1196
134.
Stenager EN, Stenager E, Koch-Henriksen N, et al: Suicide and multiple sclerosis: an epidemiological investigation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55:542–545
135.
Feinstein A, Pavisian B: Multiple sclerosis and suicide. Mult Scler 2017; 23:923–927
136.
Corallo F, Lo Buono V, Genovese R, et al: A complex relation between depression and multiple sclerosis: a descriptive review. Neurol Sci 2019; 40:1551–1558
137.
Rocca MA, Barkhof F, De Luca J, et al: The hippocampus in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17:918–926
138.
Feinstein A, O’Connor P, Feinstein K: Multiple sclerosis, interferon beta-1b and depression: a prospective investigation. J Neurol 2002; 249:815–820
139.
Patten SB, Metz LM: Interferon beta-1a and depression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an analysis of depression data from the PRISMS clinical trial. Mult Scler 2001; 7:243–248
140.
Schippling S, O’Connor P, Knappertz V, et al: Incidence and course of depression in multiple sclerosis in the multinational BEYOND trial. J Neurol 2016; 263:1418–1426
141.
Bakshi R, Shaikh ZA, Miletich RS, et al: Fatigue in multiple sclerosis and its relationship to depression and neurologic disability. Mult Scler 2000; 6:181–185
142.
Solaro C, Gamberini G, Masuccio FG: Depression in multiple sclerosis: epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. CNS Drugs 2018; 32:117–133
143.
Minden SL, Feinstein A, Kalb RC, et al: Evidence-based guideline: assessment and management of psychiatric disorders in individuals with MS: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2014; 82:174–181
144.
Patten SB, Burton JM, Fiest KM, et al: Validity of four screening scales for major depression in MS. Mult Scler 2015; 21:1064–1071
145.
Fruehwald S, Loeffler-Stastka H, Eher R, et al: Depression and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2001; 104:257–261
146.
D’Alisa S, Miscio G, Baudo S, et al: Depression is the main determinant of quality of life in multiple sclerosis: a classification-regression (CART) study. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28:307–314
147.
Ochoa-Morales A, Hernández-Mojica T, Paz-Rodríguez F, et al: Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis and its association with depressive symptoms and physical disability. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 36:101386
148.
Schmidt S, Jöstingmeyer P: Depression, fatigue and disability are independently associated with quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: results of a cross-sectional study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 35:262–269
149.
Yalachkov Y, Soydaş D, Bergmann J, et al: Determinants of quality of life in relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 30:33–37
150.
Göksel Karatepe A, Kaya T, Günaydn R, et al: Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: the impact of depression, fatigue, and disability. Int J Rehabil Res 2011; 34:290–298
151.
Santos M, Sousa C, Pereira M, et al: Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: a study with patients and caregivers. Disabil Health J 2019; 12:628–634
152.
Mohr DC, Goodkin DE, Likosky W, et al: Treatment of depression improves adherence to interferon beta-1b therapy for multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 1997; 54:531–533
153.
Kargiotis O, Paschali A, Messinis L, et al: Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: effects of current treatment options. Int Rev Psychiatry 2010; 22:67–82
154.
Hart S, Fonareva I, Merluzzi N, et al: Treatment for depression and its relationship to improvement in quality of life and psychological well-being in multiple sclerosis patients. Qual Life Res 2005; 14:695–703
155.
Wilken JA, Sullivan C: Recognizing and treating common psychiatric disorders in multiple sclerosis. Neurologist 2007; 13:343–354
156.
Mohr DC, Hart SL, Goldberg A: Effects of treatment for depression on fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Psychosom Med 2003; 65:542–547
157.
Mohr DC, Goodkin DE, Islar J, et al: Treatment of depression is associated with suppression of nonspecific and antigen-specific T(H)1 responses in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2001; 58:1081–1086
158.
Koch MW, Glazenborg A, Uyttenboogaart M, et al: Pharmacologic treatment of depression in multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 2:CD007295
159.
Mohr DC, Boudewyn AC, Goodkin DE, et al: Comparative outcomes for individual cognitive-behavior therapy, supportive-expressive group psychotherapy, and sertraline for the treatment of depression in multiple sclerosis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69:942–949
160.
Simpson R, Simpson S, Ramparsad N, et al: Mindfulness-based interventions for mental well-being among people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90:1051–1058
161.
Silverman AM, Verrall AM, Alschuler KN, et al: Bouncing back again, and again: a qualitative study of resilience in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2017; 39:14–22
162.
Dauwan M, Begemann MJH, Slot MIE, et al: Physical exercise improves quality of life, depressive symptoms, and cognition across chronic brain disorders: a transdiagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol (Epub August 14, 2019).
163.
Mohr DC, Goodkin DE: Treatment of depression in multiple sclerosis: review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 1999; 6:1–9

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published in print: Spring 2020
Published online: 24 April 2020

Keywords

  1. Depression
  2. Neuropsychiatry/neurobiology
  3. stroke
  4. traumatic brain injury
  5. Parkinson’s disease
  6. multiple sclerosis

Authors

Details

Susan K. Conroy, M.D., Ph.D. [email protected]
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Conroy, McAllister); Department of Psychiatry, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus (Brownlowe).
Katherine B. Brownlowe, M.D.
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Conroy, McAllister); Department of Psychiatry, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus (Brownlowe).
Thomas W. McAllister, M.D.
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Conroy, McAllister); Department of Psychiatry, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus (Brownlowe).

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Conroy ([email protected]).

Competing Interests

Dr. McAllister receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Focus

PPV Articles - Focus

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share