Psychoanalyst Examines How Culture Influences Suicide
At-risk people may often regard their suicide attempts as a social, cultural, or political form of communication.
Rising suicide rates since the 1990s have been felt across American communities and cultures: for example, among Black adolescents, suicide attempts rose by 73% between 1991 and 2017, according to a 2019 study in Pediatrics, while injury by attempt rose 122% among adolescent Black boys.
In large cities, small towns, and rural communities across the United States, the number of suicides has risen steadily between 2001 and 2015, but it has consistently been higher in rural counties than elsewhere.
Altogether more than 47,000 Americans died by suicide in 2017, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
What is driving these trends?
Certainly, any number of acute, internal stressors may immediately precede a suicide; ultimately, it may be impossible to wholly fathom why any one individual is driven to take his or her life.
Yet behind every suicide there is often a common backstory of shame and/or guilt and a surrounding context of social, cultural, economic, and political factors that shaped the actions of a suicide victim, according to psychiatrist and psychoanalyst James A. Gilligan, M.D. Gilligan presented a keynote address at a virtual conference last month titled “Suicide, Culture, and Community,” which was sponsored by the Erikson Institute for Education and Research at the Austen Riggs Center in Stockbridge, Mass.
Gilligan compared the rising rates of suicide, roughly the same as a century ago (with episodic increases), with the enormous progress that has been made to reduce the number of accidental deaths—for example, through better workplace design, improvements in automobile design, and seatbelt requirements. And he asserted that equivalent preventive mechanisms should be employed to prevent suicide.
“What we have mislabeled as ‘accidents’ were not accidental at all,” he said. “They were, and still are, the predictable result of conditions that are identifiable and preventable.”
This is also true, he said, of suicide, a problem requiring “public health and preventive medicine, including preventive psychiatry.”
‘Mattering’ Matters in Suicide
At the virtual conference, Gilligan and other clinicians and suicide researchers explored the psychosocial, cultural, and political factors that drive suicide in a range of different communities—racial and sexual minority communities in the United States, Japanese youth who populate an online community focused around suicide, rural communities in the Berkshires where Austen Riggs is located and in upstate New York, and a high school in a wealthy, predominantly-White American suburb.
They also looked at how community organizations and faith-based communities are successfully responding to suicide. (Further coverage of the conference will appear in future editions of Psychiatric News.)
Prominent in all of the presentations was the importance of addressing loneliness, social isolation, and alienation in a digital world and the need for “mattering” to instill a sense of social purpose and community belonging.
Especially salient was the influence of gender and the adverse effects of patriarchal values that compel men to act out on shame and/or guilt in the form of suicide or homicide and inhibit vulnerability or their ability to seek out help (see box).
How Patriarchy Plays a Role in Suicide
Why are men worldwide so much more likely than women to commit homicide and die by suicide?
In a keynote lecture last month at a conference at the Austen Riggs Center, psychiatrist James A. Gilligan, M.D., said one answer surely lay in the biological effects of testosterone on aggression, whether it is expressed against others or oneself.
But it is only a partial explanation at best, he said, because the differences in rates of suicide and homicide among different cultures and different countries are vastly greater than the differences in the rates between men and women alone. Moreover, Gilligan pointed to the seemingly paradoxical finding that women are significantly more likely to be treated for clinical depression.
He said he believes the differential ways in which shame and guilt are experienced by men in a patriarchal society are decisive. “One way to understand these gender-based differences is to reflect that women are showing greater degrees of what psychoanalysts call ‘ego-strength’ than men do,” he said. “Women appear to be more able and willing than men are to bear and tolerate painful emotions, such as depression, without responding to them with destructive behaviors, such as suicide and homicide. It would seem that men are more likely to escape from the pain of depression by means of suicide rather than to bear that painful affect stoically.”
This is crucial, he said, because the “final common pathway” of all psychotherapy is sadness—“acquiring the strength and endurance to accept and bear the grief one feels over the losses one has experienced and to accomplish the most painful task of all, which is called mourning.”
He added, “Accepting the inevitability of one’s defeats and losses in life is in fact the psychological condition that is necessary to achieve in order to want to go on living rather than to [die by] suicide.”
He noted that the nonlethal suicide attempts of women are commonly (and, he believes, accurately) described as “pleas for help”—attempts to reach out for a relationship with another person. “This describes a healthier mode of functioning than is displayed by men, who have been taught from childhood on that to be a ‘real man’—an identity they have to achieve, as opposed to one they are born with—they must be self-reliant and neither ask for nor accept help from others, lest they appear to be weak and dependent.”
Gilligan said that patriarchy is often described as being to the advantage of men, but he suggested it is at least as destructive for men as it is for women—”which would be a good argument for changing many of the attitudes and values that our culture imposes on males, from childhood on.”
Encompassing and impacting all of these is the political and economic environment. Commenting at the start of the virtual conference, historian Thomas Kohut, Ph.D., a member of the Council of Scholars at the Erikson Institute and conference co-director, said, “At-risk people themselves often understand suicide not as an individual personal act, but as a profound social, cultural, and at times even political act and a social, cultural, and political form of communication.”
Suicide Follows Socioeconomic Tide
Gilligan cited three socioeconomic variables that have been shown to correlate with each other and also with rates of both suicide and homicide: the rate and duration of unemployment; the frequency, depth, and duration of economic contractions; and the rates of relative poverty or degree of economic inequality, as measured by the size of the gaps in income and wealth between the rich and the poor.
“It is understandable that these economic downturns expose those who are suffering … a loss of socioeconomic status to intense and sometimes overwhelming degrees of shame and humiliation, feelings of failure, and [feelings of] defeat,” Gilligan said. “It is hardly surprising that all three of those [factors] have also been shown to predict the increases and decreases in the rates of both suicide and homicide.”
Additionally, he noted that individuals who do not have health insurance die earlier and suffer more disability than those who have insurance. Meanwhile, the United States is the only country in the developed world without universal health coverage.
He asserted that these trends matching socioeconomic downturns with rising suicide and homicide rates can be correlated with specific policies, and he especially singled out the policies of successive Republican administrations and the efforts of the Trump administration to dismantle the Affordable Care Act.
“In the medical profession, many doctors have been advocating evidence-based medicine,” he said. “If we want to reduce the rates of suicide and all other forms of death in our society, we need evidence-based politics.”
In closing, Gilligan cited the 19th century German physician Rudolph Virchow, M.D., a prominent social reformer in the German parliament, who said, “Medicine is a social science, and politics is simply medicine on a larger scale.”
Gilligan called for a collective political agenda focused on “reverence for life.” “Our mission to prevent suicide is not only a professional vocation [as] mental health professionals,” he said. “It is also a political vocation, and in the largest sense of the word, a religious vocation, which is based, as all medicine worthy of the name is, on reverence for life.” ■
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Psychiatric News
History
Published online: 12 November 2020
Published in print: November 7, 2020 - November 20, 2020
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).