Skip to main content
Full access
Letters to the Editor
Published Online: 1 October 2009

Maintenance Treatment for Patients With Bipolar Disorder

To the Editor: We read the study by Dr. Suppes et al. (1) with a great deal of interest and wish to raise concerns about the methodology. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of quetiapine with lithium or divalproex relative to monotherapy with lithium or semisodium valproate in maintenance treatment for patients with bipolar I disorder.
Randomized controlled trials are usually cited as the gold standard for detecting the efficacy of results. However, they often can be flawed in design and are not immune to bias.
First, in this study, 1,953 patients received open-label quetiapine. However, only 628 patients were randomly allocated for maintenance treatment. This indicates that only one-third of the patients were selected for maintenance therapy, which raises the possibility of selection bias. In this regard, Healy (2) stated that company sponsored clinical trials invariably recruit samples of convenience, which by definition do not actually sustain extrapolation to normal clinical practice.
Second, the authors used a wide range of exclusion and restricted inclusion criteria, which minimized the generalizability of the results.
Finally, although both arms received active treatment, the authors failed to perform power calculation, and they did not justify the sample size, which is also a requirement of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines (3) .
We would appreciate clarification of these issues raised.

Footnotes

The authors report no competing interests.
This letter (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09050700) was accepted for publication in July 2009.

References

1.
Suppes T, Vieta E, Liu S, Brecher M, Paulsson B: Maintenance treatment for patients with bipolar I disorder: results from a North American study of quetiapine in combination with lithium or divalproex (trial 127). Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166:476–488
2.
Healy D: Evidence biased psychiatry? Psychiatr Bull 2001; 25:290–291
3.
Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S: Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996; 276:637–639

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 1185
PubMed: 19797446

History

Published online: 1 October 2009
Published in print: October, 2009

Authors

Details

BETTAHALASOOR S. SOMASHEKAR, M.D., D.P.M.
ASHOK KUMAR JAINER, M.D., M.R.C.Psych.
WAJID SHAFI, M.D.
Coventry, United Kingdom

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share