Persistent β2*-Nicotinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder
Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract
Background:
Modulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), specifically those containing the β2 subunit, may be effective in treating patients with major depressive disorder. Using [123I]5-I-A-85380 single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), the authors studied the availability of β2-subunit-containing nAChRs (β2*-nAChRs) in depressed patients. To understand its molecular basis, the authors also studied β2*-nAChR binding in postmortem brain samples from depressed subjects.
Method:
The participants were 23 medication-free, nonsmoking subjects with familial, early-onset depression (eight acutely ill and 15 recovered) and 23 age- and gender-matched nonsmoking comparison subjects. Each received one [123I]5-I-A-85380 SPECT scan and an MRI scan. The availability of β2*-nAChRs was quantified as VT/fP. Postmortem analysis of β2*-nAChR binding was conducted with [123I]5-I-A-85380 on prefrontal cortex samples from 14 depressed subjects and 14 age-matched comparison subjects.
Results:
The β2*-nAChR availability in both the acutely ill and recovered depressed subjects was significantly lower across all brain regions than in the respective comparison subjects, and it was lower in the acutely ill subjects than in those who were recovered. In the depressed patients, β2*-nAChR availability was significantly correlated with lifetime number of depressive episodes, trauma score, and anxiety score. There were no differences in β2*-nAChR number between groups in the postmortem study.
Conclusions:
Depressed patients have lower β2*-nAChR availability than do healthy subjects. The difference between β2*-nAChR availability in vivo and in post-mortem samples may be analogous to data with dopaminergic PET ligands and dopamine receptor availability; lower receptor availability for the SPECT ligand could be caused by greater endogenous acetylcholine.
Converging lines of evidence suggest that the cholinergic system may be a target for the development of novel molecular approaches for the treatment of depression (1). First, cholinergic hyperactivity plays a role in the pathophysiology of depression (2–4) and can exacerbate depression-like symptoms in patients and comparison subjects (4–6). Second, tobacco dependence is highly prevalent in patients with major depressive disorder (7), and depressed patients have a high prevalence of smokers (8–10). Population-based studies show that smokers are twice as likely as nonsmokers to have a lifetime history of major depression (11–13). Furthermore, nicotine binds to neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), and partial agonists and antagonists of nAChRs, including nicotine (14), mecamylamine and dihydro-β-erythroidine (15), cytisine (16), and varenicline (17), have antidepressant-like effects in preclinical studies. However, mice lacking the β2 nAChR subunit are insensitive to the antidepressant-like effects of mecamylamine (15) and amitriptyline (18). This suggests that β2-subunit-containing (β2*) nAChRs may be important for the antidepressant-like effect in preclinical models of depression. In addition to nicotine (19, 20), nAChR modulators have been used successfully in clinical trials. Mecamylamine (21), the S-enantiomer of mecamylamine (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00593879), and varenicline (22) have been shown to have antidepressant effects in depression.
The development and use of [123I]5-I-A-85380 ([123I]-5-iodo-3-[2(S)-2-azetidinylmethoxy] pyridine) as a radioligand in single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to quantify β2*-nAChRs in vivo in the human brain now allow unparalleled access to this system in vivo (23–25). The objective of our study was to determine whether there is a core dysfunction in the β2*-nAChR system in depression, as assessed by using SPECT and the selective β2*-nAChR radioligand [123I]5-I-A-85380. We chose to study subjects who were fully recovered from major depression in order to avoid the confounding effects of acute illness or antidepressant treatment (26). We hypothesized that patients with major depressive disorder would have lower β2*-nAChR availability than healthy comparison subjects.
As in radioligand-based studies of dopamine in humans, it is critically important to note that changes in receptor availability in vivo could be due to a change in receptor number or a change in receptor occupancy. It has been shown previously in nonhuman primates that elevated acetylcholine levels induced by a high dose of intravenous physostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, can compete effectively in vivo with [123I]5-I-A-85380 binding at β2*-nAChRs (27). Therefore, lower binding of [123I]5-I-A-85380 to the β2*-nAChR could reflect one of two processes: an actual, absolute change in the number of receptors or a change in synaptic acetylcholine levels, such that an increased amount of acetylcholine would prevent the radioligand from binding to the receptor, resulting in low binding of the radioligand.
We also quantified β2*-nAChR availability in postmortem samples of brains from depressed patients and healthy comparison subjects. In the absence of endogenous acetylcholine, β2*-nAChR availability in the postmortem human samples would help interpret the precise mechanism of potential binding abnormalities observed with [123I]5-I-A-85380 in humans.
Method
SPECT Study
Participants.
Each prospective subject had an interview with an experienced psychiatrist, who elicited a complete psychiatric and medical history and conducted a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders (SCID-I) (28), standardized psychiatric assessments, and a physical examination. Routine blood tests, a pregnancy test, urine toxicology, and ECG were also performed. In addition, the participants were given the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (29), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D Scale) (30), the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (31), the NEO Personality Inventory–Revised (32), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (33), and the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale item (HAM-D) (34).
The study participants were 23 nonsmoking, medication-free subjects with recurrent major depressive disorder and 23 age- and gender-matched healthy comparison subjects. Eight of the subjects with major depression were acutely ill, and 15 were fully recovered. Subjects with any other significant axis I diagnosis were excluded from the study, and only those with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder were included. In accordance with previous studies of depressed subjects (35–37), all of those in the current study had 1) an onset of the first major depressive episode before age 25 years, 2) a lifetime history of at least two major depressive episodes, and 3) at least one first-degree relative with a reported history of major depressive disorder or an axis I disorder.
The depressed subjects had been medication-free for at least 3 months, and the acutely ill subjects scored above 16 on the HAM-D. Subjects were classified as recovered from major depression on the basis of four criteria: self-reported euthymia for more than 4 months following the last episode of major depression, clinician-rated euthymia for more than 4 months according to a clinical interview, absence of criteria for a major depressive episode for more than 4 months as judged with the SCID-I, and a HAM-D score of less than 8. Comparison nonsmoking subjects were included in the study only if they had no lifetime history or family history (in a first-degree relative) of any axis I or axis II disorder as judged with the SCID-I.
None of the subjects recruited had smoked for at least 6 months, and 14 of the depressed subjects (six acutely ill and eight recovered) reported no lifetime history of smoking. Nonsmoking status was confirmed by a plasma cotinine level less than 15 ng/ml, a urine cotinine level less than 100 ng/ml (confirmed by using a dipstick urine test on the day of the scan), and exhaled carbon monoxide level less than 11 ppm on the day of intake and on the day of the scan. Subjects were excluded if they had a positive pregnancy test on the day of the SPECT scan or prior radiation exposure within the past year such that participation in this study would place them over the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) limit for annual radiation exposure.
This study was approved by the Yale University School of Medicine Human Investigation Committee and the Radiation Safety Committee. After complete description of the study to the subjects, written informed consent was obtained. The use of the radiotracer [123I]5-I-A-85380 was approved by the FDA.
Imaging.
Each subject had one [123I]5-I-A-85380 SPECT scan and one magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. MRI was performed on a Signa 1.5-T system (General Electric, Milwaukee, Wis.) as described previously (38). SPECT imaging was conducted as described previously (39). In brief, [123I]5-I-A-85380 was administered by using a bolus plus constant infusion at a ratio of 7.0 hours (i.e., with a bolus worth 7 hours of infusion) for 8 hours. There were no significant differences in the total injected dose, bolus dose, infusion dose, or bolus-to-infusion ratio between the depressed and comparison groups (Table 1). Three 30-minute emission scans and one 15-minute simultaneous transmission and emission protocol (STEP) scan were obtained between 6 and 8 hours of the infusion on a Picker PRISM 3000 XP SPECT camera (Picker, Cleveland). Plasma samples were collected in the middle of the second scan to quantify the total amount of parent tracer and the free fraction (fp) in plasma (40) and to correct for individual differences in metabolism and protein binding of [123I]5-I-A-85380 (41). A 57Co-distributed source was measured with each experiment to control for day-to-day variation in camera sensitivity.
| Acutely Ill Patients (N=8) | Comparison Subjects for Ill Patients (N=8) | Recovered Patients (N=15) | Comparison Subjects for Recovered Patients (N=15) | ANOVA | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radioligand Measure | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F | df | p |
| Total parent level (kBq/mL) | 0.37 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 5.1 | 3, 38 | 0.005 |
| Free parent level (kBq/mL) | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 5.5 | 3, 38 | 0.003 |
| Free fraction level (kBq/mL %) | 34.1 | 3.2 | 31.7 | 3.4 | 35.4 | 3.0 | 33.1 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 3, 38 | 0.40 |
| Total injected dose (MBq) | 363.5 | 10.3 | 326.3 | 62.6 | 360.2 | 36.0 | 344.2 | 46.3 | 0.9 | 3, 42 | 0.48 |
| Bolus dose (MBq) | 157.7 | 7.1 | 148.1 | 26.6 | 157.4 | 15.7 | 149.3 | 20.7 | 0.8 | 3, 42 | 0.49 |
| Infusion dose (MBq) | 206.0 | 5.5 | 190.2 | 33.3 | 202.9 | 20.4 | 194.9 | 25.7 | 0.9 | 3, 42 | 0.45 |
| Bolus-to-infusion ratio (hours)b | 7.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 3, 42 | 0.26 |
a
Matched on age and gender.
b
Hours of infusion equivalent to bolus dose.
Image analysis and outcome measures.
SPECT emission images were analyzed as described previously (25). Specifically, SPECT emission images were reconstructed by using a filtered-back projection algorithm with a ramp filter on a 128×128 matrix to obtain 50 slices with a pixel size of 2.06×2.06×3.56 mm in the x, y, and z axes. A three-dimensional Butterworth filter (order 10, cutoff frequency 0.24 cycle/pixel) was applied post hoc. A coregistered magnetic resonance (MR) image was used to guide the placement of standard two-dimensional region-of-interest templates by means of MEDx software (Medical Numerics, Germantown, Md.). A three-dimensional volume of interest was generated for each region and transferred to the coregistered SPECT image to determine regional radioactive densities. The chosen regions were those known to contain β2*-nAChRs and included the frontal, parietal, anterior cingulate, temporal, and occipital regions, the thalamus, the striatum (an average of caudate and putamen), the hippocampus, the amygdala, the brainstem, and the cerebellum. Regional [123I]5-I-A-85380 uptake was determined by VT/fp, where VT is the total volume of distribution and fp is the free plasma fraction. Each case was analyzed by two raters, and the mean of the two raters' values was used. Interrater variability for VT/fp was less than 10% across all regions and was computed as the percentage difference between the two raters by means of the following equation: [(VT/fp1 / VT/fp2)–1]×100=% difference.
Voxel-Based Morphometric Analysis
In order to study any volumetric differences, as previously reported in patients with major depression (42, 43), a voxel-based morphometric analysis of the data was performed with SPM5 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London). A detailed description of the steps involved in processing data for voxel-based morphometry is available in the SPM5 manual (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/). Before preprocessing, the images were checked for movement artifacts and the origin of each image was set at the anterior commissure. The images were segmented, normalized, and smoothed simultaneously by means of a unified segmentation algorithm (44). In contrast to optimized voxel-based morphometry, which was used in SPM2 and in which these steps were completed sequentially, this study used the unified segmentation algorithm in SPM5 to simultaneously calculate image registration, tissue classification, and bias correction by using our participants' structural MR images combined with the tissue probability maps provided in this version of SPM. Structural MR images were segmented into gray matter, white matter, and CSF. The segmented and modulated normalized images were smoothed with an 8-mm full-width-half-maximum filter. A two-sample t test was then used to delineate any significant differences in gray matter volume between the depressed and healthy comparison groups (N=23 each), between the recovered depressed and matched comparison groups (N=15 each), and between the acutely depressed and matched comparison groups (N=8 each) separately. Given the small number of subjects and the preliminary nature of this analysis, a threshold of p<0.05, uncorrected, was used to view the results.
Postmortem Study
Human brain specimens from the prefrontal cortex of 14 depressed subjects and 14 age-matched comparison subjects were obtained from the Dallas Brain Collection (45). Methods are described in the data supplement accompanying the online version of this article.
Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed by using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). Before analysis, the data were examined descriptively and tested for normality by using normal probability plots and Kolmogorov test statistics. All data were approximately normal. Receptor binding data were analyzed by means of linear mixed models. These models included region as a within-subjects factor, diagnostic group (acutely depressed, recovered depressed, and respective comparison subjects) as a between-subjects factor, and the interaction between group and region. On the basis of the Bayesian information criterion, the best-fitting variance-covariance structure was compound symmetry with heterogeneous variance—i.e., a constant correlation between regions and region-specific variances are estimated. Significant interactions were explained by appropriate post hoc tests and graphical displays. Post hoc tests were adjusted for the 11 regional comparisons by using the Bonferroni correction (i.e., a two-sided alpha of 0.0045 was used as the threshold). An omnibus model including the four diagnostic groups was first developed. After a significant group-by-region interaction was confirmed, separate models were developed for 1) all depressed patients versus all comparison subjects, 2) acutely ill patients versus respective comparison subjects, 3) recovered patients versus respective comparison subjects, and 4) acutely ill versus recovered depressed patients. Inclusion of age and gender as covariates did not alter the results, and they were therefore dropped from the analysis. Potential associations between binding potential and crucial clinical variables of interest were assessed by using correlation analysis. In order to control for multiple correlations, the correlations of clinical and personality variables with binding data were reported only where significant correlations were observed consistently in a region. Postmortem data were analyzed by using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and correlations were analyzed by using appropriate correlation coefficients. For these data, each cell was an average of three measurements performed for each brain region for each patient. The data were then analyzed by ANOVA with group (comparison or depressed) as a between-subjects factor and brain region (gray or white matter) as a within-subjects factor. Alpha was set at 5%.
Results
SPECT Study
Subject characteristics.
Clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants in each group are shown in Table 2; the groups were well matched on most variables studied, although there were significant differences in ethnicity and lifetime smoking history among the groups. Consistent with the acute nature of their illness, the subjects in the acute depression group had significantly higher scores on the CES-D scale, the BDI, the NEO Personality Inventory neuroticism subscale, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire total scale and physical neglect subscale, and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and significantly lower scores on the NEO Personality Inventory conscientiousness subscale than the subjects recovered from major depression.
| Characteristic | Acutely Ill Patients (N=8) | Comparison Subjects for Ill Patients (N=8) | Recovered Patients (N=15) | Comparison Subjects for Recovered Patients (N=15) | Statistical Analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | χ2 | df | p | |
| Male gender | 3 | 37.5 | 3 | 37.5 | 3 | 20.0 | 3 | 20.0 | 1.7 | 3 | 0.65 |
| Race | 7.9 | 3 | <0.05 | ||||||||
| Caucasian | 5 | 62.5 | 8 | 100.0 | 12 | 80.0 | 8 | 53.3 | |||
| Non-Caucasian | 3 | 37.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 20.0 | 7 | 46.7 | |||
| Past psychotropic medication use | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Serotonin reuptake inhibitor | 5 | 62.5 | 12 | 80.0 | |||||||
| Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor | 2 | 25.0 | 1 | 6.7 | |||||||
| Mood stabilizer | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 6.7 | |||||||
| Antipsychotic | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 6.7 | |||||||
| Anxiolytic | 3 | 37.5 | 1 | 6.7 | |||||||
| None | 3 | 37.5 | 2 | 13.3 | |||||||
| Lifetime smoking history | 2 | 25.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 8 | 53.3 | 1 | 6.7 | 15.1 | 6 | 0.02 |
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F | df | p | |
| Age (years) | 36.3 | 13.8 | 37.3 | 15.5 | 32.5 | 10.6 | 31.8 | 11.0 | 0.51 | 3, 42 | 0.68 |
| Age at onset (years) | 17.7 | 4.9 | 18.0 | 4.6 | 0.02 | 1, 20 | 0.90 | ||||
| Lifetime number of depressive episodes | 4.8b | 3.8 | 4.9 | 6.2 | 0.01 | 1, 17 | 0.97 | ||||
| Duration of depression (weeks) | 28b | 17.9 | 50.6 | 87.6 | 0.21 | 1, 16 | 0.65 | ||||
| Duration of euthymia (months) | 26.3 | 25.6 | |||||||||
| Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score | 29.1 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 5.9 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 53.7 | 3, 39 | <0.001 |
| Beck Depression Inventory score | 20.4 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 28.4 | 3, 37 | <0.001 |
| NEO Personality Inventory–Revised score | |||||||||||
| Neuroticism | 111.5 | 17.5 | — | — | 76.4 | 23.1 | — | — | 11.1 | 1, 19 | 0.003 |
| Extraversion | 89.0 | 19.3 | — | — | 108.9 | 19.2 | — | — | 4.6 | 1, 19 | <0.05 |
| Openness to experience | 125.8 | 15.7 | — | — | 130.8 | 18.7 | — | — | 0.3 | 1, 19 | 0.57 |
| Agreeableness | 116.8 | 14.5 | — | — | 132.1 | 19.7 | — | — | 3.0 | 1, 19 | 0.10 |
| Conscientiousness | 91.5 | 9.1 | — | — | 123.9 | 26.2 | — | — | 8.6 | 1, 19 | 0.009 |
| Dysfunctional Attitude Scale score | 163.4 | 49.9 | — | — | 113.7 | 27.4 | — | — | 9.7 | 1, 21 | 0.005 |
| Childhood Trauma Questionnaire scores | |||||||||||
| Total | 4.9 | 3.3 | — | — | 2.1 | 2.3 | — | — | 5.7 | 1, 21 | 0.03 |
| Emotional abuse | 1.4 | 1.1 | — | — | 0.6 | 0.7 | — | — | 3.6 | 1, 20 | 0.07 |
| Physical abuse | 0.6 | 1.2 | — | — | 0.4 | 0.9 | — | — | 0.2 | 1, 20 | 0.67 |
| Sexual abuse | 0.8 | 1.4 | — | — | 0.2 | 0.8 | — | — | 1.5 | 1, 20 | 0.26 |
| Emotional neglect | 1.4 | 0.9 | — | — | 0.9 | 1.1 | — | — | 1.4 | 1, 20 | 0.27 |
| Physical neglect | 0.8 | 1.2 | — | — | 0.1 | 0.3 | — | — | 4.5 | 1, 20 | <0.05 |
| Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores | |||||||||||
| State anxietyc | 53.6 | 3.2 | 23.0 | 4.2 | 28.3 | 7.4 | 24.2 | 7.4 | 28.0 | 3, 21 | <0.001 |
| Trait anxietyd | 56.4 | 6.4 | 24.0 | 5.7 | 32.5 | 8.8 | 24.8 | 4.8 | 19.4 | 3, 21 | <0.001 |
| Carbon monoxide level on scan day (ppm) | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 3, 42 | 0.28 |
a
Matched on age and gender.
b
Subjects with episodic illness were included.
c
Scores of the comparison subjects for the acutely ill group are based on only two subjects. Scores of the comparison subjects for the recovered group are based on six subjects.
d
Scores are based on five acutely ill patients and two of their respective comparison subjects and on 12 recovered patients and six of their respective comparison subjects.
β2*-nAChR availability in major depressive disorder.
The radiochemical blood measures are shown in Table 1. Figure 1 presents β2*-nAChR availability by region. The results of the omnibus model including all four diagnostic groups revealed a significant effect of group (F=8.7, df=3, 42, p<0.0001) and a significant group-by-region interaction (F=1.8, df=30, 420, p=0.006). Given the significant interaction, we chose to disentangle the group-by-region differences by developing independent models including two groups at a time.
FIGURE 1. Regional Availability of β2*-Nicotinic Acetylcholinergic Receptors (β2*-nAChRs) in Acutely Ill and Recovered Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Matched Healthy Comparison Subjectsa
a Matched on age and gender.
b Determined by VT/fp, where VT is the volume of distribution and fp is the free plasma fraction. Values are means and standard deviations.
In the comparison of acutely depressed patients and their comparison subjects, there was a significant main effect of group (F=15.8, df=1, 14, p=0.002) and a significant interaction between group and region (F=2.5, df=10, 140, p=0.008). Post hoc comparisons revealed lower β2*-nAChR availability in the acutely ill depressed subjects than in the healthy comparison subjects in nine of the 11 regions of interest examined (for all regions except the hippocampus and amygdala, adjusted p<0.007).
In the comparison of the recovered depressed patients and their matched comparison subjects, there was also a significant group effect (F=7.9, df=1, 28, p=0.009) and group-by-region interaction (F=2.0, df=10, 280, p=0.03). Post hoc comparisons showed lower β2*-nAChR availability among patients than among comparison subjects in the frontal cortex (adjusted p=0.03), anterior cingulate (adjusted p=0.04), and thalamus (adjusted p=0.008).
When we compared the acutely ill and recovered depression patients, we found a significant overall group effect (F=10.0, df=1, 21, p=0.005), with lower overall β2*-nAChR availability in the acutely depressed patients than in those who were recovered. However, the interaction between group and region was not significant (F=1.3, df=10, 210, p=0.21).
Correlation of β2*-nAChR availability with clinical features.
The analysis of lifetime number of episodes included 19 patients (four acutely ill, 15 recovered). There was a significant positive correlation between lifetime number of episodes and β2*-nAChR availability in the temporal cortex (r=0.46, p<0.05), occipital cortex (r=0.48, p=0.04), and striatum (r=0.49, p=0.04). This was also observed in the recovered group alone (N=15) in the temporal cortex (r=0.54, p=0.04), occipital cortex (r=0.56, p=0.03), thalamus (r=0.54, p=0.04), and striatum (r=0.58, p=0.03).
In the patients with acute depression but not the recovered group, the scores on the total Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and its emotional abuse subscale were negatively correlated with receptor availability in all regions of interest studied except the amygdala. The score on the trait subscale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was negatively correlated with receptor availability in the anterior cingulate (r=–0.65, p=0.03), temporal (r=–0.64, p=0.03), and occipital (r=–0.65, p=0.03) regions and showed a nearly significant correlation in the striatum (r=–0.51, p=0.09) in the recovered group but not in the acutely ill patients. The score on the NEO Personality Inventory conscientiousness subscale was significantly correlated with receptor availability in all regions of interest studied except the amygdala and brainstem (which showed a nearly significant correlation) in the acutely ill group but not the recovered group.
The relationship between a history of past cigarette smoking and β2*-nAChR availability could not be studied because of the small and unbalanced number of subjects with a past history of cigarette smoking.
Voxel-Based Morphometric Analysis
An SPM analysis of brain volumes of all depressed patients in relation to all comparison subjects showed no significant differences in volume, even at the relatively generous threshold used in the analysis. Similarly, there were no significant differences in volume between the acutely ill depressed subjects and their respective comparison subjects, between the recovered depressed subjects and their respective comparison subjects, or between the acutely ill and recovered depressed subjects.
Postmortem Study
Demographic data for the patients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and the matched comparison subjects and the results of [125I]5-I-A-85380 equilibrium binding in postmortem brain tissue are provided in the data supplement accompanying the online version of this article. There were no statistically significant differences in β2*-nAChR number between the depressed patients and the healthy comparison subjects. Both the main effect of group (F=0.46, df=1, 23, p=0.52) and the interaction of region and group (F=0.23, df=1, 46, p=0.78) were nonsignificant.
Discussion
This multimodal analysis of β2*-nAChR availability shows that major depressive disorder is associated with significant dysfunction in the cholinergic system. From the in vivo data, we observed that acutely ill and recovered patients with major depression had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability than age- and gender-matched comparison subjects. Crucially, there were no differences in β2*-nAChR number between the postmortem samples of depressed and comparison subjects under conditions that washed out any endogenous bound acetylcholine. This suggests that the lower β2*-nAChR availability in vivo is likely better explained by high levels of extracellular acetylcholine in patients with major depression than by a low total number of receptors. This would be consistent with the cholinergic hypothesis of depression (4). Finally, we found that the lower β2*-nAChR availability in depressed patients had functional effects in that it was related to critical personality measures.
Use of [123I]5-I-A-85380 to Quantify β2*-nAChR Availability
Our data demonstrate a persistent enduring deficit in cortical and subcortical β2*-nAChR availability in subjects with major depressive disorder. As the acutely ill patients had significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability than the recovered subjects in most regions, it is possible that acetylcholine levels recover somewhat in patients with remitted depression. The continued significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability in fully recovered, euthymic medication-free subjects with depression suggests that the changes in depression are not an epiphenomenon of treatment or illness but may be associated with trait vulnerability to depression, as demonstrated by us previously for other targets (26, 46, 47). nAChRs have a ubiquitous role in the modulation of multiple neurotransmitter systems considered crucial in the pathophysiology of depression, such as serotonin, noradrenaline, glutamate, and GABA (48), and the observed dysfunction may reflect a cause or effect of dysfunction in these other systems. Finally, there were no differences in brain volume between the patients and comparison subjects, suggesting that brain atrophy could not account for differences in receptor availability in this study group.
Postmortem Studies
As described in the preceding, the lower binding of the SPECT radioligand [123I]5-I-A-85380 to β2*-nAChRs could reflect an actual, absolute abnormality in the number of receptors or it could reflect a difference in synaptic acetylcholine levels, with a greater amount of acetylcholine preventing the radioligand from binding to the receptor (27). Consistent with the latter possibility, the postmortem samples showed no difference in receptor number between the depressed patients and either comparison group. These results, together with the nonhuman primate study (27), suggest that when β2*-nAChR availability is measured in the absence of bound endogenous acetylcholine, there is no evidence of an abnormality in receptor number.
Functional Consequences of Lower β2*-nAChR Availability
We observed a significant positive correlation between the number of depressive episodes and β2*-nAChR availability in the combined depressed group and in the recovered patients. If we assume that the lower β2*-nAChR availability represents higher extracellular acetylcholine levels, the correlation implies that the greater the number of episodes, the greater the amount of extracellular acetylcholine. Studies suggest that tobacco smokers have higher β2*-nAChR availability than do nonsmokers in nonpsychiatric populations (39) and that it normalizes after 6–12 weeks of abstinence (49). However, given the small and unbalanced number of subjects with a past history of cigarette smoking, we were not able to determine the effect of this variable on β2*-nAChR availability. Finally, the association between childhood trauma and β2*-nAChR availability replicates the relationship between trauma and major depressive disorder that has been observed in previous studies (50).
Limitations
Notwithstanding the robust statistical significance of the SPECT binding results, the study group was relatively small and composed nearly entirely of subjects without a past history of cigarette smoking; only 11 of the 46 subjects studied had a past history of cigarette smoking. Future studies need to be performed to examine the relationship between past cigarette smoking and β2*-nAChR availability. The nature and logistics of using a SPECT radioligand, the absence of a quantifiable reference region and input function, and the absence of a measurement of nondisplaceable binding in patients with major depressive disorder are issues that are beyond the scope of this article but have been addressed in detail elsewhere (25, 27, 51). While the amygdala is a crucial structure in the pathophysiology of depression, SPECT has poor resolution for small brain regions and the findings for the amygdala should be interpreted with caution. A PET study needs to be performed to confirm these results. Although past smoking status is a critical issue, it was not possible to analyze this effect adequately given the small and unequal number of subjects who have smoked in the past. The use of a population exclusively composed of lifetime nonsmokers limits generalizability; however, it is essential to interpretation of the results and should be examined in future studies.
Conclusions
Patients with major depressive disorder show lower β2*-nAChR availability that persists beyond the cessation of treatment and into full recovery. Further studies are needed to clarify the molecular underpinnings of this low receptor availability. A similar study using a SPECT ligand specific to β4-containing nAChRs seems warranted because of the high density of these receptors in the habenula complex, a region increasingly implicated in depressed mood states (52).
Footnotes
Received Oct. 20, 2011; revisions received Jan. 7 and April 3, 2012; accepted April 9, 2012.
Dr. Staley died in July 2009.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary text, table, and figure
- View/Download
- 469.52 KB
References
1.
Shytle RD, Silver AA, Lukas RJ, Newman MB, Sheehan DV, Sanberg PR: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as targets for antidepressants. Mol Psychiatry 2002; 7:525–535
2.
Owens MJ, Overstreet DH, Knight DL, Rezvani AH, Ritchie JC, Bissette G, Janowsky DS, Nemeroff CB: Alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in a proposed animal model of depression with genetic muscarinic supersensitivity. Neuropsychopharmacology 1991; 4:87–93
3.
Dilsaver SC: Pathophysiology of “cholinoceptor supersensitivity” in affective disorders. Biol Psychiatry 1986; 21:813–829
4.
Janowsky DS, el-Yousef MK, Davis JM, Sekerke HJ: A cholinergic-adrenergic hypothesis of mania and depression. Lancet 1972; 2:632–635
5.
Risch SC, Cohen RM, Janowsky DS, Kalin NH, Murphy DL: Mood and behavioral effects of physostigmine on humans are accompanied by elevations in plasma beta-endorphin and cortisol. Science 1980; 209:1545–1546
6.
Janowsky DS, Overstreet DH: Cholinergic dysfunction in depression. Pharmacol Toxicol 1990; 66(suppl 3):100–111
7.
Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, McDermut W: Major depressive disorder and axis I diagnostic comorbidity. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63:187–193
8.
Hughes JR, Hatsukami DK, Mitchell JE, Dahlgren LA: Prevalence of smoking among psychiatric outpatients. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143:993–997
9.
Poirier MF, Canceil O, Bayle F, Millet B, Bourdel MC, Moatti C, Olie JP, Attar-Levy D: Prevalence of smoking in psychiatric patients. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2002; 26:529–537
10.
Glassman AH: Cigarette smoking: implications for psychiatric illness. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150:546–553
11.
Breslau N, Kilbey MM, Andreski P: Nicotine dependence and major depression: new evidence from a prospective investigation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50:31–35
12.
Quattrocki E, Baird A, Yurgelun-Todd D: Biological aspects of the link between smoking and depression. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2000; 8:99–110
13.
Grant BF, Hasin DS, Chou SP, Stinson FS, Dawson DA: Nicotine dependence and psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61:1107–1115
14.
Tizabi Y, Overstreet DH, Rezvani AH, Louis VA, Clark E, Janowsky DS, Kling MA: Antidepressant effects of nicotine in an animal model of depression. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999; 142:193–199
15.
Rabenstein RL, Caldarone BJ, Picciotto MR: The nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine has antidepressant-like effects in wild-type but not beta2- or alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit knockout mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006; 189:395–401
16.
Mineur YS, Somenzi O, Picciotto MR: Cytisine, a partial agonist of high-affinity nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, has antidepressant-like properties in male C57BL/6J mice. Neuropharmacology 2007; 52:1256–1262
17.
Rollema H, Guanowsky V, Mineur YS, Shrikhande A, Coe JW, Seymour PA, Picciotto MR: Varenicline has antidepressant-like activity in the forced swim test and augments sertraline's effect. Eur J Pharmacol 2009; 605:114–116
18.
Caldarone BJ, Harrist A, Cleary MA, Beech RD, King SL, Picciotto MR: High-affinity nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are required for antidepressant effects of amitriptyline on behavior and hippocampal cell proliferation. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 56:657–664
19.
Salin-Pascual RJ, de la Fuente JR, Galicia-Polo L, Drucker-Colin R: Effects of transdermal nicotine on mood and sleep in nonsmoking major depressed patients. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1995; 121:476–479
20.
McClernon FJ, Hiott FB, Westman EC, Rose JE, Levin ED: Transdermal nicotine attenuates depression symptoms in nonsmokers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006; 189:125–133
21.
George TP, Sacco KA, Vessicchio JC, Weinberger AH, Shytle RD: Nicotinic antagonist augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-refractory major depressive disorder: a preliminary study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008; 28:340–344
22.
Patterson F, Jepson C, Strasser AA, Loughead J, Perkins KA, Gur RC, Frey JM, Siegel S, Lerman C: Varenicline improves mood and cognition during smoking abstinence. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 65:144–149
23.
Musachio JL, Villemagne VL, Scheffel UA, Dannals RF, Dogan AS, Yokoi F, Wong DF: Synthesis of an I-123 analog of A-85380 and preliminary SPECT imaging of nicotinic receptors in baboon. Nucl Med Biol 1999; 26:201–207
24.
Fujita M, Tamagnan G, Zoghbi SS, Al-Tikriti MS, Baldwin RM, Seibyl JP, Innis RB: Measurement of alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with [123I]5-I-A-85380 SPECT. J Nucl Med 2000; 41:1552–1560
25.
Staley JK, van Dyck CH, Weinzimmer D, Brenner E, Baldwin RM, Tamagnan GD, Riccardi P, Mitsis E, Seibyl JP: 123I-5-IA-85380 SPECT measurement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human brain by the constant infusion paradigm: feasibility and reproducibility. J Nucl Med 2005; 46:1466–1472
26.
Bhagwagar Z, Cowen PJ: 'It's not over when it's over': persistent neurobiological abnormalities in recovered depressed patients. Psychol Med 2008; 38:307–313
27.
Fujita M, Al-Tikriti MS, Tamagnan G, Zoghbi SS, Bozkurt A, Baldwin RM, Innis RB: Influence of acetylcholine levels on the binding of a SPECT nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligand [123I]5-I-A-85380. Synapse 2003; 48:116–122
28.
First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders—Clinician Version (SCID-CV). Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1997
29.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK: Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd ed, Manual. San Antonio, Tex, Psychological Corp, 1996
30.
Radloff LS: The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. J Applied Psychol Measurement 1977; 1:385–401
31.
Spielberger CD: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, Calif, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1985
32.
Costa PT, McCrae RR: NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, Fla, Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992
33.
Bernstein DP, Fink L: Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A Retrospective Self-Report (CTQ). San Antonio, Tex, Harcourt Assessment, 1997
34.
Hamilton M: A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23:56–62
35.
Bhagwagar Z, Wylezinska M, Taylor M, Jezzard P, Matthews PM, Cowen PJ: Increased brain GABA concentrations following acute administration of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:368–370
36.
Bhagwagar Z, Rabiner EA, Sargent PA, Grasby PM, Cowen PJ: Persistent reduction in brain serotonin1A receptor binding in recovered depressed men measured by positron emission tomography with [11C]WAY-100635. Mol Psychiatry 2004; 9:386–392
37.
Bhagwagar Z, Hinz R, Taylor M, Fancy S, Cowen P, Grasby P: Increased 5-HT2A receptor binding in euthymic, medication-free patients recovered from depression: a positron emission study with [11C]MDL 100,907. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163:1580–1587
38.
Esterlis I, Cosgrove KP, Batis JC, Bois F, Stiklus SM, Perkins E, Seibyl JP, Carson RE, Staley JK: Quantification of smoking-induced occupancy of beta2-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: estimation of nondisplaceable binding. J Nucl Med 2010; 51:1226–1233
39.
Staley JK, Krishnan-Sarin S, Cosgrove KP, Krantzler E, Frohlich E, Perry E, Dubin JA, Estok K, Brenner E, Baldwin RM, Tamagnan GD, Seibyl JP, Jatlow P, Picciotto MR, London ED, O'Malley S, van Dyck CH: Human tobacco smokers in early abstinence have higher levels of beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors than nonsmokers. J Neurosci 2006; 26:8707–8714
40.
Zoghbi SS, Tamagnan G, Baldwin MF, Al-Tikriti MS, Amici L, Seibyl JP, Innis RB: Measurement of plasma metabolites of (S)-5-[123I]iodo-3-(2-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine (5-IA-85380), a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor imaging agent, in nonhuman primates. Nucl Med Biol 2001; 28:91–96
41.
Cosgrove KP, Mitsis EM, Bois F, Frohlich E, Tamagnan GD, Krantzler E, Perry E, Maciejewski PK, Epperson CN, Allen S, O'Malley S, Mazure CM, Seibyl JP, van Dyck CH, Staley JK: 123I-5-IA-85380 SPECT imaging of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor availability in nonsmokers: effects of sex and menstrual phase. J Nucl Med 2007; 48:1633–1640
42.
Bora E, Fornito A, Pantelis C, Yücel M: Gray matter abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of voxel based morphometry studies. J Affect Disord 2012; 138:9–18
43.
van Tol MJ, van der Wee NJ, van den Heuvel OA, Nielen MM, Demenescu LR, Aleman A, Renken R, van Buchem MA, Zitman FG, Veltman DJ: Regional brain volume in depression and anxiety disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67:1002–1011
44.
Ashburner J, Friston KJ: Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 2005; 26:839–851
45.
Stan AD, Ghose S, Gao XM, Roberts RC, Lewis-Amezcua K, Hatanpaa KJ, Tamminga CA: Human postmortem tissue: what quality markers matter? Brain Res 2006; 1123:1–11
46.
Bhagwagar Z, Murthy N, Selvaraj S, Hinz R, Taylor M, Fancy S, Grasby P, Cowen P: 5-HTT binding in recovered depressed patients and healthy volunteers: a positron emission tomography study with [11C]DASB. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:1858–1865
47.
Bhagwagar Z, Wylezinska M, Jezzard P, Evans J, Boorman E, Matthews PM, Cowen PJ: Low GABA concentrations in occipital cortex and anterior cingulate cortex in medication-free, recovered depressed patients. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 11:255–260
48.
Gotti C, Moretti M, Bohr I, Ziabreva I, Vailati S, Longhi R, Riganti L, Gaimarri A, McKeith IG, Perry RH, Aarsland D, Larsen JP, Sher E, Beattie R, Clementi F, Court JA: Selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit deficits identified in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies by immunoprecipitation. Neurobiol Dis 2006; 23:481–489
49.
Cosgrove KP, Batis J, Bois F, Maciejewski PK, Esterlis I, Kloczynski T, Stiklus S, Krishnan-Sarin S, O'Malley S, Perry E, Tamagnan G, Seibyl JP, Staley JK: Beta2-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor availability during acute and prolonged abstinence from tobacco smoking. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66:666–676
50.
Heim C, Newport DJ, Mletzko T, Miller AH, Nemeroff CB: The link between childhood trauma and depression: insights from HPA axis studies in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2008; 33:693–710
51.
Mukhin AG, Kimes AS, Chefer SI, Matochik JA, Contoreggi CS, Horti AG, Vaupel DB, Pavlova O, Stein EA: Greater nicotinic acetylcholine receptor density in smokers than in nonsmokers: a PET study with 2-18F-FA-85380. J Nucl Med 2008; 49:1628–1635
52.
Shytle R, Sheehan D, Sanberg P, Arias H: Neuronal nicotinic receptors as therapeutic targets for mood disorders, in Pharmacology of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors From the Basic and Therapeutic Perspectives. Edited by, Arias H. Trivandrum, Kerala, India, Research Signpost, 2011, pp 187–198
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 20 October 2011
Revision received: 7 January 2012
Revision received: 3 April 2012
Accepted: 9 April 2012
Published online: 1 August 2012
Published in print: August 2012
Authors
Funding Information
Dr. Seibyl reports being a consultant for Bayer Healthcare and GE Healthcare and holding equity in Molecular Neuroimaging. Dr. Bhagwagar is a full-time employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb while retaining a faculty position at Yale University. Disclosures for Dr. Tamminga, as a Deputy Editor of the American Journal of Psychiatry, were published in the January issue. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.Supported by the Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit at the Connecticut Mental Health Center and the Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addictions Services, by NIMH research grants MH-077681 (Dr. Picciotto) and MH-077914 (Dr. Bhagwagar), by the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (Dr. Bhagwagar), by the Freedman Fellowship (Dr. Saricicek), and by Clinical and Translational Science Award grant UL1 RR-024139 from the NIH National Center for Research Resources to Yale University (Dr. Bhagwagar).
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBLogin options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).