Many physicians responding to a recent survey reported that the payments they receive from public health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid are insufficient and are impeding their ability to treat the growing number of people who are enrolled in them.
A further reduction in Medicare's physician reimbursement, slated to take place January 1, 2010, will be untenable, respondents maintained.
The likely impact of planned Medicare fee cuts was among the findings in a nationwide survey sponsored by the Physicians' Foundation, a nonprofit organization that gives grants “to advance the work of practicing physicians and to improve the quality of health care for all Americans.” Its members are medical societies and physicians. The survey, which was conducted in the first half of 2008, was sent to about 320,000 family physicians, general internists, pediatricians, and obstetrician/gynecologists in “active practice” listed in the AMA Physician Masterfile. About 11,950 physicians responded.
The results, released late last year, demonstrated that “declining reimbursement” was rated highest on a list of issues that physicians identify as impediments to the delivery of patient care in their practices.
Many of the reimbursement concerns that the physicians identified in the survey focused on public health care financing systems. For instance, 65 percent of respondents said Medicaid reimbursements for services are less than the cost of the care provided, and 36 percent said Medicare reimbursements also are less than the cost of providing care.
The findings did not surprise Laurence Miller, M.D., chair of APA's Committee on Public Funding for Psychiatric Services.
“More and more practices are not taking Medicare or Medicaid patients at all” due to the low reimbursements, Miller said.
The survey's findings seem to bear out this statement. More than 33 percent of physicians surveyed have closed their practices to new Medicaid patients, and 12 percent have closed their practices to new Medicare patients.
It's not just a physician's personal income that is affected. The impact of low reimbursements on physicians' practices has included an inability to provide staff raises, purchase new equipment, and devote the optimum amount of time to each patient.
Another possible result of the low reimbursements is limiting the ability of physicians to adopt modern time- and money-saving technology. Among the respondents who lack an electronic medical record system—a priority for health care reformers—77 percent said they cannot afford the cost of adopting such technology.
Further Cuts Could Be Catastrophic
Future low reimbursements may further limit patients' access to care in both Medicare and Medicaid, particularly troubling as the U.S. population ages.
The physicians' responses to the survey echoed many similar concerns about the low reimbursements from public insurance programs raised in earlier physician surveys by other groups.
For example, a 2007 survey of 8,955 physicians sponsored by the AMA found that 60 percent of clinicians were planning to limit the number of new Medicare patients they would treat if a 10 percent cut in physician reimbursements had gone into effect in 2008. In July 2008 Congress voted to replace that cut with a small increase.
Medicare law requires payments to physicians to be set annually using a formula known as the sustainable growth rate. In recent years, the formula has resulted in reduced physician fees whose implementation was averted by congressional action. Medicare is scheduled for a 21 percent cut in physician reimbursements starting on January 1, 2010.
The great majority of respondents to the most recent survey, 82 percent, said even smaller cuts would make their practices “unsustainable.” A 10 percent payment reduction would lead 24 percent of the physicians to reduce the number of Medicare patients they see, and 14 percent said they would stop seeing Medicare patients entirely.
Miller said the lower reimbursement would serve as a double blow because many Medicare and Medicaid patients have complex illnesses, including mental illness comorbid with nonpsychiatric illnesses. Treating these patients is much more difficult and time consuming.
Are Better Times Ahead?
The sentiments expressed in the foundation's recent survey may help inform the effort by President Barack Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress to overhaul the U.S. health care system and expand health care access. Several health care reform proposals include expanded roles for public health care financing programs, while falling short of suggesting that raising reimbursements would be part of the reformed system.
The foundation emphasized that its survey findings indicate that medical coverage does not equate to medical access. Rather, they said, time and financial constraints will limit the ability of many physicians to treat patients newly covered by government and private plans.
“At a time when the new administration and new Congress are talking about ways to expand access to health care, the harsh reality is that there might not be enough doctors to handle the increased number of people who might want to see them if they get health insurance,” said Walker Ray, M.D., vice president of the Physicians' Foundation, in a written statement.
Expanding coverage without expanding the number of physicians and their compensation is likely to result in long wait times for the shrinking number of physicians willing to participate in a public system. These payment dynamics already have played out in Massachusetts, according to critics, where a near universal health care financing program has been accompanied by a physician shortage and long waits for care.
At least some congressional leaders have called for increased funding for paying and training primary care physicians, but the financial impact on other specialty physicians remains unclear.
Rep. Pete Stark, (D-Calif.), chair of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health and a leader of health care reform, cautioned during a December 2008 conference call with reporters that physician concerns over reimbursement financing in the public sector will not derail a reform that the general public clearly wants.
He added that the public's health appears to be of less concern to the physicians with whom he talks than their declining incomes.
“The last time I looked in my district, I didn't see any Porsche dealers going out of business because the doctors were all going broke,” said Stark.
Findings from “The Physicians' Perspective: Medical Practice in 2008” are posted at<www.physiciansfoundations.org/news/news_show.htm?doc_id=72887>.▪