Skip to main content

Surprising Predictor of Rehospitalization

To the Editor: Recurrent readmission to inpatient psychiatric services is a vexatious problem for all involved in mental health services. Klinkenberg and Calsyn ( 1 ) proposed system responsiveness as the most important element associated with high readmission rates. One approach to system responsiveness has been discharge planning. Caton and colleagues ( 2 ) found that adequate discharge planning significantly influenced treatment adherence and rehospitalization in the first three months after an index hospitalization.
This letter describes an unexpected finding from a pilot study evaluating a discharge planning intervention for patients with a history of recurrent psychiatric hospitalization.
Patients who were hospitalized twice or more in the 18 months before an index hospitalization and who were 18 years of age or older, fluent in English, and able to give informed consent were invited to participate in the discharge planning study, which received approval from the local institutional review board. Thirty-one patients were enrolled during 2005–2006 and followed monthly for six months after discharge in order to determine their adherence to the treatment plans and to assess clinical outcome.
The treatment intervention was a discharge planning process that included providers from all agencies involved in the patient's care in the creation of a systematic plan to address major service domains—that is, food and shelter, case management, clinical care (both medication and psychological support), and psychosocial rehabilitation. Before discharge and at each follow-up, the patient's understanding of, agreement with, and motivation for three domains (case management, medication, and psychosocial rehabilitation) were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Also assessed were the complexity of the patient's medication plan; the patient's level of expectation in regard to food, housing, and security; and the overall adequacy of the discharge plan. Assessments and ratings were carried out by research staff within two days of discharge.
Overall, 13 patients (42%) were readmitted within six months of the index hospitalization. Results of logistic regression showed that only patients' understanding of their case management plans predicted readmission. Patients who had a poor understanding of case management had nearly sevenfold higher odds of being readmitted within six months (Wald χ 2 =4.25, df=1, p=.03; odds ratio=6.86, 95% confidence interval=1.1–42.8). Poor understanding was rated by the research staff as failure to understand the purpose of case management and elements of case management.
This result raises an intriguing possibility that among patients with a history of recurrent hospitalization, cognitive understanding at discharge of a key component of follow-up treatment—case management—predicts rehospitalization within six months. Several elements of this finding surprised us. We expected that provisions in the treatment plan related to food, shelter, and security would be associated with psychiatric readmission, especially because many patients rated such arrangements as lacking, or that medication adherence would predict longer community tenure. That patients' understanding of case management—but not any other domain of discharge planning—predicted readmission raises the prospect that recently discharged individuals who may underestimate or minimize the importance of receiving help from others in the community because of a lack of cognitive understanding of case management are at greater risk of rehospitalization. We wonder whether this poor understanding of case management is related to the abstract nature of what this activity entails and thus signifies a deficit in neurocognition or whether these patients have a specific block against the idea of interpersonally oriented activities—a deficit that, regardless of cause, may not be fully appreciated by those treating them.

Acknowledgments and disclosures

The project was supported by a contract with Eli Lilly and Company.
The authors report no competing interests.

Footnote

The authors are affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

References

1.
Klinkenberg WD, Calsyn RJ: Predictors of receipt of aftercare and recidivism among persons with severe mental illness: a review. Psychiatric Services 47:487–496, 1996
2.
Caton CLM, Goldstein JM, Serrano O, et al: The impact of discharge planning on chronic schizophrenic patients. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 35:255–262, 1984

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services
Psychiatric Services
Pages: 577
PubMed: 18451026

History

Published online: 1 May 2008
Published in print: May, 2008

Authors

Details

William H. Sledge, M.D.
Christine L. Dunn, M.A.
Timothy Schmutte, Psy.D.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share