Skip to main content
Full access
Letters to the Editor
Published Online: 4 September 2009
Recently I had two referral experiences that I would like to share. The circumstances of both were identical. An insurance company had given two patients my name—however, the company had given out two names: that of a mental health therapist who it said would perform the evaluation and provide treatment and that of “a psychiatrist for your medications.” It does indeed appear that psychiatry has traded off the “50-minute hour” for the “15-minute med-check visit.” Perhaps the time has come to change the official definition of what a psychiatrist does.
I began to wonder about this “sea change”—not just in psychiatry but in medicine in general—and the proverbial swinging pendulum between mind and body. Clearly one cannot have a psychogenic illness without a brain, and as such, the neurosciences and medications are a realistic consideration. However, it does appear that we have taken the psychotherapy out of psychiatry.
I began to wonder how this has come about; it has been a slow and progressive process. Periodically we read about circuit-riding psychiatrists being subsidized liberally by pharmaceutical companies. We read about large pharmaceutical studies. Rarely do we read about psychotherapy studies—an exception being the article in the October 1, 2008, Journal of the American Medical Association, titled “Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.”
We see pharmaceutical ads saturating the airwaves, magazines, and all manner of reading material. We now have conflict-of-interest disclosures. One must begin to wonder by whom and how is psychiatry being defined. Or perhaps we should remember the Watergate metaphor and “follow the money.” I began to wonder about how our psychiatrists are being trained and what are the philosophies that are defining their training—is it perhaps an amalgam of big pharma, insurance companies, and who knows what else?
Progress is inevitable and realistic. I am not suggesting a return to the past—that also had its limitations, biases, and omissions. But, to repeat myself, we cannot have a psychogenic illness without a brain. We have established the appropriate need to examine the pivotal role of the brain. However, perhaps it is time for psychiatry to reintroduce the 50-minute hour and develop an equal interest in examining the human side of that mind/body equation.

CHESTER BERSCHLING, M.D.
 Pittsburgh, Pa.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 4 September 2009
Published in print: September 4, 2009

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share