Resting-State Correlations of Fatigue Following Military Deployment
Publication: The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Abstract
Objective:
Persistent fatigue is common among military servicemembers returning from deployment, especially those with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The purpose of this study was to characterize fatigue following deployment using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), a multidimensional self-report instrument. The study was developed to test the hypothesis that if fatigue involves disrupted effort/reward processing, this should manifest as altered basal ganglia functional connectivity as observed in other amotivational states.
Methods:
Twenty-eight current and former servicemembers were recruited and completed the MFI. All 28 participants had a history of at least one mTBI during deployment. Twenty-six participants underwent resting-state functional MRI. To test the hypothesis that fatigue was associated with basal ganglia functional connectivity, the investigators measured correlations between MFI subscale scores and the functional connectivity of the left and right caudate, the putamen, and the globus pallidus with the rest of the brain, adjusting for the presence of depression.
Results:
The investigators found a significant correlation between functional connectivity of the left putamen and bilateral superior frontal gyri and mental fatigue scores. No correlations with the other MFI subscales survived multiple comparisons correction.
Conclusions:
This exploratory study suggests that mental fatigue in military servicemembers with a history of deployment with at least one mTBI may be related to increased striatal-prefrontal functional connectivity, independent of depression. A finding of effort/reward mismatch may guide future treatment approaches.
Servicemembers commonly report fatigue for months after returning from deployment. In a prospective study of Dutch Armed Forces deployed to Afghanistan, 14% of returning troops endorsed recurrent, severe fatigue for the 24 months of the study duration (1). Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in military and nonmilitary populations is also frequently associated with persistent fatigue (2, 3). Fatigue is an important clinical finding that has been shown to affect duty performance. For example, daytime fatigue was found to be a significant contributor to poor memory performance in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, independent of mTBI, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or sleep quality (2). The neural basis of fatigue is poorly understood, particularly in the setting of neuropsychiatric disease, which inhibits the development of effective treatments.
Most studies of the neural correlates of pathological fatigue have been observed in patients with single diagnoses and localizable pathology, such as studies of multiple sclerosis (4) and some, but not all, studies of poststroke fatigue (5). One hypothesis arising from this work is that fatigue may represent disturbed reward processing from disturbance of striatal-prefrontal cortical connections, resulting in an effort-for-reward mismatch (6).
Striatal-prefrontal cortical connections are believed to be involved in balancing the energetic cost of action against potential reward. Higher energetic cost relative to predicted reward may decrease the willingness to act, resulting in a state that may correspond with the subjective experience of fatigue. The proposed cortical and subcortical structures involved in effort/reward action control include the nucleus accumbens in reward anticipation, the putamen in the calculation of energetic cost of an action, the anterior cingulate in effort/reward valuation, and the orbitofrontal cortex in regulation of vigorous output toward a goal (7, 8). Positive correlations between self-reported fatigue and mean diffusivity among basal ganglia nuclei have been reported in healthy young adults (9). Increased striatal-prefrontal functional connectivity has also been observed in some patients with depression as well and has been found to correlate with increased anhedonia and psychomotor retardation (10).
The primary aim of this exploratory study was to investigate the neural correlates of fatigue dimensions in U.S. servicemembers and veterans experiencing at least one deployment-related concussion occurring during deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (2001–2014), Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003–2010), and Operation New Dawn (2010–2011). The study was developed to test the hypothesis that if fatigue involves disrupted effort/reward processing, this should manifest as altered basal ganglia functional connectivity, as observed in other amotivational states. We used a multidimensional self-report of fatigue and resting-state functional connectivity measured with functional MRI (fMRI). We also acquired task-related functional connectivity data, which will be reported elsewhere.
Methods
Participants
Twenty-eight active and former servicemembers (100% male) with a history of military deployment and persistent symptoms at least 6 months following an mTBI during a deployment were recruited. Persistent symptoms included fatigability, sleep disturbances, headache or other chronic widespread pain, emotional lability, lack of spontaneity or apathy, loss of motivation, irritability, and change in personality or anxiety. Each interested individual was initially interviewed by the study coordinator by phone using a checklist that listed the Department of Defense (DoD) definition of mTBI (11) used in this study, study inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the persistent symptoms listed above. The lead investigator then interviewed each participant in person to obtain an injury history. The DoD definition of mTBI was used (11). Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1. Individuals with daily use of stimulants (including >600 mg caffeine), narcotics, hypnotics, or anxiolytics were excluded, as were those with sleep apnea. Prior to participation, all participants gave informed consent to a protocol approved by the National Institutes of Health Combined Neuroscience Institutional Review Board. All study procedures conformed to the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and all U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulatory standards.
| Characteristic | Mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 34.4 | 7.5 | 32 | 27 | 44 |
| Years of education | 14.6 | 1.4 | 14 | 13 | 18 |
| mTBI totalb | 2.2 | 0.8 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Months since index injury | 56.1 | 31.9 | 50.5 | 12 | 120 |
| CESD scorec | 15.9 | 10.3 | 15 | 3 | 35 |
| PCL-M scored | 39.3 | 15.2 | 35 | 19 | 66 |
| MFI subscale scorese | |||||
| Mental fatigue | 14.3 | 3.8 | 15 | 6 | 20 |
| General fatigue | 12.1 | 4.0 | 12 | 4 | 20 |
| Physical fatigue | 8.5 | 3.7 | 8 | 4 | 17 |
| Reduced motivation | 9.9 | 3.1 | 10 | 4 | 16 |
| Reduced activity | 9.9 | 4.2 | 10 | 4 | 18 |
a
All in the sample were male. CESD=Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; MFI=Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; PCL-M=Posttraumatic Checklist–Military version; TBI=traumatic brain injury.
b
One participant reported “several” but did not provide a number; no moderate or severe TBIs were reported by the study participants.
c
Possible scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
d
Possible scores range from 17 to 85, with higher scores indicating more severe PTSD symptoms.
e
Scores for each subscale range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Outcome Measures
The primary outcome measures for this study were scores from the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) (12). The MFI produces a score for each of five subscales: mental fatigue, physical fatigue, general fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. To control for the confounding effects of depression on self-reported fatigue, participants also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CESD) Scale (13). Participants also completed the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist—Military Version (14).
Participants completed a 7.5-minute resting-state fMRI scan and a T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (anatomical) scan during a single session in a Siemens 3T Biograph scanner. The resting-state scan included 150 T2*-weighted echoplanar volumes (time to repeat=3,000 ms, echo time=25 ms, flip angle=90°, slice thickness=3 mm, slices=43, voxel size=1.7188 × 1.7188 × 3 mm, field of view=1,540 × 1,540 mm, matrix=128 × 128). Participants were asked to keep their eyes closed but not to sleep. No music was used during the scan. One participant did not complete the resting-state scanning session due to claustrophobia; another participant’s resting-state data set was unusable due to excessive motion/scanner artifact, resulting in a total of 26 participants for MRI analysis. The MRI acquisition was completed within 24 hours of outcome measures assessments.
Preprocessing of the resting-state fMRI data included despiking, interpolation to correct for slice time acquisition differences (3dTshift), and spatial registration to minimize effects of head motion (3dvolreg to the first volume) using Analysis of Functional NeuroImages (AFNI) (15). The resting-state time-series was blurred using a full width at half maximum of 6 mm, and rescaled to percentage signal change. Anatomical images were segmented into maps of gray matter, white matter, and CSF using FreeSurfer (16). Then, time-series within the resulting white matter and CSF masks were averaged. Next, we used the ANATICOR procedure to remove artifacts, including six motion parameters, localized average white matter (within a 15-mm-radius sphere centered on each voxel) and CSF time-series, and respiration and cardiac signals (17, 18). These artifacts were entered into a linear regression with the resting-state time-series (19). The residual time-series data were then transformed into Talairach space (20) and standardized to z scores using Fisher’s transformation. Global gray matter was not regressed out to avoid the likelihood of increased anticorrelations (21, 22).
Functional Connectivity Analyses
Whole-brain correlations were performed for all five MFI subscale scores, controlled for depression using the CESD scale score as a covariate, with a voxelwise threshold of p<0.005, familywise error corrected at p<0.00083. We chose to adjust for the CESD score because some subtypes of depression show changes in striatal-prefrontal connectivity (10). Whole-brain correlations, also referred to as “connectedness,” are calculated as the average Pearson’s correlation of each voxel with the rest of the brain. Whole-brain connectedness maps were calculated for each participant, and each of the five MFI scales were then correlated in a voxelwise manner across participants.
Seed regions for six basal ganglia nuclei (left and right caudate, left and right putamen, and left and right globus pallidus) were created for each participant using FreeSurfer. Functional connectivity correlations with these six seed regions were performed using the MFI subscale scores (mental fatigue, physical fatigue, general fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity). To control for depressive symptoms, the CESD scale score was added as a covariate in the seed-based analyses as well.
Specifically, we performed group-level t tests (one-sample 3dttest++ against zero) of each subject’s scores with the connectivity data, including only areas where 90% of the subjects had data. To control for different motion levels across subjects, a summary measure of each subject’s transient head motion during the scan (AFNI’s @1dDiffMag, comparable to mean framewise displacement) was calculated and entered as a mean-centered covariate into the group-level t tests. We used a voxelwise threshold of p<0.005, corrected to p<0.00083 (familywise error corrected) with a cluster size threshold of K=363, obtained using AFNI’s empirically modeled spatial auto-correlation function (23).
Results
We regressed whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity against each of the five MFI subscale scores, using a voxelwise threshold of p<0.005 and familywise error-corrected p value of 0.00083, and found no significant correlations.
We then regressed the seed region to whole-brain functional connectivity against the MFI subscale scores using a corrected p<0.00083 (familywise error corrected) and found significant positive correlations between the left putamen seed and superior frontal gyri (SFG) bilaterally with mental fatigue adjusted for the CESD score (left SFG MNI coordinates −33, +31, +42, 688 voxels; right SFG MNI coordinates +25, +27, +44, 570 voxels; Figure 1). No correlations with the other MFI subscale scores survived multiple comparisons correction.
FIGURE 1. Functional connectivity correlations between the left putamen and left and right superior frontal gyrus and mental fatigue scores after controlling for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale scorea
aThe data survived familywise error multiple comparisons, corrected p=0.00083. MF=mental fatigue; MFI=Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; SFG=superior frontal gyrus. (For a color version of this figure, view the online version of the article at neuro.psychiatryonline.org.)
Discussion
The neural basis for the experience of fatigue is unclear. In the effort/reward model of fatigue, effort is overvalued relative to the anticipated reward. Because the putamen is involved in the energetic cost of action, our finding of increased connectivity between the putamen and SFG and mental fatigue ratings is consistent with this model. Our findings also support the hypothesis that fatigue involves altered basal ganglia functional connectivity.
Changes in striatal-prefrontal networks have been reported previously in fatigue. For example, increased connectivity between the left caudate nucleus and left superior frontal gyrus after a fatiguing mental task has been reported in multiple sclerosis patients with cognitive fatigue (24); in mTBI, a significant correlation between self-reported fatigue and functional connectivity between the middle frontal gyrus and the rest of the brain was found during a psychomotor vigilance task (25).
Besides history of military deployment and concussion, another consideration in servicemembers and veterans is the possible influence of PTSD on fatigue. One study has looked at connectivity changes in military servicemembers with a history of mTBI with and without PTSD symptoms and found increased connectivity in the posterior left middle frontal gyrus, left parahippocampal gyrus, and left cuneus in those endorsing PTSD symptoms (26). The reported regions were posterior to the regions we found in our seed-based analysis of fatigue and regions not associated with striatal-prefrontal networks like depression. Given our relatively small sample size and concern for introducing type 2 error, we did not include PTSD as an additional covariate in our analysis.
There are several limitations to this study, one of which is that the correlations are based upon self-report measures, unconfirmed by behavioral or clinical outcomes. However, we were specifically interested in the subjective sense of fatigue, which is available only by self-report and has been shown to be clinically meaningful (27). Another important limitation is that the individuals in this study were deployed servicemembers and veterans who received at least one in-theater concussion. Because fatigue may be related specifically to deployment independent of concussion history, we cannot causally relate fatigue to either deployment alone or history of mTBI in this exploratory study. Finally, MFI scores have not been reported in other studies of military personnel, so comparisons between military groups with and without a history of mTBI are not currently possible.
Fatigue is a frequent complaint among servicemembers and veterans returning from deployment, including those with a history of mTBI. This study provides preliminary evidence that self-reported mental fatigue correlates with increased striatal-prefrontal functional connectivity and may represent a bias in effort/reward processing. Further work to compare fatigue symptoms in other populations, such as deployed personnel without head injury, is needed to determine if postdeployment fatigue in general is due to such biased processing. Successful treatment of persistent fatigue in servicemembers following deployment will significantly improve their productivity, sense of self-efficacy, and quality of life.
Footnote
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policies or position of the Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. government.
References
1.
Wiborg JF, Rademaker AR, Geuze E, et al: Course and predictors of postdeployment fatigue: a prospective cohort study in the Dutch Armed Forces. J Clin Psychiatry 2016; 77:1074–1079
2.
Rau HK, Hendrickson RC, Roggenkamp HC, et al: Fatigue—but not mTBI history, PTSD, or sleep quality—directly contributes to reduced prospective memory performance in Iraq and Afghanistan era veterans. Clin Neuropsychol 2018; 32;:1319–1336
3.
Stulemeijer M, van der Werf S, Bleijenberg G, et al: Recovery from mild traumatic brain injury: a focus on fatigue. J Neurol 2006; 253:1041–1047
4.
Dobryakova E, DeLuca J, Genova HM, et al: Neural correlates of cognitive fatigue: cortico-striatal circuitry and effort-reward imbalance. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2013; 19:849–853
5.
Kutlubaev MA, Duncan FH, Mead GE: Biological correlates of post-stroke fatigue: a systematic review. Acta Neurol Scand 2012; 125:219–227
6.
Chaudhuri A, Behan PO: Fatigue and basal ganglia. J Neurol Sci 2000; 179(S1–2):34–42
7.
Park IH, Lee BC, Kim JJ, et al: Effort-based reinforcement processing and functional connectivity underlying amotivation in medicated patients with depression and schizophrenia. J Neurosci 2017; 37:4370–4380
8.
Münster A, Hauber W: Medial orbitofrontal cortex mediates effort-related responding in rats. Cereb Cortex 2018; 28:4379–4389
9.
Nakagawa S, Takeuchi H, Taki Y, et al: Basal ganglia correlates of fatigue in young adults. Sci Rep 2016; 6:21386
10.
Drysdale AT, Grosenick L, Downar J, et al: Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat Med 2017; 23:28–38
11.
Management of Concussion/mTBI Working Group: VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009; 46:CP1–CP68
12.
Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, et al: The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 1995; 39:315–325
13.
Radloff LS: The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1:385–401
14.
Weathers FL, Litz BT, Herman, DS, et al: The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Utility. San Antonio, Tex, International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 1993
15.
Cox RW: AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996; 29:162–173
16.
Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, et al: Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002; 33:341–355
17.
Glover GH, Li TQ, Ress D: Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44:162–167
18.
Birn RM, Murphy K, Bandettini PA: The effect of respiration variations on independent component analysis results of resting state functional connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29:740–750
19.
Jo HJ, Saad ZS, Simmons WK, et al: Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal. Neuroimage 2010; 52:571–582
20.
Talairach P, Tournoux J: Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart, Germany, Thieme, 1988
21.
Fox MD, Zhang D, Snyder AZ, et al: The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. J Neurophysiol 2009; 101:3270–3283
22.
Saad ZS, Gotts SJ, Murphy K, et al: Trouble at rest: how correlation patterns and group differences become distorted after global signal regression. Brain Connect 2012; 2:25–32
23.
Cox RW, Chen G, Glen DR, et al: FMRI clustering in AFNI: false-positive rates redux. Brain Connect 2017; 7:152–171
24.
Pravatà E, Zecca C, Sestieri C, et al: Hyperconnectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex following mental effort in multiple sclerosis patients with cognitive fatigue. Mult Scler 2016; 22:1665–1675
25.
Nordin LE, Möller MC, Julin P, et al: Post mTBI fatigue is associated with abnormal brain functional connectivity. Sci Rep 2016; 6:21183
26.
Nathan DE, Bellgowan JAF, French LM, et al: Assessing the impact of post-traumatic stress symptoms on the resting-state default mode network in a military chronic mild traumatic brain injury sample. Brain Connect 2017; 7:236–249
27.
Purcell A, Fleming J, Bennett S, et al: Determining the minimal clinically important difference criteria for the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in a radiotherapy population. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18:307–315
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 14 October 2020
Revision received: 29 December 2020
Accepted: 27 January 2021
Published online: 16 August 2021
Published in print: Fall 2021
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).