Skip to main content
Full access
Communications and Updates
Published Online: 1 July 2014

Response to Silberman

To the Editor: We appreciate Dr. Silberman’s characterization of our article as a welcome demonstration of the benefits of using benzodiazepines for the treatment of social anxiety disorder, but would like to address a number of issues raised by his letter. The study was designed to examine potential “next-step” pharmacological strategies for patients remaining symptomatic despite treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)—it was thus intended as a study of treatment-resistant patients and not as one examining the question of the comparative benefits of potential first-line interventions such as SSRIs and benzodiazepines for social anxiety or other anxiety disorders.
We do, however, agree that serious reconsideration of the role of benzodiazepines for the treatment of anxiety disorders is warranted, particularly in light of evidence that they can be effective and well tolerated, and continue to be widely prescribed (1). A recent meta-analysis of studies examining the relative efficacy and tolerability of benzodiazepines and antidepressants for the treatment of anxiety disorders (2) did not demonstrate a significant efficacy advantage for either class of agents, although benzodiazepines tended to be better tolerated. However, the vast majority of studies examined in this analysis included the use of the older tricyclic agents rather than the now more commonly used SSRIs. But important questions about the use of benzodiazepines in practice remain to be conclusively addressed. Although anxious patients with remote histories of substance abuse or mild depressive symptoms can apparently be given benzodiazepines safely, it is also clear that these agents can be ineffective for or worsen depression (if used as monotherapy), or can be abused by patients with a substance abuse diathesis. Furthermore, some patients experience significant difficulties discontinuing these agents, and there is some evidence, although inconclusive, that they may hamper the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy in some patients.
Taking into consideration the potential benefits of benzodiazepines and antidepressants, but recognizing the important factors that may influence their application in clinical practice, we too believe that further study in clinically relevant populations, including the development of practice guidelines for responsible prescription of benzodiazepines (3), would be of service to our patients and to the field.

References

1.
Vasile RG, Bruce SE, Goisman RM, Pagano M, Keller MB: Results of a naturalistic longitudinal study of benzodiazepine and SSRI use in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder and social phobia. Depress Anxiety 2005; 22:59–67
2.
Offidani E, Guidi J, Tomba E, Fava GA: Efficacy and tolerability of benzodiazepines versus antidepressants in anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychother Psychosom 2013; 82:355–362
3.
el-Guebaly N, Sareen J, Stein MB: Are there guidelines for the responsible prescription of benzodiazepines? Can J Psychiatry 2010; 55:709–714

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 795 - 796
PubMed: 24980175

History

Accepted: April 2014
Published online: 1 July 2014
Published in print: July 2014

Authors

Affiliations

Mark H. Pollack, M.D.
From Rush University Medical Center, Chicago; the University of California, San Diego; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Murray Stein, M.D.
From Rush University Medical Center, Chicago; the University of California, San Diego; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Naomi Simon, M.D.
From Rush University Medical Center, Chicago; the University of California, San Diego; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Michael Van Ameringen, M.D.
From Rush University Medical Center, Chicago; the University of California, San Diego; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

Competing Interests

The authors’ disclosures appear with the original article.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share