Social Ties and Suicidal Ideation Among Veterans Referred to a Primary Care–Mental Health Integration Program
Abstract
Objective:
This study examined associations between three indices of social ties (perceived social support, frequency of negative social exchanges, and degree of social integration) and suicidal ideation among veterans referred by their primary care provider for a behavioral health assessment.
Methods:
The sample included 15,277 veterans who completed a mental health and substance use assessment on referral to a Primary Care–Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) program. Data on sociodemographic factors, mental health and substance use conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, and substance use), perceived general health, the three indices of social ties, and suicidal ideation were extracted from clinical interviews.
Results:
The mean±SD age of the sample was 51.3±15.9, most (89%) were men, and about half (48%) were white. Most met criteria for at least one mental health or substance use condition on PCMHI assessment, and 39% reported either low- or high-severity suicidal ideation, as measured by the Paykel Suicide Scale. Logistic regression analyses indicated that after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, perceived health, and comorbid mental health and substance use conditions, each of the three social tie indices was uniquely associated with higher odds of reporting suicidal ideation, compared with no ideation.
Conclusions:
Findings underscore the value of assessing multiple indices of social ties when examining suicidal ideation among high-risk veterans in primary care experiencing behavioral health issues. Incorporating an assessment of the quality of patients’ social interactions and level of social integration into routine PCMHI practice has the potential to enhance screening and intervention efforts aimed at reducing suicidal ideation.
HIGHLIGHTS
•
Although the association between the quality and nature of social relationships and suicidal outcomes is well established, these aspects of social ties are rarely assessed in primary care and other clinical settings where patients at high risk of suicide are seen.
•
Findings from this study of veterans referred for a behavioral health assessment to a Primary Care–Mental Health Integration program suggest that three indices of social ties (perceived social support, frequency of negative social exchanges, and degree of social integration) are uniquely associated with suicidal ideation.
•
Systematically and routinely assessing multiple dimensions of veterans’ social ties may help improve screening and intervention efforts for patients at high risk of suicide outcomes.
Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death in the United States, and veterans are twice as likely as nonveterans in the general population to die by suicide (1, 2). Accordingly, suicide prevention is the top clinical priority of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), underscoring the need to identify factors that may increase veterans’ susceptibility to suicide morbidity and mortality (1). Factors that have been linked to increased suicide rates in the general population that may be particularly relevant among veterans include male sex, younger and older ages, functional limitations, and availability of and experience with firearms (3–5). Psychiatric conditions also serve as significant risk factors for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among veterans (6). For example, veterans meeting criteria for mental health or substance use conditions such as depression, psychosis, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use disorders are particularly likely to experience suicidal ideation and mortality, with psychiatric comorbidity placing veterans at an even greater risk (7–11).
The significant associations among mental health and substance use conditions and suicidal ideation and mortality have prompted a variety of suicide prevention efforts within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) (1, 12, 13). Recognizing the importance of early screening and risk assessment (14), the VHA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, for instance, has recently announced plans to implement a standardized process of screening for suicide risk, which includes adding well-validated suicide ideation screeners (including item 9 from the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 [PHQ-9]) to existing clinical reminders to screen for depression and PTSD (15–17). Key efforts also have been implemented specifically within primary care, because primary care serves as a particularly high-leverage setting for suicide prevention. For example, research has shown that approximately three-quarters of individuals who die by suicide have had a primary care appointment in the year prior to their death, and 45% have seen a primary care provider within 1 month of suicide (18). Moreover, primary care providers are often tasked with helping patients manage many of the conditions and factors that are associated with elevated suicide risk, including mental health and substance use conditions (19, 20). Accordingly, under the Primary Care–Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) initiative, the VHA requires all medical centers to adopt a PCMHI collaborative care management program (21). Central to PCMHI programs is ensuring timely, routine screening for mental health and substance use conditions (e.g., depression, PTSD, and substance use disorders) and suicidal ideation and providing algorithm-driven, measurement-based decision support for the management of these conditions in primary care (22).
Although PCMHI programs screen for and target multiple factors that heighten the risk of suicide-related outcomes among veterans with mental health or substance use issues, these factors tend to focus on biological and psychiatric symptoms and conditions (6). There are, however, additional factors that are not traditionally assessed in primary care and other clinical settings that may be associated with suicide rates in this vulnerable group. For example, the nature and quality of an individual’s connections with social network members represent factors that are associated not only with general medical and psychiatric health issues but also with suicide-related outcomes among primary care patients experiencing symptoms of mental health or substance use conditions (23, 24). Positive social relationships and exchanges (e.g., interactions that are perceived as emotionally rewarding and result in a feeling of being supported, valued, and cared for) are essential in promoting physical and mental health (25). Moreover, although negative exchanges (e.g., interactions that entail criticism and conflict or fail to offer support in times of need) occur less frequently than positive exchanges, they appear to have a particularly negative impact on mental health when they do occur (24, 26), highlighting the value of examining both positive and negative aspects of social ties in clinical settings.
The association between social network factors and suicide outcomes, specifically, is also well documented, with literature on the impact of social connectedness on suicidal behaviors dating back to the 1960s (27). For example, social support and greater social integration (i.e., the degree to which a person engages in various types of social relationships and interactions at both the individual and community level) are associated with lower suicidal ideation and completion rates in both veteran and nonveteran samples (3, 10, 28–33). Prior studies have typically relied on a single indicator to capture the nature of a person’s social ties (e.g., social integration or social support); however, to have the greatest clinical utility and more fully inform prevention efforts, it is important to tease apart which indicators have the greatest impact on suicide-related outcomes (e.g., suicidal ideation and attempts).
To that end, several studies have examined the association between multiple dimensions of the nature and quality of a person’s social ties and suicidal ideation and behavior. For example, in an examination of patients recruited from residential substance use treatment programs, You and colleagues (34) found that interpersonal conflict and lack of belongingness (i.e., having the innate need to belong in meaningful relationships met) were significantly associated with suicidal ideation and that a lack of perceived social support and belongingness and living alone were related to having made a suicide attempt. Among veterans with probable major depression who were receiving primary care at a VA hospital, loneliness (i.e., a state arising from the lack of perceived social connectedness) remained the sole predictor of suicidal ideation after the analysis controlled for other indices of social ties (e.g., social support, number of confidants, and interpersonal conflict) (35). Finally, in one of the first examinations of the relative impact of positive and negative social exchanges on suicidal ideation among VA primary care patients referred for a mental health and substance use evaluation, our team found that after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, physical functioning, and comorbid mental health and substance use conditions, negative but not positive exchanges significantly predicted suicidal ideation (23). Of note, subsequent analyses indicated that one category of negative social exchanges, social interactions that elicited feelings of rejection or neglect, were the most related to suicidal ideation. These results further support the notion that “thwarted belongingness,” or having unmet needs for meaningful and supportive social ties, may be particularly likely to elicit suicidal thoughts and behaviors (34, 36, 37).
Despite the link between social network factors and suicidal ideation, few PCMHI programs routinely assess multiple indices of social ties in a standardized fashion. Information regarding veterans’ perceived social support and connectedness represents an important, unaddressed target that can be used to help guide more tailored, patient-centered, and measurement-based care. Veterans engaged in primary care who screen positive for a mental health or substance use condition are at high risk of suicidal ideation not only because of their physical or psychological health but also because they are likely to have fewer positive social interactions, resources, and supports (38–41).
Guided by empirical findings from prior studies highlighting the clinical value of evaluating multiple indices of social ties (34) and by our work with veterans enrolled in a PCMHI program (23), in 2010 the Behavioral Health Laboratory (BHL) (the PCMHI program at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center) incorporated three items into its routine baseline clinical assessment that capture veterans’ perceived social support, the frequency of negative exchanges with social network members, and the frequency of contact with friends and relatives (a proxy for social integration). These three dimensions of social ties were chosen to reflect domains that have been found to have independent, unique associations with suicidal ideation (23, 34) and with psychological health more broadly (24, 25, 42). The study reported here sought to explore the relative association between each of these indices and suicidal ideation among veterans referred to the BHL by their primary care providers for a mental health and substance use assessment. To examine the added clinical value of including these items, our multivariate models adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, perceived general medical health, and symptoms of mental health and substance use conditions. We hypothesized that all three items capturing social ties would be independently associated with increased odds of suicidal ideation, after the analysis adjusted for other known correlates of suicide outcomes (3–6).
Methods
Study Sample and Procedures
All study procedures were approved by the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The study employed a retrospective analysis of clinical patient records. Data for 15,277 veterans who completed a BHL baseline assessment between September 2010 and March 2016 were extracted from the medical record. The BHL is an evidence-based, PCMHI program that focuses on the identification, assessment, triage, and clinical care management of primary care patients who may need care for mental health or substance use issues, such as depression, anxiety, substance use disorder, and PTSD. The veterans included in the analysis had all received primary care at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center or affiliated community-based outpatient clinics (43, 44). Veterans were referred to or identified by the BHL through three mechanisms: referral by a primary care provider after a positive screen for PTSD, alcohol misuse, or depression; direct referral by a primary care provider on the basis of clinical judgment, independent of screening; or pharmacy-based casefinding of patients newly prescribed an antidepressant by their primary care provider.
On referral, patients were contacted to complete an initial, 20- to 30-minute mental health and substance use assessment. The assessments were conducted by BHL health technicians, who are extensively trained interviewers with a bachelor’s degree or higher. The clinical interview, conducted either over the phone or in person, included questions regarding sociodemographic characteristics, general health and mental health functioning, substance use, and assessments of axis I disorders (e.g., depression, PTSD, and psychosis).
Assessments and Measures
Patient characteristics.
The following sociodemographic variables were exported for analysis: age, sex (0, female; 1, male), race-ethnicity (0, other; 1, white), marital status (0, not married or partnered; 1, married or partnered), and inadequate financial status (0, have at least enough to get by; 1, can’t make ends meet). A single item (“In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?”) from the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey assessed the patient’s perceived general health (45).
Clinical BHL mental health and substance use assessments.
The PHQ-9 was used to assess severity of depressive symptoms (15). The 7-day Timeline Follow-Back Interview and a modified version of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test were used to assess whether patients met criteria for (coded as 1) or did not meet criteria for (coded as 0) at-risk drinking and illicit drug use, respectively (46, 47). Given changes in the BHL assessment battery over the course of the data extraction time window, whether patients met criteria for (coded as 1) or did not meet criteria for (coded as 0) generalized anxiety disorder was determined by scores on either the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (48) or the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 scale (GAD-7) (49). The Patient Checklist–Civilian (PCL-C) for PTSD or the PCL-5 (assessments were modified during the data extraction time frame because of changes in the criteria set forth in the DSM) assessed whether patients met criteria for (coded as 1) or did not meet criteria for (coded as 0) PTSD (50). DSM criteria were also used to assess whether patients met criteria for (coded as 1) or did not meet criteria for (coded as 0) mania and psychosis (48). Diagnostic cutoffs for the GAD-7, PCL and PCL-5, mania, and psychosis were based on DSM-IV or DSM-5 criteria and symptom clusters, depending on the version and timing of the assessment administered.
Suicidal ideation.
Suicidal ideation was assessed with two separate measures. First, the five-item Paykel Suicide Scale was used to assess for the severity of suicidal ideation in the past year (51, 52). Patients were asked to respond (yes or no) to a series of questions regarding whether they had felt as if life was not worth living (coded as 1); had wished they were dead (coded as 2); or had thought about taking (coded as 3), seriously considered taking (coded as 4), or made an attempt to take (coded as 5) their own life over the past year. Patients’ scores corresponded to the greatest severity of suicidal ideation or behavior endorsed (53). On BHL assessment, patients who respond yes to items 3, 4, or 5 are contacted by a clinician for follow-up. Accordingly, we used Paykel scores to categorize patients in one of three groups reflecting the severity of suicidal ideation: no suicidal ideation (Paykel score of 0), low-severity suicidal ideation (response of yes to either item 1 or 2), or high-severity suicidal ideation (response of yes to item 3, 4, or 5).
Second, item 9 from the PHQ-9—“Over the past two weeks, how often have you been bothered by thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way?”—was dichotomized and treated as the outcome in separate analyses. Veterans who reported “several days,” “more than half the days,” or “nearly every day” in response to the item were coded as having a positive suicide ideation screen.
Social exchanges, support, and integration.
Three indices of social ties were assessed with individual items from validated measures. One item (“In the past month, how often did people you know act inconsiderate to you or unsympathetic about your personal concerns?”), from the Positive and Negative Social Exchanges Scale, captured the frequency of negative social exchanges (0, never, to 4, very often) (24). A second item (“On the whole, how much do your friends and relatives make you feel loved and cared for?”), from the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, captured perceived social support (0, not at all, to 4, a great deal) (54). The final item (“How often are you in contact with any of your friends or relatives that do not live with you (including visits, phone calls, letters, or electronic mail messages)?”) was modified from the Midlife in the United States study and dichotomized to capture the degree of social integration (0, once a month or less; 1, about once a week or more) (55). Bivariate analyses of the three social tie indices yielded the following correlations: social support and negative interactions (r=–.33, p<.001), social support and social integration (r=.29, p<.001), and negative interactions and social integration (r=–.17, p<.001).
Analytic Strategy
To compare sample characteristics across veterans who did and did not endorse suicidal ideation, measured by both the Paykel Suicide Scale and PHQ-9 item 9, we ran a series of bivariate tests of significance, including t tests for equality of means and chi-square tests for continuous and dichotomous outcomes. We also ran a series of unadjusted binomial (with PHQ-9 item 9 as the outcome) and multinomial (with suicidal ideation severity from the Paykel Suicide Scale as the outcome) logistic regression models for each of the patient, clinical, and social tie variables summarized above.
To test our main hypotheses regarding the associations among the items capturing social ties and suicidal ideation, we ran two adjusted multivariate logistic regression models. In the first model, suicidal ideation (none, low severity, and high severity) over the past year, as measured by the Paykel Suicide Scale, was specified as a categorical outcome. Patients reporting no suicidal ideation served as the reference group. In the second model, item 9 from the PHQ-9 was specified as a dichotomous outcome (0 [reference group], negative suicide ideation screen; 1, positive suicide ideation screen). Both adjusted models controlled for age; sex; perceived general health; race-ethnicity; marital status; financial status; depressive symptom severity; illicit drug use; and meeting criteria for PTSD, mania, psychosis, anxiety, or at-risk drinking. The selected covariates not only have been shown in prior work to covary with suicidal ideation but also were significantly associated with suicidal ideation in our initial, bivariate analyses. Analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics 20.
Results
Table 1 summarizes sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the full sample and the same characteristics stratified by suicidal ideation severity as measured by the Paykel Suicide Scale. The mean age of the patients was 51.3. Most were men, and most met criteria for at least one mental health or substance use condition on being assessed by the BHL. Roughly half were white, and 44% were married or partnered. Thirty-nine percent of the sample reported either low- or high-severity suicidal ideation, as measured by the Paykel Suicide Scale. Results from the bivariate analyses showed that across both measures used to assess for suicidal ideation, those who reported suicidal ideation differed from those who did not on all the variables examined, with one exception; sex was unrelated to suicidal ideation severity, as measured by the Paykel Stress Scale.
| Suicidal ideation severity | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (N=15,277) | None (N=9,296) | Low (N=2,678) | High (N=3,303) | ||||||||
| Characteristic | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | Test statistic | df | p |
| Sociodemographic | |||||||||||
| Age (M±SD) | 51.3±15.9 | 50.6±16.6 | 55.4±14.5 | 51.4±14.5 | F=118.08 | 2, 15,274 | <.001 | ||||
| Male | 13,545 | 89 | 8,222 | 88 | 2,371 | 89 | 2,952 | 89 | χ2=2.13 | 2 | .34 |
| Race-ethnicity | χ2=45.15 | 8 | <.001 | ||||||||
| Non-Hispanic white | 7,371 | 48 | 4,645 | 50 | 1,258 | 47 | 1,468 | 44 | |||
| Black/African American | 6,424 | 42 | 3,751 | 40 | 1,191 | 45 | 1,482 | 45 | |||
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 179 | 1 | 119 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 40 | 1 | |||
| Native American/Alaskan | 84 | 1 | 48 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 18 | 1 | |||
| Other or mixed | 1,219 | 8 | 733 | 8 | 191 | 7 | 295 | 9 | |||
| Married or partnered | 6,790 | 44 | 4,222 | 45 | 1,185 | 44 | 1,383 | 42 | χ2=12.46 | 2 | .002 |
| Can’t make ends meet | 4,098 | 21 | 1,946 | 21 | 890 | 33 | 1,262 | 38 | χ2=438.42 | 2 | <.001 |
| Perceived overall health (M±SD)b | 2.5±1.0 | 2.7±1.0 | 2.2±.9 | 2.2±1.0 | F=443.22 | 2, 15,274 | <.001 | ||||
| Mental health and substance use | |||||||||||
| Depressive symptoms (M±SD)c | 11.9±6.8 | 9.3±6.0 | 14.9±5.6 | 16.8±5.7 | F=2,438.37 | 2, 15,274 | <.001 | ||||
| Illicit drug use | 591 | 4 | 255 | 3 | 120 | 5 | 216 | 7 | χ2=97.72 | 2 | <.001 |
| PTSD | 6,461 | 42 | 2,871 | 31 | 1,458 | 55 | 2,132 | 65 | χ2=1,328.03 | 2 | <.001 |
| Mania | 333 | 2 | 101 | 1 | 71 | 3 | 161 | 5 | χ2=167.38 | 2 | <.001 |
| Psychosis | 523 | 3 | 151 | 2 | 98 | 4 | 274 | 8 | χ2=328.59 | 2 | <.001 |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | 6,403 | 42 | 2,795 | 30 | 1,435 | 54 | 2,173 | 66 | χ2=1,459.07 | 2 | <.001 |
| At-risk alcohol use | 3,673 | 24 | 2,096 | 23 | 608 | 23 | 969 | 29 | χ2=64.71 | 2 | <.001 |
| Social tie indices | |||||||||||
| Social support (M±SD)d | 2.9±1.2 | 3.1±1.1 | 2.6±1.3 | 2.4±1.3 | F=523.65 | 2, 15,274 | <.001 | ||||
| Negative interactions (M±SD)d | 1.3±1.3 | 1.1±1.2 | 1.6±1.3 | 1.7±1.3 | F=367.90 | 2, 15,274 | <.001 | ||||
| High social integratione | 10,850 | 71 | 7,164 | 77 | 1,728 | 65 | 1,958 | 59 | χ2=441.17 | 2 | <.001 |
a
Measured by the Paykel Suicide Scale.
b
Assessed with an item from the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. Possible scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better health.
c
Assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire–9. Possible scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
d
Possible scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more support or more frequent negative interactions.
e
Patients with high social integration reported having contact with friends or relatives, other than those living with them, about once a week or more.
Results from the adjusted, multinomial logistic regression model suggested that when the analysis controlled for age, sex, race-ethnicity, marital and financial status, perceived overall health, depressive symptoms, and mental health or substance use comorbidity, all three social tie indices were independently associated with severity of suicidal ideation over the previous year (Table 2). Specifically, patients reporting more social support or more frequent social contact with friends or relatives were significantly more likely to report no suicidal ideation as opposed to low- or high-severity suicidal ideation on the Paykel Suicide Scale. When the analysis adjusted for covariates, a one-unit increase in social support was associated with a reduction in the odds of reporting low-severity and high-severity suicidal ideation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.86 and 0.82, respectively), compared with no ideation. Similarly, for those who had a high degree of contact with friends or relatives, the odds of reporting suicidal ideation were lower than for those with less contact (low-severity ideation, AOR=0.88; high-severity ideation, AOR=0.83).
| Variable and suicidal ideation severity groupb | OR | 95% CI | p | Adjusted ORc | 95% CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||||
| Low severity | 1.02 | 1.02–1.03 | <.001 | 1.03 | 1.02–1.03 | <.001 |
| High severity | 1.01 | 1.00–1.01 | .001 | 1.01 | 1.01–1.02 | <.001 |
| White | ||||||
| Low severity | .89 | .81–.97 | .01 | 1.08 | .98–1.19 | .10 |
| High severity | .80 | .74–.87 | <.001 | 1.09 | 1.00–1.20 | .08 |
| Male | ||||||
| Low severity | 1.01 | .88–1.15 | .89 | .87 | .74–1.01 | .06 |
| High severity | 1.10 | .97–1.25 | .15 | 1.06 | .91–1.23 | .44 |
| Married or partnered | ||||||
| Low severity | .95 | .88–1.04 | .29 | .92 | .83–1.01 | .08 |
| High severity | .87 | .80–.94 | <.001 | .94 | .85–1.04 | .21 |
| Can’t make ends meet | ||||||
| Low severity | 1.88 | 1.71–2.07 | <.001 | 1.19 | 1.07–1.32 | .002 |
| High severity | 2.34 | 2.14–2.55 | <.001 | 1.23 | 1.11–1.36 | <.001 |
| Perceived overall health | ||||||
| Low severity | .61 | .58–.64 | <.001 | .89 | .85–.94 | <.001 |
| High severity | .59 | .57–.62 | <.001 | .95 | .90–1.00 | .05 |
| At-risk alcohol use | ||||||
| Low severity | 1.00 | .91–1.12 | .87 | .98 | .88–1.10 | .72 |
| High severity | 1.43 | 1.30–1.56 | <.001 | 1.21 | 1.09–1.35 | <.001 |
| Illicit drug use | ||||||
| Low severity | 1.66 | 1.33–2.08 | <.001 | 1.23 | .97–1.57 | .09 |
| High severity | 2.48 | 2.06–2.99 | <.001 | 1.57 | 1.26–1.96 | <.001 |
| Depressive symptoms severity | ||||||
| Low severity | 1.16 | 1.15–1.17 | <.001 | 1.12 | 1.11–1.13 | <.001 |
| High severity | 1.23 | 1.22–1.24 | <.001 | 1.17 | 1.16–1.18 | <.001 |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | ||||||
| Low severity | 2.69 | 2.46–2.93 | <.001 | 1.22 | 1.10–1.36 | <.001 |
| High severity | 4.47 | 4.11–4.87 | <.001 | 1.42 | 1.28–1.57 | <.001 |
| PTSD | ||||||
| Low severity | 2.67 | 2.45–2.92 | <.001 | 1.41 | 1.28–1.57 | <.001 |
| High severity | 4.07 | 3.75–4.43 | <.001 | 1.57 | 1.42–1.74 | <.001 |
| Mania | ||||||
| Low severity | 2.48 | 1.83–3.37 | <.001 | 1.36 | .98–1.89 | .07 |
| High severity | 4.67 | 3.63–6.00 | <.001 | 1.78 | 1.33–2.36 | <.001 |
| Psychosis | ||||||
| Low severity | 2.30 | 1.78–2.98 | <.001 | 1.25 | .95–1.65 | .11 |
| High severity | 5.48 | 4.47–6.71 | <.001 | 2.33 | 1.84–2.95 | <.001 |
| Social support | ||||||
| Low severity | .69 | .67–.71 | <.001 | .86 | .83–.90 | <.001 |
| High severity | .62 | .60–.64 | <.001 | .82 | .78–.85 | <.001 |
| Negative interactions | ||||||
| Low severity | 1.34 | 1.30–1.39 | <.001 | 1.08 | 1.04–1.13 | <.001 |
| High severity | 1.47 | 1.43–1.52 | <.001 | 1.07 | 1.03–1.12 | <.001 |
| High social integration | ||||||
| Low severity | .54 | .49–.59 | <.001 | .88 | .80–.98 | .02 |
| High severity | .43 | .40–.47 | <.001 | .83 | .75–.91 | <.001 |
a
Assessed with the Paykel Suicide Scale, which assesses severity of suicidal ideation in the past year.
b
Reference group: no suicidal ideation.
c
The analysis adjusted for age, sex, race-ethnicity, marital and financial status, perceived overall health, depressive symptoms, and mental illness or substance use comorbidity.
On the other hand, patients who reported a greater frequency of negative exchanges with network members were significantly more likely to report low- or high-severity suicidal ideation in the past year than to report no suicidal ideation. For every one-unit increase in negative exchanges, the odds of reporting low- or high-severity suicidal ideation, compared with no ideation, increased (low-severity ideation, AOR=1.08; high-severity ideation, AOR=1.07). These effects are comparable in size to those found in other multivariable analyses of the association between sociodemographic and psychosocial variables and suicidal ideation (34, 56–58). Results from analyses of the primary suicidal ideation screener from the PHQ-9 paralleled these findings; when the analysis adjusted for covariates, greater social support and more frequent social contact were each independently associated with lower odds of a positive suicidal ideation screen (Table 3). Greater frequency of negative exchanges, however, was related to higher odds of suicidal ideation in the past 2 weeks.
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | p | Adjusted ORb | 95% CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.01 | 1.01–1.02 | <.001 | 1.02 | 1.02–1.03 | <.001 |
| White (reference: nonwhite) | .86 | .80–.93 | <.001 | 1.06 | .96–1.17 | .23 |
| Male (reference: female) | 1.28 | 1.12–1.46 | <.001 | 1.21 | 1.03–1.41 | .02 |
| Married or partnered (reference: unmarried/unpartnered) | .96 | .89–1.04 | .33 | 1.04 | .94–1.14 | .48 |
| Can’t make ends meet (reference: have at least enough to get by) | 2.12 | 1.95–2.30 | <.001 | 1.13 | 1.02–1.25 | .02 |
| Perceived overall health | .61 | .58–.63 | <.001 | 1.01 | .96–1.07 | .61 |
| At-risk alcohol use (reference: none) | 1.27 | 1.16–1.39 | <.001 | 1.13 | 1.01–1.25 | .03 |
| Illicit drug use (reference: none) | 1.98 | 1.66–2.37 | <.001 | 1.25 | 1.01–1.55 | .04 |
| Depressive symptoms severity | 1.24 | 1.23–1.25 | <.001 | 1.21 | 1.20–1.22 | <.001 |
| Generalized anxiety disorder (reference: none) | 3.38 | 3.11–3.67 | <.001 | 1.14 | 1.02–1.26 | .02 |
| PTSD (reference: none) | 2.92 | 2.69–3.17 | <.001 | 1.18 | 1.07–1.31 | .001 |
| Mania (reference: none) | 2.65 | 2.12–3.32 | <.001 | 1.19 | .92–1.55 | .18 |
| Psychosis (reference: none) | 3.20 | 2.68–3.82 | <.001 | 1.39 | 1.12–1.71 | .002 |
| Social support | .66 | .64–.68 | <.001 | .85 | .82–.89 | <.001 |
| Negative interactions | 1.38 | 1.34–1.43 | <.001 | 1.06 | 1.02–1.10 | .01 |
| High social integration (reference: low integration) | .49 | .45–.53 | <.001 | .89 | .81–.99 | .03 |
a
Assessed with item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9), which assesses for suicidal ideation in the past 2 weeks. Reference group is negative screen for suicidal ideation.
b
The analysis adjusted for age, sex, race-ethnicity, marital and financial status, perceived overall health, depressive symptoms, and mental illness or substance use comorbidity.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to examine the value of evaluating multiple indices of social ties when assessing suicidal ideation among veterans referred by primary care to a PCMHI program for a mental health and substance use assessment. The results support our hypothesis; even after the analysis adjusted for other known, robust correlates of suicide outcomes in primary care and psychiatric patient samples (3–6), all three social tie items were independently associated with suicidal ideation. Of note, the association between the social tie items and suicidal ideation was significant both in terms of suicidal ideation severity over the past year (as assessed by the Paykel Suicide Scale) and in terms of the more proximal measure of suicidal ideation in the past 2 weeks (as assessed by PHQ-9 item 9). The convergence of findings across the two scales highlights the clinical utility of addressing the quality and frequency of social ties at multiple points over the course of assessment and treatment, particularly given the significant positive association between PHQ-9 item 9 and increased odds of suicide mortality in both VA and community samples (16, 17).
The finding that greater social support and social integration and less frequent negative exchanges were significantly associated with reduced odds of reporting suicidal ideation is consistent with prior work (23, 34, 35). The fact that each of the three social tie indices was independently associated with suicidal ideation, even when the analysis controlled for the other two indices and marital status, lends further support to the value of examining multiple domains of social ties when assessing suicide-related outcomes among individuals experiencing psychiatric symptoms. The benefits of social support are well documented; however, even supportive, close relationship partners can be a source of conflict and disappointments that are particularly detrimental to psychological well-being (59). Indeed, positive and negative interactions with network members can best be characterized as two unique dimensions of interpersonal experience, rather than as two ends of a single continuum (25), further underscoring the importance of evaluating both domains.
Similarly, our findings support the notion that frequency of contact with social network members, a marker for social integration or connectedness, also may confer a unique benefit for psychological well-being. Prior work has shown that social and community integration (e.g., frequency of social contact, availability of non–family members within driving distance, social network size, and marital status) and religious involvement are associated with suicide mortality even after adjustment for well-established covariates such as age; comorbid health conditions, including mental health conditions; and employment status (31, 60). Moreover, other correlates of low social connectedness or integration, including feelings of rejection or neglect and loneliness, have all been shown to predict suicidal ideation among veterans with behavioral health conditions (23, 34, 35). Our finding that frequency of contact with friends and relatives was uniquely associated with suicidal ideation is also consistent with interpersonal theories of suicide (36, 37). It has been suggested, for example, that feeling socially excluded from others may deny individuals satisfaction of their essential human need for belonging (i.e., thwarted belongingness). Feeling as if one does not belong can further lead to a loss of self-worth, sense of meaning in life, and self-regulatory abilities, leading to an increase in self-defeating behavior and suicide risk (61, 62).
Several caveats should be considered when interpreting the results. First, this study specifically focused on the clinical value of assessing various indices of social ties when examining suicidal ideation risk among veterans referred to a PCMHI program. Thus, although our sample afforded us the opportunity to examine a group at high risk of suicide morbidity and mortality, the focus on a primary care sample of veterans may limit the generalizability of our findings in terms of other high-risk or nonveteran populations. Generalizability of our results also may be limited because of the disproportionately high number of men in the sample. Second, the clinical data evaluated in this study were cross-sectional, thus precluding inferences about the directionality of the association between the social relationship indices and suicidal ideation. The association between interpersonal functioning and suicidal ideation is most likely reciprocal in nature, because acute and chronic symptoms of mental illness or substance use disorders and suicidal thoughts can also affect the quality and structure of one’s relationships with others (40, 63). Finally, our analyses relied primarily on single items to capture the three indices of social ties. The inclusion of valid, reliable multi-item scales in future work is warranted. In a similar vein, future work would benefit from inclusion of measures that take into account other dimensions of social relationships (e.g., perceived burdensomeness to network members, perceived loneliness, instrumental and tangible support, and criticism and rejection by others) and the relationship type (e.g., spouse, child, friend, or peer), because these factors may be especially important when evaluating suicidal ideation among individuals experiencing symptoms of mental health or substance use conditions (36, 38, 64).
Conclusions
Notwithstanding these limitations, the results from this study provide preliminary support for the clinical value of evaluating the nature and quality of social ties among veterans who screen positive for behavioral health issues in primary care and who are referred to a PCMHI program. Because this patient population is at high risk of suicidal thoughts, behavior, and mortality, the finding that each of the three indices of the veterans’ social ties was uniquely associated with suicidal ideation, even after control for known clinical and sociodemographic correlates, has multiple implications for clinical research and practice. Future investigations that use more comprehensive, multidimensional measures of social ties and examine the longitudinal mechanisms by which social ties, symptoms of mental health and substance use conditions, and suicidal ideation are linked would help inform the timing and content of suicide prevention efforts. Systematically including scales or items that capture multiple dimensions of veterans’ social ties in routine intake and follow-up PCMHI assessments may help identify patients at high risk of developing suicidal thoughts and inform care decisions. Moreover, care management or brief interventions that aim to improve the quality of preexisting social relationships, encourage engagement in social and community activities, and aid in the development of skills to reduce negative and maximize positive exchanges with network members may have a significant impact on reducing suicidal ideation among those at high risk.
Footnote
The content of this article does not necessarily reflect the views of the Veterans Health Administration or the U.S. government.
References
1.
VA National Suicide Data Report 2005–2015. Washington, DC, Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, June 2018. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2015/OMHSP_National_Suicide_Data_Report_2005-2015_06-14-18_508.pdf
2.
Xu JQ, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, et al: Mortality in the United States, 2015. NCHS data brief, 267. Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, 2016
3.
Desai RA, Dausey D, Rosenheck RA: Suicide among discharged psychiatric inpatients in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Mil Med 2008; 173:721–728
4.
Desai MM, Rosenheck RA, Desai RA: Time trends and predictors of suicide among mental health outpatients in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Behav Health Serv Res 2008; 35:115–124
5.
Kaplan MS, McFarland BH, Huguet N, et al: Physical illness, functional limitations, and suicide risk: a population-based study. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2007; 77:56–60
6.
Ashrafioun L, Pigeon WR, Conner KR, et al: Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among veterans in primary care referred for a mental health evaluation. J Affect Disord 2016; 189:344–350
7.
Corson K, Denneson LM, Bair MJ, et al: Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation among Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans. J Affect Disord 2013; 149:291–298
8.
Chakravorty S, Grandner MA, Mavandadi S, et al: Suicidal ideation in veterans misusing alcohol: relationships with insomnia symptoms and sleep duration. Addict Behav 2014; 39:399–405
9.
Jakupcak M, Cook J, Imel Z, et al: Posttraumatic stress disorder as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans. J Trauma Stress 2009; 22:303–306
10.
Pietrzak RH, Goldstein MB, Malley JC, et al: Risk and protective factors associated with suicidal ideation in veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. J Affect Disord 2010; 123:102–107
11.
Valenstein M, Kim HM, Ganoczy D, et al: Higher-risk periods for suicide among VA patients receiving depression treatment: prioritizing suicide prevention efforts. J Affect Disord 2009; 112:50–58
12.
Katz IR, McCarthy JF, Ignacio RV, et al: Suicide among veterans in 16 states, 2005 to 2008: comparisons between utilizers and nonutilizers of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services based on data from the National Death Index, the National Violent Death Reporting System, and VHA administrative records. Am J Public Health 2012; 102(suppl 1):S105–S110
13.
McCarthy JF, Bossarte RM, Katz IR, et al: Predictive modeling and concentration of the risk of suicide: implications for preventive interventions in the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Am J Public Health 2015; 105:1935–1942
14.
VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide, Version 1.0. Washington, DC, Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense, June 2013. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/MH/srb/VADODCP_suiciderisk_full.pdf
15.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB: The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16:606–613
16.
Louzon SA, Bossarte R, McCarthy JF, et al: Does suicidal ideation as measured by the PHQ-9 predict suicide among VA Patients? Psychiatr Serv 2016; 67:517–522
17.
Simon GE, Coleman KJ, Rossom RC, et al: Risk of suicide attempt and suicide death following completion of the Patient Health Questionnaire depression module in community practice. J Clin Psychiatry 2016; 77:221–227
18.
Luoma JB, Martin CE, Pearson JL: Contact with mental health and primary care providers before suicide: a review of the evidence. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:909–916
19.
Blow FC, Bohnert AS, Ilgen MA, et al: Suicide mortality among patients treated by the Veterans Health Administration from 2000 to 2007. Am J Public Health 2012; 102(suppl 1):S98–S104
20.
Shapiro S, Skinner EA, Kessler LG, et al: Utilization of health and mental health services: three epidemiologic catchment area sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984; 41:971–978
21.
Uniform Mental Health Services in VA Medical Centers and Clinics VHA Handbook 1160.01. Washington, DC, Department of Veterans Affairs, 2008
22.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Care Services; Committee to Evaluate the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services: Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services. Washington, DC, National Academies Press,2018
23.
Mavandadi S, Rook KS, Newsom JT, et al: Suicidal ideation and social exchanges among at-risk veterans referred for a behavioral health assessment. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013; 48: 233–243
24.
Newsom JT, Rook KS, Nishishiba M, et al: Understanding the relative importance of positive and negative social exchanges: examining specific domains and appraisals. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2005; 60:304–P312
25.
Cohen S: Social relationships and health. Am Psychol 2004; 59:676–684
26.
Finch JF, Okun MA, Pool GJ, et al: A comparison of the influence of conflictual and supportive social interactions on psychological distress. J Pers 1999; 67:581–621
27.
Durkheim E: Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York, Free Press, 1951
28.
Handley TE, Inder KJ, Kelly BJ, et al: You’ve got to have friends: the predictive value of social integration and support in suicidal ideation among rural communities. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012; 47:1281–1290
29.
Lemaire CM, Graham DP: Factors associated with suicidal ideation in OEF/OIF veterans. J Affect Disord 2011; 130:231–238
30.
Pietrzak RH, Johnson DC, Goldstein MB, et al: Psychosocial buffers of traumatic stress, depressive symptoms, and psychosocial difficulties in veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom: the role of resilience, unit support, and postdeployment social support. J Affect Disord 2010; 120:188–192
31.
Tsai AC, Lucas M, Sania A, et al: Social integration and suicide mortality among men: 24-year cohort study of U.S. health professionals. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161:85–95
32.
Qin P, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB: Suicide risk in relation to socioeconomic, demographic, psychiatric, and familial factors: a national register-based study of all suicides in Denmark, 1981–1997. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:765–772
33.
Vilhjalmsson R, Kristjansdottir G, Sveinbjarnardottir E: Factors associated with suicide ideation in adults. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998; 33:97–103
34.
You S, Van Orden KA, Conner KR: Social connections and suicidal thoughts and behavior. Psychol Addict Behav 25:180–184, 2011
35.
Teo AR, Marsh HE, Forsberg CW, et al: Loneliness is closely associated with depression outcomes and suicidal ideation among military veterans in primary care. J Affect Disord 2018; 230:42–49
36.
Joiner T: Why People Die by Suicide. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2005
37.
Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Cukrowicz KC, et al: The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev 2010; 117:575–600
38.
Laffaye C, Cavella S, Drescher K, et al: Relationships among PTSD symptoms, social support, and support source in veterans with chronic PTSD. J Trauma Stress 2008; 21:394–401
39.
Monson CM, Taft CT, Fredman SJ: Military-related PTSD and intimate relationships: from description to theory-driven research and intervention development. Clin Psychol Rev 2009; 29:707–714
40.
Renshaw KD, Rodrigues CS, Jones DH: Psychological symptoms and marital satisfaction in spouses of Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans: relationships with spouses’ perceptions of veterans’ experiences and symptoms. J Fam Psychol 2008; 22:586–594
41.
Sayers SL, Farrow VA, Ross J, et al: Family problems among recently returned military veterans referred for a mental health evaluation. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 70:163–170
42.
Wagner CA, Dichter ME, Mavandadi S, et al: Gender differences in social relationships and mental health among Veterans Affairs patients. Mil Behav Health 2016; 4:220–229
43.
Oslin DW, Ross J, Sayers S, et al: Screening, assessment, and management of depression in VA primary care clinics. The Behavioral Health Laboratory. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 46–50
44.
Tew J, Klaus J, Oslin DW: The Behavioral Health Laboratory: Building a stronger foundation for the patient-centered medical home. Fam Syst Health 2010; 28:130–145
45.
Kazis LE, Miller DR, Skinner KM, et al: Applications of methodologies of the Veterans Health Study in the VA healthcare system: conclusions and summary. J Ambul Care Manage 2006; 29:182–188
46.
Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor TF, et al: Validation of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). Addiction 2008; 103:1039–1047
47.
Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Leo GI, et al: Reliability of a timeline method: assessing normal drinkers’ reports of recent drinking and a comparative evaluation across several populations. Br J Addict 1988; 83:393–402
48.
Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al: The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59(suppl 20):22–33
49.
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, et al: A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:1092–1097
50.
Blanchard EB, Jones-Alexander J, Buckley TC, et al: Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behav Res Ther 1996; 34:669–673
51.
Bartels SJ, Coakley E, Oxman TE, et al: Suicidal and death ideation in older primary care patients with depression, anxiety, and at-risk alcohol use. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002; 10:417–427
52.
Paykel ES, Myers JK, Lindenthal JJ, et al: Suicidal feelings in the general population: a prevalence study. Br J Psychiatry 1974; 124:460–469
53.
Meneese WB, Yutrzenka BA: Correlates of suicidal ideation among rural adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav 1990; 20:206–212
54.
Spanier GB: Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam 1976; 38:15–28
55.
Brooks KP, Gruenewald T, Karlamangla A, et al: Social relationships and allostatic load in the MIDUS study. Health Psychol 2014; 33:1373–1381
56.
Duberstein PR, Conwell Y, Seidlitz L, et al: Personality traits and suicidal behavior and ideation in depressed inpatients 50 years of age and older. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2000; 55:18–26
57.
Hirsch JK, Duberstein PR, Conner KR, et al: Future orientation and suicide ideation and attempts in depressed adults ages 50 and over. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 14:752–757
58.
Kleiman EM, Liu RT: Social support as a protective factor in suicide: findings from two nationally representative samples. J Affect Disord 2013; 150:540–545
59.
Rook KS: Investigating the positive and negative sides of personal relationships: through a glass darkly? in The Dark Side of Close Relationships. Edited by Spitzberg BH, Cupach WR. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, 1998
60.
Duberstein PR, Conwell Y, Conner KR, et al: Poor social integration and suicide: fact or artifact? A case-control study. Psychol Med 2004; 34:1331–1337
61.
Stillman TF, Baumeister RF, Lambert NM, et al: Alone and without purpose: life loses meaning following social exclusion. J Exp Soc Psychol 2009; 45:686–694
62.
Baumeister RF, Brewer LE, Tice DM, et al: Thwarting the need to belong: understanding the interpersonal and inner effects of social exclusion. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2007; 1:506–520
63.
Coyne JC, Kessler RC, Tal M, et al: Living with a depressed person. J Consult Clin Psychol 1987; 55:347–352
64.
Finch JF, Okun MA, Barrera M Jr, et al: Positive and negative social ties among older adults: measurement models and the prediction of psychological distress and well-being. Am J Community Psychol 1989; 17:585–605
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 2 October 2018
Revision received: 19 February 2019
Accepted: 22 March 2019
Published online: 29 May 2019
Published in print: September 01, 2019
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Funding Information
This work was supported by the VISN 4 MIRECC at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).