Skip to main content
Full access
Brief Reports
Published Online: 1 June 2016

Coping With Suicidal Thoughts: A Survey of Personal Experience

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of the study was to describe use of services and self-care strategies by people experiencing suicidal thoughts.

Methods:

Constituents of the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (N=611) completed an anonymous online survey regarding experience of suicidal ideation and use of a range of clinical services, community supports, and self-care strategies.

Results:

Mental health providers were the most frequently used and the most favorably rated source of support. Peer supports were less frequently used but also favorably rated. Emergency rooms and telephone crisis clinics were used less frequently and were rated less favorably. The most frequently used self-care strategies included engaging in distracting activities or social activities, using positive affirmations, exercising, and engaging in personal spiritual practices.

Conclusions:

Peer support may be an underutilized resource for coping with suicidal thoughts. Unfavorable ratings for emergency rooms and crisis clinics may indicate a need to develop more collaborative models of emergency care. Frequent use of spiritual practices suggests greater attention to spirituality may be a useful strategy in suicide prevention.
Suicide is the tenth-ranked cause of death in the United States, accounting for nearly 40,000 deaths per year (1). Nonfatal suicide attempts result in approximately 700,000 emergency department visits in the United States annually (2). Approximately 4% of U.S. adults (and 7% of those under age 25) reported experiencing thoughts of suicide or self-harm in a 12-month period (3).
Of U.S. residents who reported experiencing suicidal thoughts, only half reported receiving care from specialty mental health providers (4,5). One-third reported receiving care from general medical providers, and one-quarter reported help from human service providers or other nonmedical sources (5,6). For many people who experienced thoughts of suicide, the primary or sole sources of support were community resources, nonprofessional helpers, and self-care (7).
The Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA) conducted an informal online survey to describe use of various health and human services as well as use of specific self-care strategies by people who have experienced suicidal thoughts. The survey aimed to examine prevalence of using various sources of support and users’ perceptions of helpfulness of each.

Methods

DBSA is an educational, advocacy, and support organization for people living with mood disorders; the organization is governed, staffed, and run primarily by people with lived experience of depression and bipolar disorder. DBSA’s outreach activities include periodic constituent surveys regarding affected individuals’ and family members’ views regarding clinical, research, and policy issues. These surveys are available on the DBSA Web site, DBSAlliance.org; advertised via DBSA’s electronic newsletters for constituents and chapter leaders; and highlighted via DBSA’s social media channels. All surveys are anonymous; respondents are not asked to provide any identifying information.
A survey regarding individuals’ personal experience of coping with suicidal thoughts was posted on the Web site and the other outlets from February 28 through May 28, 2013. Topics within the survey include personal experience with suicidal ideation and behavior, experiences with sources of care or support regarding suicidal ideation, experience with personal self-care or wellness strategies, and attitudes regarding suicide prevention. Survey items were developed collaboratively by DBSA staff, individuals with lived experience of suicidal ideation, and mental health researchers. Questions regarding specific sources of support and self-care strategies include both Likert-type ratings of helpfulness and open-ended questions with space for comments. [The complete survey text is provided in the online supplement to this report.]
All respondents were advised about the goals and content of the survey, including our intent to publish survey results. Because all responses were anonymous and no protected health information was collected, written informed consent was not required.

Results

Of 611 survey respondents, 588 (96%) reported ever having “thoughts about harming yourself or killing yourself,” 460 (75%) reported ever having “made a plan to harm yourself or try to kill yourself,” 293 (48%) reported ever having “done something to try to kill yourself,” 315 (52%) reported ever having been “admitted to a hospital because of suicidal thoughts or a suicide attempt,” and 203 (33%) reported ever having been “held or treated against your will because of suicidal thoughts or a suicide attempt.” Subsequent results were limited to the 588 respondents who reported a history of suicidal thoughts. [Results for the full sample are in the online supplement.]
Questions and responses regarding use of various sources of help or support are shown in Table 1. The most commonly reported sources of help for suicidal thoughts were mental health professionals (therapists and psychiatrists) and family members. Use of peer support was also frequent, with three out of four receiving individual support from speaking with peers, over half attending an in-person peer support group, and about one-third receiving online peer support. One-half reported ever seeking help from an emergency department because of suicidal thoughts, and only one-third reported ever calling a crisis line.
TABLE 1. Use and perceived helpfulness of professional services, other supports, and self-care strategies when experiencing suicidal thoughts
 Ever usedPerceived helpfulness among those ever using resource
 (N=588)HarmfulNot helpfulSomewhat helpfulVery helpful
ResourceN%N%N%N%N%
Source of help or support          
 Talking to a therapist or counselor511878256112344621342
 Talking to a psychiatrist4768120471152375014831
 Talking to family members44876651415535162366615
 Talking to peers43073368104241914419923
 Talking to a family or primary care doctor3736316413336166455816
 Attending a support group303521035117143479933
 Going to an emergency department2814837137928103376222
 Talking to clergy or a spiritual adviser220373918532487404119
 Calling a crisis clinic205352512522587424120
 Going online for peer support17630106402384484224
Self-care strategy          
 Doing things to stay busy56796102107192965215427
 Watching films, TV, or other forms of entertainment5609519316229296538315
 Doing things with other people55494163116212965312622
 Using positive self-talk or affirmations532907117433268508316
 Exercising506866196192755412926
 Turning to prayer, meditation, or spiritual practice49384153127262034114830
 Taking extra medication4257271179322182437919
 Drinking alcohol or using street drugs376641594298269024298
Also shown in the upper portion of Table 1 are responses regarding perceived helpfulness of each source of support. Ratings of helpfulness were limited to those reporting some use of that service or resource. Respondents’ experiences varied considerably, with every resource being described as very helpful by a significant proportion and every resource being described as harmful by at least a few. Interactions with therapists or psychiatrists were described most favorably, with over 80% of respondents describing those interactions as somewhat or very helpful. Various types of support from peers (individually, in support groups, or online) were described as somewhat or very helpful by 65%−80% of respondents. Respondents’ experiences with emergency rooms and telephone crisis clinics were more mixed, with approximately half reporting those encounters as somewhat or very helpful but 10%−15% describing them as harmful. Experiences with support from family members or clergy were similarly mixed. Respondents’ free-text comments (online supplement) illustrate the diversity of experience with different sources of support.
Additional analyses examined perceived helpfulness according to personal history of suicide attempt (online supplement). Talking with primary care physicians was rated as not helpful or as harmful by 49% (N=99) of those with a history of suicide attempt, compared with 29% (N=50) of those without a suicide attempt. Talking with family members regarding suicidal thoughts was rated as not helpful or harmful by 57% (N=133) of those with a personal history of suicide attempt compared with 40% (N=87) of those without such history. Helpfulness ratings for other services or resources did not differ between those with and without a history of suicide attempt.
Questions and responses regarding use of various self-care strategies are also shown in Table 1. Over 80% of respondents reported some experience with positive self-talk; prayer or meditation; social contact; physical activity; scheduling activities to stay busy; or distraction by movies, television, or other entertainment. Nearly two-thirds reported ever having used alcohol or street drugs to attempt to manage suicidal thoughts.
Also shown in Table 1 are responses regarding perceived helpfulness of various self-care strategies. Most self-care strategies were described as somewhat or very helpful by 70% or more of respondents. Prayer or meditation was most often rated as very helpful—by nearly one-third of survey participants. In contrast, use of alcohol or street drugs was infrequently reported as helpful and was experienced as harmful by over 40%. Taking extra medication to cope with suicidal thoughts was reported as very helpful by about one in five respondents and as harmful by an approximately equal number. Free-text comments (online supplement) illustrate the diversity of experience with various self-care strategies.
Additional analyses examined perceived helpfulness of self-care strategies according to personal history of suicide attempt (online supplement). Respondents with a personal history of suicide attempt were more likely than those without such a history to report that using extra medication to manage suicidal thoughts was not helpful or was harmful (45%, N=106, versus 30%, N=59). Perceived helpfulness of other self-care strategies did not vary according to personal history of suicide attempt.
When asked about attitudes toward suicide prevention, 73% (N=441) of respondents somewhat or strongly agreed with the statement that suicide is often preventable. Whereas 72% (N=435) somewhat or strongly agreed that involuntary treatment is sometimes necessary, 52% (N=313) somewhat or strongly endorsed being reluctant to speak with health care providers about suicidal ideation. Opinions regarding preventability of suicide, willingness to speak with providers about suicidal thoughts, and appropriateness of involuntary treatment did not differ significantly between respondents with and without a personal history of either a suicide attempt or involuntary treatment (online supplement).

Discussion

The methods of this survey (anonymous responses to a broad public invitation) resulted in important limitations. For example, we were not able to describe respondents’ demographic characteristics, diagnoses, or histories of treatment. We could not determine the number of people reached by survey invitations or the proportion of those reached who responded. Consequently, we could not assess representativeness of this sample compared with all people living with mood disorders or all people who experience suicidal thoughts. Compared with previous community surveys regarding suicidal thoughts (4,5), in our survey respondents were more likely to report use of specialty mental care. Likelihood of responding to the survey may have been related to past experiences; those who were especially satisfied or especially dissatisfied with specific services may have been more likely to respond.
Despite the limitations, these data provide a unique view of the experiences and views of people who have experienced suicidal thoughts or attempted suicide. We are not aware of other data regarding the use and perceived helpfulness of the full range of professional services, community services, and self-care for people experiencing thoughts of suicide or self-harm.
In combination with population-based data from other sources (46), these survey findings have implications for suicide prevention efforts across a range of health care and human service settings. Although respondents to our surveys typically reported positive experiences with specialty mental health providers, only half of community residents experiencing suicidal ideation (and half of people who die by suicide) receive specialty mental health care (4,8). A larger proportion of people experiencing suicidal ideation see general medical providers for help (5,6), but our survey respondents reported such contacts as only moderately helpful. Improving the quality or helpfulness of suicide prevention services in general medical settings appears to be a priority.
Our survey findings also suggest that additional attention needs to be devoted to experiences with emergency resources. Our respondents reported relatively low utilization of emergency departments and telephone crisis clinics, the expected sources of round-the-clock emergency care for suicide risk. In addition, those emergency resources were among the services most often rated as unhelpful or harmful. This higher rate of negative experiences may reflect the circumstances in which individuals often encounter these services: an urgent or crisis situation in which people may fear coercive or involuntary treatment. A 2009 survey of users of a suicide prevention helpline found generally high rates of satisfaction (9). Nevertheless, the increased frequency of negative ratings for emergency or crisis service settings suggests a need to reconsider how these services might collaborate more with people in crisis. A survey of emergency department providers (10) identified a need for additional training regarding assessment of and counseling and referral for people with suicidal thoughts. Addressing consumers’ negative perceptions of existing emergency services may require additional training for emergency care providers or increased availability of alternative emergency care resources, including respite services and peer-provided services.
Services most frequently used were among those described as most helpful, and those least often used were rated less favorably. The exceptions to this pattern were support from family members and peer support services (both peer support group and online peer support). Support from family members was often used but also had relatively high prevalence of unfavorable experiences. Conversely, peer support services were used by less than half of those responding but were among the most favorably rated by our survey respondents. This combination of relatively infrequent use and high rates of perceived helpfulness suggests a missed opportunity: increasing awareness and availability of organized peer support resources could have significant benefit for people who experience suicidal thoughts.
Self-care activities appear to be the most common strategies for dealing with suicidal thoughts. This finding is consistent with Alexander and colleagues’ (7) previous assessment of lived experience of suicidal ideation. High rates of utilization and high ratings for helpfulness of prayer or meditation were notable. Spirituality or religious practice are not emphasized by most structured psychotherapies for mood disorders or by therapies specifically developed to manage suicidal ideation. Our findings suggest that mental health and human service providers may want to ask people presenting with suicidal ideation about their use of a variety of spiritual practices. Our data suggest that meditation, prayer, and other personal spiritual practices can be helpful self-care tools for a significant proportion of people coping with suicidal thoughts. Although personal spiritual practices were often rated as helpful, it is notable that talking with clergy or other spiritual advisers received relatively low ratings for helpfulness.
Also of note were high rates of use and high ratings for helpfulness of various activities to distract attention from suicidal thoughts (exercise, social contact, and entertainment, for example). Providers should consider these strategies as potentially useful parts of self-care or crisis management plans.
Use of extra medication was often rated unfavorably (second only to use of alcohol and street drugs). We cannot determine, however, whether respondents were describing provider-supervised use of “rescue” medications or self-directed overuse of anxiolytic or sedative-hypnotic drugs.

Conclusions

Attitudes regarding suicide prevention revealed an important paradox. Over 70% of respondents agreed that suicide is often preventable, and a similar proportion agreed that involuntary or forced treatment is sometimes necessary. Nevertheless, over half indicated reluctance to speak with doctors or therapists regarding suicidal thoughts. Our survey did not address reasons for that reluctance. Understanding and addressing barriers to open communication regarding suicidal thoughts should be a priority for future research.

Supplementary Material

File (appi.ps.201500281.ds001.pdf)

References

1.
Deaths: Final Data for 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, Md, National Center for Health Statistics, 2015
2.
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2008 Emergency Department Summary Tables. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/nhamcsed2008.pdf
3.
Crosby AE, Han B, Ortega LAG, et al: Suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adults aged ≥18 years—United States, 2008–2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 60:1–22, 2011
4.
Ahmedani BK, Perron B, Ilgen M, et al: Suicide thoughts and attempts and psychiatric treatment utilization: informing prevention strategies. Psychiatric Services 63:186–189, 2012
5.
Bruffaerts R, Demyttenaere K, Hwang I, et al: Treatment of suicidal people around the world. British Journal of Psychiatry 199:64–70, 2011
6.
Bruffaerts R, Demyttenaere K, Borges G, et al: Treatment of suicidal persons around the world; in Suicide: Global Perspectives From the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Edited by Nock MK, Borges G, Ono Y. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012
7.
Alexander MJ, Haugland G, Ashenden P, et al: Coping with thoughts of suicide: techniques used by consumers of mental health services. Psychiatric Services 60:1214–1221, 2009
8.
Ahmedani BK, Simon GE, Stewart C, et al: Health care contacts in the year before suicide death. Journal of General Internal Medicine 29:870–877, 2014
9.
Coveney CM, Pollock K, Armstrong S, et al: Callers’ experiences of contacting a national suicide prevention helpline: report of an online survey. Crisis 33:313–324, 2012
10.
Betz ME, Sullivan AF, Manton AP, et al: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of emergency department providers in the care of suicidal patients. Depression and Anxiety 30:1005–1012, 2013

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services

Cover: Bowl, interior, Zuni People, circa 1889. Painted terracotta MNC12330. Cité de la Ceramique, Sevres, France. Photo: Martine Beck-Coppola.

Psychiatric Services
Pages: 1026 - 1029
PubMed: 27247170

History

Received: 15 July 2015
Revision received: 19 October 2015
Revision received: 24 December 2015
Accepted: 1 February 2016
Published online: 1 June 2016
Published in print: September 01, 2016

Authors

Affiliations

Gregory E. Simon, M.D., M.P.H.
Dr. Simon is with the Group Health Research Institute of the Group Health Cooperative, Seattle (e-mail: [email protected]). Ms. Specht and Mr. Doederlein are with the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, Chicago.
Cynthia Specht, B.A.
Dr. Simon is with the Group Health Research Institute of the Group Health Cooperative, Seattle (e-mail: [email protected]). Ms. Specht and Mr. Doederlein are with the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, Chicago.
Allen Doederlein, B.A.
Dr. Simon is with the Group Health Research Institute of the Group Health Cooperative, Seattle (e-mail: [email protected]). Ms. Specht and Mr. Doederlein are with the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, Chicago.

Notes

Findings from this study were presented at the 17th annual conference of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, Toronto, June 5, 2015.

Funding Information

National Institute of Mental Health10.13039/100000025: U19MH092201
This work was supported by Cooperative Agreement U19MH092201 from the National Institute of Mental Health.The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share