Skip to main content
Full access
Letters to the Editor
Published Online: 3 December 2004

Beyond Scientific Method

The article headed “Programs Try to Restore Luster to Psychodynamic Psychotherapy” in the June 18 issue reported that all graduating psychiatry residents are now required to demonstrate competence in five core psychotherapy treatment options, including psychodynamic psychotherapy.
One course being offered presents “some of the scientific evidence underpinning psychodynamic psychotherapy.” Scientific evidence may help restore the prominence, popularity, and respect for psychodynamic psychotherapy, but the scientific method has its limitations. It is based on comparing groups. If individuals fit into groups that have been studied, there is a statistical probability that the outcomes of the group studies apply to an individual. Scientific method cannot study or evaluate a single unit, a single individual.
In contrast, psychoanalysis or psychodynamic psychotherapy of a single patient is a method of studying and evaluating a single individual. The analytic process has an internal, logical, and rational approach throughout. Even in one session, a patient's statements at the beginning of a session are compared with statements during and at the end of the session.
This same rational process applies throughout an analysis. Statements and reports about mental pictures, feelings, and behaviors are continually cross-checked and compared. Inductive reasoning proposes hypotheses that are repeatedly confirmed or contradicted. In the latter case new hypotheses are formed. Thus, the study of an individual is continually being developed. The probabilities (to borrow a scientific term) of valid conclusions about an individual are gradually increased.
While we are in debt to scientific methods for much knowledge and information, and science-based treatment will always be important to treatment of individuals, it is time for professionals to stop worshiping the scientific method as if it were the only source of knowledge and information and accept that it cannot study or evaluate a single individual and produces only probabilities for an individual patient.
It is time to start appreciating the rational and logical approach of psychodynamic psychotherapy for producing probable knowledge and information about an individual patient.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 3 December 2004
Published in print: December 3, 2004

Authors

Affiliations

James M. Murphy, M.D

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share