Use of Topical Application of Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream to Reduce Injection-Site Pain of Depot Antipsychotics

During 1999 a total of 15 consecutive patients from a mental health center gave informed consent to participate. Entrance criteria included being an outpatient, being aged 16 to 65 years, having a diagnosis of schizophrenia or a schizoaffective disorder from two senior psychiatrists according to DSM-IV criteria, and being treated with the same long-acting depot medication for at least two months. The study was approved by the institutional Helsinki Committee.

The patients' clinical condition was quantified with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) (6), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (7), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) (8), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) (9), and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) (6). Possible scores on the CGI range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Possible scores on the BPRS range from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating increased severity of symptoms. Possible scores on the HAM-D range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Possible scores of the HAM-A range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety. Possible scores on the ESRS range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating more severe extrapyramidal symptoms. Patients used a visual analogue scale to quantify their pain at the injection site. The visual analogue scale is commonly used in pain studies and has been shown to reliably estimate quantitative aspects of pain (10). The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing maximal ("the most imaginable") pain.

Injections were given by the same nurse into the gluteus muscle by using a 21 G needle, a .1 air lock, and a double-needle technique. The Z technique was not used.

Participants were randomly assigned to groups by the flipping of a coin. For the first injection, the patients were assigned to receive lidocaine-prilocaine cream or a placebo one hour before receiving the depot antipsychotics in a double-blind, randomized fashion. For the next injection, the two treatment groups were crossed over. The placebo was a mineral oil cream that is ordinarily used to moisten dry skin. Both ointments were prepared on nylon patches, so the nurse and examiner were blind to treatment type. Each patient completed a visual analogue scale five minutes after each injection. A physician (AA) inspected the area for any local reaction.

To test the effect of treatment on pain, a 2 × 2 multivariate analysis of variance with a between-subjects factor of order (receipt of placebo first or the local anesthetic first) and a within-subject factor of treatment (placebo or local anesthetic) was performed on visual analogue scale measures. Correlations were tested with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

The study sample included 11 males (73 percent) and four females (27 percent) whose ages ranged between 23 and 58 years (mean±SD age of 42.4±7.9 years). Eleven patients (73 percent) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (six had paranoid schizophrenia and five had unspecified schizophrenia), and four patients (27 percent) had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. The range of illness duration was four to 28 years (mean of 16.7±6.6 years), and the number of hospitalizations ranged from one to14 (mean of 6.3±4.2 hospitalizations).

The patients' medical treatment consisted of haloperidol (two participants, or 13 percent), fluphenazine (nine participants, or 60 percent), and zuclopenthixol (four participants, or 27 percent). The injected volume of the antipsychotics ranged from .25 to 4 ml (mean of 1.2±.94 ml) and did not differ among the drugs. The patients' mental status on entry to the study indicated that they were actively psychotic (mean CGI score of 4±.53 and mean BPRS score of 40.9±9.6), that they had anxiety and depression (mean HAM-A score of 11.3±7.6 and mean HAM-D score of 13.7±5.4), and that they had some extrapyramidal side effects (mean ESRS score of 4.2±3.8).

An analysis of variance that was performed on visual analogue scale measures demonstrated a significant treatment effect (F=20.47, df=1, 13, p<.001), indicating that the local anesthetic led to a substantial reduction of pain compared with the placebo. The mean score on the visual analogue scale was .38±.6 for patients who received the local anesthetic first, compared with 4.3±3.1 for patients who received the placebo first, and .7±.82 for patients who received the local anesthetic second, compared with 2.2±1.9 for patients who received the placebo second. No significant order effect was seen whether the patient received the local anesthetic first or the placebo first, and no order by treatment interaction was observed. No significant correlations were observed between the injected volumes of the depot antipsychotics and the visual analogue scale measures after either the placebo or the anesthetic was applied.

The physician's impression of the injected area was that only one subject had mild rubor that resulted from the use of the local anesthetic. The rubor cleared within 30 minutes.

In this randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study the application of a local anesthetic reduced the minor pain at the injection site that was caused by depot antipsychotics. This finding is important for patients with schizophrenia who are using depot antipsychotics, who will need repeated injections throughout long-term therapy. Moreover, because a considerable number of patients with schizophrenia are characteristically noncompliant (1), the possibility of ameliorating pain from injections might have a parallel beneficial effect in enhancing medication compliance. Although our study did not examine long-term effect and compliance, the fact that one of our previous studies (3) showed a correlation between the pain that patients' experienced from an injection and their attitude toward the injection leads one to believe that the use of a local anesthetic could facilitate medication compliance. Although there are beneficial effects of using a local anesthetic cream, one should note that there is the inconvenience of waiting an hour to give the injection after the cream is applied. In clinical practice this waiting period can be managed by giving patients the possibility of applying the local anesthetic cream at home, either by themselves or with the help of caregivers. The limitations of the study include the small sample, the short follow-up, and the fact that compliance was not monitored. Our study was a pilot study. Long-term follow-up studies to monitor how patients' compliance with depot antipsychotics is affected by the use of local anesthetics are needed to test the clinical usefulness of this type of therapy.

The authors thank Gal Gilad, Ph.D., for his assistance in the statistical analysis.

The authors are affiliated with the Child and Adolescent Outpatient Clinic in Shalvata, Hod Hasharon, P.O. Box 94, Israel (e-mail, [email protected]).