Site maintenance Wednesday, November 13th, 2024. Please note that access to some content and account information will be unavailable on this date.
Full access
Professional News
Published Online: 7 September 2012

How Successful Are Residents in Predicting Violence Risk?

Aaron LevinAuthors Info & Affiliations
Publication: Psychiatric News
Volume 47, Number 17
https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.47.17.psychnews_47_17_20-a
Track CitationsAdd to favorites

Abstract

Years of experience can give attending psychiatrists an advantage in violence risk assessment, but first-year residents may have a way to catch up quickly.
Mass shooting incidents always prompt renewed discussion about mental health clinicians’ ability to evaluate someone’s risk for violence.
Experience matters for that skill, and so do numbers, according to a study published online September 1 in Psychiatric Services in Advance. Attending clinicians did a better job than residents in assessing potential for violence among psychiatric inpatients at a California hospital, the study concluded.
“It’s reassuring to know that, but it isn’t as obvious as it seems,” lead author Alan Teo, M.D., now a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation clinical scholar at the University of Michigan, told Psychiatric News.
In fact, little research explores how training and experience affect risk assessment, wrote Teo and colleagues, who were all at the University of California, San Francisco, when working on the study.
Using a retrospective, case-control design, they compared evaluations of 151 patients who had physically assaulted staff with those of 150 randomly selected nonviolent patients.
A total of 38 psychiatry trainees, most a year or two into residency, had evaluated 52 patients at admission. Forty-one attending psychiatrists, on average 14 years after completing residency, assessed the other 249 patients.
The attendings predicted risk accurately for 70 percent of the patients, but the residents got it right only 52 percent of the time—roughly equal to flipping a coin.
The researchers then used a five-item clinical subscale of the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-20 (HCR-20-C) to evaluate charts of all the patients.
The five questions covered active symptoms of major mental illness, impulsivity, lack of insight, negative attitudes, and unresponsiveness to treatment, said Teo. “Twenty items is just not feasible in a busy clinical setting.”
Use of the HRC-20-C would have improved the residents’ accuracy to 67 percent, almost that of their more-experienced colleagues. However, the latter would not have done much better using the list.
Still, said Teo, “It’s not every day that you can find a checklist to make up for that gap in clinical experience.”
Use of structured risk assessments like the HCR-20-C might make residents more aware of useful information arising during an admission workup and help them improve their skills, the researchers suggested.
“The Relationship Between Level of Training and Accuracy of Violence Risk Assessment” is posted at http://ps.psychiatryonline.org/PSInAdvance.aspx.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric News
Psychiatric News
Volume 47 • Number 17 • September 7, 2012
Pages: 20 - 21

History

Published online: 7 September 2012
Published in print: September 7, 2012

Authors

Details

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard
Tips for downloading citations

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

×

As described within the American Psychiatric Association (APA)'s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences. Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.