Attitudes of Mental Health Service Users Toward Storage and Use of Electronic Health Records

EHR benefits include improved quality of care and improved access to care (3, 4), more efficient service delivery, and better clinical outcomes (5); additional benefits include improved efficiency of disease prevention, follow-up, and coordination between health care professionals (6). EHRs also open new opportunities for cost-effectively examining longitudinal and complex data from large and diverse populations and for building clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) (7).

Similar to other digital information about individuals, clinical “big data” raise concerns about safety and privacy. To address these issues, the European Union introduced data protection rules (i.e., the General Data Protection Regulation) that added structure for how people can access information about themselves; in addition, these rules place limits on what organizations can do with people’s personal data (8). The United States has no federal data privacy law such as the General Data Protection Regulation. Although big data (including clinical big data) have received considerable attention from various professional groups (9), the voices of service users regarding use of such data are not always heard. Involvement of service users must be a part of clinical practice planning and operations; however, it is still experienced by many groups as tokenistic and policy driven rather than as genuine concern for the individual (10), which is especially important when evaluating research that can ultimately inform practice (11). Knowledge about service users’ awareness and attitudes toward the storing and sharing of their health data should be a part of clinical practice and research planning.

Research that elicits service users’ opinions and attitudes toward EHRs is only limited. Weitzman et al. (12) found that nearly all of the community members they studied were willing to share health information to support research and public health; however, half of the study participants wanted to control this information whereby a user could decide what information can be shared, with whom the information can be shared, and what information should be excluded from sharing. Such EHR control has increased recently with legislation requiring transparency about how service users’ information is utilized (13). Kim et al. (14) reported that most patients were willing to share general medical EHRs as well as biospecimens; 77% chose to control and amend information to be shared. For example, patients wanted to choose to share only what they considered relevant for specific research and to be able to make specific choices. In another general health care study, patients favored broad permission, with “yes” or “no” options only (13). Kim et al. (14) argued that an “all or nothing approach” can lead to loss of EHR data that are useful for research. Zurita and Nøhr (15) affirmed that patients accepted EHRs and new technologies; however, the patients were adamant that portability (being able to move information across services), access for other health care providers (i.e., family physicians), and privacy protections were all important.

With rapid digitalization of mental health services (especially during the COVID-19 pandemic), substantial amounts of data are collected. Stigma associated with mental health services was one of the reasons why EHR uptake was slower than in general health care and why mental health EHRs were separated from other EHRs (16–18). As reported by Salomon et al. (19), 63% of mental health professionals expressed low willingness to input confidential or sensitive information, and 83% favored limiting the routine access to patient EHRs. Other behavioral health professionals have found that service users did not wish to share records detailing diagnosis (47%) and substance use (48%); however, users were willing to share records of emergency admissions and treatments (57%) as well as historic patient records (52%) because these records were seen as important for ongoing care (20).

Satinsky et al. (21) found that mental health service users showed little awareness of health data uses for research but were largely comfortable sharing their health records. Some participants raised issues of transparency, advocating for clear opt-out choices and processes, whereas others stressed an interest in being part of reference groups to stay up to date on findings. Likewise, participants of Kim et al.’s (14) study were willing to share family mental health histories (40%), mental health treatment procedures (39%), details of mental health medications (40%), and mental health disease conditions (40%). Shen et al. (22) reported that mental health service users favored sharing health information, even after considering the sensitive nature of the data. However, data exchange was based on trust and being well informed about how their data benefit others’ experiences.

Results from a study by O’Brien et al. (23) indicated that most service users were more attentive to the benefits of EHR sharing than the risks; the authors found few discrepancies in these views between general health and mental health service users. The service users were most concerned about EHRs being stolen or hacked (83%) and thought that the largest benefits of sharing included helping doctors make better decisions about health (94%) and making therapies available faster (94%). Overall, service users have been positive about sharing mental health EHRs for research and improving services (14, 22, 23). However, persistent concerns include issues relating to privacy and security, hacking of personal information, and anonymity (21–23).

EHRs can be also used to build a CDSS, a computerized tool that uses patient information and health care data to enable clinicians to make recommendations on the next step in a patient’s care. CDSSs in child and adolescent mental health settings are uncommon and have major shortcomings (24). Therefore, we are building an Individualized Digital DEcision Assist System (IDDEAS), which is a new CDSS based on clinical guidelines and decades of anonymized EHR-derived mental health data (25). Because the EHR is central to CDSSs, it was important to understand service users’ attitudes toward and perceptions about storing and sharing of their EHRs. In this study, we investigated mental health service users’ awareness about health authorities’ storing and sharing of EHR information, users’ attitudes about EHR storage and sharing, and their opinions about the purposes of EHR sharing.

In this study, we investigated mental health service users’ awareness and attitudes about EHR storage and sharing while also examining users’ perceived risks and benefits associated with EHR use in health care and research. Most service users were aware of EHRs being stored by health authorities and had positive attitudes toward both storing and sharing. Of the service users, 83% approved of EHRs being stored, and 84% saw it as beneficial.

For the qualitative portion of this study, mental health service users were asked to indicate concerns and risks via free-text responses mainly on the negative aspects of EHRs. The users identified concerns and perceived risks related to privacy (i.e., anonymization, hacking, misuse of data, and transparency), similar to findings from previous studies (3, 4, 26, 27) that identified concerns about potential for breaches in confidentiality (21–23). Managing these concerns has led to multiple levels of control, including obtaining consent and allowing service users to affirm what data are shared (12–14). However, mental health professionals and service users previously still expressed reservations about sharing EHRs because of safeguarding concerns (19, 20). Participants in this study appeared to trust health authorities who store and share their data. Given this trust, sharing sensitive health data appears relatively unproblematic, and our findings support the notion that trust among service users is linked to higher acceptance of EHR sharing (22).

Similar to results of other studies (14, 22, 23), mental health service users in this study agreed to storage of their EHRs and to sharing of these records for the benefit of others. Findings of this study support the results of Kim et al. (14), who reported that most service users deliberately would choose to share data, and of O’Brien et al. (23), who found that the predominant reason for users’ support of sharing data was that such sharing can improve health care. Previous studies in mental health settings have indicated openness to sharing, along with awareness of where data are going and for what purposes (22) and that increasing transparency on what is shared creates more access to valuable data (28). Regulations alone do not reassure service users that data will be protected. Health care professionals can increase trust among service users by providing clarity about the use of EHR data (29). Trust emerges as a key factor for service users recognizing positive outcomes for patients when mental health records are stored and shared.

Despite their concerns, the participants focused on the benefits of sharing health data for service user care, helping others with similar diagnoses, and policy development. In other words, for these service users, benefits outweighed concerns. This finding supports EHR data use for the development of future systems to improve efficiency and quality of mental health care through technological advancements, including CDSSs (24, 25, 30–32).

The strength of this study was that it elicited opinions of mental health service users, who are often underrepresented in similar research. We note the low survey response rate and the relatively small sample size as limitations. Additional limitations included a skew in gender distribution toward women and participants with high education levels, lack of younger participants, few unemployed participants, and participation by few non-Norwegians. Lack of information on sociodemographic characteristics of the sample population was also a limitation. We also do not know whether this sample was representative of the larger population and whether these results can be generalized to all members or other groups in the health care community. The survey was anonymous, meaning that we did not have access to information about nonresponders to compare with the data from responders.

To our knowledge, this study is the first in Norway to explore mental health service users’ perspectives on EHR use. We found that although mental health service users were aware of risks of EHR data storage, they agreed to storage and sharing of their anonymized data to help other patients. This study builds a strong case against separating general medical and mental health EHRs. Our findings should encourage investigators, caregivers, and policy makers to collect and store EHR data from patients with mental disorders for use in research and policy decision making similar to how general medical data are collected and used.

This study is among only a few to explore mental health service users’ perspectives on storage and use of their EHRs. Our results suggest that the mental health service users in our sample were similar to other patients in the general health care system with respect to their perspectives on the use of their clinical data in EHRs. Mental health service users were aware that clinical data are stored and shared. They were appropriately concerned about privacy and anonymization of their data but trusted that authorities can safeguard their health information. In addition, mental health service users supported the idea that research that uses properly controlled data sharing will positively contribute to general health care, health care policy, and health care innovations. Finally, the mental health service users were willing to consent to use of their data to help others.