Skip to main content
Full access
Clinical & Research News
Published Online: 5 December 2008

Is Hispanics' Depression Outcome Affected by Language Choice?

English-speaking Hispanic participants in a major clinical trial responded better to antidepressant treatment than did their Spanish-speaking peers, but language preference is probably a marker for other medical and social factors, said a report in the November Psychiatric Services.
The study, a secondary analysis of the STAR*D study of depression treatments, points to the need for culturally informed approaches to psychiatric diagnosis and care, said Andres Pumariega, M.D., chair of the Department of Psychiatry at the Reading Hospital and Medical Center in Reading, Pa., who was not involved in the report.
“Psychiatrists and primary care physicians need training in a culturally specific understanding of illness, its cultural expression, and the signs and symptoms of illness for the population we are serving,” said Pumariega, chair of APA's Committee of Hispanic Psychiatrists.
In the STAR*D study, researchers led by Ira Lesser, M.D., chair of psychiatry at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles, sought to find out if Hispanic patients with major depressive disorder who preferred communicating in Spanish (n=74) differed in illness severity or response patterns compared with Hispanic patients who preferred speaking in English (n=121). The participants all were enrolled in the trial from two Southern California treatment sites and accounted for 60 percent of the Hispanics in the STAR*D trial.
Research coordinators who were both bilingual and bicultural assessed participants choosing Spanish, and bilingual and bicultural physicians managed their treatment with the antidepressant citalopram.
Before adjustment of confounding variables, the Spanish speakers were less likely to achieve remission and took longer to get there, wrote Lesser and colleagues. However, adjustment for demographic, clinical, functional, and severity variables eliminated those differences, indicating that those factors may be just the ones standing in the way of better outcomes for these patients, they said.
“[T]he poorer response by Spanish speakers may be related to factors such as their more disadvantaged socioeconomic status or higher medical burden, rather than their language preference per se,” wrote the authors.
The Spanish speakers tended to be older and less educated than their counterparts who preferred using English, with lower incomes and a first major depressive episode occurring later in life.
“These baseline differences are consistent with what we know about Latinos with mental illness” who prefer to speak Spanish, said Pumariega. “They have more socioeconomic and medical illness burdens, but also show more chronicity of mental illness and a longer time to seeking treatment.”
Part of that disparity may be due not only to socioeconomic issues but to a preference among Latinos for obtaining mental health care from primary care providers, who ordinarily know less about mental illnesses than specialists do, said Pumariega.
“Primary care physicians do not have the same skills as psychiatrists in diagnosing and treating depression, leading to a less-skilled approach to management of depression and possibly contributing to some disparities of outcomes,” he said.
Furthermore, a preference for primary care may have deep cultural roots. Among some Latinos, especially the less educated and the more recent arrivals in the United States, there is an added burden of stigma in seeking help, based on experiences in their ancestral countries. To them, seeing a psychiatrist is just the first step on a slippery slope to institutionalization, said Pumariega.
Another issue is the variation of subcultures collected under the single umbrella labeled “Hispanic” or “Latino.” “A Cuban-American psychiatrist may well miss the meaning and context of a Mexican-American's story,” said Pumariega.
Finally, many clinical trials may contain a subtle, invisible barrier despite all attempts to bridge the gap between researcher and subject, he said.
“It is assumed that Latinos have a clear conception of what depression means to the interviewer or psychiatrist,” he said. “If they used culturally specific Spanish-language terms, the responses may have been different. You have to use terminology they use, not what is used in mainstream culture.”
“Depression Outcomes of Spanish- and English-Speaking Hispanic Outpatients in STAR*D” is posted at<http://ps.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/59/11/1273>.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric News

History

Published online: 5 December 2008
Published in print: December 5, 2008

Notes

Whether clinical trial participants chose to be addressed in Spanish rather than English was associated with depression severity and outcomes.

Authors

Details

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share