Many (more than 20%) of the patients with Alzheimer’s disease experience visual hallucinations. They are distressing
(1), precipitate admission to residential care
(1), and are associated with more rapid cognitive decline
(2). Reports
(1,
3) suggest a link between visual hallucinations and visual impairment, although impaired acuity was inferred from clinical interviews in two studies. This report examines the association among visual hallucinations, acuity, and specific eye pathologies in 50 patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease.
METHOD
Consecutive patients with dementia were included in a case registry. The History and Aetiology Schedule
(4) was used for the study; it records psychiatric and past medical history, medication, and the results of a standardized physical examination. Psychotic symptoms were rated with the Columbia University Scale for Psychopathology in Alzheimer’s Disease
(5), from which operationalized diagnoses of visual hallucinations, delusions, and delusional misidentification were made
(6). An appendix rated the minutes of visual hallucinations over the week before the assessment. Cognitive assessments were made with the cognitive section of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly, section B
(7). A diagnosis of probable Alzheimer’s disease was made according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association
(8).
Postmortem examinations were obtained from 50 of the 338 case registry patients. The positive predictive value for probable Alzheimer’s disease in a clinical setting against a neuropathological diagnosis was 80%
(9).
Fifty patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease were selected for ophthalmological evaluation (20 with visual hallucinations, 30 without). Patients and caregivers were shown an information sheet that explained the study in full. If they wished to participate, written consent was obtained from the patient and written assent from the next of kin. Approval was obtained from the relevant ethical committee.
Binocular acuity with existing glasses was measured by the Snellen chart. All patients were refracted by the study optometrist and examined by an ophthalmologist (F.M.C.) who was blind to the subject’s hallucination status. Assessments included the visual field evaluation to confrontation and the slit lamp biomicroscopy before and after pupil dilation. Cataracts were defined by a simplified Oxford cataract grading system
(10). Age-related macular degeneration was graded by using photographs from the Wisconsin age-related macular degeneration grading system
(11) and scored when visually significant.
Visual acuity and cognitive impairment were compared among patients with and without visual hallucinations by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Cataracts were compared between the two groups by using chi-square analysis. Statistical analyses were made with the SPSS computer software.
RESULTS
Sixty-two case registry patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease were living at the time of the study. All 20 with visual hallucinations and 30 who were randomly selected from the 42 without hallucinations were enrolled. Mean age at assessment was 81.7 years for hallucinators and 79.2 years for nonhallucinators. Seventeen of the 20 hallucinators were women, compared to 17 of the 30 nonhallucinators (χ
2=4.1, df=1, p=0.04). Hallucinators had significantly worse mean scores than nonhallucinators on the cognitive section of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (48.6 and 62.7) (Mann-Whitney U, z=2.6, p=0.009). Visual acuity was also significantly more impaired in hallucinators (Mann-Whitney U, z=3.0, p=0.003) (
table 1). No patients with visual hallucinations had normal acuity (6/5 or 6/6 on the Snellen chart).
Hallucinators with a visual acuity of 6/12 or worse had 33.7 minutes of visual hallucinations in the week before the assessment compared to 3.3 minutes for the hallucinators without impaired visual function, and eight of 13 (62%) of the hallucinators with poor visual acuity (6/12 or worse) who completed the follow-up still had visual hallucinations at 1 year compared to one of four (25%) of the hallucinators without impaired visual function.
Delusions were also significantly associated with impaired visual acuity (Mann-Whitney U, z=2.3, p=0.02), and there was a trend toward an association with delusional misidentification (Mann-Whitney U, z=1.8, p=0.06).
Medications likely to influence visual hallucinations or visual acuity were not substantially different in patients with or without visual hallucinations (hallucinators: tricyclic antidepressants=15% [N=3], anticholinergics=5% [N=1], neuroleptics=25% [N=5], steroids=0% [N=0]; nonhallucinators: tricyclic antidepressants=7% [N=2], anticholinergics=7% [N=2], neuroleptics=13% [N=4], steroids=7% [N=2]; no patients were taking tamoxifen, chloroquine, or antituberculosis medications).
Logistic regression analysis examined cognition, visual acuity, and gender as associates of visual hallucinations; only impaired visual acuity (Wald χ2=4.2, df=2, p=0.04) was entered into the equation.
Eye pathology was identified in 13 (65%) of the hallucinators and 13 (43%) of the nonhallucinators. Cataracts (45%, N=9 versus 10%, N=3) were significantly more common among hallucinators (p=0.006, Fisher’s exact test). The rates of glaucoma (hallucinators, 10%, N=2; nonhallucinators, 17%, N=5), macular degeneration (10%, N=2 and 13%, N=4, respectively), and corneal scars (0%, N=0 and 3%, N=1, respectively) were similar. Confrontational visual field evaluations showed one (5%) of the hallucinators had reduction (retinal arterial occlusion), whereas three (10%) of the nonhallucinators had constriction (two with glaucomatous and one with aphakic lenses in their glasses).
Twelve (60%) of the hallucinators had their acuity improved by the refractions. Optician referral was instigated for six patients with visual hallucinations and impaired acuity who were followed up for 1 year. Four of six (67%) of these patients were free of hallucinations at follow-up, compared to only one of six (17%) who had no action taken.
A modest correlation was seen between scores on the cognitive section of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly and visual acuity (r
s=0.30, N=50, p=0.03); the relationship is illustrated in
table 1.
DISCUSSION
An association was demonstrated between visual hallucinations and impaired acuity; visual hallucinations may be more persistent and more severe in patients with these conditions. Furthermore, preliminary information from follow-up examinations indicates that referral to an optician may improve the outcome of visual hallucinations. Of the specific eye pathologies, only cataracts were significantly associated with visual hallucinations. There was some evidence that impaired visual acuity may be associated with other forms of psychosis.
An association was seen between visual acuity and scores on the cognitive section of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly. The main variability was between patients with absent impairment and mild impairment of visual acuity who were not experiencing visual hallucinations. Visual acuity was also independently associated with visual hallucinations in a logistic regression analysis.
Cataract treatment and interventions to improve visual acuity may be important adjuncts to antipsychotic therapy in those suffering from dementia and may have a prophylactic role. Controlled trials are indicated.