Incidence, Prevalence, and Surveillance for Diabetes in New York State Psychiatric Hospitals, 1997-2004

Data were obtained from the Integrated Research Database (IRDB) created by the Information Sciences Division of the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research. The IRDB contains patient information (demographic characteristics; dates of admission, transfer, and discharge; and diagnosis) and drug prescription information for every inpatient in the 17 adult civil facilities of the New York State psychiatric hospital system. These psychiatric centers provide intermediate and long-term care to patients with severe and persistent mental illness. Patients admitted to these facilities have usually been receiving inpatient care for several weeks in community-based hospitals before their transfer. Approximately half of the patients in the state-operated facilities have a length of stay of one year or more. Institutional review board approval was obtained, along with a waiver for written informed consent. Personal identifiers were removed from the data, and the study (retrospective review of existing data) presented no more than minimal risk to participants.

Patients were included in the study if they were inpatients at any time during the period January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2004. Cases were defined as those who had received prescriptions of antidiabetic medication as documented in the IRDB (insulin, glyburide, glipizide, glimepiride, tolbutamide, chlorpropamide, tolazamide, repaglinide, metformin, troglitazone, acetohexamide, acarbose, miglitol, rosiglitazone maleate, pioglitazone hydrochloride, and nateglinide) or those who had a recorded diagnosis of diabetes mellitus ( ICD-9 code 250.xx) in the IRDB. Incident cases were defined as those with a new prescription for an antidiabetic medication; that is, we excluded patients from being considered as an incident case if an antidiabetic medication had been prescribed at any time since January 1, 1994 (the earliest date for which such data were available), as documented in the IRDB. Patients were also excluded from the calculation of incident cases if they ever had a recorded diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.

To reduce the possibility that a prescription of an antidiabetic medication was a renewal of a medication received before hospitalization, for incident cases patients were required to have at least a 30-day period of hospitalization before the start of the prescription of the antidiabetic medication. Patients who received a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in the absence of a new prescription of an antidiabetic medication were not counted as a new incident case, because the coding of a diagnosis of diabetes may have occurred immediately after admission in response to the medical history obtained at that time and thus may not have represented a true incident case.

Because the risk of developing diabetes may be related to demographic and diagnostic variables, prevalence and incidence were categorized by gender, race or ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, and other), and age group (18 to 44, 45 to 64, and 65 years and older). Three diagnostic categories were used: schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and other nonmood nonorganic psychotic disorders ( DSM-IV-TR code 295.x, 297.1, 297.3, 298.8, or 298.9), major mood disorders ( DSM-IV-TR code 296.x), and other diagnoses.

Relative risk ratios (RR) for incidence and prevalence were calculated from 2×2 tables. When comparing rates from the year 2004 to those of 1997, we also stratified by gender, age, race or ethnicity, and diagnosis ( 19 ). When comparing rates between the subgroups (men versus women, nonwhite race or ethnicity versus white, age 45 years or older versus younger than 45 years, diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder versus mood disorders or others), we stratified by calendar year.

We compared our prevalence rates with those observed in the population at large in New York State, as estimated by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System study, which measured, by telephone survey, self-reported diabetes among noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 years or older ( 3, 20, 21 ).

Because the likelihood of a person's being diagnosed or treated for diabetes is influenced by the rate at which plasma glucose tests are ordered, surveillance for diabetes mellitus was measured by calculating the frequency of plasma glucose testing performed during the relevant calendar year. These data were obtained from the administrative records maintained by the central laboratory that processes the bulk of these tests for the hospitals operated by the New York State Office of Mental Health. The records indicate if a test was done and its value, but they do not indicate if the sample was taken when the patient was fasting or not. A minority of patients were hospitalized at more remote facilities not served by the central laboratory. Laboratory data were available for nine facilities in 1997 and 1998 and for ten facilities in 1999 through 2002. To avoid counting laboratory tests done for patients with identified diabetes, patients who were identified as a case were excluded. We examined counts of plasma glucose tests per 100 patient-days. To estimate the number of potential cases of diabetes not captured by a recording of a diagnosis of diabetes or the prescription of an antidiabetic medication, we counted the number of unique patients in this group of patients not identified as having diabetes but who nevertheless had plasma glucose levels of 200 mg/dL or greater.

Table 1 summarizes the basic demographic characteristics of the population by year, including age, gender, race or ethnicity, and principal psychiatric diagnosis. In all years, antipsychotic medication was prescribed for 92 to 93 percent of all patients. Comprehensive reports of the utilization and dosing patterns of antipsychotics in this population have been published elsewhere ( 16, 22 ).

Table 2 provides the yearly period prevalence of identified cases of diabetes mellitus by gender, race or ethnicity, age, and diagnosis for the years 1997 to 2004. Annual period prevalence of diabetes increased from 696 of 10,091 patients (6.9 percent) in 1997 to 1,079 of 7,420 (14.5 percent) in 2004 (for the comparison between 2004 and 1997, risk ratio [RR]=2.11; 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=1.93-2.31). The difference remained statistically significant after stratification by age (RR= 2.12, CI=1.99-2.26), race or ethnicity (RR=2.06, CI=1.94-2.18), gender (RR=2.13, CI=2.04-2.21), and diagnosis (RR=2.10, CI=2.01-2.19).

In all years, prevalence of diabetes was significantly higher for women than for men, for patients aged 45 years or older than for those younger than 45 years, and for patients of nonwhite race or ethnicity than for white patients (after stratification by year, RR=1.68, CI=1.65-1.71; RR=1.87, CI=1.83-1.91; and RR=1.49, CI= 1.46-1.51, respectively).

Differences in prevalence of diabetes by psychiatric diagnosis were not consistent; no statistically significant differences were found between patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and those with a mood disorder or other psychiatric diagnosis for the years 1997 through 1999 and 2002 through 2004.

Table 3 provides the yearly incidence of newly treated diabetes mellitus by gender, race or ethnicity, age, and diagnosis for the years 1997 to 2004. Incidence increased from 74 of 8,468 patients (.9 percent) in 1997 to 106 of 5,982 (1.8 percent) in 2004 (for the comparison between 2004 and 1997, RR=2.03, CI=1.51-2.73). The difference remained statistically significant after stratification by age (RR=2.03, CI=1.51-2.73), race or ethnicity (RR=2.00, 95 CI=1.49-2.69), gender (RR=2.04, CI=1.52-2.74), and diagnosis (RR=2.01, CI=1.74-2.32).

In all years, incidence of diabetes was significantly higher for nonwhites than whites (after stratification by year, RR=2.07, CI=1.79-2.39). No statistically significant differences were found in incidence of diabetes by gender for any specific year; however, for the comparison between women and men, after stratification by year the overall RR was 1.16 (CI=1.00-1.34). No statistically significant differences in incidence of diabetes were found between patients 45 years or older and younger patients or between patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and those with a mood disorder or other psychiatric diagnosis.

Prevalence data for diabetes mellitus are available for the general population of New York State through the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System study ( 3, 20, 21 ). In that study, diagnosed diabetes was defined by an affirmative response to the question, "Have you ever been told by a doctor that you have diabetes?" ( 20 ). Reported prevalence rates of diabetes (excluding gestational diabetes) were 5.5 percent in 1998 and 6.0 percent in 1999 ( 20 ). In our population, corresponding prevalence rates calculated by using the same three-year moving-average technique were about 50 percent higher (8.2 and 9.2 percent, respectively). When our population in 2003 was compared with the general population in New York State for that year ( 21 )—the latest information publicly available—the rates for the psychiatric inpatient population were higher ( Table 4 ).

Among patients who did not have a recorded diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or a prescription for an antidiabetic agent, the number of plasma glucose tests per 100 patient-days increased annually. In 1997, among the 4,353 patients who were not identified as having diabetes in the nine facilities for which laboratory data were available, the number of plasma glucose tests per 100 patient-days was 1.23 (12,501 tests for 1,013,848 patient-days). In 2002 for 4,426 patients from ten facilities who also were not identified as having diabetes, the rate of testing was 1.80 tests per 100 patient-days (16,371 tests for 908,216 patient-days) (for testing in 2002 compared with 1997, RR=1.46, CI=1.43-1.50). The number of patients (all presumed nondiabetic) with plasma glucose tests greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL ranged from a low of 19 in 1999 (.45 percent of 4,250 patients) to a high of 27 in 1998 (.66 percent of 4,111 patients). It is unknown how many of these plasma glucose levels were obtained in the fasting state.

The incidence of newly treated diabetes mellitus and the prevalence of identified cases of diabetes mellitus in psychiatric patients hospitalized in the New York State Office of Mental Health system have increased markedly over the past decade. Although this rise is consistent with trends for the increased prevalence of diabetes in the general population, the absolute rise appears greater in the psychiatric population than in the general population.

The rise in incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus in our population corresponds in time with the continued adoption of second-generation antipsychotics as the preferred choice of antipsychotic medication ( 16 ). In the New York State Office of Mental Health system, prescription of a single oral first-generation agent dropped from 70.2 percent of prescribing episodes at the start of 1994 to 10.3 percent of prescribing episodes at the end of 2000, whereas over the same period, the use of second-generation antipsychotics, singly or in combination with any other antipsychotic, rose dramatically from 8.6 percent to 78.7 percent of prescribing episodes ( 16 ). Second-generation antipsychotics have been associated with new-onset diabetes mellitus; however, quantifiable differences among the newer agents have been inconsistent in pharmacoepidemiological studies ( 15, 23 ), including our own case-control study conducted with the same population ( 11 ).

Over the same period, the bed capacity of the New York State psychiatric hospital system has been reduced. It has been suggested that the patients who remain, or the new patients who require this intensity of tertiary psychiatric care, are substantially more ill than patients admitted to these hospitals in the past. This has been used as a possible explanation for the rise in the use of combination treatments with more than one antipsychotic ( 24 ) as well as the use of adjunctive anticonvulsants ( 25 ) in this population over the past decade. Thus the combination of more severe psychopathology and the use of additional medications that may also have an impact on the risk of diabetes could have contributed to the incidence and prevalence pattern reported here.

In terms of the specific demographic variables, our results are similar to those found for 1991 by Dixon and colleagues ( 6 ), before second-generation antipsychotics became generally available. Increasing age, being female, and being of nonwhite race or ethnicity increased the likelihood of having diabetes among patients with schizophrenia ( 6 ) then as well as now. We did not find that a diagnosis of schizophrenia was associated with a statistically significant higher prevalence of diabetes compared with other psychiatric disorders. However, this could be a reflection of the severity of psychiatric illness across all diagnoses in our population of state hospital inpatients.

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus appears higher for our study population than for the general population of New York State, according to data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System study ( 3, 20, 21 ). Whether the higher prevalence is due to more careful vigilance for physical disorders among hospitalized inpatients than in the general population is unknown. Of note are the observed prevalence rates for persons aged 18 to 44 years. In our population, prevalence of diabetes in this age group was 10.0 percent in 2003, compared with 2.3 percent for the corresponding sample of the general New York State population (RR=4.34, CI=3.71-5.07). The rate for inpatients aged 65 years or older was not statistically different from that for the general population (18.5 percent compared with 15.7 percent). The difference in prevalence rates for younger adults may reflect a pathophysiological process that accelerates the onset of diabetes among patients with schizophrenia who may be genetically predisposed to develop abnormalities in glucose homeostasis. Our observation is consistent with data from Taiwan where the prevalence of diabetes among 246 hospitalized patients with schizophrenia was significantly higher than for the general population only among the younger patients between the ages of 20 and 49 years ( 26 ).

The definitions of diabetes have changed over the past several years. The American Diabetes Association in 1997 ( 27 ) and the World Health Organization in 1999 ( 28 ) revised their diagnostic criteria to include a lower threshold for a fasting plasma glucose level that would signal diabetes (126 mg/dL). Because we used treatment with an antidiabetic agent as a proxy for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, our estimates are sensitive to changes in the plasma glucose thresholds for the detection and subsequent treatment of diabetes mellitus. The lower thresholds may have contributed to the increases we observed in the incidence of newly treated diabetes mellitus and in the prevalence of identified cases.

We have demonstrated a higher degree of surveillance for abnormal plasma glucose in 2002 compared with 1997. The minimum requirement for periodic physical examination, including laboratory testing, is at the time of admission and annually thereafter. Unknown is the number of patients who may consistently refuse blood testing, which may contribute to a lower case rate (fewer patients being identified as having diabetes mellitus). Nevertheless, the number of plasma glucose tests performed for patients without known diabetes mellitus (as defined by not having any prescriptions for an antidiabetic medication or any recorded diagnosis of diabetes) increased from 1.23 per 100 patient-days in 1997 to 1.80 in 2002. The increased surveillance for diabetes mellitus likely resulted in the identification of additional cases, contributing to some, but not all, of the observed increase in incidence and prevalence of diabetes reported here.

The main limitation of our study is the retrospective collection of data. The prevalence of cases of diabetes mellitus is probably an underestimate. Patients may have diabetes mellitus that remains undiagnosed.

Another limitation is that comorbid medical conditions are not always consistently recorded in our database. For example, among the 995 patients who received an antidiabetic medication in 2004, only 289 (29 percent) had a recorded diagnosis of diabetes. Also, patients may be treated with diet and exercise rather than with antidiabetic medication. If these patients do not have a recorded diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, they remain unidentifiable as a case.

A small number of patients who had elevated plasma glucose tests (greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL) did not have a recorded diagnosis of diabetes or a recorded prescription for an antidiabetic agent. In the sample of facilities for which these data were available, the percentage of patients in this category ranged from .41 to .66 percent depending on the calendar year. Even assuming that these patients would have met criteria for a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, the impact on our prevalence estimates is negligible. Because we were unable to determine if a blood sample was drawn while the patient was fasting, we were not able to determine with any reasonable certainty the numbers of patients with mild hyperglycemia.

The incident rates we report here may be overestimates, because ascertainment of prior diagnosis of diabetes or prior treatment for diabetes is somewhat hampered by the incomplete nature of the history. If patients had received treatment for diabetes before 1994 or had received treatment outside the system, they would be incorrectly classified as having had no history of diabetes. The possibility of misclassification is mitigated in part by the fact that approximately 75 percent of our patients in any given year have had an episode of care in a previous year going back to 1994 (the first year for which diagnosis and medication history are available in the database) and approximately one-third of our patients have lengths of stay exceeding five years (one-half exceeding one year).

Another limitation of our study, common in the pharmacoepidemiological literature on the association of antipsychotics and diabetes ( 23 ), is the lack of information on weight and body mass index and on family history of diabetes mellitus. Also unknown is the degree of physical activity that the patients engaged in. These are potentially important confounds. For example, if the use of second-generation antipsychotics results in greater weight gain than occurs with older agents, the resultant increases in obesity rates may have increased the observed rates of diabetes mellitus over time.

The comparison with data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System study is somewhat speculative, because the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data were ascertained in a completely different manner. That system relied on self-report by telephone survey and hence was subject to underreporting. Participants in the telephone survey may not have received screening for diabetes mellitus. In our study population everyone generally received at least one plasma glucose test. This difference may have contributed to the gap in prevalence rates of diabetes mellitus that we observed between our population and that of the general population of New York State.

Generalizability of our results may be limited to inpatients with chronic mental illness. Outpatient psychiatric populations may differ significantly on parameters such as diet, level of activity, and disease severity. Not so different from our inpatient population may be outpatients with severe and persistent mental illness receiving services in other areas of the United States that do not have the extensive network of state-operated psychiatric inpatient facilities that New York State has and that rely more on community-based programs to provide care.

The Canadian Diabetes Association has now included schizophrenia in the list of independent risk factors for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in its clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes ( 29 ). This inclusion should result in more aggressive screening for hyperglycemia. A number of monitoring guidelines for metabolic problems among patients with schizophrenia have also been introduced in the United States ( 30, 31, 32 ). Continued education about appropriate monitoring is imperative for this major public health problem.