Regional Homogeneity of Resting-State Brain Abnormalities in Violent Juvenile Offenders: A Biomarker of Brain Immaturity?
Publication: The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Abstract
The authors investigated whether male violent juvenile offenders demonstrate any differences in local functional connectivity indicative of delayed maturation of the brain that may serve as a biomarker of violence. Twenty-nine violent juvenile offenders and 28 age-matched controls were recruited. Regional homogeneity (ReHo) method was used to analyze resting-state magnetic resonance images. Violent offenders showed significantly lower ReHo values in the right caudate, right medial prefrontal cortex, and left precuneus, and higher values in the right supramarginal gyrus than the controls. These regions had both high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between the two groups suggesting that dysfunction in these regions can be used to correctly classify those individuals who are violent. Dysfunction in the right medial prefrontal-caudate circuit may, therefore, represent an important biomarker of violence juvenile males.
Violence by juvenile offenders is a costly problem that has important social relevance for the political, criminal justice, and health care systems.1,2 Previous work has suggested that more than half a million juveniles worldwide are detained in custody,3 furthermore, within the United States, one-third of the offenders arrested for a violent offense are under 18 years,4 suggesting that juvenile offenders are responsible for a disproportionate amount of violent crime. In addition, between $82 million US and $103 million US is spent each year in just one US city on victim costs arising from the violence perpetrated by juvenile offenders.5 The early identification and management of those juveniles at greatest risk of violence may, therefore, have benefits not only for the offender but also for society through reductions in victim and associated costs.6
Given its ability to link concurrent brain changes with behavioral outcomes,7 neuroimaging research offers one method of identifying individuals at risk of violence. As maturation of the brain occurs in a heterochronous manner,8 imbalance in the maturation of subcortical structures relative to the development of the prefrontal cortex has been proposed as one mechanism that underlies the development of risk-taking behaviors,9 including violence,10 in juveniles. In line with this proposition, certain subcortical structures, including the caudate and amygdala, are of significantly increased volume in male children (between 7 and 11 years of age) compared with adult males (between 17 and 33 years of age).11 The prefrontal region, in contrast, while not of significantly reduced volume in adolescents, does exhibit significant changes in neuronal density in adolescents (between 12 and 16 years of age) compared with adults (between 23 and 30 years of age).12
These structural differences may also result in differential functioning between limbic and prefrontal regions. Functional MRI (fMRI) research, for example, has found that during a reward processing task, activation in the accumbens was exaggerated while orbitofrontal cortical activity was significantly decreased in adolescents (between 13 and 17 years of age) compared with adults (between 23 and 29 years of age).13 While subcortical regions of the brain, including the caudate, amygdala, and accumbens underlie the production of emotional responses, prefrontal structures are thought to exert cognitive control over the expression of these emotions.14 Exaggerated activity in these subcortical structures, without adequate activity in the prefrontal cortex may underscore the expression of impulsive, emotionally driven behaviors, including violent behaviors.15 Reviews of previous volumetric and functional neuroimaging work, for example, have concluded that violent adults can be distinguished from nonviolent adults by reduced volumes and activity in the prefrontal cortex16 as well as increased subcortical activity.17
Much neuroimaging research into the development of the frontal-subcortical circuits, however, has focused on age-related changes in subcortical and prefrontal structures or activity and has, therefore, typically compared volumetric or functional differences in these brain regions between healthy adolescents and adults.7 In addition, previous work has investigated aberrations in functional connectivity between brain regions in the frontal-subcortical circuits. Therefore, whether violent juveniles may be characterized by delayed maturation within brain regions of the frontal-subcortical circuit relative to healthy peers is unknown at present. Local functional connectivity techniques may provide greater detail as to the patterns of activity within specific regions.18
Resting-state functional connectivity MRI (Rs-fMRI) techniques can be used to study the construction of intrinsic, interconnected neural circuits, and their relation to other cognitive or behavioral states.19 The regional homogeneity (ReHo) method is most frequently used to investigate Rs-fMRI local connectivity.20 This method assumes that for a given voxel, resting-state activity is correlated with that of functionally related neighboring voxels.21 ReHo is, therefore, thought to reflect coordination in regional neural activity.22 In addition, the ReHo method measures local functional connectivity within brain regions18 on a voxel-wise basis and, as such, enables investigation of close-range functional connectivity within brain regions.23 The present study, therefore, used the ReHo method to investigate whether violent juvenile offenders show any differences local functional connectivity, which may underscore the development of violence. Based on structural and functional neuroimaging work in adults,16,17 we expected violent juvenile offenders would show greater ReHo levels in subcortical regions and lower ReHo values in prefrontal regions compared with healthy age-matched controls.
Methods
As previous work has indicated that patterns of brain maturation differ between male and female juveniles,11 we only included males in the present study. A total of 30 violent male juvenile offenders and 29 controls were recruited to participate. All participants were aged between 15 and 17 years, were right-handed, and had no history of neurological impairment, including: paralysis, loss of sensation, muscular weakness, epilepsy, seizures, chronic pain, confusion, or altered levels of consciousness.
Violent offenders were recruited from the Hunan province Youth Detention Center (YDC) in the People’s Republic of China. They were recruited based on the severity of their index offense as recorded from official police records. Specifically, all violent juvenile offenders had been convicted of homicide or assault.
The Chinese version of the Schedule for Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children Present and Lifetime (K-SADS-PL)24,25 was used to assess current and lifetime psychiatric problems according to DSM-IV criteria. The K-SADS-PL interview procedure is outlined in detail elsewhere.26 On the basis of this assessment, any participant diagnosed with any current or lifetime psychiatric disorder was excluded. In addition, all participants had to be free from substance misuse within the last 3 months according to urine analysis, self-report, and family informant report.
Oral and written information about the aims, content, and duration of the study was given to all participants. Participants were also informed that their information was confidential and that refusal to participate would not affect their judicial status or stay in the YDC. Written informed consent was required from all the participants and from their legal guardians. All discussions about study participation were conducted in a private area of the YDC. No compensation was given for participation.
The procedures of this study were approved by the Biomedical Ethics Board of the second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, People’s Republic of China.
MR Imaging
MR images were acquired on a Siemens Allegra 3.0 T MR scanner at the Magnetic Resonance Center of Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Republic of China. A standard birdcage head coil was used, along with restraining foam pads to minimize head motion and to diminish the sounds of the scanner. Rs-fMRI scans were performed by an echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence with scan parameters of in-plane resolution=64×64, repetition time=3000 ms, echo time=30 ms, flip angle=90, field of view=240×240 mm2, slice thickness of 3 mm and no gap. Each brain volume comprised 32 axial slices, and each functional run contained 100 volumes. During the Rs-fMRI scan, participants were instructed to keep their eyes closed, relax, and move as little as possible.
Image Analysis
The first 10 volumes of each functional time series were discarded from analysis because of possible instability of the initial signal and movement caused by the participants’ adaptation to the scanning environment. The remaining 90 volumes were used in subsequent analyses. Image preprocessing, including slice timing, head motion correction, and spatial normalization, were conducted using statistical parametric mapping software SPM8 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) based on Matlab 7.8.
Head motion parameters were computed by estimating the translation in each direction and the angular rotation on each axis for each volume. Any subject who had a maximum displacement in any of the cardinal directions (x, y, z) that was larger than 2 mm, or 2° of angular motion, during the whole fMRI scan were excluded.
After slice acquisition correction and head motion correction, fMRI data were normalized to the standard SPM8 echo-planar imaging template and interpolated to 3×3 ×3 mm3 voxels. Then, using the in-house RESTV 1.6 analysis toolkit (http://resting-fmri.sourceforge.net),27 images were band-pass filtered (0.01 Hz<f<0.08 Hz) to reduce low-frequency drift and physiological high-frequency respiratory and cardiac noise.28 To reduce the influence of rising temperature from the MRI equipment, linear trends were also removed.
ReHo analysis was performed with in-house software REST V1.6.27 Individual ReHo maps were generated by calculating Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (KCC),20 which compares the temporal firing sequence of a given voxel to those of its 26 nearest neighbors in a voxel-wise analysis. The individual ReHo maps were smoothed using a Gaussian kernel of 8 mm full width at half-maximum. Maps were then subjected to group statistical analysis using SPM8.
Statistical Analysis
Comparison between the violent juvenile offenders and controls was performed using chi-square tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Differences were considered significant when p <0.05. All analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 17.0.
Two-sample t test was performed on the individual ReHo maps in a voxel-by-voxel manner for all between-group comparisons. The resulting statistical map was corrected following an approach used previously.29 In brief, the threshold used for each individual voxel was as follows: p value of <0.005, cluster sizes >324 mm3 (12 voxels).
Brain regions displaying significant differences between the two groups were identified as regions of interest (ROIs). Mean ReHo values of each ROI for each subject were then extracted using an approach described in greater detail elsewhere.30
Following an approach used previously,29 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses were used to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of detected abnormalities in ReHo values in order to compare their effectiveness in identifying the violent juvenile offenders. Adopting guidelines proposed by Swets (1988),31 AUC values were interpreted as excellent if ≥0.90; good if 0.90 >AUC ≥0.80; fair if 0.80 >AUC ≥0.70; poor if 0.70 >AUC ≥0.60; and as having no effect if AUC <0.60. AUC analyses were also conducted using SPSS, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc).
In addition, following previous methods,32 Fisher discriminant analysis was used to predict whether a participant was a violent offender or a control according to the individual’s ReHo values for those ROIs which demonstrated significant (p <0.005) differences in ReHo values between groups. The discriminant analysis was then cross-validated using the leave-one-out method.32
Results
Information from two participants had to be excluded from the analysis owing to excessive head movement: one each from the violent juvenile offender and control groups. Among the remaining 29 juvenile offenders, four (13.8%) were convicted of homicide and 25 (86.2%) were convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm.
The duration of education of the offenders was significantly lower than that of the controls (7.7±2.2 years versus 10.0±0.0 years; t=5.73, df=55, p <0.01). There were no significant age differences between the violent juvenile offenders and the controls, however, (=16.0±0.7 years versus =16.0±0.4 years; t= 0.08, df=55, p=0.99).
ReHo: Comparisons Between Violent Offenders and Controls
Violent juvenile offenders showed significantly lower ReHo values in the right caudate (Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinate [9,6,–9], t=–5.186, corrected p <0.01), right medial prefrontal cortex (r-mPFC) (MNI coordinate [6,30,–15], t=–3.994, corrected p <0.01), left precuneus (MNI coordinate [–15,–51,66], t=–4.463, corrected p <0.01), and significantly higher values in the right supramarginal gyrus (MNI coordinate [39,–36,45], t=4.08, corrected p <0.01) (Table 1 and Figure 1).
| Brain Region | MNI Coordinate | Peak t Value | Voxel Size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | |||
| Lower ReHo Values | |||||
| Right medial prefrontal cortex | 6 | 30 | –15 | –3.99 | 8 |
| Right caudate | 9 | 6 | –9 | –5.18 | 11 |
| Left precuneus | –15 | –51 | 66 | –4.46 | 4 |
| Higher ReHo Values | |||||
| Right supramarginal | 39 | –36 | 45 | 4.08 | 7 |
a
MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute coordinate.
FIGURE 1. Brain Regions of Interest (ROIs) Showing Higher/Lower ReHo in Male Violent Juvenile Offenders Superimposed on a T1-Weighted Template (violent juvenile offenders versus controls; two-sample t test)a
a These ROIs include the right caudate, right medial prefrontal cortex (r-mPFC), left precuneus, and the right supramarginal gyrus. The color bar signifies the t value of the group analysis.
ROC Analysis and Discriminant Analysis: Abnormalities in ReHo Values Between Violent Offenders and Controls
Abnormalities in ReHo values for the caudate, precuneus, mPFC, and supramarginal gyrus had high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between the violent offenders and controls (Table 2). For each of these four areas, the AUC33 was higher than 70% suggesting that dysfunction in these areas represents a fair biomarker of violence in juveniles.
| Variable | Caudate | Precuneus | r-mPFC | Supramarginal Gyrus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity % | 75.0 | 75.0 | 60.7 | 71.4 |
| Specificity % | 75.9 | 79.3 | 82.8 | 75.9 |
| AUC | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
a
r-mPFC: right medial prefrontal cortex.
The four areas that showed ReHo abnormalities between the two groups were then subjected to discriminant analysis. The total percentage of correct classification was 89.5%, suggesting that 89.5% of all participants were classified into the correct groups: 85.7% were correctly classified as typically developing controls, whereas 93.1% were correctly classified as violent juvenile offenders. The validity of ReHo abnormalities in differentiating between the two groups was supported by Wilk’s lambda=0.46 (df=4, p<0.001).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to use the ReHo method as an addition to Rs-fMRI data to identify neural correlates of violence in juveniles. We found that, compared with typically developing controls, male violent juvenile offenders had lower ReHo values in the right mPFC, right caudate, and left precuneus, coupled with higher ReHo values in the right supramarginal gyrus. These findings provide primary evidence of abnormal spontaneous activity specific to the prefrontal-striatal circuit in male violent juvenile offenders.
Throughout adolescence and into early adulthood, the brain undergoes a period of maturation such that prefrontal regions become increasingly active while subcortical regions become less active.34 fMRI work suggests that subcortical structures, and most notably the amygdala, are implicated in processing of emotional material, whereas the prefrontal cortex is implicated in the cognitive interpretation of emotion.14 In this way, prefrontal structures are thought to directly regulate activation in the subcortical system.15 Maturational changes in the functional circuitry of the subcortical and prefrontal systems, therefore, enable the development of cognitive control, helping adolescents to suppress the inappropriate expression of emotions to achieve a more mature cognitive style.34 Delayed, or even incomplete, maturation of this circuit, in contrast, may underlie the development of violence.
Adults who have sustained damage to the frontal lobes, for example, are unable to suppress the behavioral expression of emotion and may instead respond with exaggerated or even inappropriate emotional reactions.35 Frontal lobe damage has also been implicated with the development of violence.35 Reduced volume or function in the prefrontal cortex, even in the absence of damage, has also been associated with increased violence, particularly impulsive violence.36 In addition, volumetric and functional neuroimaging research has found that violent adults are distinguished by reduced volumes and activity in the prefrontal cortex,16 alongside increased subcortical activity.17
Much of the neuroimaging research into the development of the brain compares differences between healthy adolescents and adults.7 In one exception, task-dependent fMRI was used to investigate functioning in the frontal-striatal circuit in male adolescents (between 12 and 15 years of age) diagnosed with externalizing disorders compared with healthy age-matched controls. Male adolescents diagnosed with externalizing disorders showed poorer bottom-up connectivity from the caudate to the middle frontal cortex, coupled with an absence of top-down connectivity running from the middle frontal cortex to the caudate.37
Our study, however, represents the first attempt to use Rs-fMRI ReHo analysis to compare male violent juvenile offenders with their typically developing peers. Both the low local connectivity of the right mPFC and caudate indicates that dysfunction may be localized to the right medial prefrontal-striatal circuit and that this circuit may demonstrate not only abnormal task-related activity,37 but also abnormal spontaneous activity.
Given the significant association between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and violence in juveniles and young adults,38 and that dysfunction in the frontal-striatal circuit has also been observed in patients with ADHD compared with healthy controls,39 it is of interest to note that the four ROIs identified in this study appear distinct from those implicated in ADHD.40 We also evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of these ReHo abnormalities to investigate whether dysfunction in this circuit was sensitive and specific to male violent juvenile offenders compared with their healthy peers. AUCs for dysfunction in each of the regions identified by ReHo analysis were specific to the male violent juvenile offenders. Discriminant analysis, furthermore, suggested that dysfunction in ReHo values in this circuit could predict which participant was a member of the violent offender group. Taken together then, results of this study suggest that dysfunction in the prefrontal-striatal circuit during the resting state may be indicative of brain immaturity, which is specific to male violent juvenile offenders.
Results of these analyses extend previous work which found that neuropsychological methods are significantly more accurate at distinguishing between male violent and nonviolent adult offenders than personality measures.41 ReHo measurements in these regions, therefore, appear to be promising neuroimaging biomarkers for characterizing violent male juveniles. Although previous work indicates that ReHo value abnormalities can be used to predict brain immaturity in individual participants,42 further work will be necessary to validate these findings, however, before ReHo can be used to identify individual juveniles at risk of violence.
Limitations and Implications
Our study is limited in some respects. First, the study was conducted solely in boys, so findings cannot be generalized to violent girls or to adults. Further work is required to establish whether female violent juvenile offenders are characterized by the same pattern of dysfunction.
Second, other etiological factors may have confounded the pattern of brain dysfunction observed in this study. For example, as most of the violent juvenile offenders who participated in this study had lower education levels compared with the typically developing controls, a lack of education may be responsible for the delays in brain maturity observed in this study. Further work could investigate whether educational exposure influences brain development such that nonviolent juveniles with a lower educational level exhibit the same pattern of dysfunction as the violent offenders in this study.
Third, previous work has also shown that juvenile offenders are significantly more likely than their noncriminally involved peers to sustain a traumatic brain injury.43 Longitudinal work is, therefore, necessary to determine whether the patterns of brain dysfunction identified in this study are a cause or a consequence of violence.
In addition, as the precuneus is one of the most highly active areas of the brain during the resting state,44 it is unclear whether this structure should be considered a biomarker of violence at this stage.
Last, because of power considerations, we were unable to divide our sample into training and validation sets for the purposes of discriminant analysis. Further work using a fresh sample is, therefore, necessary to investigate whether the four ROIs identified in this study distinguish between male controls and violent juvenile offenders with the same degree of correct classification as found in this study.
Conclusions
This study represents a first step in determining local functional connectivity in violent juvenile offenders compared with controls. The ReHo method used to analyze voxel-based whole-brain resting-state activity in male violent juvenile offenders revealed that, compared with typically developing controls, male violent juvenile offenders were characterized by significantly lower ReHo values in the right caudate, right mPFC, and left precuneus, and significantly higher values in the right supramarginal gyrus. AUC analyses, alongside discriminant analyses, revealed that these abnormalities were associated with high sensitivity and specificity suggesting that right medial prefrontal-caudate circuit dysfunction maybe an important biomarker of immaturity in male violent juveniles and that the ReHo is a promising method of detecting these abnormalities during the resting-state.
References
1.
Hoptman MJ: Neuroimaging studies of violence and antisocial behavior. J Psychiatr Pract 2003; 9:265–278
2.
Czabanski J: Estimates of cost of crime: history, methodologies, and implications. Warszawa, Poland, Springer, 2008
3.
Walmsley R, Britain G: World prison population list. International Centre for Prison Studies, Kings College London, London, 2007.
4.
Piquero AR, Farrington DP, Blumstein A: The criminal career paradigm, in Crime and Justice. Edited by Tonry M. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2003, pp 359–506
5.
Welsh BC, Loeber R, Stevens BR, et al: Costs of Juvenile Crime in Urban Areas A Longitudinal Perspective. Youth Violence Juv Justice 2008; 6:3–27
6.
Greenwood P: Prevention and intervention programs for juvenile offenders. Future Child 2008; 18:185–210
7.
Luna B, Padmanabhan A, O’Hearn K: What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence? Brain Cogn 2010; 72:101–113
8.
Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NO, et al: Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2:861–863
9.
Casey BJ, Jones RM, Levita L, et al: The storm and stress of adolescence: insights from human imaging and mouse genetics. Dev Psychobiol 2010; 52:225–235
10.
Steinberg L: A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev 2008; 28:78–106
11.
Caviness VS Jr, Kennedy DN, Richelme C, et al: The human brain age 7-11 years: a volumetric analysis based on magnetic resonance images. Cereb Cortex 1996; 6:726–736
12.
Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Tessner KD, et al: Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: Inverse relationships during postadolescent brain maturation. J Neurosci 2001; 21:8819–8829
13.
Galvan A, Hare TA, Parra CE, et al: Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. J Neurosci 2006; 26:6885–6892
14.
Hariri AR, Bookheimer SY, Mazziotta JC: Modulating emotional responses: effects of a neocortical network on the limbic system. Neuroreport 2000; 11:43–48
15.
Seo D, Patrick CJ, Kennealy PJ: Role of serotonin and dopamine system interactions in the neurobiology of impulsive aggression and its comorbidity with other clinical disorders. Aggress Violent Behav 2008; 13:383–395
16.
Bufkin JL, Luttrell VR: Neuroimaging studies of aggressive and violent behavior: current findings and implications for criminology and criminal justice. Trauma Violence Abuse 2005; 6:176–191
17.
Fabian JM: Neuropsychological and neurological correlates in violent and homicidal offenders: A legal and neuroscience perspective. Aggress Violent Behav 2010; 15:209–223
18.
Liu D, Yan C, Ren J, et al: Using coherence to measure regional homogeneity of resting-state fMRI signal. Front Syst Neurosci 2010; 4:1–9
19.
Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, et al: Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34:537–541
20.
Zang Y, Jiang T, Lu Y, et al: Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage 2004; 22:394–400
21.
Fair DA, Cohen AL, Power JD, et al: Functional brain networks develop from a “local to distributed” organization. PLOS Comput Biol 2009; 5:e1000381
22.
Liu Y, Wang K, Yu C, et al: Regional homogeneity, functional connectivity and imaging markers of Alzheimer’s disease: a review of resting-state fMRI studies. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46:1648–1656
23.
Broyd SJ, Demanuele C, Debener S, et al: Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009; 33:279–296
24.
Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, et al: Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997; 36:980–988
25.
Shanee N, Apter A, Weizman A: Psychometric properties of the K-SADS-PL in an Israeli adolescent clinical population. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 1997; 34:179–186
26.
Zhou J, Chen C, Wang X, et al: Psychiatric disorders in adolescent boys in detention: a preliminary prevalence and case–control study in two Chinese provinces. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 2012; 23:664–675
27.
Song XW, Dong ZY, Long XY, et al: REST: a toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing. PLoS ONE 2011; 6:e25031
28.
Stockmeier CA, Shapiro LA, Dilley GE, et al: Increase in serotonin-1A autoreceptors in the midbrain of suicide victims with major depression-postmortem evidence for decreased serotonin activity. J Neurosci 1998; 18:7394–7401
29.
Liu CH, Ma X, Wu X, et al: Regional homogeneity of resting-state brain abnormalities in bipolar and unipolar depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2013; 41:52–59
30.
Smith SM: Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 17:143–155
31.
Swets JA: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240:1285–1293
32.
Ma Z, Li R, Yu J, et al: Alterations in regional homogeneity of spontaneous brain activity in late-life subthreshold depression. PLoS ONE 2013; 8:e53148
33.
Linden A: Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12:132–139
34.
Rubia K: Functional brain imaging across development. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2013; 22:719–731
35.
Hawkins KA, Trobst KK: Frontal lobe dysfunction and aggression: Conceptual issues and research findings. Aggress Violent Behav 2000; 5:147–157
36.
Brower MC, Price BH: Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behaviour: a critical review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 71:720–726
37.
Shannon KE, Cauder C, Beauchaine TP, et al: Disrupted effective connectivity between the medial frontal cortex and the caudate in adolescent boys with externalizing behavior disorders. Crim Justice Behav 2009; 36:1141–1157
38.
Loeber R, Pardini D, Homish DL, et al: The prediction of violence and homicide in young men. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005; 73:1074–1088
39.
Castellanos FX, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Milham MP, et al: Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction. Trends Cogn Sci 2006; 10:117–123
40.
Cheng W, Ji X, Zhang J, et al: Individual classification of ADHD patients by integrating multiscale neuroimaging markers and advancing pattern recognition techniques. Front Syst Neurosci 2012; 6:1–10
41.
Spellacy F: Neuropsychological discrimination between violent and nonviolent men. J Clin Psychol 1978; 34:49–52
42.
Dosenbach NU, Nardos B, Cohen AL, et al: Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science 2010; 329:1358–1361
43.
Farrer TJ, Frost RB, Hedges DW: Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in juvenile offenders: a meta-analysis. Child Neuropsychol 2013; 19:225–234
44.
Cavanna AE, Trimble MR: The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 2006; 129:564–583
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 3 March 2013
Revision received: 16 May 2013
Accepted: 19 June 2013
Published in print: Winter 2015
Published online: 26 February 2015
Authors
Funding Information
This work was supported by Key Projects in the National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan Period (2012BAK16B04), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 30800368, 81371500), Ministry of Education in China Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (13YJC190033).The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBLogin options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).