Valproate Prescription Prevalence Among Women of Childbearing Age

The New York State Office of Mental Health (OMH) receives Medicaid claims data from the New York State Department of Health for individuals who either have a psychiatric diagnosis or who have generated a Medicaid claim for a mental health service in the current or prior year. The study sample consisted of Medicaid recipients with one or more active non-antipsychotic mood stabilizer prescriptions on May 1, 2009. Individuals with a diagnosis of a seizure disorder (ICD-9 diagnoses codes 345–345.99) in the previous five years were excluded. This work was conducted as part of a quality improvement initiative and was deemed by the OMH institutional review board to not constitute human subjects research.

Demographic information was extracted from Medicaid records (date of birth, gender, and race and ethnicity). We used the World Health Organization's definition of childbearing age (15–49 years) on the focal day (May 1, 2009) to identify the following groups: women of childbearing age, men in the same age range (15–49), and women 50 years and older.

Following a procedure created at the University of Pittsburgh (B. Stein, personal communication, May 21, 2008), we used claims data to assign a diagnosis according to the one most frequent among the ten most recent service claims in the past year. If a tie occurred, the most recent diagnosis was assigned, and if two diagnoses occurred on the same day, we selected the one associated with the higher-priced claim.

Frequency distributions were developed for race, gender, and diagnosis. Rates of use of non-antipsychotic mood stabilizers were examined for the entire sample and for three subgroups: women aged 15–49, men aged 15–49, and women ≥50 years of age. Chi square tests were used to compare rates of valproate use between subgroups.

Of 48,028 individuals with an active prescription for a non-antipsychotic mood stabilizer, 7,502 were not included because of a diagnosis of epilepsy, for a study sample of 40,526. A total of 51.3% were Caucasian (N=20,781); 21.0% (N=8,508) were African American, 12.7% (N=5,150) were Latino, 9.5% (N=3,837) were from other racial-ethnic minority groups, and 5.5% (N=2,250) had missing information. A total of 23,196 (57.2%) were women with a mean age of 38.8±14.8 years. The age categories included 3.4% (N=791) <15 years; 61.4% (N=14,236) 15–49 years, and 35.2% (N=8,169) ≥50 years of age. For men, 10.9% (N=1,883) were <15 years, 62.5% (N=10,823) 15–49 years, and 26.7% (N=4,624) ≥50 years. Among 40,526 individuals taking a non-antipsychotic mood stabilizer, 24.0% (N=9,744) had a bipolar disorder, 22.9% (N=9,298) had major depression or dysthymia, 18.7% (N=7,566) had schizophrenia, 8.5% (N=3,458) had an anxiety disorder, 13.3% (N=5,394) had other diagnoses, and 12.5% (N=5,066) were missing data that indicated psychiatric diagnosis. Individuals in the sample had 44,726 active prescriptions for non-antipsychotic mood stabilizers.

In the entire sample, valproate was the most frequently prescribed non-antipsychotic mood stabilizer (N=13,125, 32.3%), followed by gabapentin (N=10,697, 26.4%), lamotrigine (N=6,757, 16.7%), topiramate (N=5,460, 13.5%), lithium (N=5,293, 13.0%), oxcarbazepine (N=2,080, 5.1%), and carbamazepine (N=1,314, 3.2%). Women of childbearing age were less likely to be prescribed valproate compared with similarly aged men (23.4% versus 44.3%, χ²=1,222.4, df=1, p<.001) or women ≥50 years old (23.4% versus 25.8%, χ²=16.2, df=1, p<.001) (Figure 1). Compared with women ≥50 years, childbearing-aged women were more likely be prescribed lithium (12.4% versus 8.1%, χ²=99.6, df=1, p<.001), although less likely compared with similarly aged men (16.9%, χ²=98.5, df=1, p<.001). For women ≥50 years, gabapentin was the most commonly prescribed non-antipsychotic mood stabilizer and was prescribed significantly more often than for younger women (41.9% versus 22.9%, χ²=892.2, df=1, p<.001).

Valproate was the most frequently prescribed non-antipsychotic mood stabilizer for women of childbearing age. Among individuals on a non-antipsychotic mood stabilizer, women of childbearing age had lower rates of receiving valproate than similarly aged men or older women; however, 23.4% of women received this agent. Lithium, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine have less reproductive toxicity than valproate (5–7), and guidelines with risk-benefit decision-making support for treatment of pregnant women with bipolar disorder have been published (7). In the United Kingdom, Ackers and colleagues (8) demonstrated a tenfold increase in lamotrigine prescriptions for adolescent girls with epilepsy from 1993 to 2006, with fewer prescriptions for valproate and carbamazepine because of the greater reproductive toxicity of these agents.

The filling of a prescription by a woman of childbearing age provides an opportunity to provide teratology information to patients and prescribers. Our data suggest that such opportunities are frequent and could be incorporated into quality improvement initiatives to emphasize treatment with evidence-based agents tailored to reproductive capacity.

Even after data for individuals with a seizure disorder were removed from the analysis, patients with a wide variety of psychiatric diagnoses received anticonvulsants, and only a minority (20%) had diagnoses of bipolar disorder. The research base supports valproate, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine, but not gabapentin or other anticonvulsive agents, as being effective treatments for bipolar disorder (9,10). Nevertheless, gabapentin was the second most prescribed anticonvulsant in the New York State Medicaid mental health population and the most common agent prescribed to older women.

More than 20% of childbearing-aged women who had a psychiatric disorder and received a non-antipsychotic mood stabilizer were treated with valproate. The benefit of valproate treatment may outweigh the risks, such as for young women who are nonresponsive to alternative mood stabilizers. However, reducing the rate of first-line valproate use among women of childbearing age creates an opportunity for prevention of reproductive toxicity. Informing patients and providers about the comparative reproductive risks among mood stabilizers as well as about the evidence to support the efficacy of only a subset of anticonvulsants for bipolar disorder is a necessary component of influencing practice patterns (10). Researchers and quality improvement administrators should collaborate to develop interventions to support evidence-based treatments that incorporate reproductive considerations.

This work was conducted and funded under the auspices of the New York State Office of Mental Health Psychiatric Services and Clinical Knowledge Enhancement (PSYCKES) Initiative. Dr. Wisner's work was supported by grant R01-MH075921 from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).

Dr. Wisner served on an advisory board for Eli Lilly and Company and received a donation of estradiol and matching placebo transdermal patches from Novartis (Novogyne) for use in an NIMH-funded randomized clinical trial. Dr. Finnerty has received funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca to support the development of a consumer version of PSYCKES. The other authors report no competing interests.