In the digital age, social media have become ubiquitous in youth culture, offering unparalleled opportunities for mental health support and education. Yet, generating content that is both safe and influential, particularly for diverse youth populations, is challenging. Here, I define social media as Internet-based communication platforms that facilitate interactions among users through the sharing or consumption of information. In this column, I discuss how to craft social media videos that prioritize safety according to the principle of “first, do no harm,” and I explore the mechanisms driving these interventions’ effectiveness. I then outline a path for future research and practice in this crucial area.
Research underscores the efficacy of digital interventions (
1), particularly social media videos, in promoting help-seeking behavior among youths. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, video content on platforms such as Instagram and TikTok has become a primary source of mental health information for young individuals. Videos offer dynamic ways to engage this audience. Influencers play a crucial role in mental health discourse by crafting brief, compelling videos that share personal stories or direct followers to mental health resources. This approach is important, given that roughly half of all mental health issues begin by the time an individual is 14 years old (
2). Social media videos not only provide vital information and social support but also facilitate self-expression, creating supportive online environments that are essential for the well-being of young people navigating mental health challenges.
A supportive online environment is important for all youths and particularly critical for marginalized youths from diverse racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minority groups (
3). Social media can amplify the risk for racial-ethnic discrimination among minoritized groups when posted content perpetuates negative stereotypes and stress, which are linked to adverse mental health outcomes (
3). Black and Latinx adolescents experience substantial increases in depressive and anxiety symptoms because of individual and vicarious online racial discrimination, with heightened patterns of exposure over time affecting psychological well-being. Watkins et al. (
4) highlighted the importance of incorporating racial considerations into interventions, demonstrating that culturally sensitive social media–based programs can effectively address the distinctive mental health challenges encountered by young Black men while bolstering social support within their specific cultural and social contexts. Another study (
5) similarly showed that seven out of 10 adolescent girls of color find positive or identity-affirming content related to their race on these platforms. Therefore, to ensure the effectiveness and pertinence of social media interventions, their designers and producers must be guided by evidence-based comprehension of the varied backgrounds and experiences of marginalized youths.
Yet, social media use carries substantial risks (
6,
7). Overuse is harmful: a systematic review of 42 studies on the effects of social media use found a consistent relationship between the amount of social media use and depression among youths (
8). Social media can expose youths to extreme, inappropriate, and hurtful content, ranging from disinformation (e.g., the claim that drinking bleach can cure illnesses) to cyberbullying and harassment. Digital spaces can perpetuate hate-based content, such as discriminatory or prejudiced messages against specific groups, exacerbating feelings of isolation or distress among vulnerable populations. The historical reluctance of public health policy makers to engage audiences on social media has created a dangerous vacuum in which misinformation and disinformation can flourish.
The
White House Report on Mental Health Research Priorities, published in February 2023, highlights the urgent need to understand the complex effects of social media on youths’ mental health, including potential harms and benefits, in order to develop targeted interventions that mitigate negative effects (
6). This report also underscores the importance of harnessing social media’s potential to promote mental well-being by enhancing peer support, self-esteem, and access to mental health resources. Shortly after the release of the White House report, the Surgeon General’s Advisory, released in May 2023, urged the public, policy makers, and researchers to attend to the growing concern about the effects of social media on youths’ mental health and to create further safeguards that are based on existing research on social media effects (
7). Specifically, the advisory stresses the pressing need to fill knowledge gaps and develop evidence-based interventions to foster safe and healthy online environments for young people.
Although the effect of social media on youths’ mental health is widely recognized, the specific role and efficacy of brief video interventions remain underexplored. Addressing these needs necessitates a rigorous approach to testing and refining interventions in order to ensure that they are both safe and effective before introducing them to young audiences. In the next section, I introduce an online tool that embodies this careful, evidence-driven process; its use represents a significant step forward in creating supportive digital spaces for youths.
Crowdsourcing as a Laboratory for Brief Video Interventions
The advent of crowdsourcing platforms in the past decade has revolutionized the way researchers approach the development and testing of mental health interventions. Crowdsourcing platforms serve as digital venues for conducting surveys and gathering information from a pool of individuals willing to complete tasks for small payments. Although the representativeness of participants is limited, given that potential participants who opt in may have a particular interest in or experience with mental illness, crowdsourcing provides easy access to large numbers of young people. Use of these platforms enables rapid data collection from participants with myriad demographic characteristics, facilitating more nuanced understanding of an intervention’s mechanisms of action, moderators, and mediators. These platforms are virtual laboratories and enable researchers to access a diverse, global group of participants, allowing rapid iteration and refinement of interventions before they are widely implemented. This process has particular value in ensuring not only that interventions are effective but also that they resonate with target audiences. This approach has the potential to significantly reduce the risk associated with rolling out untested interventions on social media and other large platforms and instead increase the likelihood that the final content is both effective and well received.
Specifically, the use of crowdsourcing platforms as controlled environments has permitted the iterative testing of social contact–based brief video interventions. Social contact–based interventions stand at the forefront of efforts to combat mental health stigma and encourage help-seeking behavior. By showcasing real-life stories of individuals who have experienced mental health challenges, these interventions foster a sense of connection and empathy among viewers. The power of personal narrative cannot be overstated: it humanizes the abstract concept of mental illness, breaking down barriers of misunderstanding and prejudice. However, research suggests that sympathetic narratives—stories that humanize people who have a mental illness—may paradoxically increase stigma if the viewer does not identify with the person portrayed, which highlights the importance of identity concordance (
9). For example, studies have shown that reactions to the same story may differ depending on the racial background or socioeconomic status of the person portrayed in the story (
9).
Evidence suggests that social contact–based brief video interventions are particularly effective in altering perceptions of mental health, reducing stigma, and increasing the likelihood of having the intent to seek help when needed (
10). These interventions leverage the fundamental human capacity for empathy, making them a potent tool in the ongoing battle against mental health stigma and in the promotion of a more inclusive approach to mental health care.
The transition from controlled testing environments to real-world social media settings is a critical step in the process of evaluating the effectiveness of these interventions. In a recent campaign on Instagram, my colleagues and I posted a 60-second video that had proven in a crowdsourcing study to be effective at reducing stigma. The video garnered substantial engagement, evidenced by almost 1 million views and high numbers of impressions, reach, and link clicks to mental health resources (
11). The success of this campaign demonstrates the potential potency of social media as a tool for mental health advocacy, provided that the content is tested and refined to ensure its safety and efficacy. This campaign was the first to test evidence-based content, building on previously tested brief video interventions, in an area that deserves far greater attention.
Youths’ Mental Health: Strategies and Paradigms
To help researchers, content creators, and mental health advocates navigate the multifaceted challenges and opportunities in supporting youths’ mental health, I propose a comprehensive range of strategies to enhance the effectiveness of brief video interventions posted on social media platforms. First, exploring (preferably in a laboratory setting) the underlying mechanisms through which brief video interventions influence mental health perceptions and actions could provide valuable insights for crafting more effective messages. This exploration should include efforts aimed at developing a deeper understanding of how youths from a wide range of demographic groups interact with mental health content. These efforts will require creating content that not only is inclusive but also resonates with various cultural, ethnic, and gender identities, filling significant gaps in current intervention strategies.
Second, the effects of these interventions on stigma reduction and help-seeking behaviors, areas that currently lack robust data, require targeted investigation. A paradigm shift is needed: instead of pursuing long-term effects, researchers should take advantage of the immediate change in perceptions. Incorporating ways to provide direct access to mental health services within these interventions could revolutionize the provision of support, ensuring its accessibility. This approach would be a seamless integration, whereby brief social media video interventions not only educate and engage users but also provide direct links or embedded features that facilitate immediate access to mental health services, such as online counseling or crisis support, thereby streamlining the transition from awareness to action. This collaboration would entail a multidisciplinary effort, whereby mental health professionals, content creators, and researchers work in tandem with policy makers and social media platforms. The goal would be to codevelop ethical guidelines and content standards that would safeguard the use of social media in mental health advocacy. Community-driven models could enhance peer support mechanisms within these digital spaces.
Third, implementing protective strategies is essential for enhancing the safety of individuals who present their personal stories on social media. As discussed earlier, personal narratives shared by people with lived experience are a compelling way to connect with and engage youths. These stories can substantially enhance the relatability and impact of content. However, sharing personal experiences online comes with potential risks, such as unwanted exposure and privacy concerns. Mitigating these risks while preserving the authenticity and impact of these narratives can mean using strategies such as voiceovers, pixelated images, or professional actors (with appropriate disclaimers). These strategies not only safeguard individuals’ privacy but also maintain the integrity of their stories. Research supports this approach: in a study where young individuals with psychosis shared their personal stories of distressing experiences and recovery journeys through 2-minute videos that featured either an individual with lived experience or a professional actor who presented their story, both conditions had similarly effective outcomes (
12). This finding supports the casting of professional actors for videos as a viable alternative for people who want to share their stories but are concerned about privacy and digital exposure.
Fourth, addressing the pervasive issue of misinformation in social media is crucial to ensure that users have access to accurate and supportive content. Misinformation (e.g., the myths that mental health issues are a failure of willpower and do not require professional help) can deter people from seeking necessary treatment. Social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok, in collaboration with federal agencies, can play a pivotal role in fighting misinformation by implementing strict content moderation policies, promoting educational campaigns, and facilitating access to reliable mental health resources, thereby empowering users with trustworthy tools and information. Optimizing the user experience to increase engagement with mental health interventions can heighten the impact of such initiatives. Finally, evaluating the scalability and adaptability of these interventions for a global audience could extend their reach, providing support to youths worldwide and marking a significant step toward ensuring that the global community is informed and supportive regarding mental health.
It is crucial to build on these insights and establish mechanisms that educate and guide youths in crafting and sharing content that reduces stigma and elicits positive responses. Empowering young content creators with the knowledge and tools to convey their messages responsibly can amplify the beneficial impact of social media on mental health discourse. Key to this approach is providing clear guidelines on how to share personal narratives with empathy and respect and how to ensure that these resources are easily accessible to all. Such guidance not only helps to create a more informed and sensitive online community but also encourages a mindful approach to discussing mental health, contributing to a culture of understanding and acceptance among young individuals.
Another unavoidable issue is the need to overcome barriers beyond stigma, particularly the availability and accessibility of mental health services for youths. Even if a social media message reduces stigma and motivates individuals to seek help, lack of available services may remain a daunting deterrent or barrier to obtaining help. Initiatives should explore innovative ways to bridge this gap, perhaps by integrating direct links to available online services within social media interventions or advocating for policy changes to increase the availability of mental health resources.
Conclusions
Social contact–based brief video interventions have the potential to destigmatize mental health issues and encourage help-seeking behavior among youths. Furthermore, the exploration of these interventions in controlled environments, such as crowdsourcing platforms, is needed to ensure their safety and efficacy before widespread implementation. However, future steps require rigorous testing and commitment to creating content that is not only representative of youths’ diverse experiences but also engaging and safe. Collaborative efforts among professionals, platforms, and communities are essential to harness the full potential of social media to support youths’ mental health. Prioritizing safety, inclusivity, and evidence-based practices will ensure that brief video interventions posted on social media will cultivate spaces that foster well-being and resilience among young individuals.