Both posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (
1) and chronic pain (
2) are prevalent and highly comorbid in the U.S. population. A nationally representative U.S. study indicated that, compared with individuals without PTSD, those with PTSD have a higher prevalence of musculoskeletal, digestive, and nerve pain conditions (
3). For active duty and veteran populations, these comorbid conditions are especially noteworthy. Rates of chronic pain are higher among active duty service members and veterans than among their civilian counterparts (
4), and chronic pain and PTSD often co-occur after combat deployment (
5–
9). Compared with the prevalence of PTSD in civilian populations with chronic pain, PTSD prevalence among veterans with chronic pain may be as high as 50% (
10). Much of the literature examining the presence of and treatment for comorbid chronic pain and PTSD comes largely from studies of veterans, although the co-occurrence of both conditions is relevant across both civilian and military settings.
Comorbid chronic pain and PTSD may be associated with worse outcomes and reduced quality of life, relative to chronic pain or PTSD alone. Compared with veterans with chronic pain only, those with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD symptoms reported higher pain intensity and higher levels of pain-related disability (
6). Among veterans of the Afghanistan or Iraq conflicts who received care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system and received an opioid prescription, those who also had a PTSD diagnosis were more likely to receive opioids for pain diagnoses, higher-dose opioids, two or more concurrent opioids, concurrent hypnotic prescriptions, and early opioid refills, compared with those without PTSD and those with other mental health conditions (
11). These findings are mirrored by those with a nationally representative U.S. civilian sample, in which comorbidity of chronic pain and PTSD was associated with a greater risk for opioid use disorder (
3).
Mental disorders among veterans, including PTSD, are associated with increased behavioral health and nonbehavioral health care utilization (
12–
14), yet few studies have focused on populations with comorbid chronic pain (
15,
16). In a study of veterans treated in the VHA system in 2002–2007, those with comorbid pain and PTSD had 7% more primary care visits and 25% more pain specialty visits than the group with chronic pain only and 46% more primary care visits than the group with PTSD only (
17). Only about 50% of eligible veterans utilize VHA health care services after leaving the military (
18,
19); thus, examining health care utilization patterns of military members in the Military Health System (MHS) provides a more complete picture of treatment received among individuals with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD.
The MHS has taken steps to address both chronic pain and PTSD with a patient-centered approach (
20). This approach includes establishing interdisciplinary and integrative pain management approaches (
21,
22) and promoting clinical practice guidelines for delivering high-quality mental health services for military members with PTSD (
23,
24). These models often incorporate nonpharmacologic treatments for pain treatment and comorbid conditions (
25,
26). The goal of this study was to examine the prevalence of chronic pain alone, PTSD alone, and chronic pain together with PTSD among U.S. Army soldiers during the postdeployment year. For these three clinical subgroups, we examined receipt of nonpharmacologic treatment (such as therapeutic exercise and chiropractic treatment), prescription opioids, and other health care services. Last, because opioid prescriptions increase the risk for adverse outcomes (
27,
28), we examined the association of PTSD with receipt of an opioid days’ supply of >30 days during the postdeployment year among members in the chronic pain subgroup.
Methods
Data Sources
Data from 576,425 Army active duty soldiers were extracted from the MHS Data Repository for the Substance Use and Psychological Injury Combat (SUPIC) study. In the SUPIC study, data were included for all soldiers returning from an Afghanistan or Iraq deployment in fiscal years 2008–2014. Additional details on the methods for the SUPIC study are described by Larson and colleagues (
29). Data from the SUPIC study include all pharmacologic treatments and outpatient and inpatient specialist and nonspecialist health care from all ambulatory claims and admissions in military “direct care” settings and civilian “purchased care” settings covered by TRICARE. Other data sources included pain scores from vital records of the Clinical Data Repository and deployment information from the Contingency Management System.
This study was approved by Brandeis University’s Committee for Protection of Human Subjects; the Human Research Protection Program of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs/Defense Health Agency conducted the human subjects review. The Defense Health Agency’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Office executed the data use agreements.
Sample Classification
The sample was classified by two characteristics observed during the postdeployment year: clinically significant chronic pain and receipt of a PTSD diagnosis. Clinically significant chronic pain was defined by duration of a pain diagnosis as the reason for care and duration of moderate or greater pain severity. Specifically, we required the presence of at least two ambulatory records with primary diagnoses of pain conditions, identified in our previous research of the same pain category (
30) and spanning at least 90 days during the year, and self-reported pain scores of 4–10 (i.e., moderate to severe) on the numeric pain-rating scale for two or more encounters spanning at least 90 days (
31). Soldiers classified as not having chronic pain may have received pain treatment but did not meet both the duration and pain intensity definitions. PTSD was based on the presence of the
ICD-9-CM diagnosis code 309.81 in any position for any ambulatory or hospital care encounter. Our analysis required only one PTSD diagnosis, reflecting a concern that military providers are reluctant to record PTSD diagnoses (
32,
33). In a sensitivity analysis, we used a more conservative PTSD definition, requiring one inpatient PTSD diagnosis, two outpatient PTSD diagnoses, or one PTSD diagnosis and a positive result for PTSD on the Primary Care PTSD Screen (
34,
35) from the postdeployment health assessment or reassessment surveys (81% [N=23,721] of the PTSD sample [N=29,285], met this conservative definition).
Pharmacologic Treatments
To identify pharmacologic treatments for chronic pain, PTSD, or both, we analyzed records from the Department of Defense (DoD) Pharmacy Data Transaction Service, a comprehensive file that included all prescriptions dispensed to the soldiers in the sample. Each prescription record contained the days’ supply, which we summed for the postdeployment year. We classified opioid prescription utilization during the postdeployment year as an opioid days’ supply of ≥7 days or an opioid days’ supply of >30 days. Our definition of opioid prescriptions can be found in Adams et al. (
36). Using the therapeutic classification of the American Hospital Formulary System, we selected other pharmacologic treatments for analysis, including tramadol (a weak opioid, scheduled as a controlled drug in 2014), other analgesics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), benzodiazepines, and antipsychotics. We calculated the mean annual days’ supply for each medication class.
Nonpharmacologic Treatments
Using procedure codes for ambulatory claims or encounters, we identified a set of nonpharmacologic treatment modalities that might be used for chronic pain or PTSD conditions, on the basis of our review of research and clinical guidelines studies (
37–
39). Nonpharmacologic treatments were organized into four large groups and were not mutually exclusive: therapeutic exercise, chiropractic and osteopathic spinal manipulation, complementary procedures (acupuncture, biofeedback, and cold laser), and other physical therapy procedures such as massage, heat, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, traction, ultrasound, and lumbar supports. All nonpharmacologic treatments were assessed during the postdeployment year.
Other Health Care Utilization Measures
We included summary measures for any inpatient admission and the number of emergency department visits during the postdeployment year as descriptive measures of overall health status. We also used procedure codes to include measures of mental health specialty treatment and substance use specialty treatment.
Functional Measures
As a measure of functional ability, we also determined whether soldiers received any outpatient evaluation at a military treatment facility and had a documented duty limitation or work restriction for any reason, including assignment to quarters, restricted duty, or hospital admission.
Statistical Analysis
We present estimates of health care service receipt among soldiers within four subgroups: no chronic pain or PTSD, chronic pain only, PTSD only, and comorbid chronic pain and PTSD. Statistical comparisons of the percentage of soldiers with nonpharmacologic treatment utilization were made between the chronic pain groups (with and without PTSD) and between the PTSD groups (with and without chronic pain). For each medication class, we compared mean total days’ supply among users. Chi-square tests were used for categorical measures and the test of means for continuous measures, with statistical significance set at p<0.001.
We conducted logistic regression models on annual opioid days’ supply of >30 days to assess the independent association of receiving a PTSD diagnosis, controlling for four nonpharmacologic treatment modalities. Because the dependent variable was opioid receipt, we restricted this analysis to the chronic pain subgroup (N=70,309). To further investigate the potential role of PTSD as a moderator of nonpharmacologic treatments, interaction terms of PTSD status with each nonpharmacologic treatment modality were added to the regression model. Analyses controlled for age, sex, race or ethnicity, marital status, fiscal year of the end of the deployment, and military rank. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and p values are reported. We conducted a sensitivity analysis by reestimating the logistic regression restricting our sample to soldiers who met the aforementioned conservative PTSD definition (i.e., the 81% of the PTSD subsample). The analyses were conducted with SAS software, version 9.4.
Results
The SUPIC active duty cohort (N=576,425) was predominantly male (89.3%, N=514,502), White and non-Hispanic (57.1%, N=328,910), married (58.4%, N=336,757), and in the 18–24-year age range (40.7%, N=234,431). Of the cohort, 12.2% (N=70,309) met the definition for having clinically significant chronic pain during the postdeployment year, 5.1% (N=29,285) had a PTSD diagnosis, and 1.8% had both (N=10,153). Among soldiers with chronic pain, 14.4% (N=10,153) had a comorbid PTSD diagnosis, whereas among soldiers without chronic pain, only 3.8% (N=19,132) had a PTSD diagnosis. In all subgroups, the prevalence of a PTSD diagnosis was higher among soldiers with chronic pain than among those without chronic pain. (A table showing data on which these percentages are based is available as an online supplement to this article.)
More than one-half (N=5,513) of the soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD received an opioid days’ supply of ≥7 days in the postdeployment year. Nearly one-third of these soldiers (31.4%, N=3,191) received an opioid days’ supply of >30 days, a proportion that was higher than in all other subgroups (
Table 1). More than one-third of those with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD (N=3,551) received tramadol. Almost all soldiers with chronic pain received other analgesic medications, although the average days’ supply of these medications was higher among soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD than among those with chronic pain only. The percentages of utilization of SSRIs or SNRIs, benzodiazepines, and antipsychotics, medications most commonly associated with psychiatric diagnosis, were higher for soldiers with PTSD or chronic pain than for those without those diagnoses and was highest for those with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD. More than one-third (N=3,585) of the soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD received a benzodiazepine prescription, and one-third (N=3,361) received an antipsychotic prescription.
Soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD had the highest receipt of nonpharmacologic treatment and mental health specialty treatment (
Table 2). More than three-fourths (80.3%, N=8,150) of the soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD received at least one nonpharmacologic treatment, a proportion significantly higher than that for soldiers with chronic pain only and more than double the percentage of soldiers with PTSD only. Most in the group with chronic pain and PTSD received therapeutic exercise. Utilization of mental health specialty treatment was nearly universal among subgroups with PTSD. Utilization of specialty substance use treatment was higher in the subgroups with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD and with PTSD only, compared with the subgroups without PTSD.
Soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD had the highest utilization of overall health care services and were the most likely to experience a duty limitation, compared with other subgroups (
Table 3). Approximately one-third of the soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD had an inpatient admission; this was greater than for those with chronic pain only (11.5%, N=6,935) or those with PTSD only (22.3%, N= 4,274). Nearly two-thirds of soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD (N= 6,694) had an emergency department visit. The PTSD-only group had nearly twice the rate of inpatient admissions, and equivalent rates of emergency department use, as the group with chronic pain only.
The results of the logistic regression model showed that soldiers with a PTSD diagnosis (main effect) had 1.4 times higher odds of receiving an opioid days’ supply of >30 days, relative to soldiers without PTSD diagnosis (
Table 4). However, the odds ratios (ORs) represented by the significant interaction terms of PTSD and chiropractic care (OR>1) and acupuncture care (OR<1) indicated that the effect of PTSD depended on treatments received. Soldiers with PTSD who received chiropractic or spinal manipulation services had increased odds of receiving an opioid days’ supply of >30 days, relative to those with no chiropractic or spinal manipulation services. Those with PTSD who received acupuncture, biofeedback, or cold laser had reduced odds of receiving an opioid days’ supply of >30 days, compared with those without such care. No other statistically significant interactions were detected. The coefficients for covariates indicated significantly reduced odds of receiving an opioid days’ supply of >30 days among female soldiers; the youngest age group (relative to the 30–34-year age group); Black non-Hispanic, Hispanic, and other race ethnicity (relative to White, non-Hispanic soldiers); and all ranks (relative to junior enlisted). The odds of receiving an opioid days’ supply of >30 days were higher among married soldiers (relative to never married) and among Asian and Pacific Islander soldiers (relative to White, non-Hispanic soldiers).
In sensitivity analysis restricted to confirmed PTSD cases (81% of the PTSD sample; N=23,721), these findings were replicated, and the coefficients and confidence intervals for the key independent variables were nearly identical, although the p value increased from p<0.05 to p<0.066 for the interaction of PTSD and therapeutic exercise, reflecting the smaller sample size.
Discussion
These findings highlight the unique health care needs of patients with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD in a population of active duty soldiers returning from deployment. We found that 12.2% had clinically significant chronic pain with self-reports of moderate to severe pain intensity that lasted >3 months in the postdeployment year. Among soldiers with chronic pain, 14.4% had a comorbid PTSD diagnosis, representing 1.8% of the entire active duty study population (N=10,153). Soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD had substantially greater health care utilization, including nonpharmacologic treatment, inpatient hospitalizations, and emergency visits, than the other three subgroups. Furthermore, nearly all had documented limited duty restrictions or days out of work. Although such health care utilization patterns suggest overall burden, these analyses did not determine whether the pharmacologic treatment utilization occurred first, followed by nonpharmacologic treatment. Research is warranted to understand the extent to which early and intensive health care intervention mitigates the risk for more expensive health care encounters, such as hospitalizations, and whether work impairment is influenced by treatment choices, for example, whether it is associated with opioid or benzodiazepine use.
Recent clinical guidelines developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the DoD urge providers to select short-duration opioids when prescribing opioids for pain treatment and suggest using nonpharmacologic treatment as a first option in chronic pain management (
28). In one case-control study of >18,000 soldiers, those with opioid dependence were 28 times more likely to have had a previous PTSD diagnosis, compared with those without opioid dependence (
40). To improve guideline-concordant care, close monitoring of continued benefits among patients receiving opioids may mitigate the risk for adverse effects, particularly among those with PTSD. Interdisciplinary pain management approaches and nonpharmacologic treatment both have been found effective in treating chronic pain (
39,
41,
42), and the MHS has expanded access to interdisciplinary pain management (
43,
44). In the present sample, 16.9% of soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD were seen by substance use treatment specialists (
Table 2); future research should examine the utility of involving behavioral health clinicians at the time of the decision to initiate opioid-based treatment of soldiers, particularly of those with PTSD. Although our data focused primarily on active duty soldiers, the implications of this study could be relevant also for civilians. Opioid prescription use is higher among civilians with PTSD and chronic pain than among those without PTSD (
45). Moreover, the likelihood of an opioid use disorder is higher among civilians with PTSD and chronic pain than among those without either condition (
3).
Nonpharmacologic treatments such as acupuncture, yoga, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and meditation have been associated with clinical improvements of PTSD symptoms or clinical improvements in managing both PTSD and chronic pain (
46–
52). The
VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Reaction suggests that mindfulness, yoga, acupuncture, and massage may facilitate a relaxation response (
53). Consistent with this, our study found that receipt of acupuncture, biofeedback, or cold laser was more likely to be associated with reduced opioid use among those with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD than among those with chronic pain only. Our results showed that spinal manipulation is effective for soldiers with chronic pain but not in the presence of PTSD. Future research should examine whether spinal manipulation may exacerbate hyperarousal or other PTSD symptoms.
We report very high utilization of mental health specialty treatment among soldiers with PTSD and note that the MHS has worked to identify PTSD among military members, including systematic PTSD screening after deployment (
34). The medical records we used did not indicate the degree to which behavioral health therapy was trauma focused, nor did we assess therapy duration or timing.
Overall, the findings of this study highlight the need for integrative, patient-centered models of care to ensure patients with chronic pain and with PTSD are assessed early for comorbid conditions, given the prevalence of these conditions and their impact on subsequent health care utilization. As health care systems move to adopt value-based initiatives, it is important to consider the unique health care needs of those with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD, such as the role of coordinating care among multiple providers and consolidation of multidisciplinary treatments in single clinics, including multidisciplinary pain or behavioral health centers. Mitigating the risk for inpatient and emergency department admissions among patients with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD through more intensive treatment schedules and coordinated care may not only improve patient outcomes but also reduce long-term health care costs and burden overall.
Our study had several limitations, primarily associated with the observational study design and reliance on secondary analysis of administrative data. Because the patients were not randomly assigned to treatment, we could not infer any causal relationships. Further, we did not study the sequence of diagnoses and treatment events; thus, we could not distinguish the causal relationship between chronic pain and PTSD or causal relationships between these conditions and health care utilization and between their co-occurrence and health care utilization. It is likely that the prevalence of PTSD was underestimated because its diagnosis was identified in the context of service utilization rather than through population screening and assessment. Finally, opioid prescribing for active duty service members began to decline in 2011 (
54), in the middle of our study window. Although we did include a measure of fiscal year at the end of deployment in the logistic regression models to control for changes in prescription over time, additional research is needed to determine whether the study findings persist as prescribing trends continue to change after the end of our study period.
Conclusions
Soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD have complex treatment needs and require access to specialty care. This study provides evidence that mental health specialty services were widely utilized by this patient group, but some nonpharmacologic modalities may be underutilized. The results also reflected a high prevalence of opioid receipt and prescriptions for benzodiazepines and antipsychotic medications that warrant close monitoring, particularly among soldiers with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD. Future studies should assess the impact of MHS-wide changes to pain management and mental health care in improving guideline-concordant care.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Axiom Resources Management for compiling the data files used in these analyses. The Defense Health Agency’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Office provided access to Department of Defense (DoD) data. The authors thank Sharon Reif, Ph.D., for contributions to the study’s pain measures; Alex H. S. Harris, Ph.D., for contributions to the overall study; William Becker, M.D., for clinical consultation on classification of opioid agents; Natalie Moresco, M.A., and Sue Lee, M.S., for analysis programming; and Col. (ret.) Chester Buckenmaier, III, M.D., who was the DoD data sponsor.