Skip to main content
Full access
Government News
Published Online: 15 October 2004

House Defeats Hasty Amendment Barring Mental Health Screenings

APA had a hand in defeating an amendment to a bill under consideration in the House of Representatives that would have prohibited the use of federal funds for nationwide mental health screenings.
Ron Paul (R-Tex.), a gynecologist, was the author of the amendment, which had been tacked on to an appropriations bill funding the departments of Labor and Health and Human Services.
Among the concerns that he said led him to introduce his proposal, Paul cited the call for such a screening program in the President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, published last year. In fact, the report nowhere says that the federal government should sponsor widespread mental health screenings.
He also sounded alarms about the possibility that widespread screening of children for mental health problems would open the door to “schoolhouse drug pushers,” by which he meant psychiatrists, and in particular those who prescribe stimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
“We already have an epidemic in our schools” of children being“ overtreated” for ADHD, Paul said, and “parents who have denied medication for their children have been accused of child abuse. There is already tremendous pressure on parents to allow public school officials to put children on medication like Ritalin.”
He went on to blame psychiatrists for their eagerness to label as mentally ill people who do not agree with their political beliefs. “If one has a strange world view or a strange personal belief,” he told his House colleagues, “if you have a prejudice or whatever, one may be deemed mentally ill.”
The day before the amendment was introduced, APA sent an action alert to its members explaining the content of Paul's “anti-mental-health” amendment and asking them to contact their representative in the House and urge him or her to vote against the amendment.
“Make no mistake,” APA said, “these efforts are fundamentally designed to attack access to medically necessary psychiatric treatment, particularly of children and adolescents.”
The amendment was voted down on the day it was introduced by a vote of 315-95. ▪

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 15 October 2004
Published in print: October 15, 2004

Notes

The House of Representatives shows little enthusiasm for a proposal that, based on faulty premises, would have barred the use of federal dollars to conduct mental health screenings.

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share