Skip to main content
Full access
Clinical Synthesis
Published Online: 1 January 2014

Ethics Commentary: Ethical Considerations in Sleep Medicine

Abstract

As we adopt a forward-looking perspective in the still emerging field of sleep medicine, it is imperative to revisit a set of core ethical principles to serve as a road map in this journey. The foundational concepts of nonmaleficence, autonomy, truthfulness, justice, and beneficence must inform our efforts and guide our actions as we set about to conduct this important work. The primary responsibility of a medical provider is to act in a way that does not cause additional harm to a patient beyond the inherent and unavoidable consequences of a disease process. To avoid potential adverse effects, the judicious use of prescription medications, including sleeping pills, is imperative. Patient autonomy and veracity must be preserved by disclosing the association between REM behavior disorder (RBD) and other neurodegenerative conditions. Distributive justice requires access to basic medical care and fair allocation of resources, including an equal share of public safety, to all members of society. Through education, access to diagnostic procedures, and timely therapy, significant impacts can be made throughout public health. The opportunity for great beneficence exists in the discipline of sleep medicine with a substantial need and effective treatments strengthened by the integral role of technology. Medical care that is founded on these basic ethical standards will ensure continued success as the specialty continues to develop.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 1 January 2014
Published in print: Winter 2014

Authors

Affiliations

Notes

Address correspondence to: Brandon Peters, M.D., Consulting Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, 100 Rowland Way, Suite 300, Novato, CA 94945; e-mail: [email protected]

Funding Information

Author Information and CME Disclosure
Brandon Peters, M.D., Stanford University
Dr. Peters reports no competing interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Focus

PPV Articles - Focus

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share