Skip to main content

Family History and GINA

To the Editor: This letter is an addendum to Paul Appelbaum's Law & Psychiatry column in the April issue, "Genetic Discrimination in Mental Disorders: The Impact of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act" (GINA) ( 1 ).
After GINA was signed into law in May 2008, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) held informational sessions with clinicians representing a range of professional backgrounds and specialties who sometimes conducted employee medical assessments on behalf of employers. These clinicians were concerned that information they routinely gathered in such assessments, such as family histories and histories of family illness, could be used by employers in work-related decisions that might result in discrimination. A senior EEOC representative assured them that information from family histories was considered in the GINA provisions to be "genetic information," along with information obtained specifically through genetic testing, and was therefore covered under GINA, meaning that it could not be used by employers in work-related decisions. It was further stated that if the employer was "thought to use" that information or even "possessed it," it was covered under GINA. When questioned further, the senior representative stated that if there was a claim of discrimination, the employer would have to prove not only that it did not use the information, whether obtained in an employer-initiated evaluation or accidentally, and that the employer had obtained it "by accident"—for example, in passing or in a document sent to the employer for other reasons.
Most mental health clinicians' work does not involve evaluating employees for employers, and most large employers, when such legally compromising information has surfaced, are likely to act contrary to their own interests in order to avoid even the appearance of discrimination. However, because a family history is a necessary part of any evaluation, we all need to be aware that the pen and the computer have become dangerous instruments.

Footnote

Dr. Scott is affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Reference

1.
Appelbaum PS: Genetic discrimination in mental disorders: the impact of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. Psychiatric Services 61:338–340, 2010

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services
Psychiatric Services
Pages: 634
PubMed: 20513693

History

Published online: 1 June 2010
Published in print: June, 2010

Authors

Details

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share