Skip to main content
Full access
Professional
Published Online: 18 March 2020

Diagnosis of Prolonged Grief Disorder Proposed for Inclusion in DSM-5

Data show that a cluster of symptoms that persist more than a year after the death of a loved one clearly differ from those that are part of the normal grieving process and are associated with poorer prognosis and greater functional impairment.
Paul Appelbaum, M.D., chair of the DSM Steering Committee, said the new criteria tested well on measures of validity and reliability.
David Hathcox
Public comments on a proposed diagnosis to be included in DSM—prolonged grief disorder—will be accepted beginning April 6. The diagnosis, if approved, would be added to Section II of DSM-5 in the chapter on depressive disorders. The category of persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD), which currently resides in Section III of the diagnostic manual under “Conditions for Further Study,” would be deleted.
The criteria will be posted on the APA website, where interested individuals can also post their comments. The comment period ends May 20. (See box for the criteria.)
Past APA President Paul Appelbaum, M.D., who is chair of the DSM Steering Committee, said the proposed diagnostic criteria are the result of years of deliberation by grief experts. “Several research groups have been working for a number of decades to study the phenomenon of prolonged grief after the death of a person who was close to the bereaved,” he told Psychiatric News. “Although a separate diagnostic category for prolonged grief had been proposed for previous editions of DSM, the supporting data had never been evaluated as sufficiently strong to warrant its inclusion.”

Proposed Criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder

A.
The death of a person close to the bereaved at least 12 months previously.
B.
Since the death, there has been a grief response characterized by intense yearning/longing for the deceased person or a preoccupation with thoughts or memories of the deceased person. This response has been present to a clinically significant degree nearly every day for at least the last month.
C.
As a result of the death, at least three of the following symptoms have been experienced to a clinically significant degree, nearly every day, for at least the last month:
1.
Identity disruption (e.g., feeling as though part of oneself has died)
2.
Marked sense of disbelief about the death
3.
Avoidance of reminders that the person is dead
4.
Intense emotional pain (e.g., anger, bitterness, sorrow) related to the death
5.
Difficulty moving on with life (e.g., problems engaging with friends, pursuing interests, planning for the future)
6.
Emotional numbness
7.
Feeling that life is meaningless
8.
Intense loneliness (i.e., feeling alone or detached from others)
D.
The disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
E.
The duration of the bereavement reaction clearly exceeds expected social, cultural, or religious norms for the individual’s culture and context.
F.
The symptoms are not better explained by another mental disorder.
By the time DSM-5 was being prepared for publication, however, there were enough data to include a category for PCBD in Section III as a “Conditions for Further Study.”
Appelbaum said the research groups involved in this work continued to collect new data and refine their approaches to diagnosis. This led to the submission in 2018 of a new proposal for a diagnosis for prolonged grief, with somewhat different criteria than PCBD in DSM-5.
In June 2019, the steering committee convened a workshop bringing together several research groups to review the criteria. Those groups were led by Katherine Shear, M.D., of Columbia University and Charles Reynolds, M.D., of the University of Pittsburgh; Holly Prigerson, Ph.D., and Paul Maciejewski, Ph.D., of Cornell; and Christopher Layne, Ph.D., and Robert Pynoos, M.D., of the University of California, Los Angeles. An expert panel chaired by David Brent, M.D., of the University of Pittsburgh, reviewed the data and identified areas of disagreement requiring resolution.
“That workshop resulted in tentative agreement on a set of diagnostic criteria that appeared to reflect a consensus based on the data in hand from the research groups,” Appelbaum said. “The criteria were tested on a number of datasets and performed well on measures of validity and reliability and were then finalized and approved for posting for public comment.”
He said the proposed criteria differ from the existing PCBD criteria in the following ways:
The new criteria recognize the possibility of delayed onset of symptoms in contrast to the PCBD criteria, which appear to require that the symptoms begin soon after the death. However, the new criteria require them to have been present to a clinically significant extent nearly every day for at least a month.
Greater emphasis has been given to the presence of intense yearning for the deceased person and preoccupation with thoughts of the person, with less emphasis on emotional pain or preoccupation with the circumstances of the death.
The data strongly suggest that the accuracy of the new diagnosis would be optimized by requiring three of eight additional symptoms, rather than six of the current 12.
Appelbaum added that researchers were attentive to a concern expressed by some that recognizing a diagnostic category of prolonged grief would “pathologize normal grieving.”
“The data from the research groups show that a cluster of symptoms that persist more than a year after death clearly differs from the normal grieving process and is associated with poorer prognosis and greater functional impairment,” he said. “Moreover, the development of treatments specifically targeting prolonged grief—distinct from the treatment of major depressive disorder—suggest substantial clinical utility to recognizing the disorder.” ■
Information about the updates to the DSM criteria and text for prolonged grief disorder are posted here.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 18 March 2020
Published in print: March 7, 2020 - March 20, 2020

Keywords

  1. Prolonged Grief Disorder
  2. DSM 5
  3. Comment period
  4. Paul Applebaum, M.D

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share