Suicide and Suicide Prevention in Later Life
Abstract
In 2010, almost 6,000 adults over age 65 died by suicide in the United States, and perhaps 200,000 worldwide. Because older adults are the most rapidly growing segment of the population, the number of suicides in this age group is expected to rise dramatically in coming decades. Development of effective approaches to late-life suicide prevention is a major public health priority. However, older adults pose particular challenges to prevention because self-injurious acts in later life tend to be more immediately lethal and with fewer warning signs than at earlier points in the life course. Research has delineated risk and protective factors in five domains: psychiatric illness (primarily mood disorders), personality and coping style, physical illnesses, social stressors and supports, and functional impairments. Research findings also indicate that primary care and other community-based health and human service settings are best suited to intervention implementation. Late-life suicide preventive interventions can be categorized as indicated (targeting high-risk individuals), selective (for individuals or groups with more distal risk factors), or universal (targeting a population) prevention approaches. Relatively few studies of preventive interventions that specifically target suicidal ideation, attempts, or completed suicide have been conducted in this age group. Available findings suggest that rates of suicidal ideation and behavior may be reduced by a variety of approaches. However, older women have been more responsive overall to preventive interventions than elderly men, the group at highest risk. Challenges remain to reducing suicide-related morbidity and mortality in later life.
Introduction
On March 14, 1932, George Eastman, the fabulously wealthy industrialist and philanthropist who founded the Eastman Kodak Company, took his own life with a gunshot to the left chest (1). He was 77 years old. A suicide note left on his bedside table said simply, “Friends. My work is done. Why wait?” These last words seemed to reflect the autonomy and self-determination that had made Mr. Eastman so successful in life. The reality, however, was far different. For several years Eastman had been racked with pain from a spinal disorder. Becoming progressively more disabled, he was required to cede control of his company. Isolated from friends and struggling to find meaning in life, Eastman became despondent and ended his own life.
Other than for his riches, Eastman is typical in many respects of older adults who take their own lives. With that backdrop, the following sections provide a brief review of the epidemiology of suicide among older adults in the United States, current knowledge regarding risk and protective factors, and evidence for the most promising approaches to reducing suicide-related morbidity and mortality in later life.
The epidemiology of suicide
As depicted in Figure 1, suicide rates vary greatly as a function of age, sex, and race (2). Women of all ages and race/ethnicities tend to have lower rates of suicide than men, and whites have higher rates than nonwhites. For both African American and American Indian men, the suicide rate peaks in young adulthood followed by steady declines thereafter. White men show a markedly different pattern in which rates rise to a peak at midlife, diminish somewhat then escalate dramatically to a rate in the oldest-old (50.8/100,000) that is over four times higher than that of the general population (12.1/100,000). In 2010, almost 6,000 people over the age of 65 years died by their own hand. In contrast to the U.S., most countries for which World Health Organization statistics are available report that rates for suicide rise steadily throughout the life course for both men and women (3)
Figure 1. Suicide Rates in the United States by Age, Sex, and Race, 2010
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System [WISQARS])
Unlike completed suicide, period prevalence rates of both suicidal ideation (4) and attempted suicide (2) decrease in frequency with greater age. As a consequence, the ratio of completed to attempted suicides is far higher among older adults than in younger and middle-aged populations. Studies estimate one suicide death of an older adult for every two to four who are hospitalized with a nonfatal self-inflicted injury (5). Among the general population, that ratio is estimated to be 1:30, and among female adolescents as much as 1:200 (6). Possible explanations for this pattern include the greater physical frailty and lesser resilience of older people, making death more likely as a result of any injury; that older adults are more likely than younger and middle-aged people to live alone, and thus are less likely to be rescued in the event of self-injury; and because older people in suicidal crises are more planful and determined to die (7). Whereas just over half of all suicides in the United States are with a firearm, almost three quarters of older adults who take their own lives do so with a gun (2). Because older adults are less likely to endorse suicidal ideation or have prior histories of suicide attempts than younger people, the detection of those at imminent risk is that much more difficult.
The fact that older people at elevated risk for suicide are both more likely to escape notice and more likely to die as a result of any initiated self-destructive act has two important implications. First, concern that an older person might be suicidal requires aggressive clinical intervention to maintain their safety, assess their risk status, and intervene as indicated. Second, special emphasis should be placed on approaches that prevent development of suicidal states in later life, because once an older adult enters a suicidal crisis, death is a far more likely outcome than for a younger person in that condition.
Risk and protective factors
The design of preventive interventions hinges on adequate understanding of those factors that predispose or protect from suicide. Figure 2 depicts one useful way to organize current knowledge about risk and protective factors – their categorization into five domains analogous to the five axes of psychiatry’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (8).
Axis I: major psychiatric illness
Table 1 lists the results of five case-controlled psychological autopsy studies of suicide in the second half of life (9–13). Results were consistent with previous uncontrolled psychological autopsy studies in demonstrating that a high proportion (80%–100%) of suicides die with a diagnosable axis I disorder (14). Mood disorders consistently showed the highest associations with suicide case status across all studies. Both major depressive disorder and other affective syndromes were associated with increased risk in this age group. In contrast, only two of five studies found a significant association between substance use disorders and completed suicide in these older adult samples, with similar inconsistent findings for anxiety and schizophrenic spectrum disorders. Only one of four studies that examined the role of dementia or delirium found a significant association—an apparent protective effect. This unintuitive finding may represent an artifact of the retrospective psychological autopsy method. Individuals with dementia may be at greatest risk for suicide early in the course of the illness when affective symptoms are most common, but before formal diagnosis is likely to be made and when family members and other informants are unaware of its presence. At later stages of dementia when diagnosis is more easily established, higher levels of supervision and difficulty planning and carrying out a suicidal act may explain lower relative risk. Neuropathology studies of Alzheimer’s-type changes in postmortem brains of suicides and controls have yielded mixed results (15, 16).
| Study | Number of Cases | Age | Gender (M/F) | Odds Ratios | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suicides | Controls | Suicides | Controls | Any Axis I Diagnosis | Any Mood Disorder | Major Depressive Episode | Substance Use Disorder | Anxiety Disorder | Schizo-phrenic Spectrum | Dementia/Delirium | ||
| Harwood et al., 2001 (9) | 54 | 54 | ≥ 60 | n/a | n/a | -- | 4.0 | -- | n.s. | -- | n.s. | 0.2 |
| Beautrais, 2002 (10) | 53a | 269 | ≥ 55 | 27/26 | n/a | 43.9 | 184.6 | -- | 4.4 | -- | -- | -- |
| Waern et al., 2002 (11) | 85 | 153 | ≥ 65 | 46/39 | 84/69 | 113.1 | 63.1 | 28.6 | 43.1 | 3.6 | 10.7 | n.s. |
| Chiu et al., 2004 (12) | 70 | 100 | ≥ 60 | 32/38 | 43/57 | 50.0 | 59.2 | 36.3 | n.s. | n.s. | >1 | n.s. |
| Conwell et al., 2009 (13) | 86 | 86 | ≥ 50 | 63/23 | 63/23 | 44.6 | 47.7 | 12.2 | n.s. | 5.9 | n.s. | n.s. |
a
Included both suicides and medically serious suicide attempts.
While other axis I psychiatric illnesses likely play a role in late life suicide, affective disorders are the most prominent factor, associated with far higher odds ratios than any other putative risk factor.
Axis II: personality and coping
Based on the Five-Factor Model of personality, traits of high neuroticism (the tendency to experience negative affect) and low openness to experience (preferring the familiar to the novel, blunted affective and hedonic responses) were associated in one retrospective case-controlled study of suicide in later life (17). A separate study found that anankastic (obsessional) and anxious traits were also associated with late life suicide (9).
Axis III: physical health
A variety of physical illnesses have also been shown in both retrospective psychological autopsy and record linkage studies to be associated with suicide (18–20). Specific illnesses most frequently identified as risk factors include malignancies and central nervous system disorders (e.g., epilepsy, spinal cord injury, Huntington’s disease), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic pain. The impact of physical illness may be cumulative. In a retrospective case-control study of late-life suicide, Juurlink and colleagues showed that the relative risk of suicide increased with the number of comorbid physical disorders (19). Compared with patients with no identified illness, for example, patients with three illnesses had over three times higher relative risk of suicide (odds ratio=3.5, 95% CI=2.9–4.2); patients with five illnesses were at almost six times greater risk (odds ratio=5.7, 95% CI=4.4–7.4).
Axis IV: social context
Studies comparing older adults who took their own lives with matched controls show that social factors determine suicide risk independent of psychiatric illness. In addition to losses common in older adulthood (e.g., bereavement, retirement, and disability), stressors that lead to social disconnectedness are particularly salient. Beautrais reported that serious relationship problems distinguished older adults with near fatal suicide attempts from controls in New Zealand (10), and in both Sweden (21) and the U.S (22, 23), family discord was significantly more common in the lives of older adult suicides than in matched, living comparison samples. Social connectedness appears also to serve as a protective factor. Individuals who report a strong family connection are less likely to report suicide ideation (24). In other retrospective studies older adult suicides were significantly less likely to have a confidante than controls (25), more likely to live alone than their peers in the community (26), and less likely to participate in community activities (23), be active in organizations, or have a hobby (21).
Axis V: functional impairment
Because physical illness and functional limitations are the norm in older people, assessment of functional capacity and any resulting disablement is a necessary component of comprehensive geriatric assessment. Evidence now shows that functional limitations and disablement make substantial independent contributions to suicide risk in older people, and therefore represent potential targets for preventive interventions. In their case-controlled study of suicide in later life, Waern and colleagues reported a significant association between suicide and need for help with activities of daily living in those over age 75 years (27). Tsoh and colleagues found that older adults who had attempted or completed suicide had greater functional impairment than nonsuicidal older adult controls (28), and our group has reported that deficits in instrumental activities of daily living significantly differentiated suicides from controls, even after accounting for presence of psychiatric disorders (13). Hospitalization for medical or surgical reasons as well as use of visiting nurse or home health aide services increased risk as well. Findings of Dombrovski and colleagues highlight more specifically the role of neurocognitive deficits in late life suicidal behavior as well (29). They have reported impaired reward/punishment learning in older adult suicide attempters, but not ideators, positing that older adults who attempt suicide over-emphasize present reward/punishment contingencies to the exclusion of past experiences. More research is clearly needed that links studies of brain structure and functioning, using refined measures of discrete cognitive processes and carefully characterized samples of older adults with and without suicidal behavior.
Other
Given that such a high proportion of older adults who die by suicide used a firearm, it is important to know whether access to guns is itself a risk factor. We compared gun ownership and storage among matched samples of older adults who killed themselves and living controls (30). Suicides were significantly more likely to have a handgun in the home; easy access to long guns did not distinguish the groups.
Access to and familiarity with firearms has been postulated to explain the increased risk for suicide observed among veterans of the armed forces at all ages (31). The elevated risk associated with veteran status is particularly pertinent to suicide prevention in later life because two thirds of men over age 65 have served in the military (32).
One final point warrants emphasis for clinical practice. Research that specifically examines the impact on suicide risk of interaction between factors is scarce. Nonetheless, clinicians should be increasingly concerned about their older patients, not only as the number and severity of risk factors for suicide within any domain rises, but as the number of domains represented in the individual’s risk assessment increases as well. Figure 2 illustrates common scenarios among older adults at the areas of interface between domains of risk. Where a larger number of domains overlap, risk is increased. Where all five domains are represented, referred to here as the area of highest convergent risk, the likelihood of suicide is greatest.
Points of access
In order to design effective preventive interventions, one must know not only characteristics that place older adults at risk for suicide that are amenable to change, but also where older adults with these risk characteristics can be most efficiently identified and engaged in prevention activities. Older people at risk for suicide seek help from mental healthcare providers far less often than younger and middle aged cohorts. On the other hand, one-quarter to a third of older adults who took their own lives were seen in a primary care practitioners office within the last week of life, and a half to three-quarters within the last month (12, 33, 34). Primary care, therefore, represents one important setting in which to detect at-risk elders and intervene. Another is home health and community-based long-term care supports and services, clients of which have been shown also to have a high prevalence of mood disorders and suicidal ideation as well as physical illness burden, functional impairment, and other social stressors (35–38). Given the large number of older adult men who are veterans, a group at even greater risk for suicide, Veterans Service Organizations and Veterans Health Administration facilities are likely to be important venues for prevention programming as well.
Preventive interventions
The Institute of Medicine classifies preventive interventions into three types (39). The first, and most familiar to clinicians, is “indicated” prevention, which targets individuals at high risk with detectable symptoms of major psychiatric illness and/or other proximal risk factors for suicide. The second is “selective” preventive interventions, which target asymptomatic or presymptomatic individuals or groups with distal risk factors for suicide, or who have a higher than average risk of developing mental disorders due to presence of more distal factors. Finally, there are “universal” preventive interventions that address risk in an entire population irrespective of the risk of any individual or subgroup. “Multilevel” preventive interventions refer to those approaches that combine components from more than one level (for example, a combination of indicated and selective interventions.)
Table 2 lists published studies in which suicidal ideation or behavior in older adults was the targeted outcome. Of eight studies listed, five are best characterized as indicated interventions (40–44), one as a selective approach (45), one universal (46), and one multilevel (47). Because suicidal ideation and behavior are uncommonly expressed in later life, their study is challenging and, as a result, the evidence base for preventive interventions is limited. Further complicating interpretation of the available evidence is that relationships between suicidal ideation and behavior in later life have yet to be fully defined. For example, do wishes for an early death and thoughts of taking one’s own life carry the same risk of future suicide or suicide attempts? Who among those older persons with histories of prior suicidal behavior is most likely to take his own life? It is premature, therefore, to assume that interventions effective in addressing suicidal ideation will have the same effect on attempted or completed suicide in later life.
| Study | Study Design | Prevention Approacha | Intervention | Participants | Age | Outcome Assessed | Effectb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unützer et al., 2006 (U.S.A.) (40) | Randomized controlled trial | Indicated | IMPACT: Primary care-based depression care management; tx algorithms; patient, family, provider education | 1801 with major depression/ dysthymia: 996 intervention, 895 controls | ≥ 60 | Suicidal ideation | Resolution of suicidal ideation: OR=0.7 (95% CI=0.4–0.8) |
| Alexopoulos et al., 2009; Bruce et al., 2004 (U.S.A.) (41) | Randomized controlled trial | Indicated | PROSPECT: Primary care-based depression care management; treatment algorithms; patient, family, provider education | 599 with mood disorders: 320 intervention, 279 controls | ≥ 60 | Suicidal ideation | For patients with major depression, resolution of suicidal ideation at 24 months: OR=3.2 (95% CI=1.1–9.5) |
| Heisel et al., 2009 (Canada) (42) | Case series | Indicated | IPT to improve social functioning + existing treatment | 11 referrals from clinicians/medical staff | ≥ 60 | Suicidal ideation | Pre/post reduction in suicidal ideation score: p=0.01 |
| Stone et al., 2009 (U.S.A.) (43) | Meta-analysis | Indicated | Antidepressant medications | 372 randomized, placebo-controlled trials, with 99,231 randomized subjects with affective disorders (50%) or other psychiatric conditions (50%) | ≥ 18 | Suicidal ideation (or behavior [14%]) | Decreasing risk of newly emerging suicidal ideation with age: <25 yrs: OR=1.62 (95% CI=0.97–2.71); 25–64: OR=0.79 (95% CI=0.64–0.98); ≥65: OR=0.37 (95% CI=0.18–0.76) |
| Oyama et al., 2008 (Japan) (47) | Meta-analysis | Multilevel | Depression screening, psychoeducation workshops, referral, follow-up, treatment by psychiatry or primary care | Five quasi-experimental studies comparing regions with and without intervention. Men: 20,598 person years; women: 28,437 person years | ≥ 65 | Suicide | Psychiatrist follow-up: men: IRR=0.3 (95% CI=0.1–0.7), women: IRR=0.3 (95% CI=0.2–0.6); GP follow-up: men: n.s., women: IRR=0.4 [0.2–0.6] |
| De Leo et al., 2002 (Italy) (45) | Ecological study | Selective | 24 hr. access to supports as needed; weekly phone contact | Men: 2,983 women: 15,658 | ≥ 65 | Suicide | For women, standardized mortality ratio=16.7% (2.0%–59.9%); for men: n.s. |
| Chan et al., 2011 (Hong Kong) (44) | Cohort study | Indicated | Primary care-based gatekeeper training, referral to geropsychiatry, care management, active aftercare for suicide attempters. | 351 suicide attempters received intervention (66 preintervention), all diagnoses | ≥ 65 | Suicide and suicide attempt | 2-year suicide rate: p=0.028; reattempt rates: p=n.s. |
| Ludwig & Cook, 2000 (U.S.A.) (46) | Ecological study | Universal | Relative change in handgun suicides in states that implemented gun control legislation versus those with no new policy implementation. | All 50 U.S. states, vital statistics data reports of suicides from 1985 through 1997 | All ages | Handgun suicides | Rate reduction per 100,000 population: −0.92 (95% CI=−1.43 to −0.42) for those ≥ 55 years. No difference for homicide rates or overall suicide rates. |
a
Indicated: targeting high-risk individuals; selective: for individuals or groups with more distal risk factors; universal: targeting a population.
b
OR=odds ratio; IRR=incidence rate ratio.
Studies of interventions that target suicidal ideation
The PROSPECT and IMPACT studies were rigorously conducted randomized controlled trials designed to test whether primary care-based collaborative depression care management for older adults was more effective than enhanced care as usual in reducing suicidal ideation among older adults with major depression and dysthymia (48, 49). Both studies found significantly greater improvement in depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation in those who received the care management intervention (40, 41). In neither study were there sufficient suicide attempts to examine the effectiveness of depression care management on suicidal behavior. Given the importance of primary care as a venue for suicide risk management in later life, and because integrated approaches to the management of comorbid mental illness and chronic physical disorders have been shown so effective (50, 51), the wider dissemination of primary care-based collaborative depression care management is a promising approach to addressing late-life suicide. Whether suicide deaths can actually be reduced remains to be determined.
Ecological studies of medication prescribing rates and their association with suicide mortality have suggested that antidepressant administration is an effective indicated preventive intervention (52–54). Interpretation of the findings remains a subject of debate, including in older adults, however (55, 56). Stone and colleagues reported results of a large meta-analysis of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data from 372 randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressant medications (43). The data revealed a statistically greater risk that suicidal ideation would emerge in adolescents and young adults during the course of treatment with active medication than placebo. These findings contributed to the institution by the FDA of a “black box” warning for the use of antidepressant medications in this age group. Less widely appreciated was the finding that among those research subjects over the age of 40, risk of suicidal ideation or behavior emerging during the drug trials was significantly reduced.
Early findings indicate the likelihood that psychosocial interventions may be effective in reducing suicidal ideation in older adults as well. Heisel and colleagues, for example, demonstrated in a case series of suicidal older adults that thoughts of killing themselves significantly diminished over the course of treatment with adapted interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) (42). More definitive trials of IPT as well as cognitive behavioral therapy for high risk elders are ongoing.
Studies of interventions that target suicide and suicide attempts
Because of complex ethical and logistical constraints, no randomized controlled trials have yet been reported in which the outcome was attempted or completed suicide. Four trials listed in Table 2, however, provide some indication of potential effect of selective, universal, and multilevel approaches tested by less rigorous methods. De Leo and colleagues, for example, reported results of the Tele-help/Tele-check intervention in which older adults at risk for adverse physical and mental health outcomes were provided telephone-based access to supportive services (45). Both on-demand and service-initiated contact by social workers with at-risk elders was associated over 11 years of intervention delivery with significantly fewer suicides than would have been expected in a comparable population (standardized mortality ratio of 0.167). The intervention is best characterized as a selective approach because it targeted a group with risk characteristics of functional impairment and social isolation rather than individuals at high risk.
In five separate studies Oyama and colleagues tested multilevel approaches to suicide prevention that combined varying elements of indicated, selective, and universal preventive interventions for older adults in rural Japanese villages. Components included depression screening for older adult residents, referral to either a general practitioner or mental health specialist for those who screened positive, engagement of older adults in group activities, and community-based psychoeducational sessions. Suicide rates in the intervention villages were then compared with demographically similar regions. Merging the five studies using meta-analytic methods (47), the investigators found that when follow up was conducted by a psychiatrist, the suicide incidence rate ratios in intervention areas were significantly reduced for both men and women. When general practitioners provided the depression care, however, the significant effect was found only for older female participants. Interestingly, more detailed analysis of the Tele-help/Tele-check intervention also revealed an effect only for women (45).
Chan and colleagues reported results of an indicated preventive intervention in Hong Kong in which older adults who survived a suicide attempt were referred to a multicomponent prevention program that included psychiatric evaluation and care and ongoing care management (44). They found significantly fewer suicides occurred during two years of program implementation than in a comparable group in the period before the program was begun. However, there was no apparent pre/postintervention difference in reattempts.
Finally, almost no data are available about the effectiveness of a purely universal preventive approach on reducing suicidal behavior in older people. A signal that universal prevention may be helpful was provided, however, by Ludwig and Cook in an analysis of ecological data associated with implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1994 (46). They observed that in the years following implementation of the legislation there was a significantly greater reduction in firearm suicides by people over the age of 55 years in those states that newly implemented background checks and waiting periods for gun purchase than in states in which no additional gun control regulations were required.
Conclusions
In coming decades, the size of the older adult population in the U.S. will increase dramatically. Similar changes will be observed in countries throughout the world due to increasing life expectancy and falling fertility rates. Far more work must be done in a number of areas to limit suicide-related morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable and rapidly growing population of older people. We must better understand factors that place older adults at risk for suicide, in particular through multivariate research designs that define not only which factors and domains of factors are most potent in determining risk, but how they interact to determine risk status. We must define with greater precision the implications for risk assessment of thoughts of death and suicide in later life. And finally, we must apply that knowledge to the design and rigorous testing of preventive interventions that incorporate the most promising approaches to late life suicide prevention at all levels–indicated, selective, and universal.
Footnote
Yeates Conwell, M.D., Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry and Center for the Study and Prevention of Suicide, Rochester, NY
The author reports no competing interests.
References
1.
Brayer E: George Eastman: A Biography. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). 2010 [October 4, 2012]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html
3.
World Health Organization - Suicide Prevention (SUPRE): World Health Organization. 2010 [October 4, 2012]; Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/
4.
Gallo JJ, Anthony JC, Muthén BO: Age differences in the symptoms of depression: a latent trait analysis. J Gerontol 1994; 49:251–264
5.
McIntosh JL, Santos JF, Hubbard RW, Overholser JC: Elder Suicide: Research, Theory, and Treatment. Washington, D.C., American Psychological Association, 1994
6.
Fremouw WJ, dePerczel M, Ellis TE: Suicide Risk: Assessment and Response Guidelines. New York, Pergamon Press, 1990
7.
Conwell Y, Duberstein PR, Cox C, Herrmann J, Forbes N, Caine ED: Age differences in behaviors leading to completed suicide. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 1998; 6:122–126
8.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition - Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000
9.
Harwood D, Hawton K, Hope T, Jacoby R: Psychiatric disorder and personality factors associated with suicide in older people: a descriptive and case-control study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16:155–165
10.
Beautrais AL: A case control study of suicide and attempted suicide in older adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2002; 32:1–9
11.
Waern M, Runeson BS, Allebeck P, Beskow J, Rubenowitz E, Skoog I, Wilhelmsson K: Mental disorder in elderly suicides: a case-control study. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:450–455
12.
Chiu HF, Yip PS, Chi I, Chan S, Tsoh J, Kwan CW, Li SF, Conwell Y, Caine E: Elderly suicide in Hong Kong—a case-controlled psychological autopsy study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004; 109:299–305
13.
Conwell Y, Duberstein PR, Hirsch JK, Conner KR, Eberly S, Caine ED: Health status and suicide in the second half of life. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 25:371–379
14.
Conwell Y, Van Orden K, Caine ED: Suicide in older adults. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2011; 34:451–468, ix
15.
Rubio A, Vestner AL, Stewart JM, Forbes NT, Conwell Y, Cox C: Suicide and Alzheimer’s pathology in the elderly: a case-control study. Biol Psychiatry 2001; 49:137–145
16.
Peisah C, Snowdon J, Gorrie C, Kril J, Rodriguez M: Investigation of Alzheimer’s disease-related pathology in community dwelling older subjects who committed suicide. J Affect Disord 2007; 99:127–132
17.
Duberstein PR: Openness to experience and completed suicide across the second half of life. Int Psychogeriatr 1995; 7:183–198
18.
Harris EC, Barraclough B: Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders. A meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 1997; 170:205–228
19.
Juurlink DN, Herrmann N, Szalai JP, Kopp A, Redelmeier DA: Medical illness and the risk of suicide in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:1179–1184
20.
Quan H, Arboleda-Flórez J, Fick GH, Stuart HL, Love EJ: Association between physical illness and suicide among the elderly. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2002; 37:190–197
21.
Rubenowitz E, Waern M, Wilhelmson K, Allebeck P: Life events and psychosocial factors in elderly suicides—a case-control study. Psychol Med 2001; 31:1193–1202
22.
Duberstein PR, Conwell Y, Conner KR, Eberly S, Caine ED: Suicide at 50 years of age and older: perceived physical illness, family discord and financial strain. Psychol Med 2004; 34:137–146
23.
Duberstein PR, Conwell Y, Conner KR, Eberly S, Evinger JS, Caine ED: Poor social integration and suicide: fact or artifact? A case-control study. Psychol Med 2004; 34:1331–1337
24.
Purcell B, Heisel MJ, Speice J, Franus N, Conwell Y, Duberstein PR: Family connectedness moderates the association between living alone and suicide ideation in a clinical sample of adults 50 years and older. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 20:717–723
25.
Miller M: A psychological autopsy of a geriatric suicide. J Geriatr Psychiatry 1977; 10:229–242
26.
Barraclough BM: Suicide in the elderly: recent developments in psychogeriatrics. Br J Psychiatry (special suppl) 1971; 6:87–97
27.
Waern M, Rubenowitz E, Wilhelmson K: Predictors of suicide in the old elderly. Gerontology 2003; 49:328–334
28.
Tsoh J, Chiu HF, Duberstein PR, Chan SS, Chi I, Yip PS, Conwell Y: Attempted suicide in elderly Chinese persons: a multi-group, controlled study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 13:562–571
29.
Dombrovski AY, Clark L, Siegle GJ, Butters MA, Ichikawa N, Sahakian BJ, Szanto K: Reward/Punishment reversal learning in older suicide attempters. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167:699–707
30.
Conwell Y, Duberstein PR, Connor K, Eberly S, Cox C, Caine ED: Access to firearms and risk for suicide in middle-aged and older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002; 10:407–416
31.
Kaplan MS, Huguet N, McFarland BH, Newsom JT: Suicide among male veterans: a prospective population-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61:619–624
32.
Aging Stats. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. http://www.Agingstats.gov/Main_Site/Data/2012_Documents/Population.aspx (accessed 11-13-2012)
33.
Cattell H, Jolley DJ: One hundred cases of suicide in elderly people. Br J Psychiatry 1995; 166:451–457
34.
Luoma JB, Martin CE, Pearson JL: Contact with mental health and primary care providers before suicide: a review of the evidence. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:909–916
35.
Bruce ML, McAvay GJ, Raue PJ, Brown EL, Meyers BS, Keohane DJ, Jagoda DR, Weber C: Major depression in elderly home health care patients. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:1367–1374
36.
Raue PJ, Meyers BS, Rowe JL, Heo M, Bruce ML: Suicidal ideation among elderly homecare patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007; 22:32–37
37.
Richardson TM, Friedman B, Podgorski C, Knox K, Fisher S, He H, Conwell Y: Depression and its correlates among older adults accessing aging services. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 20:346–354
38.
Richardson TM, Simning A, He H, Conwell Y: Anxiety and its correlates among older adults accessing aging services. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 26:31–38
39.
Mrazek PJ, Haggerty RJ: Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 1994
40.
Unützer J, Tang L, Oishi S, Katon W, Williams JW, Hunkeler E, Hendrie H, Lin EH, Levine S, Grypma L, Steffens DC, Fields J, Langston Cfor the IMPACT Investigators: Reducing suicidal ideation in depressed older primary care patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54:1550–1556
41.
Alexopoulos GS, Reynolds CF, Bruce ML, Katz IR, Raue PJ, Mulsant BH, Oslin DW, Ten Have TPROSPECT Group: Reducing suicidal ideation and depression in older primary care patients: 24-month outcomes of the PROSPECT study. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166:882–890
42.
Heisel MJ, Duberstein PR, Talbot NL, King DA, Tu XM: Adapting interpersonal psychotherapy for older adults at risk for suicide: preliminary findings. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2009; 40:156–164
43.
Stone M, Laughren T, Jones ML, Levenson M, Holland PC, Hughes A, Hammad TA, Temple R, Rochester G: Risk of suicidality in clinical trials of antidepressants in adults: analysis of proprietary data submitted to US Food and Drug Administration. BMJ 2009; 339:b2880
44.
Chan SS, Leung VP, Tsoh J, Li SW, Yu CS, Yu GK, Poon TK, Pan PC, Chan WF, Conwell Y, Lam LC, Chiu HF: Outcomes of a two-tiered multifaceted elderly suicide prevention program in a Hong Kong Chinese community. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 19:185–196
45.
De Leo D, Dello Buono M, Dwyer J: Suicide among the elderly: the long-term impact of a telephone support and assessment intervention in northern Italy. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 181:226–229
46.
Ludwig J, Cook PJ: Homicide and suicide rates associated with implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. JAMA 2000; 284:585–591
47.
Oyama H, Sakashita T, Ono Y, Goto M, Fujita M, Koida J: Effect of community-based intervention using depression screening on elderly suicide risk: a meta-analysis of the evidence from Japan. Community Ment Health J 2008; 44:311–320
48.
Bruce ML, Ten Have TR, Reynolds CF, Katz II, Schulberg HC, Mulsant BH, Brown GK, McAvay GJ, Pearson JL, Alexopoulos GS: Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older primary care patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291:1081–1091
49.
Unützer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, Williams JW, Hunkeler E, Harpole L, Hoffing M, Della Penna RD, Noël PH, Lin EH, Areán PA, Hegel MT, Tang L, Belin TR, Oishi S, Langston CIMPACT Investigators. Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment: Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288:2836–2845
50.
Katon W, Unützer J: Collaborative care models for depression: time to move from evidence to practice. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:2304–2306
51.
Gilbody S, Bower P, Fletcher J, Richards D, Sutton AJ: Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:2314–2321
52.
Grunebaum MF, Ellis SP, Li S, Oquendo MA, Mann JJ: Antidepressants and suicide risk in the United States, 1985-1999. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65:1456–1462
53.
Gibbons RD, Brown CH, Hur K, Marcus SM, Bhaumik DK, Mann JJ: Relationship between antidepressants and suicide attempts: an analysis of the Veterans Health Administration data sets. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:1044–1049
54.
Gibbons RD, Hur K, Bhaumik DK, Mann JJ: The relationship between antidepressant medication use and rate of suicide. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:165–172
55.
Erlangsen A, Canudas-Romo V, Conwell Y: Increased use of antidepressants and decreasing suicide rates: a population-based study using Danish register data. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008; 62:448–454
56.
Helgason T, Tómasson H, Zoega T: Antidepressants and public health in Iceland. Time series analysis of national data. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184:157–162
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: 1 January 2013
Published in print: Winter 2013
Authors
Funding Information
Author Information and CME Disclosure
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).