Multiple-Family Groups for Urban Children With Conduct Difficulties and Their Families
Abstract
The authors present the results of two studies designed to improve treatment engagement among urban youths with conduct and oppositional behavioral difficulties. In the first study, information on attitudes about mental health treatment was obtained from 159 adult caregivers of children who were referred to an urban child mental health clinic because of disruptive behavioral difficulties. The caregivers listed insufficient time, lack of transportation, the child's not wanting to attend treatment, and the caregiver's concern that treatment might not help as barriers to service use. The data from study 1 were used to design a multiple-family group intervention to be tested in study 2. The families who participated in these groups attended an average of seven sessions during the 16-week study, compared with four sessions for families who participated in family therapy and three for families who participated in individual psychotherapy.
Childhood disruptive behavior is the most common reason for referral to child mental health services. In urban, low-income communities, the prevalence of behavioral difficulties among youths ranges from 24 percent to 40 percent, making this the most significant mental health problem in these communities (1). However, use of mental health services is low among urban children (2). Multiple-family groups have been described as a service delivery alternative that could replicate mutual aid and social support that have been found to be necessary and acceptable to urban families of color while reducing the stigma associated with obtaining mental health services (3).
Over the past decade, we have developed and tested multiple-family-group interventions among urban youths and their families (4). In previous studies, we documented the association between involvement in multiple-family groups and greater use of services in urban communities (5) and reductions in child disruptive behavior (6). This intervention, which was developed in collaboration with urban families, targeted family organizational issues, relationship issues, communication, and the development of social support networks to assist with parenting and stress management. The groups included six to eight families and involved both adult caregivers, all the children in the family, and a group facilitator (4).
We present the results of two studies designed to develop acceptable, efficient, and effective mental health services for urban youths with disruptive behavioral difficulties. These studies considered the need to develop services on the basis of empirical data from urban clinical samples and to incorporate service delivery strategies that can be implemented in real-world mental health settings (7).
Methods
Study 1
The first study, conducted during 1996, was designed to assess the attitudes of the adult caregivers of youths with disruptive behavioral difficulties toward help seeking and the mental health service needs of children.
Sample. The participants in study 1 were 159 children consecutively referred to an urban child mental health clinic for services for disruptive behavioral difficulties, along with their caregivers. The mean±SD age of the youths was 9.8±3.4 years. A total of 128 youths (81 percent) were African American, 18 (11 percent) were Latino, and ten (6 percent) were white. Boys (120, or 76 percent) outnumbered girls. All were Medicaid eligible. A total of 56 children (34 percent) were being reared in single-parent households, and 52 (33 percent) had had contact with the child welfare system.
Measures and procedures. An adaptation of the Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) (8) was administered to all the adult caregivers to assess their previous experience with service use, previous family involvement with mental health services, attitudes toward mental health care, and barriers to service use.
Study 2
The second study was designed to determine whether participation in the multiple-family groups improved involvement in child mental health services. Data obtained during study 1 were used to inform development of the intervention.
Sample. The sample for study 2 consisted of 138 children who were consecutively referred with disruptive behavioral difficulties to an urban child mental health clinic during a nine-month period during 1996 and 1997. The mean±SD age of the youths was 9.3±3.3 years. A total of 96 youths (70 percent) were African American, 25 (18 percent) were Latino, and 17 (12 percent) were white. Boys outnumbered girls (106, or 77 percent).
Measures and procedures. Use of child mental health services was recorded by the computerized scheduling system at the research site. During the 16-week study period, use of mental health services was assessed among participants in the multiple-family groups and among participants who attended "service as usual" family therapy or individual therapy sessions—the comparison groups.
At intake, youths who presented with conduct difficulties as well as their families were consecutively assigned to the three multiple-family groups until the groups were full. Subsequently referred youths and their families were assigned to a comparison group. The characteristics of the youths and their families were not significantly different between groups.
Results
In the study 1 sample, a total of 71 youths (45 percent) had previously received mental health care, of whom 42 (59 percent) had received individual psychotherapy. Approximately half of the adult caregivers (74, or 47 percent) reported that previous treatment had had no impact. The caregivers were divided in terms of their feelings about involvement in services: 25 caregivers (46 percent) reported positive feelings, nine (16 percent) were neutral, and 21 (38 percent) reported negative feelings. Furthermore, the caregivers expressed skepticism about mental health care, with 113 (72 percent) indicating that seeking mental health care is appropriate only after the person has tried for awhile on his or her own, has sought help from family members, or as a last resort.
The adult caregivers identified the following barriers to service use: insufficient time (50 caregivers, or 32 percent), lack of transportation (68 caregivers, or 44 percent), the child's not wanting to attend treatment (35 caregivers, or 22 percent), and concern that services might not help (39 caregivers, or 25 percent).
The families who participated in the multiple-family groups in study 2 attended a mean±SD number of sessions of 7±3.3 during the 16-week study, compared with 4±3.2 for families who participated in family therapy and 3.1±2.7 for those who participated in individual psychotherapy (F=15.6, df=2, 136, p<.001).
Discussion and conclusions
The challenge to the field is to develop service delivery approaches that simultaneously take into account high no-show rates in community-based settings, multiple barriers to help seeking, and integration of effective services into real-world settings.
The two studies we report here addressed these issues by using data from the target clinical population to inform the development of services and address some of the challenges facing researchers and providers in the field of child mental health services. Furthermore, the multiple-family-group approach we tested is based on a series of previous studies conducted in real-world settings with community-based providers that indicated reductions in childhood conduct difficulties (4,5,6). It is also based on the empirical literature for family-level interventions for youths who have disruptive behavioral difficulties and on collaboration with consumers.
We demonstrated an association between participation in a multiple-family group and greater use of services. However, the increase in use of services occurred in the context of seven sessions. Although participation in a multiple-family group has been linked to positive outcomes in previous studies (5), more research is needed to determine whether seven sessions is sufficient to reduce the often significant and sometimes chronic mental health problems of urban children.
These studies had limitations. Quasi-experimental designs were used. Because the studies used small samples and a single study site, the results need to be replicated in a larger sample of youths across multiple settings. The possibility of selection bias exists, because the youths were not randomly assigned to treatment groups. It is also possible that engagement and involvement in treatment is not just a matter of attendance per se. Nevertheless, these studies have piloted an approach that may be used to develop service innovations to yield positive outcomes for youths and to address obstacles associated with real-world service delivery.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Gail DeLyser, M.S.W., Lynn Haynes, M.S.W., Patricia Prazak, M.S.W., and Anne Tokarz, M.S.W.
Footnote
Dr. McKay is affiliated with the School of Social Work at Columbia University, 622 West 113th Street, New York, New York 10025 (e-mail, [email protected]). Dr. Harrison is with the department of psychiatry at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City. Mr. Gonzales, Ms. Kim, and Dr. Quintana are affiliated with the department of psychiatry at the University of Illinois in Chicago.
References
1.
Tolan PH, Henry D: Patterns of psychopathology among urban-poor children: co-morbidity and aggression effects. Journal of Consulting Psychology 64:1094-1099, 1996
2.
Griffin JA, Cicchetti D, Leaf PJ: Characteristics of youths identified from a psychiatric case register as first-time users of services. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 44:62-65, 1993
3.
Boyd-Franklin N: Black families, in Normal Family Process. Edited by Walsh F. New York, Guilford, 1993
4.
McKay M, Gonzales J, Stone S, et al: Multiple family therapy groups: a responsive intervention model for inner-city families, in Voices From the Field. Edited by Alissi A, Mergins C. New York, Haworth, 1995
5.
McKay M, Quintana E, Kim L, et al: Multiple family groups: an alternative for reducing disruptive behavioral difficulties of urban children. Research on Social Work Practice 9:414-428, 1999
6.
Stone S, McKay M, Gonzales J, et al: Addressing urban children's behavioral problems with multiple family groups. Small Group Research 27:398-415, 1996
7.
Weisz JR: Agenda for child and adolescent psychotherapy research: on the need to put science into practice. Archives of General Psychiatry 57:837-838, 2000
8.
Burns BJ, Angold A, Magruder-Habib K, et al: The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment. Developmental Epidemiology Program. Durham, NC, Duke University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, 1994
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: 1 November 2002
Published in print: November 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
View options
PDF/ePub
View PDF/ePubGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).