Skip to main content
Full access
Letters to the Editor
Published Online: 20 March 2009

Ethics Lesson

Thanks to Dr. Stotland for her January 16 column, which was both about, and not about, the man who is no longer governor of Illinois. Her column was a“ lemons-to-lemonade” accomplishment on her part. She managed to turn a major embarrassment for our state into an opportunity to educate the public, and our membership, about a not-too-well-known section of our ethics code.
As chair of the Illinois Psychiatric Society's Ethics Committee, I'm aware that the so-called “Goldwater Rule”—the prohibition on APA members making public diagnoses of public figures—is not widely known. One only has to watch major news outlets to see members of various mental health professions violating this ethical canon. The resignation of Gov. Spitzer of New York and recent events in Illinois both provoked such comments.
If we impressionistically feel a public figure is harming the public, it's tempting but still wrong to publicly diagnose that individual. This would lead us down a path fraught with risk to people in public life, to our profession, and to society at large. Were we to ignore this ethics rule, public figures could be stigmatized, psychiatrists would hurt the reputation of our profession by acting outside the bounds of our expertise (diagnosing people we've never met, without their consent), and society might miss the chance to hold politicians and others accountable for their behavior through the psychiatrist's perceived grant of a pathological “excuse.”
By the same token, our knowledge and experience may make us think it likely a public figure suffers from a mental disorder, but we must remember that true psychiatric diagnosis is based on a careful and objective weighing of information, and that information should be obtained directly from the person being diagnosed, at their request or at least with their consent.
As professionals with a responsibility to society as well as to our patients, we must resist the urge to assign a diagnosis to those in public life because of the harm it could do both to public discourse and to our own profession. Thanks, Dr. Stotland, for reminding us, and the public, of this important principle.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 20 March 2009
Published in print: March 20, 2009

Authors

Affiliations

David H. Baron, M.D.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share