Skip to main content
Full access
Letters
Published Online: 1 December 2017

Predictors of Staff Attitudes Toward Schizophrenia Treatments

TO THE EDITOR: Despite the existence of a range of evidence-based psychological interventions, the treatment of schizophrenia remains largely pharmacological (1). Lack of available nonpharmacological therapies for people with schizophrenia may be partly due to the attitudes of mental health professionals toward people with this disorder (2,3).
Whereas the attitudes of lay people toward schizophrenia have been extensively researched, mental health professionals’ views remain underresearched. Compared with the general public, some professionals seem to have less negative attitudes regarding dangerousness and unpredictability in schizophrenia and more optimistic views about usefulness of treatments and recovery (2,3). However, evidence of professionals’ negative attitudes also exists, especially regarding prognosis and the capacity of people with schizophrenia to participate in collaborative therapeutic relationships (4).
We conducted a survey to explore whether mental health professionals’ attitudes toward various treatments for people diagnosed as having schizophrenia were predicted by professional staff’s beliefs about people with this disorder. We hypothesized that professionals who more strongly recommend long-term medication and less strongly endorse psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia would be more convinced that people with this disorder are dangerous and unpredictable; these professionals also would be more pessimistic about recovery, more skeptical about the capacity of people with schizophrenia to have trusting service user–staff relationships, and less positive about the role of family as a resource for the patient.
The survey, approved by the Research Ethical Board of the Department of Psychology of Campania University, was carried out at the Mental Health Department of Caserta, Italy, from October 2015 to February 2016. Of the 302 professionals approached, 166 (55%) gave written informed consent and completed a questionnaire about people with schizophrenia and a range of treatments (5). [An online supplement provides details.] Ninety (54%) were female; the mean±SD age was 50.1±7.3 years; 134 (81%) were married or cohabiting; 32 (19%) were psychiatrists, 24 (14%) were psychosocial staff, and 110 (66%) were nursing or other health care staff.
Relationships between professionals’ views of people with schizophrenia and their families and beliefs about need for long-term medication and usefulness of psychosocial intervention were initially explored by Spearman’s r coefficients [see online supplement]. The simultaneous effects of views of people with schizophrenia and of their families on respondents’ beliefs about medication and psychosocial interventions were investigated by regression analyses.
Professionals who were more certain about the necessity of long-term medication more firmly believed that people with schizophrenia are dangerous (β=.24, p<.01) and incapable of a trusting relationship with staff (β=–.33, p<.001; F=17.59, df=4 and 135, p<.001; r2=.34). Professionals who attributed greater usefulness to psychosocial interventions had a lower perception of patients’ unpredictability (β=–.30, p<.001) and a more optimistic view about prognosis (β=.19, p<.05) and the role of families (β=.26, p<.001; F=11.8, df=5 and 131, p<.001; r2=.31).
These findings suggest that educating staff about stigma may help increase the provision of psychosocial interventions (1). Future studies should investigate whether improving service user–staff relationships—by helping professionals to identify a more positive focus and place greater value in their relationships with people with schizophrenia (4)—may help reduce prejudice and its effects on which treatments are offered to people with this disorder.

Supplementary Material

File (appi.ps.201700257.ds001.pdf)

References

1.
Harris A, Boyce P: Why do we not use psychosocial interventions in the treatment of schizophrenia? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 47:501–504, 2013
2.
Schulze B: Stigma and mental health professionals: a review of the evidence on an intricate relationship. International Review of Psychiatry 19:137–155, 2007
3.
Wahl OA: Attitudes of mental health professionals about mental illness: a review of the recent literature. Journal of Community Psychology 38:49–62, 2010
4.
Hewitt J, Coffey M: Therapeutic working relationships with people with schizophrenia: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 52:561–570, 2005
5.
Magliano L, Strino A, Punzo R, et al: Effects of the diagnostic label “schizophrenia,” actively used or passively accepted, on general practitioners’ views of this disorder. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 63:224–234, 2017

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services

Cover: New York City Views. Skaters Near 59th Street, Samuel H. Gottscho. Museum of the City of New York. Photo credit: Museum of the City of New York/Art Resource, New York City.

Psychiatric Services
Pages: 1321
PubMed: 29191145

History

Published online: 1 December 2017
Published in print: December 01, 2017

Keywords

  1. Schizophrenia
  2. Attitudes toward mental illness
  3. Staff relationships/roles
  4. Community psychiatry

Authors

Details

Lorenza Magliano, M.D., Ph.D. [email protected]
Dr. Magliano and Dr. Affuso are with the Department of Psychology, Campania University “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Caserta, Italy. Prof. Read is with the School of Psychology, University of East London, London.
John Read, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Dr. Magliano and Dr. Affuso are with the Department of Psychology, Campania University “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Caserta, Italy. Prof. Read is with the School of Psychology, University of East London, London.
Gaetana Affuso, Ph.D.
Dr. Magliano and Dr. Affuso are with the Department of Psychology, Campania University “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Caserta, Italy. Prof. Read is with the School of Psychology, University of East London, London.

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Magliano (e-mail: [email protected]).

Funding Information

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share