Skip to main content
Coordinated specialty care (CSC) is a multidisciplinary treatment model for early psychosis. It comprises medication management, supported employment and education, individual or group psychotherapy, case management, family services, and other evidence-based interventions that lead to client gains in several functional domains and to reductions in symptom burden. The success of CSC has made its implementation a national priority. A key mechanism for expansion has been a federal Mental Health Block Grant (MHBG) that requires a recipient state to allocate 10% of its grant to early psychosis treatment.
Two studies in this issue highlight the progress and remaining questions for this implementation. George and colleagues (1) provide evidence of the role of the MHBG in expanding CSC. Meanwhile, Daley and colleagues (2) investigated the racial composition of 35 CSC sites, finding that 70% of those sites served a disproportionately higher rate of Black individuals compared with the racial makeup of CSC “primary service areas” in which most clients resided, according to team leads.
George et al. found that 69% of the clinics they surveyed were initiated after the MHBG set-aside program was established (half of which were started after MHBG funds were increased in 2016 as part of the Cures Act). This provides evidence that federal funding, administered by state mental health authorities, can serve as a key incentive in implementation and scaling of evidence-based interventions, such as CSC. Unfortunately, the authors also found that only 14% of these clinics were operating at capacity, and one-third were operating at ≤50% capacity. These findings raise critical questions whether recruitment simply needs more time or whether the MHBG incentive is misaligned with community needs. Has CSC reached the target population, or does some portion of that population lack access (e.g., rural clients who might need to travel long distances for CSC and might instead benefit from mobile health options)? Should the target population be expanded (e.g., allowing greater duration of untreated psychosis, expanding diagnostic criteria)?
Daley et al.’s study explores whether CSC clinics are achieving health equity. Black individuals being overrepresented in mental health services is atypical generally, and the study did not find differences in receipt of Medicaid funding or recent use of emergency services or legal involvement that may account for referral source bias. Their study was exploratory with a small sample of clinics compared with number of CSCs nationally. Racial data were dichotomized (Black and non-Black), and further investigation is needed. Black individuals are known to receive a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder at a greater rate than other racial-ethnic groups—whether because of institutional racism or other risk factors—and so perhaps their greater representation in CSC is expected. Uncovering factors associated with high representation of Black individuals in CSC is necessary for health equity, and efforts should continue toward this end. At the same time, health systems must improve access to services for other often marginalized groups, such as Asian American/Pacific Islander and Native American/Alaska Native groups, who are rarely seen in CSC clinics.
Together, these studies raise questions about how to optimize continued funding for early intervention for psychosis. George et al.’s work highlights the importance of funding and need to dedicate resources to efficiently serve at-need populations. Daley et al.’s study brings up important issues about health equity and how to continue serving racial-ethnic diversity groups. Perhaps at the heart of both studies is a need for innovative strategies to engage and diversify community outreach and partnerships across CSC sites to better engage all individuals with early psychosis and their families. The Early Psychosis Intervention Network is a key resource to investigate potential engagement mechanisms and inform cultural adaptations, which may include emphasis on employment of bilingual clinicians, partnership with religious and spiritual communities, increased staff diversity, and more training on individual and cultural diversity. It can also investigate dissemination strategies to decrease stigma surrounding psychosis and increase public awareness of the effectiveness of early interventions.

References

1.
George P, Ghose SS, Goldman HH, et al: Growth of coordinated specialty care in the United States with changes in federal funding policies: 2014–2018. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:1346–1351
2.
Daley TC, George P, Goldman HH, et al: Client racial composition in first-episode psychosis programs compared with compositions in program service areas. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:1373–1379

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services
Psychiatric Services
Pages: 1319
PubMed: 36453052

History

Published online: 1 December 2022
Published in print: December 01, 2022

Authors

Details

Alia Warner, Ph.D. [email protected]
The Louis A. Faillace, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Warner) and School of Public Health (Tsai), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston; Department of Psychiatry and Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Smith).
William R. Smith, M.D., Ph.D.
The Louis A. Faillace, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Warner) and School of Public Health (Tsai), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston; Department of Psychiatry and Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Smith).
Jack Tsai, Ph.D., M.S.C.P.
The Louis A. Faillace, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Warner) and School of Public Health (Tsai), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston; Department of Psychiatry and Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Smith).

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Warner ([email protected]).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share