Neural Correlates of Emotional Distractibility in Bipolar Disorder Patients, Unaffected Relatives, and Individuals With Hypomanic Personality
Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract
Objective
Neuropsychological deficits and emotion dysregulation are present in symptomatic and euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. However, there is little evidence on how cognitive functioning is influenced by emotion, what the neural correlates of emotional distraction effects are, and whether such deficits are a consequence or a precursor of the disorder. The authors used functional MRI (fMRI) to investigate these questions.
Method
fMRI was used first to localize the neural network specific to a certain cognitive task (mental arithmetic) and then to test the effect of emotional distractors on this network. Euthymic patients with bipolar I disorder (N=22), two populations at high risk for developing the disorder (unaffected first-degree relatives of individuals with bipolar disorder [N=17]), and healthy participants with hypomanic personality traits [N=22]) were tested, along with three age-, gender-, and education-matched healthy comparison groups (N=22, N=17, N=24, respectively).
Results
There were no differences in performance or activation in the task network for mental arithmetic. However, while all participants exhibited slower responses when emotional distractors were present, this response slowing was greatly enlarged in bipolar patients. Similarly, task-related activation was generally increased under emotional distraction; however, bipolar patients exhibited a further increase in right parietal activation that correlated positively with the response slowing effect.
Conclusions
The results suggest that emotional dysregulation leads to exacerbated neuropsychological deficits in bipolar patients, as evidenced by behavioral slowing and task-related hyperactivation. The lack of such a deficit in high-risk populations suggests that it occurs only after disease onset, rather than representing a vulnerability marker.
Bipolar disorder is a chronic, highly debilitating disease. Only 24% of bipolar patients achieve functional recovery 1 year after a manic episode (1), a rate that rises to only 43% after 2 years (2). The level of psychosocial functioning in bipolar patients is correlated with a number of neuropsychological deficits in executive function, attention, and memory (3, 4). These cognitive deficits are present in manic and depressive episodes and even persist into remission (5, 6). It has been hypothesized that the cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder arise, at least in part, from a general hyperreactivity of limbic brain structures and emotional hyperreactivity that interferes with neocortical activity necessary for successful task performance (7, 8). Indeed, heightened amygdala activation at rest and during nonemotional and emotion-related tasks has been seen in symptomatic (9, 10) and euthymic bipolar patients (11–13).
A few studies have investigated cognitive task performance in the presence of emotional distractors. Two studies using the emotional Stroop task found abnormally increased frontal and limbic activity in bipolar patients during color naming of emotional compared with neutral words (11, 14). However, emotion did not affect color-naming response latencies, both in patients and in comparison subjects, suggesting that task processing was not directly influenced. In a previous study (15), we applied an emotional go/no-go task, which yielded behavioral distraction effects in the emotional compared with the neutral condition, but no behavioral alterations in bipolar disorder, although activation was increased in frontal and limbic regions. Similar activation increases without behavioral effects were found in working memory tasks with sad mood induction (16) and face distractor stimuli (17). Critically, these studies could not clarify whether the observed hyperactivations reflect altered processing of the cognitive tasks (e.g., as a compensatory effect) or simply aberrant emotional processing. Addressing this issue would require independent definition of the relevant task network before studying the influence of emotion on this network.
Furthermore, it is unknown whether the potentially increased emotional distractibility is a consequence of the disorder or whether it represents a vulnerability marker. Clinically, this differentiation is critical for refining etiological models of bipolar disorder and designing either targeted therapy or preventive interventions.
In the present study, we aimed to investigate emotional distractibility in patients with bipolar disorder using a two-step functional MRI (fMRI) procedure. The first experiment allowed for the localization of the neural network relevant to a cognitive task, here mental arithmetic. To elucidate the influence of emotion on this network, the second experiment presented arithmetic tasks on top of emotional and neutral distractor images. Using this procedure, we previously found that in healthy subjects, emotional distraction leads to slower performance and increased activation in the task-related neural network, particularly in the parietal cortex (18). The crucial role of this region in arithmetic processing has been repeatedly demonstrated (19, 20). Our approach to testing whether potential deficits represent a vulnerability marker was to investigate remitted patients with bipolar I disorder and two groups of participants at heightened risk for developing bipolar disorder (i.e., unaffected first-degree relatives of bipolar I patients and healthy participants with hypomanic personality [defined using the Hypomanic Personality Scale (21)]), who have been demonstrated to have an increased risk of developing bipolar disorder over time (22). We compared each of these experimental groups with separate matched comparison groups and additionally compared the experimental groups directly with demographic variables as covariates.
If cognitive processing deficits in bipolar disorder are associated with increased emotional distractibility, we would expect an exacerbated behavioral slowing effect and a more pronounced task-related activation increase, particularly in the parietal cortex, which should also be present in the high-risk groups if these deficits represent a vulnerability marker of bipolar disorder.
Method
Participants
All participants underwent the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (23–26), as well as screening for exclusion criteria (neurological disorders, head trauma with loss of consciousness, metal implants, tattoos, substance abuse or dependence, and age <18 or >65). Interviews and observer rating scales for mania (Young Mania Rating Scale [27]) and depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D] [28]) were conducted by clinical psychologists, and participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI [29, 30]). The study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Heidelberg University Faculty of Medicine in Mannheim, Germany. All participants provided written informed consent before entering the study.
Sample 1: bipolar patients and healthy comparison subjects.
Twenty-two euthymic bipolar patients and 22 gender-, age-, and education-matched healthy comparison subjects with no history of or current mental disorders participated in the study. Patients were recruited at the Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany, and through local psychiatrists, psychotherapists, and patient support groups. None of the patients currently met criteria for any DSM-IV disorder other than bipolar I disorder. A life chart assessing variables related to illness course was completed for all patients (Table 1). Euthymia was defined as a HAM-D score <5 and a Young Mania Rating Scale score <7 (31). We asked patients about their current medication and verified its stability during the past 6 months. To analyze the psychotropic medication effect, we calculated the total medication load according to a published algorithm (32) reflecting dosage and a variety of different medications (33). The composite measure was generated by summing all individual medication codes for each medication category (mean=2.32, SD=2.08). We then checked for correlations of this index with the effects of interest in bipolar patients.
| Characteristic | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bipolar Patients (N=22) | Healthy Comparison Subjects (N=22) | Analysis | Relatives (N=17) | Healthy Comparison Subjects (N=17) | Analysis | Hypomanic Personality Participants (N=22) | Healthy Comparison Subjects (N=24) | Analysis | |||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | p | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | p | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | p | |
| Age (years) | 39.4 | 11.8 | 40.5 | 11.8 | 0.770 | 36.6 | 16.2 | 35.9 | 15.6 | 0.898 | 21.0 | 1.6 | 22.3 | 2.9 | 0.064 |
| Education (years) | 11.3 | 1.6 | 11.8 | 1.5 | 0.293 | 12.5 | 1.2 | 12.9 | 0.3 | 0.175 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0 | |
| Intelligence scorea | 105.4 | 12.6 | 107.7 | 14.5 | 0.592 | 103.1 | 11.8 | 109.4 | 12.8 | 0.157 | 97.7 | 5.2 | 102.3 | 12.8 | 0.127 |
| Handedness (laterality quotient score)b | 83.8 | 13.8 | 85.7 | 23.1 | 0.736 | 57.7 | 64.8 | 80.1 | 41.1 | 0.238 | 82.7 | 16.9 | 84.6 | 16.5 | 0.715 |
| Current symptoms | |||||||||||||||
| Young Mania Rating Scale score | 1.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.029 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.543 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.904 |
| Beck Depression Inventory score | 6.7 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 2.0 | <0.001 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 0.289 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 0.068 |
| Course of illness | |||||||||||||||
| Age at onset (years) | 25.2 | 7.7 | |||||||||||||
| Age at first hospitalization (years) | 27.3 | 8.2 | |||||||||||||
| Number of previous hospitalizations | 3.2 | 2.5 | |||||||||||||
| Number of depressive episodes | 3.6 | 2.4 | |||||||||||||
| Number of manic episodes | 3.0 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||
| Time in remission (months) | 54.0 | 69.0 | |||||||||||||
| N | % | N | % | p | N | % | N | % | p | N | % | N | % | p | |
| Gender | |||||||||||||||
| Female | 14 | 63.6 | 12 | 54.5 | 0.540 | 8 | 47.1 | 8 | 47.1 | 1.00 | 13 | 59.1 | 14 | 58.3 | 0.958 |
| Male | 8 | 36.4 | 10 | 45.5 | 9 | 52.9 | 9 | 52.9 | 9 | 40.9 | 10 | 41.7 | |||
| Ever married | 12 | 55.0 | 13 | 59.1 | 0.761 | 11 | 64.7 | 6 | 35.3 | 0.169 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Currently employed | 13 | 59.1 | 21 | 95.5 | 0.004 | 15 | 88.2 | 15 | 88.2 | 1.00 | 19 | 86.4 | 24 | 100 | 0.101 |
| Medication use | |||||||||||||||
| None | 3 | 13.6 | |||||||||||||
| Antidepressants | 7 | 31.8 | |||||||||||||
| Benzodiazepines | 1 | 4.5 | |||||||||||||
| Antipsychotics | 12 | 54.5 | |||||||||||||
| Lithium carbonate | 8 | 36.4 | |||||||||||||
| Valproic acid | 11 | 50.0 | |||||||||||||
| Lamotrigine | 6 | 27.3 | |||||||||||||
| Substance use | |||||||||||||||
| Caffeine | 14 | 66.7 | 17 | 81.0 | 0.292 | 10 | 62.5 | 13 | 81.3 | 0.433 | 14 | 63.6 | 12 | 52.2 | 0.550 |
| Nicotine | 6 | 28.6 | 2 | 9.1 | 0.101 | 2 | 12.5 | 1 | 5.9 | 0.601 | 9 | 40.9 | 3 | 12.5 | 0.031 |
| Alcohol | 7 | 31.8 | 9 | 40.9 | 0.531 | 6 | 35.3 | 7 | 41.2 | 1.00 | 20 | 90.9 | 10 | 42.7 | <0.001 |
a
Measured with the Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest-B.
b
Measured with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.
Sample 2: relatives of bipolar patients and healthy comparison subjects.
Seventeen unaffected relatives of bipolar I patients and 17 gender-, age-, and education-matched healthy volunteers participated (Table 1). None fulfilled criteria for any lifetime or current mental disorders, and none were taking any psychotropic medications. The relatives were not related to the bipolar patients tested in this study. Five relatives were siblings, four were children, and eight were parents of bipolar patients. Twelve relatives were from simplex families (one case in the family), and five were from multiplex families (at least two cases in the family).
Sample 3: individuals with hypomanic personality and healthy comparison subjects.
In previous studies (22, 34), individuals with hypomanic personality were selected based on the Hypomanic Personality Scale, on which scoring in the upper 10% was defined as hypomanic personality (resulting in scores ≥31). Through online questionnaires and in lectures, 1,567 individuals were screened. Twenty-four individuals with hypomanic personality were included, as well as 24 gender-, age-, and education-matched healthy comparison subjects who did not score 0.5 standard deviations above the mean of the distribution (Table 1). For analyses, two participants with hypomanic personality were excluded because of fMRI motion artifacts. None of the participants in this sample fulfilled criteria for mental disorders or reported a positive family history of affective or psychotic disorders, nor were they taking any psychotropic medications. In general, participants with hypomanic personality reported increased caffeine and alcohol consumption; however, none of the study participants consumed alcohol or caffeine beginning the evening of the day before scanning.
Experimental Paradigm
The details of the experimental paradigm have been described elsewhere (18). Briefly, two experimental tasks were presented (Figure 1). Task 1 was a localizer to identify brain activation patterns specific to mental arithmetic operations. In this task, 20 arithmetic problems and 20 number rows were presented for 6,000 ms each, and participants decided whether the presented solution for the equation was correct or whether a “0” was part of the number row.
FIGURE 1. Sequence of Events in the Trial of a Localizer to Identify Brain Activation Patterns Specific to Mental Arithmetic Operations (Task 1) and the Experimental Task To Test the Effects of Emotional Distraction in Mental Arithmetic (Task 2)a
a The images shown are examples that resemble those in the experiment but are not part of the International Affective Picture System, which was used in this study.
Task 2 aimed to test the influence of emotional distraction on task processing and presented arithmetic problems equivalent to but different from the problems presented in the localizer task (35). The arithmetic problems were superimposed on 32 highly arousing emotional images (16 negative, 16 positive) and 16 low-arousal neutral images (taken from the International Affective Picture System [36]). Each trial started with 1) a fixation cross presented with a jitter of 3,000–5,025 ms, followed by 2) an emotion induction phase (1,000 ms), 3) the distraction (i.e., the presentation of an arithmetic problem through a transparent overlay on the images; 6,000 ms), and 4) a rating phase (4,000 ms), which was not relevant to this study. Task 2 included 48 mental arithmetic trials. Participants received six training trials before the experiment to familiarize themselves with the procedure.
MRI Data Acquisition
MRI data were collected on a Magnetom Tim Trio 3-T scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) at the Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim. A high-resolution T1-weighted three-dimensional image was acquired (slice thickness, 1.1 mm, field of view=256×240×176 mm3, matrix=256×240×160). Functional images were obtained from 40 gradient-echo T2*-weighted slices (slice thickness, 2.3 mm) per volume. We used a single-shot echo planar sequence with parallel imaging GRAPPA (generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions) technique (with an acceleration factor of 2)(TR=2,700 ms, flip angle=90°, TE=27 ms, field of view=220 mm2, matrix=96×96, slice gap=0.7 mm).
fMRI Data Analysis
Image processing and statistical analyses were performed with SPM8 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8/). Functional images were realigned, slice-time corrected, and spatially normalized using the Montreal Neurological Institute template. For normalization, images were resampled every 3 mm using sinc interpolation. Images were smoothed using a 9×9×9-mm Gaussian kernel.
Individual data were analyzed using a general linear model for blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal changes due to the experimental conditions. Movement parameters calculated during realignment were included as parameters of no interest to control for movement artifacts. Individual statistical parametric maps were calculated for the contrasts of interest in order to investigate BOLD signal changes in response to 1) mental arithmetic (task 1: arithmetic problems versus number detection) and 2) the influence of emotion on mental arithmetic (task 2: arithmetic problems superimposed on emotional versus neutral images).
Second-level random-effects analyses were conducted. First, one-sample t tests were calculated for the above-mentioned individual contrast images across participants in each of the three samples. Second, to evaluate differences between the bipolar patients, the at-risk populations, and their respective comparison counterparts, two-sample t tests were computed for all the contrasts. These analyses were not confounded by demographic differences because the groups were carefully matched. Third, to explore differences between the experimental groups directly, we drew a sample from all available healthy comparison subjects that was matched in size to the bipolar group (N=22) and matched in demographic variables as closely as possible to all three experimental groups. We then conducted analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with group as a between-subjects factor (the bipolar, relatives, hypomanic personality, and comparison groups) and age and gender as covariates, since the included groups differed significantly in demographic variables (see Table S1 in the data supplement that accompanies the online edition of this article). Results of these analyses are reported in the data supplement.
For all analyses, because direct contrasts of these conditions yielded no differences in the mental arithmetic task networks, we averaged across negative and positive stimuli and thus enhanced statistical power (18, 35). Activations were thresholded at a whole-brain family-wise-error-corrected p value <0.05, with an extent threshold of 10 voxels in order to protect against false positive activations. From the activations found in task 1, a mask image was created. This mask was then used for task 2, in which activation was also thresholded with a family-wise-error-corrected p value <0.05 and a minimum of 10 voxels.
Behavioral Data Analysis
Reaction times and accuracy were analyzed with SPSS, version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, N.Y.). Repeated-measures ANOVAs were calculated with group (bipolar patients compared with healthy comparison subjects, relatives compared with healthy comparison subjects, and hypomanic personality participants compared with healthy comparison subjects) as a between-subject factor and task (arithmetic, number detection), in Task 1, or emotion (emotional or neutral distractor), in Task 2, as a within-subject factor. As for the imaging data, additional analyses comparing all groups directly were carried out and included age and gender as covariates (see the online data supplement).
Results
Behavioral Data
Task 1.
Accuracy was higher in the number detection task than in the arithmetic task (see Table S3 in the online data supplement), which was evident in a main effect of task condition in each sample (sample 1: F=86.7, df=1, 42, p<0.001; sample 2: F=60.8, df=1, 32, p<0.001; sample 3: F=67.4, df=1, 42, p<0.001). There were no significant effects of group or interactions of group and task condition.
Regarding reaction times, there were significant main effects of task condition in each sample (sample 1: F=267.4.5, df=1, 41, p<0.001; sample 2: F=168.2, df=1, 32, p<0.001; sample 3: F=256.4, df=1, 42, p<0.001), with prolonged reactions in the arithmetic task compared with the number detection task, but no group effects were found.
Task 2.
For accuracy rates, we observed no significant main effects for distractor condition (emotional compared with neutral images) or group, nor a significant interaction effect (see Table S3 in the data supplement). However, participants were slower in solving arithmetic problems presented on emotional compared with neutral images, as evident in significant main effects of distractor condition on reaction times (sample 1: F=45.0, df=1, 42, p<0.001; sample 2: F=6.7, df=1, 32, p<0.05; sample 3: F=20.7, df=1, 42, p<0.001). We observed no significant main effect of group in any of the samples. While there were no interactions of group with the distractor condition in samples 2 and 3, there was an interaction in sample 1 with bipolar patients and healthy comparison subjects (F=18.7, df=1, 42, p<0.01). The difference between bipolar patients and their healthy counterparts was also larger than the difference between the other two groups and their respective comparison counterparts (Δ sample 1 compared with Δ sample 2: t=4.9, df=76, p<0.001; Δ sample 1 compared with Δ sample 3: t=6.4, df=88, p<0.001).
None of the behavioral effects correlated with medication load.
fMRI Data
Task 1.
To elucidate the neural correlates of mental arithmetic, we contrasted the arithmetic task with the number detection task. There were no significant group differences in any of the samples. Therefore, we averaged across the groups in each sample (Figure 2A–C; also see Table S4 in the data supplement), which yielded largely consistent activation patterns. Activation foci included the left and right dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, the insula, and the parietal cortex, extending into the occipital and ventral temporal cortex. Because the groups did not differ, one mask image for each sample with these networks was created for the analysis for task 2. There were no regions with enhanced activation in the number detection task.
Task 2.
To test the influence of emotional distractors on task processing, we contrasted the arithmetic task trials presented on emotional images with those presented on neutral images using the network identified in task 1 as a mask. For emotional background images, we found increased activation in the dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and the parietal cortex in all three samples and in the left and right insula in samples 2 and 3 (Table 2, Figure 2D–F). There were no differences between relatives or individuals with hypomanic personality and their respective comparison counterparts. However, bipolar patients exhibited increased activation in the right parietal cortex compared with healthy comparison subjects (Figure 3).
| Contrast and Region | Hemisphere | Brodmann’s Area | MNI Coordinates (x, y, z)a | Cluster Sizeb | Z | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bipolar patients plus healthy comparison subjects: emotional > neutral distractors | ||||||
| Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | Left | 6 | –27, –1, 49 | 160 | 3.39 | 3.65 |
| Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex | Right | 32 | 9, 23, 40 | 155 | 3.13 | 3.34 |
| Superior/inferior parietal cortex | Left | 7 | –15, –76, 52 | 576 | 3.63 | 3.96 |
| Right | 7 | 18, –79, 49 | 398 | 3.54 | 3.83 | |
| Relatives plus healthy comparison subjects: emotional > neutral distractors | ||||||
| Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | Right | 48 | 39, 14, 28 | 206 | 3.83 | 4.33 |
| Right | 45 | 48, 23, 4 | 58 | 3.83 | 4.33 | |
| Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex | Right | 32 | 3, 35, 31 | 281 | 3.34 | 3.68 |
| Insula | Left | 48 | –27, 10, –11 | 74 | 3.56 | 3.96 |
| Right | 48 | 33, 14, 7 | 87 | 3.54 | 3.94 | |
| Superior/inferior parietal cortex | Left | 7 | –9, –70, 58 | 476 | 3.66 | 4.10 |
| Right | 7 | 12, –61, 61 | 339 | 4.01 | 4.60 | |
| Hypomanic personality participants plus healthy comparison subjects: emotional > neutral distractors | ||||||
| Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | Right | 6 | 21, 2, 55 | 50 | 3.75 | 4.08 |
| Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex | Left | 32 | –9, 26, 25 | 84 | 3.22 | 3.44 |
| Insula | Left | 48 | –30, 17, –14 | 41 | 4.20 | 4.68 |
| Right | 48 | 30, 20, –17 | 19 | 3.77 | 4.11 | |
| Superior/inferior parietal cortex | Left | 5 | –18, –58, 61 | 269 | 4.05 | 4.48 |
| Right | 7 | 21, –61, 64 | 191 | 3.92 | 4.30 | |
| Bipolar patients > healthy comparison subjects: emotional > neutral distractors | ||||||
| Superior/inferior parietal cortex | Right | 7 | 30, –64, 64 | 61 | 4.01 | 4.46 |
a
MNI=Montreal Neurological Institute.
b
Number of activated voxels.
FIGURE 3. Reaction Time and Activation Increase in Emotional vs. Neutral Trialsa
a In panel A, reaction times in task 2 for bipolar patients indicate enlarged distraction effects through emotional background images. In panel B, activation differences between bipolar patients and healthy comparison subjects (blue) are shown on the main effect of distraction (red [as displayed in Figure 2D]). Panel C shows the correlation of the reaction time distraction effect and the parietal hyperactivation for mental arithmetic on emotional background images. Panel D shows the respective percent signal change for bipolar patients and comparison subjects.
The difference in the extracted percent signal change in this region between bipolar patients and healthy comparison subjects was also larger than that between the other two groups and their respective comparison counterparts (Δ sample 1 compared with Δ sample 2: t=5.4, df=76, p<0.001; Δ sample 1 compared with Δ sample 3: t=4.5, df=88, p<0.001).
To relate the right parietal activation increase to the behavioral distraction effect, we correlated the reaction time increase with the activation increase (i.e., the differences between emotional and neutral trials). We found a significant correlation (r=0.45, p<0.01) (Figure 3), which remained significant when calculating across all participants (r=0.32, p<0.005).
There were no regions with enhanced activation in response to neutral compared with emotional background images. For the bipolar patients, we also correlated the observed distraction effect with different clinical variables (i.e., the medication load, time in remission, age at illness onset, number of illness episodes, age at first hospitalization, and number of previous hospitalizations), but no significant correlations were observed. Additionally, there were no significant correlations with scores on the BDI, HAM-D, and Young Mania Rating Scale, with intelligence, or with years of education (see Table S8 in the data supplement).
Discussion
The principal finding of this study is that euthymic bipolar patients experience exacerbated cognitive deficits under emotional distraction; this deficit is specific to bipolar patients in contrast to unaffected high-risk individuals. Bipolar patients exhibited increased response slowing during the arithmetic task while under emotional distraction, which was accompanied by a greater activation increase in a part of the task-related neural network, the right parietal cortex. That relatives of bipolar patients and participants with hypomanic personality were indistinguishable from their respective comparison counterparts suggests that this deficit is a consequence of the disorder rather than a vulnerability marker.
Neither bipolar patients nor high-risk individuals exhibited alterations in behavior or brain activity during the nonemotional mental arithmetic task. The identified neural network underlying mental arithmetic closely conforms with previous reports of clusters in the left and right parietal cortex (19), the dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (20, 37), and the insula, a common finding in studies of arithmetic processing (18, 38). The lack of group differences in behavioral and neural measures of task performance suggests that there are no general mathematical deficits in remitted bipolar patients and high-risk individuals. This allowed us to use the resulting activation patterns for the definition of one arithmetic task-specific neural network across groups.
When testing for the influence of emotional distractors on this network, bipolar patients exhibited prolonged response slowing. Consistent with our previous data from healthy individuals (18), all participants needed longer to perform the task while under emotional compared with neutral distraction, but this effect was largely increased in the bipolar disorder group. The lack of any effect on error rates demonstrates that participants were still able to solve the equations and compensate for the distraction effect. The fMRI data mirrored this pattern. Task-related activation, particularly in the left and right parietal cortex, but also in the dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, was increased in all participants under emotional distraction. Thus, it seems to be the additional recruitment of task-specific neural resources that enables individuals to compensate for emotional distraction effects, as has been previously suggested (18, 39–41). Critically, bipolar patients exhibited a larger interference effect than healthy comparison subjects, indicated by further enhanced activation increase in the right parietal cortex. Together with the increased response slowing, this suggests that bipolar patients are more affected by emotional distraction and need to recruit more task-specific neural resources to overcome the distraction effects. That is, those with the greatest distraction-related slowing exhibit the greatest degree of compensation to maintain accuracy in the face of slow performance. These results corroborate previous reports of increased activation in bipolar patients under emotional distraction in the absence of behavioral deficits (11, 14–16). The two-step fMRI procedure applied in our study, however, allows a clear interpretation of the activation increase as task specific, which is further supported by the correlation of increased response times with parietal hyperactivation.
Neither of the studied high-risk populations exhibited the increased emotional distraction effect observed in bipolar patients, although in previous studies, abnormal emotional processing (e.g., in responding to emotional faces) and emotion regulation have been observed in unaffected relatives (42–44) and in individuals with hypomanic personality (45–47). This selective impairment in remitted chronic bipolar patients suggests that increased emotional distractibility is a consequence of bipolar disorder that develops after the experience of at least one illness episode. Emotional stimuli are particularly salient distractors but seem to have an increased potential to impair cognition in bipolar disorder, for which an emotional hyperreactivity is well described. The persistent neuropsychological deficits after bipolar disorder onset are evidence of vulnerable cognitive processing. Our results suggest that this vulnerable system cannot manage emotional distraction as well as before illness onset. Interestingly, there was no correlation with current symptoms or clinical characteristics, such as the number of previous episodes, which may suggest that the deficit occurs after the first illness episode and remains stable thereafter. Future studies should investigate whether emotional distractibility is increased during acute episodes, whether it shows some valence specificity, and whether it increases with the number of experienced episodes. These studies should also compare first-onset and chronic bipolar patients.
Clinically, our findings are highly relevant with regard to patients’ functional recovery. Because emotional distraction leads to neuropsychological dysfunction, which in turn predicts functional recovery (3, 4), interventions could include training of selective attention and emotion regulation, since this may be able to enhance sociofunctional integration in euthymic bipolar patients. Establishing such an intervention for improving neuropsychological performance in bipolar patients seems particularly important because these patients may attach emotional meaning even to nonemotional stimuli and tasks (48–50).
There are several limitations to this study. A large proportion of the tested patients continued to receive psychotropic medication. While it has been noted that this may increase generalizability (33), it may also confound the results. We tested for an influence of medication by correlating the effects with a composite medication load score, which has previously been suggested and successfully applied (33, 51–53). However, future studies should include samples large enough to allow contrasting of drug subgroups and testing for effects in nonmedicated patients. It may also be possible that our sample sizes were not large enough to detect small differences; this is particularly relevant for the comparison of relatives and participants with hypomanic personality with their respective comparison counterparts. However, here the analysis was not only based on null effects in this comparison, but also on observed differences when comparing bipolar patients with any of the other groups (see the online data supplement). Because approximately one-half of the relatives were >30 years old, one might argue that they do not represent a group at high risk but rather possess some resilience factor. However, we found no differences when directly comparing younger and older relatives (see the data supplement), which corroborates the conclusion that the deficit develops only after the experience of an illness episode.
Conclusions
In summary, our results indicate increased emotional distractibility as a consequence of bipolar disorder. Hyperactivation in task-relevant neural regions is related to these behavioral deficits. The findings support a role of disturbed emotion-cognition interactions during the course of bipolar disorder that could critically hinder functional recovery and thus should be a specific target of treatment.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Heike Schmidt for assistance with data acquisition.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material (1487_ds001.pdf)
- View/Download
- 497.21 KB
References
1.
Keck PE, McElroy SL, Strakowski SM, West SA, Sax KW, Hawkins JM, Bourne ML, Haggard P: 12-Month outcome of patients with bipolar disorder following hospitalization for a manic or mixed episode. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:646–652
2.
Tohen M, Zarate CA, Hennen J, Khalsa HM, Strakowski SM, Gebre-Medhin P, Salvatore P, Baldessarini RJ: The McLean-Harvard First-Episode Mania Study: prediction of recovery and first recurrence. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:2099–2107
3.
Martínez-Arán A, Vieta E, Colom F, Torrent C, Sánchez-Moreno J, Reinares M, Benabarre A, Goikolea JM, Brugué E, Daban C, Salamero M: Cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar patients: implications for clinical and functional outcome. Bipolar Disord 2004; 6:224–232
4.
Martínez-Arán A, Vieta E, Reinares M, Colom F, Torrent C, Sánchez-Moreno J, Benabarre A, Goikolea JM, Comes M, Salamero M: Cognitive function across manic or hypomanic, depressed, and euthymic states in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:262–270
5.
Dittmann S, Fast K, Dederra K, Seemüller F, Möller H-J, Riedel M, Severus E: Kognitive Funktionsfähigkeit bei bipolaren Erkrankungen. Nervenheilkunde 2008; 3:155–164
6.
Arts B, Jabben N, Krabbendam L, van Os J: Meta-analyses of cognitive functioning in euthymic bipolar patients and their first-degree relatives. Psychol Med 2008; 38:771–785
7.
Henin A, Micco JA, Wozniak J, Briesch JM, Narayan AJ, Hirshfeld-Becker DR: Neurocognitive functioning in bipolar disorder. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2009; 16:231–250
8.
Strakowski SM, Delbello MP, Adler CM: The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a review of neuroimaging findings. Mol Psychiatry 2005; 10:105–116
9.
Altshuler L, Bookheimer S, Proenza MA, Townsend J, Sabb F, Firestine A, Bartzokis G, Mintz J, Mazziotta J, Cohen MS: Increased amygdala activation during mania: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:1211–1213
10.
Almeida JR, Versace A, Hassel S, Kupfer DJ, Phillips ML: Elevated amygdala activity to sad facial expressions: a state marker of bipolar but not unipolar depression. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67:414–421
11.
Lagopoulos J, Malhi GS: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of emotional Stroop in euthymic bipolar disorder. Neuroreport 2007; 18:1583–1587
12.
Wessa M, Linke J: Emotional processing in bipolar disorder: behavioural and neuroimaging findings. Int Rev Psychiatry 2009; 21:357–367
13.
Phillips ML, Ladouceur CD, Drevets WC: A neural model of voluntary and automatic emotion regulation: implications for understanding the pathophysiology and neurodevelopment of bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2008; 13:833–857
14.
Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J, Sachdev PS, Ivanovski B, Shnier R: An emotional Stroop functional MRI study of euthymic bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2005; 7(suppl 5):58–69
15.
Wessa M, Houenou J, Paillère-Martinot ML, Berthoz S, Artiges E, Leboyer M, Martinot JL: Fronto-striatal overactivation in euthymic bipolar patients during an emotional go/nogo task. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:638–646
16.
Deckersbach T, Rauch SL, Buhlmann U, Ostacher MJ, Beucke JC, Nierenberg AA, Sachs G, Dougherty DD: An fMRI investigation of working memory and sadness in females with bipolar disorder: a brief report. Bipolar Disord 2008; 10:928–942
17.
Bertocci MA, Bebko GM, Mullin BC, Langenecker SA, Ladouceur CD, Almeida JR, Phillips ML: Abnormal anterior cingulate cortical activity during emotional n-back task performance distinguishes bipolar from unipolar depressed females. Psychol Med 2012; 42:1417–1428
18.
Wessa M, Heissler J, Schönfelder S, Kanske P: Goal-directed behavior under emotional distraction is preserved by enhanced task-specific activation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2013; 8:305–312
19.
Menon V, Rivera SM, White CD, Glover GH, Reiss AL: Dissociating prefrontal and parietal cortex activation during arithmetic processing. Neuroimage 2000; 12:357–365
20.
Ischebeck A, Zamarian L, Schocke M, Delazer M: Flexible transfer of knowledge in mental arithmetic: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2009; 44:1103–1112
21.
Eckblad M, Chapman LJ: Development and validation of a scale for hypomanic personality. J Abnorm Psychol 1986; 95:214–222
22.
Kwapil TR, Miller MB, Zinser MC, Chapman LJ, Chapman J, Eckblad M: A longitudinal study of high scorers on the Hypomanic Personality Scale. J Abnorm Psychol 2000; 109:222–226
23.
First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Publishing, 1997
24.
First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Benjamin L: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Washington DC, American Psychiatric Publishing, 1997
25.
Wittchen H-U, Zaudig M, Fydrich T: SKID-I: Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1997. [Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders]
26.
Wittchen H-U, Zaudig M, Fydrich T: SKID-II: Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1997. [Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders]
27.
Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA: A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 1978; 133:429–435
28.
Hamilton M: A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23:56–62
29.
Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4:561–571
30.
Hautzinger M, Keller F, Kühner C: BDI-II: Beck-Depressions-Inventar Revision. Frankfurt, Pearson Assessment, 2009
31.
Mercer L, Becerra R: A unique emotional processing profile of euthymic bipolar disorder? A critical review. J Affect Disord 2013; 146:295–309
32.
Sackeim HA: The definition and meaning of treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62(suppl 16):10–17
33.
Phillips ML, Travis MJ, Fagiolini A, Kupfer DJ: Medication effects in neuroimaging studies of bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165:313–320
34.
Meyer TD, Drüke B, Hautzinger M: Hypomane persönlichkeit: psychometrische evaluation und erste ergebnisse zur validität der deutschen version der Chapman-Skala. Z Klin Psychol Psychother 2000; 29:35–42
35.
Kanske P, Heissler J, Schönfelder S, Bongers A, Wessa M: How to regulate emotion? Neural networks for reappraisal and distraction. Cereb Cortex 2011; 21:1379–1388
36.
Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN: International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective Ratings of Pictures and Instruction Manual (Technical Report A–6). Gainesville, University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology, 2005
37.
Rickard TC, Romero SG, Basso G, Wharton C, Flitman S, Grafman J: The calculating brain: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38:325–335
38.
Grabner RH, Ansari D, Koschutnig K, Reishofer G, Ebner F, Neuper C: To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47:604–608
39.
Blair KS, Smith BW, Mitchell DG, Morton J, Vythilingam M, Pessoa L, Fridberg D, Zametkin A, Sturman D, Nelson EE, Drevets WC, Pine DS, Martin A, Blair RJ: Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion. Neuroimage 2007; 35:430–440
40.
Hart SJ, Green SR, Casp M, Belger A: Emotional priming effects during Stroop task performance. Neuroimage 2010; 49:2662–2670
41.
Pereira MG, de Oliveira L, Erthal FS, Joffily M, Mocaiber IF, Volchan E, Pessoa L: Emotion affects action: midcingulate cortex as a pivotal node of interaction between negative emotion and motor signals. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2010; 10:94–106
42.
Surguladze SA, Marshall N, Schulze K, Hall MH, Walshe M, Bramon E, Phillips ML, Murray RM, McDonald C: Exaggerated neural response to emotional faces in patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives. Neuroimage 2010; 53:58–64
43.
Olsavsky AK, Brotman MA, Rutenberg JG, Muhrer EJ, Deveney CM, Fromm SJ, Towbin K, Pine DS, Leibenluft E: Amygdala hyperactivation during face emotion processing in unaffected youth at risk for bipolar disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2012; 51:294–303
44.
Green MJ, Lino BJ, Hwang EJ, Sparks A, James C, Mitchell PB: Cognitive regulation of emotion in bipolar I disorder and unaffected biological relatives. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2011; 124:307–316
45.
Carver CS, Johnson SL: Tendencies toward mania and tendencies toward depression have distinct motivational, affective, and cognitive correlates. Cognit Ther Res 2009; 33:552–569
46.
Gruber J, Johnson SL, Oveis C, Keltner D: Risk for mania and positive emotional responding: too much of a good thing? Emotion 2008; 8:23–33
47.
Kwapil TR, Barrantes-Vidal N, Armistead MS, Hope GA, Brown LH, Silvia PJ, Myin-Germeys I: The expression of bipolar spectrum psychopathology in daily life. J Affect Disord 2011; 130:166–170
48.
Rich BA, Vinton DT, Roberson-Nay R, Hommer RE, Berghorst LH, McClure EB, Fromm SJ, Pine DS, Leibenluft E: Limbic hyperactivation during processing of neutral facial expressions in children with bipolar disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:8900–8905
49.
Strakowski SM, Adler CM, Holland SK, Mills N, DelBello MP: A preliminary fMRI study of sustained attention in euthymic, unmedicated bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 29:1734–1740
50.
Adler CM, Holland SK, Schmithorst V, Tuchfarber MJ, Strakowski SM: Changes in neuronal activation in patients with bipolar disorder during performance of a working memory task. Bipolar Disord 2004; 6:540–549
51.
Kanske P, Heissler J, Schönfelder S, Wessa M: Neural correlates of emotion regulation deficits in remitted depression: the influence of regulation strategy, habitual regulation use, and emotional valence. Neuroimage 2012; 61:686–693
52.
Versace A, Almeida JR, Hassel S, Walsh ND, Novelli M, Klein CR, Kupfer DJ, Phillips ML: Elevated left and reduced right orbitomedial prefrontal fractional anisotropy in adults with bipolar disorder revealed by tract-based spatial statistics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:1041–1052
53.
Linke J, King AV, Rietschel M, Strohmaier J, Hennerici M, Gass A, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Wessa M: Increased medial orbitofrontal and amygdala activation: evidence for a systems-level endophenotype of bipolar I disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2012; 169:316–325
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 7 August 2012
Revision received: 20 March 2013
Revision received: 8 May 2013
Accepted: 17 May 2013
Published online: 1 December 2013
Published in print: December 2013
Authors
Funding Information
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Supplementary Material
Funded by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant We3638/3-1).Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBLogin options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).