Site maintenance Wednesday, November 13th, 2024. Please note that access to some content and account information will be unavailable on this date.
Skip to main content
Full access
Brief Reports
Published Online: 26 August 2021

Increases in Inpatient Psychiatry Beds Operated by Systems, For-Profits, and Chains, 2010–2016

Abstract

Objective:

This study explored trends in the quantity of inpatient psychiatry beds and in facility characteristics.

Methods:

Using the National Bureau of Economic Research’s Health Systems and Provider Database, the authors examined changes in the number of psychiatric facilities and beds, focusing on system ownership, profit status, facility type (general acute care versus freestanding), and affiliation with psychiatric hospital chains from 2010 to 2016.

Results:

The number of psychiatric beds was relatively unchanged from 2010 (N=112,182 beds) to 2016 (N=111,184). However, the number of beds operated by systems increased by 39.8% (N=15,803); for-profits, by 56.9% (N=8,572); and chains, by 16.7% (N=6,256). Net increases in beds were primarily concentrated in for-profit freestanding psychiatric hospitals. In 2016, most for-profit beds were part of chains (70.2%) and systems (61.3%).

Conclusions:

Inpatient psychiatry has shifted toward increased ownership by systems, for-profits, and chains. Payers and policy makers should safeguard against profiteering, and future research should investigate the implications of these trends on quality of care.

HIGHLIGHTS

Overall, the number of psychiatric beds and hospitals in the United States was stable from 2010 to 2016.
The number of beds owned by systems, for-profits, and psychiatric hospital chains increased substantially.
Payers and policy makers should safeguard against profiteering, and research should investigate the implications of these trends on quality of care.
Concerns about the adequacy and quality of mental health resources in the United States have been long-standing (1, 2). Reports describe closures of inpatient psychiatric care facilities, but psychiatric hospitals are also targets for acquisition by private equity investors, systems (i.e., organizations that provide inpatient and outpatient services), and psychiatric hospital chains (i.e., organizations that own two or more freestanding psychiatric hospitals) (3). Little is known about how the structural characteristics of inpatient psychiatry have changed, especially since passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010.
We used a novel national database developed by members of the research team to examine changes from 2010 to 2016 in the quantity of psychiatric facilities and beds and to classify the psychiatric beds in terms of system ownership, profit status, facility type (freestanding or general acute care), and affiliation with chains. We also explored changes in hospitals and beds across service characteristics and regions.

Methods

This descriptive study of longitudinal data on hospitals and health systems used the Health Systems and Provider Database (HSPD) (4). The HSPD is a novel database developed by the National Bureau of Economic Research Center of Excellence on Comparative Health Systems that seeks to provide a census of all hospitals and systems within the United States (4). One of the unique features of the HSPD is its identification of health systems using a large and diverse set of sources, including data on Medicare provider enrollment, affiliation with chains, and ownership systems as well as Internal Revenue Service filings for tax-exempt entities.
Hospitals were considered to provide inpatient psychiatry if they indicated providing such services in one of the key databases. Hospitals were considered system owned if their organizational entity owned at least one general acute care hospital and had at least 50 total physicians and 10 primary care physicians (4). Hospitals were considered to be part of a psychiatric chain if their organizational entity owned at least two freestanding psychiatric hospitals. Systems and chains were not mutually exclusive. Key hospital characteristics were psychiatric bed count, hospital ownership (system-owned, non–system-owned), hospital profit status (for profit, not for profit, public), hospital type (freestanding psychiatric, general acute care), and chain ownership (common ownership with at least two freestanding psychiatric hospitals). Secondary characteristics included treatment of forensic psychiatric patients, provision of outpatient psychiatric care, provision of substance use disorder treatment, size (<10, 11–20, 21–30, 31–50, >50 beds), having an emergency department, rurality, and region (Midwest, Northeast, South, West).
We first calculated overall net changes in the percentage and number of psychiatric facilities and beds from 2010 to 2016 and then examined changes in beds by system ownership, profit status, hospital type, and affiliation with chains. We also examined changes in facilities and beds in terms of service characteristics and region from 2010 to 2016. Because the data represented a census and not a sample, we provide point estimates only. All analyses occurred between August 2019 and June 2021. The institutional review boards of Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard University approved this study.

Results

Between 2010 and 2016, the number of hospitals providing inpatient psychiatry declined by 0.2% (N=4 hospitals; 1,787 in 2010 and 1,783 in 2016), and the number of psychiatric beds declined by 0.9% (N=998 beds; 112,182 in 2010 and 111,184 in 2016) (see part A in the online supplement). However, the number of beds operated by system-owned and for-profit hospitals changed substantially. The number of beds operated by system-owned hospitals increased by 39.8% (39,689 in 2010; 55,492 in 2016), whereas the number of those operated by non–system-owned hospitals decreased by 23.2% (72,493 in 2010; 55,692 in 2016) (Table 1; see part A in the online supplement). In terms of profit status, the number of beds operated by for-profit hospitals increased by 56.9% (15,059 in 2010; 23,631 in 2016), whereas the number operated by not-for-profits decreased by 5.4% (36,032 in 2010; 34,098 in 2016) and the number of those operated by public hospitals decreased by 10.7% (47,850 in 2010; 42,719 in 2016). In 2010, 13.4%, 32.1%, and 42.7% of beds were owned by for-profits, not-for-profits, and public facilities, respectively. This composition changed to 21.3%, 30.7%, and 38.4% by 2016.
TABLE 1. Psychiatric beds stratified by hospital type and system ownership, 2010–2016a
 2010201120122013201420152016% change,
Hospital characteristicN%N%N%N%N%N%N%2010–2016
Overall beds112,182100110,118100111,565100112,613100112,227100112,531100111,184100–.9
 Freestanding59,12152.758,00652.759,67053.561,21154.461,14654.561,78854.962,03555.84.9
 System-owned39,68935.446,22242.046,74741.949,04543.649,43644.152,32946.555,49249.939.8
For-profit beds15,05913.417,99416.319,15517.219,82517.621,36919.022,51820.023,63121.356.9
 Freestanding10,8529.713,77112.514,82513.315,45613.716,78415.017,78315.818,82916.973.5
  System-owned7,3426.59,7738.99,3878.49,5308.59,8558.89,7208.610,2749.239.9
  Non–system-owned3,5103.13,9983.65,4384.95,9265.36,9296.28,0637.28,5557.7143.7
General acute care4,2073.84,2233.84,3303.94,3693.94,5854.14,7354.24,8024.314.1
  System-owned3,3183.03,2813.03,4293.13,5953.24,0013.64,1443.74,2213.827.2
  Non–system-owned889.8942.9901.8774.7584.5591.5581.5–34.6
Not-for-profit beds36,03232.134,03530.933,73630.234,30130.533,96430.333,90630.134,09830.7–5.4
Freestanding8,9888.07,8857.27,7697.08,4317.58,4707.58,4587.58,2837.4–7.8
  System-owned3,4213.04,0183.64,3003.94,5164.04,6694.24,6574.14,7354.338.4
  Non–system-owned5,5675.03,8673.53,4693.13,9153.53,8013.43,8013.43,5483.2–36.3
General acute care27,04424.126,15023.725,96723.325,87023.025,49422.725,44822.625,81523.2–4.5
  System-owned17,83715.920,55218.721,20119.022,03219.622,14919.722,52620.022,92420.628.5
  Non–system-owned9,2078.25,5985.14,7664.33,8383.43,3453.02,9222.62,8912.6–68.6
Public beds47,85042.745,08140.945,74841.045,65440.544,03139.243,51638.742,71938.4–10.7
Freestanding39,28135.036,35033.037,07633.237,32433.135,89232.035,54731.634,92331.4–11.1
  System-owned1,9841.82,0481.91,7231.52,9732.62,4182.24,8204.37,0206.3253.8
  Non–system-owned37,29733.234,30231.235,35331.734,35130.533,47429.830,72727.327,90325.1–25.2
General acute care8,5697.68,7317.98,6727.88,3307.48,1397.37,9697.17,7967.0–9.0
  System-owned5,5715.06,1555.66,3445.76,2445.56,2555.66,3735.76,2525.612.2
  Non–system-owned2,9982.72,5762.32,3282.12,08633.41,88430.11,59625.01,54424.7–48.5
a
Mutually exclusive rows will not add to 100% or exactly to the total N of beds for a given year because of missing data for the profit status variable.
In general, the number of beds in system-owned hospitals increased across all profit statuses and hospital types (Table 1). For-profit hospitals experienced 39.9% and 143.7% increases in the number of system- and non–system-owned freestanding beds, respectively, and a 27.2% increase in system-owned general acute care psychiatric beds, whereas the number of non–system-owned general acute care hospital beds declined by 34.6%. Not-for-profit hospitals experienced a 38.4% increase in the number of system-owned freestanding beds and a 28.5% increase in the number of system-owned general acute care beds, with 36.3% and 68.6% declines in non–system-owned freestanding and non–system-owned general acute care beds, respectively. Similarly, public hospitals experienced a 253.8% increase in the number system-owned freestanding beds and a 12.2% increase in system-owned general acute care beds, with 25.2% and 48.5% declines in both non–system-owned freestanding and non–system-owned general acute care beds, respectively.
From 2010 to 2016, the number of beds that were part of chains increased by 16.7% (N=6,256) (see part B in the online supplement). The proportion of chain-owned beds that were for profit increased by 32.5% (N=5,862), whereas the proportion that were not for profit and public declined. Trends for facilities were similar. In 2016, most for-profit beds were owned by chains (N=16,587, 70.2%) and systems (N=14,495, 61.3%). Only 11.2% (N=3,803) of not-for-profit beds were owned by chains, and 81.1% (N=27,659) were owned by systems. Most public beds, in comparison, were owned by chains (N=23,331, 54.6%) but not systems (N=13,272, 31.1%).
Last, there were changes in service and regional characteristics. The number of facilities and beds providing care to forensic patients increased by 19.4% (N=26) and 11.2% (N=2,670), respectively, with a majority concentrated among systems (see part C in the online supplement). The number of facilities and beds affiliated with an onsite emergency department increased by 88.9% (N=563) and 83.3% (N=20,422), respectively. The number of facilities and beds affiliated with onsite outpatient psychiatric care also increased by 30.4% (N=205) and 25.1% (N=10,076), respectively. There were no meaningful increases in the number of facilities and beds providing substance use disorder treatment overall, but there were considerable increases among freestanding facilities. The greatest declines in the number of facilities and beds were concentrated among hospitals with few psychiatric beds (<10 beds), and the greatest growth occurred among hospitals with many beds (>31 beds); this trend was most pronounced among freestanding facilities. There were also regional differences, with the Northeast experiencing the greatest overall decline in the number of facilities and beds but the greatest increase in system ownership.

Discussion and Conclusions

Although the overall number of psychiatric facilities and beds in the United States remained stable from 2010 to 2016, the types of hospitals delivering these services shifted. The number of psychiatric facilities and beds operated by for-profit companies increased substantially, especially beds in freestanding psychiatric hospitals. In 2010, about 13% of beds were for profit, compared with 21% in 2016. The number of psychiatric beds owned by systems also increased across all profit status categories, with the largest relative increases occurring among for-profit and public hospitals. In 2010, only about 35% of beds were system owned, compared with 50% in 2016. However, although the rise in system-owned beds was countered by declines in non–system-owned beds for both not-for-profits and public facilities, for-profits experienced substantial increases in both system- and non–system-owned beds. The proportion of hospitals owned by chains and for-profits also increased from 2010 to 2016. In 2016, most for-profit and public beds were owned by psychiatric hospital chains, compared with a small fraction of not-for-profits. The number of hospitals and beds providing treatment for forensic patients, as well as those affiliated with onsite outpatient psychiatric care and an emergency department, also increased overall. Surprisingly, despite the opioid epidemic occurring during the study period, the number of hospitals and beds providing substance use disorder treatment increased only modestly.
The rise in for-profit beds is likely the result of different but potentially related forces. First, the prevalence of mental illness and suicidality has been rising in the United States (5, 6). Second, there was increased insurance coverage for the behavioral health population and behavioral health services after provisions of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the ACA (7, 8). Third, health care organizations that specialize in psychiatric care, such as system-owned freestanding psychiatric hospitals and chains, might have the financing and expertise needed to capitalize on increased demand and insurance coverage while also being able to offer services more efficiently because of economies of scale. Moreover, psychiatric facilities that also provide outpatient care can direct referrals within their system, and system-owned facilities that are freestanding might have greater capacity to exercise preference over the patients they admit. Indeed, although the largest relative increase among for-profits occurred among non–system-owned freestanding facilities, the largest absolute increase occurred among system-owned freestanding facilities.
The dominance of for-profit chains observed in this study is not without precedence. Levenson (9) described increases in the number of for-profit freestanding psychiatric hospital chains in the 1980s. Levenson estimated that there were 198 private freestanding psychiatric hospitals owned by chains in 1982; for-profits owned 65% of them. In our study, there were 286 private freestanding psychiatric hospitals owned by chains in 2016, with about 80% (N=225) of these facilities owned by for-profits. From 2010 to 2016, overall chain ownership increased, with a considerable shift toward for-profits. These trends warrant concern. Several investigations have focused on the largest supplier of psychiatric beds in the country (a system-owned for-profit chain) obtaining profits at the expense of quality and engaging in fraudulent activities (e.g., admitting patients when not medically necessary) (2). Empirical work documenting quality differences by profit status in both inpatient psychiatric and residential substance use disorder treatment is beginning to be published (1012). However, a critical need remains for empirical scrutiny of inpatient psychiatric care in general and how it varies across facility characteristics.
The more blunted trends in beds observed in general acute care hospitals across all profit status categories might be related to the view among general acute care hospitals that inpatient psychiatric care is not a driver of profits. General acute care hospitals likely do not have the expertise or focus necessary to efficiently manage psychiatric patients, and more profitable service lines could be deemed as more worthy of investment. Additionally, general acute care hospitals might not have comparable negotiating power, especially if they are negotiating with a managed behavioral health organization. Freestanding psychiatric facilities could also offer lower rates as a result of lower per diem Medicare rates, against which negotiations are benchmarked.
This analysis had several noteworthy limitations. First, the HSPD is derived from administrative data and reflects ownership changes over time; linkage to patient-level data (e.g., claims) would be necessary to understand how these structural changes relate to volume of admissions and care delivery. However, the HSPD is unique in its ability to capture whether outpatient providers and hospitals are commonly owned by a larger entity (i.e., health systems and chains). These data provide more descriptive information than the data historically used to understand trends in inpatient psychiatry (13). Second, our analyses were restricted to 2010–2016, and did not capture the present day. However, these years are important because they occurred after implementation of the ACA, which changed the financial landscape for behavioral health services.
Although the overall number of psychiatric facilities and beds remained stable from 2010 to 2016, the composition changed in terms of profit status, ownership, chain affiliation, and service characteristics. Future research is needed to understand the mechanisms underpinning these trends and their implications for equitable access to quality care (3, 14). Policy makers and payers should consider the potential for profiteering and institute appropriate safeguards.

Supplementary Material

File (appi.ps.202100182.ds001.pdf)

References

1.
Alegría M, Frank RG, Hansen HB, et al: Transforming mental health and addiction services: commentary describes steps to improve outcomes for people with mental illness and addiction in the United States. Health Affairs 2021; 40: 226–234
2.
Shields MC, Stewart MT, Delaney KR: Patient safety in inpatient psychiatry: a remaining frontier for health policy. Health Aff 2018; 37:1853–1861
3.
Public crisis, private toll: the hidden costs of the mental-health industry’s expansion. Seattle Times, Jan 2, 2020. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/times-watchdog/public-crisis-private-toll-an-investigation-by-the-seattle-times. Accessed April 1, 2021
4.
Systems and Provider Database (HSPD) Methodology. Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020. http://data.nber.org/hspd_method. Accessed Feb 18, 2021
5.
Miron O, Yu K-H, Wilf-Miron R, et al: Suicide rates among adolescents and young adults in the United States, 2000–2017. JAMA 2019; 321:2362–2364
6.
Santillanes G, Axeen S, Lam CN, et al: National trends in mental health–related emergency department visits by children and adults, 2009–2015. Am J Emerg Med 2020; 38: 2536–2544
7.
Novak P, Anderson AC, Chen J: Changes in health insurance coverage and barriers to health care access among individuals with serious psychological distress following the Affordable Care Act. Adm Policy Ment Health 2018; 45:924–932
8.
Kozloff N, Sommers BD: Insurance coverage and health outcomes in young adults with mental illness following the Affordable Care Act dependent coverage expansion. J Clin Psychiatry 2017; 78:e821–e827
9.
Levenson AI: Issues surrounding the ownership of private psychiatric hospitals by investor-owned hospital chains. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1983; 34:1127–1131
10.
Beetham T, Saloner B, Gaye M, et al: Admission practices and cost of care for opioid use disorder at residential addiction treatment programs in the US. Health Aff 2021; 40:317–325
11.
Shields MC, Rosenthal MB: Quality of inpatient psychiatric care at VA, other government, nonprofit, and for-profit hospitals: a comparison. Psychiatr Serv 2017; 68:225–230
12.
Shields MC: Effects of the CMS’ public reporting program for inpatient psychiatric facilities on targeted and nontargeted safety: differences between for-profits and nonprofits. Med Care Res Rev (Epub ahead of print, Mar 12, 2021)
13.
National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS). Rockville, MD, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2017. https://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/dasis2/nmhss.htm. Accessed April 1, 2021
14.
Shields MC. Patient characteristics associated with admission to low-safety inpatient psychiatric facilities: evidence for racial inequities. Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72:1151–1159

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services
Psychiatric Services
Pages: 561 - 564
PubMed: 34433287

History

Received: 1 April 2021
Revision received: 9 June 2021
Revision received: 4 July 2021
Accepted: 16 July 2021
Published online: 26 August 2021
Published in print: May 2022

Keywords

  1. Inpatient treatment
  2. Service delivery systems

Authors

Details

Morgan C. Shields, Ph.D. [email protected]
Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Shields); Department of Health Care Policy (Beaulieu, Busch) and Department of Pediatrics (Lu, Chien), Harvard Medical School, Boston; Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston (Lu, Chien); McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts (Busch); National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Cutler); Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts (Cutler).
Nancy D. Beaulieu, Ph.D.
Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Shields); Department of Health Care Policy (Beaulieu, Busch) and Department of Pediatrics (Lu, Chien), Harvard Medical School, Boston; Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston (Lu, Chien); McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts (Busch); National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Cutler); Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts (Cutler).
Sifan Lu, B.A.
Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Shields); Department of Health Care Policy (Beaulieu, Busch) and Department of Pediatrics (Lu, Chien), Harvard Medical School, Boston; Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston (Lu, Chien); McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts (Busch); National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Cutler); Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts (Cutler).
Alisa B. Busch, M.D., M.S.
Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Shields); Department of Health Care Policy (Beaulieu, Busch) and Department of Pediatrics (Lu, Chien), Harvard Medical School, Boston; Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston (Lu, Chien); McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts (Busch); National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Cutler); Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts (Cutler).
David M. Cutler, Ph.D.
Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Shields); Department of Health Care Policy (Beaulieu, Busch) and Department of Pediatrics (Lu, Chien), Harvard Medical School, Boston; Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston (Lu, Chien); McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts (Busch); National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Cutler); Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts (Cutler).
Alyna T. Chien, M.D., M.S.
Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Shields); Department of Health Care Policy (Beaulieu, Busch) and Department of Pediatrics (Lu, Chien), Harvard Medical School, Boston; Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston (Lu, Chien); McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts (Busch); National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Cutler); Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts (Cutler).

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Shields ([email protected]).
This research was presented at the 2020 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ’s) Centers of Excellence for Comparative Health Systems Annual Meeting, August 2020 (virtual) as well as at the 2021 AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting, June 2021 (virtual).

Funding Information

This research was supported by a grant from AHRQ (U19 HS024072) and a T32 postdoctoral training grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH109433).The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share