Skip to main content
Full access
Government News
Published Online: 5 March 2004

Oregon Anti-Tax Vote Spells Trouble for Health Care

Oregon voters again rejected a tax increase that would have enabled the state to maintain access to health care services for the poor and near-poor through the Oregon Health Plan (OHP).
More than a year ago, in January 2003, state residents voted against an increase in the state’s income tax that was designed to avoid cuts in health care services, education, public-safety measures, and other essential services.
As a result, the state eliminated access to outpatient mental health benefits and substance abuse treatment for approximately 100,000 residents and temporarily eliminated access to prescription drug coverage (Psychiatric News, April 4, 2003).
Later in 2003, Oregon’s state legislature passed an $800 million tax increase intended to balance the state’s 2003-05 budget. Measure 30, a voter referendum initiative, subjected the increase to a statewide vote.
Voters rejected the tax increase by 59 percent to 41 percent. In addition to a three-year income tax increase, the measure would have raised taxes on cigarettes, increased the minimum level of corporate taxes, and reduced the medical state tax deduction for seniors.
The legislature had spelled out $545 million in cuts that would take place if the tax increases were rejected. According to a statement on the Measure 30 ballot, about 52,000 persons will lose OHP coverage and other health care cuts will occur as a result of the defeat.
In the February 5 Oregonian, reporter David Austin described the cuts likely to occur in Multnomah County, which includes Portland.
He noted that as many as 25,000 people in the county will lose mental health services, including housing and financial help to pay for medication.
Gov. Ted Kulongoski (D) targeted health coverage for children and pregnant women, prescription drug coverage for seniors, and state crime labs as services he would try to preserve, despite the impending cuts.
He was quoted in the February 5 Oregonian as saying, “Oregon is not going to cease existing if this measure fails, but there will be drastic consequences to some of our most vulnerable citizens. Anybody that thinks this is all going to be absorbed in efficiencies and administrative costs is not telling you the truth.” ▪

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 5 March 2004
Published in print: March 5, 2004

Notes

Oregon plans new cuts in health care services after voters reject tax increases.

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share