Skip to main content
Full access
Communications and Updates
Published Online: 1 April 2011

Limitations of Retrospective Research

To the Editor: There are several issues with the article by Tami L. Mark and colleagues (1) published in the October 2010 issue of the Journal that deserve attention. The first issue is that of validity. The statistical analyses performed do not solve the concerns with the validity of the fundamental question in this paper: Does it make clinical sense that the branded antidepressant medications available between 2003 and 2006 would outperform the generic antidepressants in effectiveness? Or, even if that argument was valid for that period of time, does it make clinical sense that the currently available branded medications would be able to outperform the currently available generic antidepressants in effectiveness, to the point of affecting outcomes?
The article has other limitations. The most concerning is the significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The group who received step therapy had a lower average income, higher levels of comorbidity, and a higher burden of chronic illness, indicating that the group that received step therapy might have been at higher risk for worse outcomes and higher utilization. Although the study used statistical models to adjust for the differences between the two groups, it is likely that baseline differences in the two groups explain the difference in outcomes. The currently available models for risk adjustment in psychiatry perform poorly and usually do not explain more than one-third of the variance (2).
Another piece of information missing is the baseline utilization of the two groups prior to the implementation of step therapy. Prior year expenditures have been shown to outperform any other risk-adjustment model when analyzing utilization and expenditure (3, 4). It would be important to know if the group in which step therapy was implemented already had higher levels of utilization.
The article did not consider the complexity of the treatment of depression, including the use of polypharmacy. Patients treated for depression commonly receive prescriptions for several other psychotropic medications (5). Any attempt to understand the effects of change in pharmacy benefits, including step therapy, should include a broader analysis of all classes of psychotropic medications, especially antipsychotics, which have been increasingly used in combination with antidepressants.
Hopefully, the issues raised above will help readers better understand the complexity of this kind of study.

Footnote

Accepted for publication in January 2011.

References

1.
Mark TL, Gibson TM, McGuigan K, Chu BC: The effects of antidepressant step therapy protocols on pharmaceutical and medical utilization and expenditures. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167:1202–1209
2.
Hermann R, Rollins C, Chan J: Risk-adjusting outcomes of mental health and substance-related care: a review of the literature. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2007; 15:52–69
3.
Maciejewski M, Liu C-F, Derleth A, McDonell M, Anderson S, Fihn S: The performance of administrative and self-reported measures for risk adjustment of Veterans Affairs expenditures. Health Serv Res 2005; 40:887–904
4.
Sernyak MJ, Rosenheck R: Risk adjustment in studies using administrative data. Schizophr Bull 2003; 29:267–271
5.
Mojtabai R, Olfson M: National trends in psychotropic medication polypharmacy in office-based psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67:26–36

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 436 - 437
PubMed: 21474598

History

Accepted: January 2011
Published online: 1 April 2011
Published in print: April 2011

Authors

Affiliations

Paulo R. Correa, M.D.

Funding Information

Dr. Correa reports no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share