Skip to main content
Full access
Research Article
Published Online: August 1997

Satisfaction of Vietnamese patients and their families with refugee and mainstream mental health services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study examined levels of satisfaction with mainstream mental health services and specialized mental health services for refugees among Vietnamese psychiatric patients and their relatives. Demographic, diagnostic, symptomatic, and service-related issues that might influence satisfaction were investigated. METHODS: Eighty-six Vietnamese patients were identified from case notes of mainstream inpatient services (N = 31), mainstream community services (N = 7), and a specialized refugee treatment unit (N = 48). During an interview, a scale measuring satisfaction with treatment as well as measures of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder was administered to them. A modified satisfaction scale was administered to 56 relatives. RESULTS: Patients and relatives were, on average, moderately satisfied with treatment. Patients expressed greater satisfaction with the specialized treatment unit for refugees than with mainstream services, a finding that was not influenced by diagnostic differences or symptom levels at the time patients responded. Further analyses controlling for multiple comparisons revealed that the extent of the information provided and the ease of negotiating changes in treatment were the most salient variables in distinguishing satisfaction levels across the two types of treatment centers. Patients' fluency in English and their relatives' level of education were inversely associated with satisfaction scores, tentatively suggesting that the greater the ability of patients and their families to evaluate services, the less likely they were to express satisfaction with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Specialized mental health services for refugees may be more acceptable to refugee populations than their mainstream counterparts, perhaps because better communication with patients and their families is possible in the specialized services. Patients and families who are in a position to evaluate services fully are more likely to be critical of treatments offered.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services
Psychiatric Services
Pages: 1064 - 1069
PubMed: 9255840

History

Published in print: August 1997
Published online: 1 April 2006

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share