Skip to main content
Constructing a mental self-continuity of consciousness, memory, and identity is a task, not a given. Our mental life is full of discontinuities: sleep and wakefulness, sad and happy moods, loneliness and social connection, safety and trauma. Sudden positive as well as traumatic events are often accompanied by a sense of disbelief, as though they were happening to someone else. Our brain processes experiences bottom-up, not top-down, through associative networks that facilitate storage and retrieval. Neurons that fire together wire together through long-term potentiation that strengthens synapses. Events and relationships in our lives shape how we perceive and understand ourselves. The coherence of identity that is constructed as life unfolds is never seamless.
For some, the cracks in identity are marked, as in dissociative identity disorder, in which elements of personal identity are experienced as distinct—different ages, stores of memory, predominant moods, and social skills. For others, the poorly integrated components involve primarily memory, as in dissociative amnesia, or perception, as in depersonalization/derealization disorder. But dissociative disorders have themselves been dissociated from psychiatric nosology, viewed as odd and somehow less “real” than bread-and-butter psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, and borderline personality disorder. For this reason in particular, Lyssenko and colleagues, in an article presented in this issue (1), have performed a particular service to psychiatry in general and dissociation in particular by reporting a thorough meta-analysis of studies examining dissociative experiences using the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) among a wide variety of psychiatric populations. Their thorough search of electronic databases led them to 216 articles involving 15,219 people. They employed sophisticated meta-analytic techniques to compare findings across these studies. Not surprisingly, they found the highest DES scores among those diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder, which certainly provides evidence of construct validity for the undertaking. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was identified as having the next highest range of DES scores. This is not surprising, both because of the frequency with which a history of significant trauma is associated with dissociative disorders (2) and because of—as the authors note—the inclusion of a dissociative subtype of PTSD in DSM-5 (3). The inclusion of the dissociative subtype in DSM-5 was based on evidence that a substantial minority (about 14%) of a large sample (25,018) of individuals with PTSD also suffer significant depersonalization and/or derealization and are characterized by a history of more severe and earlier trauma, suicidal ideation, and more functional impairment (3). Functional neuroimaging showed that trauma survivors with more dissociative symptoms had a pattern of hyperfrontality and limbic inhibition that was the opposite of that seen among those with the more common hyperarousal type of PTSD, who had limbic hyperactivation and hypofrontality (4). Other studies employed latent class analysis and related techniques to look at the clustering of symptoms among trauma survivors and identified a distinct subgroup with dissociation (5, 6). Thus, a substantial subgroup of those with PTSD have significant dissociative symptoms, and indeed, they respond less well to standard exposure-based psychotherapy and better to treatments that assist them with self-stabilization as well (7, 8). So identifying and understanding dissociative symptoms in PTSD beyond the standard flashbacks, numbing, and amnesia improves treatment outcome as well as our understanding of the disorder.
The nosological group with the third highest scores on the DES was those with borderline personality disorder. There is growing evidence of trauma history as an etiological factor in this disorder (912). There is even evidence that psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder alters frontolimbic circuits (13).
Lower but still substantial ranges of DES scores were found among those with schizophrenia, somatic symptom disorders, eating disorders, and anxiety disorders, and scores were lower still among those with depression and bipolar disorder. However, all of the clinical samples had higher dissociation scores than those found in healthy samples. In some cases, as the authors conjecture, higher dissociation scores may be due to comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders that are more typified by dissociation. But the findings also suggest that dissociation more often than not has psychopathological implications.
This study suggests that, just as we identify and treat uncontrolled extremes of mood and defects in cognition, we can help many of our patients more if we identify problems with integration of identity, memory, perception, and consciousness. It is time to better integrate dissociation into our overall understanding of mental dysfunction.

References

1.
Lyssenko L, Schmahl C, Bockhacker L, et al: Dissociation in psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis of studies using the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Am J Psychiatry 2018; 175:37–46
2.
Dalenberg CJ, Brand BL, Gleaves DH, et al: Evaluation of the evidence for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation. Psychol Bull 2012; 138:550–588
3.
Lanius RA, Brand B, Vermetten E, et al: The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder: rationale, clinical and neurobiological evidence, and implications. Depress Anxiety 2012; 29:701–708
4.
Lanius RA, Vermetten E, Loewenstein RJ, et al: Emotion modulation in PTSD: clinical and neurobiological evidence for a dissociative subtype. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167:640–647
5.
Ginzburg K, Koopman C, Butler LD, et al: Evidence for a dissociative subtype of post-traumatic stress disorder among help-seeking childhood sexual abuse survivors. J Trauma Dissociation 2006; 7:7–27
6.
Wolf EJ, Miller MW, Reardon AF, et al: A latent class analysis of dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder: evidence for a dissociative subtype. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69:698–705
7.
Cloitre M, Petkova E, Wang J, et al: An examination of the influence of a sequential treatment on the course and impact of dissociation among women with PTSD related to childhood abuse. Depress Anxiety 2012; 29:709–717
8.
Resick PA, Galovski TE, Uhlmansiek MO, et al: A randomized clinical trial to dismantle components of cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in female victims of interpersonal violence. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008; 76:243–258
9.
Brodsky BS, Cloitre M, Dulit RA: Relationship of dissociation to self-mutilation and childhood abuse in borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1788–1792
10.
Galletly C: Borderline-dissociation comorbidity (letter). Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:1629
11.
Harned MS, Rizvi SL, Linehan MM: Impact of co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder on suicidal women with borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167:1210–1217
12.
Vermetten E, Spiegel D: Trauma and dissociation: implications for borderline personality disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2014; 16:434
13.
Perez DL, Vago DR, Pan H, et al: Frontolimbic neural circuit changes in emotional processing and inhibitory control associated with clinical improvement following transference-focused psychotherapy in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2016; 70:51–61

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 4 - 5
PubMed: 29301423

History

Accepted: October 2017
Published in print: January 01, 2018
Published online: 5 January 2018

Keywords

  1. Dissociative Disorders
  2. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
  3. Meta-Analysis
  4. Borderline Personality Disorder
  5. Dissociative Experiences Scale

Authors

Details

David Spiegel, M.D. [email protected]
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.

Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Spiegel ([email protected]).

Funding Information

The author reports no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share