Skip to main content
Full access
Professional News
Published Online: 15 April 2011

Medicare Payment Commission Urges Minor Boost, Not Huge Cut

Abstract

In testimony before Congress, the MedPAC chair highlighted concerns that the long-running uncertainty about payment rates could affect the long-term stability of the program.
Medicare payments to physicians should be increased next year by 1 percent, according to a report last month to Congress by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC).
The committee's recommendations came just days after the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) forecast a massive 29.5 percent cut next year for physician payment under the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula.
In its report, the commission stated that "available data find that, overall, Medicare payments [at current levels] for physician and other health professional services are adequate. Access, supply, quality, and volume measures suggest that most Medicare beneficiaries are able to obtain physician services with few or no problems."
The report added that a 2010 patient survey by the commission found that "Medicare beneficiaries (age 65 or older) were more likely to report better access to physicians than privately insured individuals (age 50 to 64)."
However, the commission noted that "relative to current law, this recommendation [for a 1 percent update] is estimated to increase federal program spending by more than $2 billion in the first year and by more than $10 billion over five years."
Physician payment under the Medicare program has evolved into a repetitive drama, with increasingly draconian cuts being forecast each year by CMS followed by vigorous protests from physician groups and last-minute reprieves granted by Congress. Last year Congress extended 2010 Medicare physician payment rates through the rest of 2011, blocking a dramatic 25 percent across-the-board cut that was to have taken effect January 1 (Psychiatric News, January 7).
The MedPAC recommendation is not binding on Congress, but is used as a starting point for negotiations. The 2012 reduction is the largest that physicians have faced.
APA, the AMA, and other physician and senior groups such as AARP have consistently argued that the entire formula—especially the sustainable growth rate component, which requires increases in Medicare volume to be compensated for by decreases in payment—needs to be reformed.
"The AMA concurs with MedPAC's conclusion that the nearly 30 percent cut built into Medicare's payment system for 2012 would jeopardize access to physician services for many patients and should be replaced with a positive update to help offset increases in practice costs," said AMA President Cecil Wilson, M.D., in a statement.
In testimony before Congress, Med-PAC Chair Glenn Hackbarth, J.D., discussed the flaws of the SGR formula and the concern that continued uncertainty about payment rates can have on the stability of the Medicare program.
"A main flaw of the SGR is it neither rewards individual providers who restrain unnecessary volume growth nor penalizes those who contribute most to inappropriate volume increases," he said. "Indeed, volume growth has been a major factor in the prescribed SGR payment cuts—cuts expected to be at least 25 percent in 2012.
"There is general consensus that fee cuts of that magnitude would be detrimental to beneficiary access to care, and legislative overrides of the SGR have averted payment cuts in recent years," Hackbarth said. "However, these overrides are merely temporary, leading to mounting frustration among physicians, other health professionals, and their patients and to a desire for a longer-term remedy. However, the high budgetary cost of eliminating some or all of the scheduled fee cuts in the longer term has prevented such proposals from becoming law.... The commission plans to continue to work on SGR payment policies and consider various approaches for updating Medicare's physician fee schedule."
The MedPAC report and the chair's testimony to Congress is posted at <www.medpac.gov/documents/Mar11_EntireReport.pdf>.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 15 April 2011
Published in print: April 15, 2011

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share