Full access
Health Care Economics
Published Online: 2 January 2004

Cost-Shifting Burden Falls Unevenly on Sickest

Publication: Psychiatric News
Volume 39, Number 1
https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.39.1.0010
Who gets hurt most from increases in patient cost sharing? According to a study from the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC), “increased patient cost-sharing raises out-of-pocket costs more for people with chronic conditions, those in poor health, and people with at least one hospitalization.”
Sally Trude, author of “Patient Cost Sharing: How Much Is Too Much?,” wrote that cost-shifting to employees can occur in two main ways: increasing the percentage of the total premium that they pay or mandating higher deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance. Employers primarily have opted for the latter method.
The researchers expect that a “significant increase in out-of-pocket costs would moderate use of health care services,” according to Trude.
HSC used actuarial models to estimate patients’ expected average annual out-of-pocket costs for different benefit structures. Those structures range from option 1, in which a patient pays a copayment of $10 for primary care and specialist visits and no deductible, to option 6, which has a $2,500 deductible with 30 percent coinsurance for in-network care and 50 percent coinsurance for out-of-network care.
Researchers calculated, by health status and benefit scenario, the likelihood that out-of-pocket costs would exceed 10 percent of an employee’s income.
One percent of employees with chronic conditions under option 1 (lowest cost sharing) were projected to spend more than 10 percent of their income on out-of-pocket health care costs; however, 22 percent of employees with chronic conditions under option 6 (highest cost sharing) were projected to spend more than 10 percent of their income on out-of-pocket health care costs.
Fifty-three percent of employees in poor health under option 6 were projected to spend more than 10 percent of their income on out-of-pocket costs, while only 5 percent of those in poor health would do so under option 1.
Trude pointed out that nearly half of all personal bankruptcies are due in part to medical expenses.
“Patient Cost Sharing: How Much Is Too Much?” is posted online at www.hschange.org/CONTENT/630/. ▪

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric News
Psychiatric News
Volume 39 • Number 1 • January 2, 2004
Pages: 10

History

Published online: 2 January 2004
Published in print: January 2, 2004

Notes

When patients are forced to assume more of the cost of their care, those with serious or chronic illness feel it the most.

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard
Tips for downloading citations

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

×

As described within the American Psychiatric Association (APA)'s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences. Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.