Skip to main content
To the Editor: Extensive media coverage of the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro and the emergence of sports medicine as a subspecialty reflect elite athletes’ important societal roles. While the optimization of athletes’ physical performance is a priority, their mental health is largely ignored. Psychiatric studies of competitive athletes are nonexistent in the United States and are limited worldwide, despite risks to athletes that include sleep disruption, travel, low autonomy, and performance demands (13). Physicians are biased toward athletes’ mental well-being (3, 4); moreover, athlete help-seeking is stigmatized (4).
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating, treatable illness affecting 2.3% of adults, with subthreshold obsessive-compulsive symptoms occurring in 28.2% of adults (5). Competitive athletes’ traits, including overresponsibility, perfectionism, and secrecy, mask OCD identification (4, 5). Calorie obsession, body hyperfocus, superstitions, and rituals are normative for athletes (2). We report findings from the first OCD study in collegiate athletes, derived from two data collection waves of a study on college athletic stress at a Division I National Collegiate Athletic Association school.

Method

In year 1, 20.1% (N=54) of 269 athletes representing 13 sports screened positive for OCD on the validated Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ) (6), prompting detailed examination. In year 2, 270 (141 of whom were included in year 1) completed the PDSQ, the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (FOCI) (7) (diagnostic score ≥8), and the Obsessive-Compulsive Checklist Patient Rating Scale (8) (detailing symptoms). “All-conference” elite-level athletes were identified. National Comorbidity Survey Replication epidemiologic data were used for comparison (5). Analyses were conducted via SPSS, version 20 (SPSS, Chicago) (significance threshold p<0.05).

Results

All participants denied OCD diagnosis, as confirmed by medical records. Nearly 35% (N=94) of year 2 participants endorsed obsessive-compulsive symptoms, 16.7% (N=45) screened positive for OCD, and 5.2% (N=14) met full OCD criteria. Among OCD-affected athletes, half reported more than five symptom types, with hoarding, ordering, and checking as the most common (Table 1). The mean age at onset was 14.3 years (SD=3.9), 5.3 years (SD=4.8) prior to assessment, which is comparable to OCD findings from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (5). All-conference athletes reported fewer OCD symptoms (t=2.36, df=119.6, p=0.02) and screened positive less frequently for OCD (χ2=5.68, p=0.017) compared with their peers.
TABLE 1. Prevalence of Obsessions and Compulsions by Symptom Dimension, Type, and Associated Distress in a Study of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in College Athletes
Item DescriptionaObsession/Compulsion TypeFull Sample (N=270)PDSQ Positive Screen (N=45)bFOCI Positive Diagnosis (N=14)cAll-Conference Athletes (N=53)Non-All-Conference Athletes (N=217)Associated Distress (N=270)Clinical Distress (score >8) (N=14)
  N%N%N%N%N%MeanSDMeanSD
Any hoarding symptoms9837.52155.8861.51529.48339.5  
Fear of losing important information and/or indecision about throwing things outHoarding obsessions6223.71534.1646.2815.75425.63.82.366.171.94
Fear of losing things/“need to know”Hoarding or need to know7729.42045.5646.21223.56530.83.992.405.502.67
Hoarding/having clutterHoarding compulsions72.700.000.023.952.43.862.67
Any symmetry symptoms8030.81651.2758.31019.67033.5  
Need to engage in orderingArranging compulsions3814.41636.4646.259.83315.64.722.968.502.07
Reread/rewrite; repeating behaviorsRepeating compulsions4015.31227.9430.8713.73315.74.182.869.250.96
Symmetry/exactness concernsSymmetry obsessions2911.1715.9325.035.92612.43.592.573.671.53
Counting compulsionCounting compulsions62.324.717.712.052.43.671.5310.000.0
Any forbidden thought symptoms8432.81751.2758.31325.57134.6  
Checking about harm to self/others or body conditionChecking compulsions3613.81023.3538.5815.72813.33.182.314.801.79
Fear of impulsive, harmful behaviorsAggression obsessions124.649.3325.012.0115.15.172.625.333.22
Concern about diseaseSomatic obsessions135.049.1323.135.9104.74.922.334.673.51
Praying or having magical thoughts to prevent harmPraying or mental compulsions5521.11330.2323.1611.84923.33.922.865.332.08
Excessive moral concernsReligious obsessions155.8716.3215.423.9136.23.922.865.332.08
Sexual obsessionSexual obsessions124.649.300.023.9104.84.333.42
Any miscellaneous symptoms4517.2920.5538.5611.83918.5  
Touch/tap/blink; confessionMiscellaneous compulsions2911.1918.2538.547.82511.84.253.167.202.59
Superstitious, colors/numbersSuperstitious obsessions2710.349.1215.4611.82110.04.053.247.503.54
Any cleaning or contamination symptoms3011.7223.8433.3815.72210.7  
Fear and disgust of contaminationContamination obsessions218.1614.0325.059.8167.73.052.375.674.16
Excessive self-cleaningCleaning compulsions176.5818.6323.147.8136.24.972.956.332.31
Any of the above15661.43278.0872.72651.013064.0  
a
Items are from the Obsessive-Compulsive Checklist Patient Rating Scale, a measure used clinically and in previous investigations of OCD symptom severity (8). This scale is a 17-item questionnaire inquiring about the presence of common obsessions and compulsions. In the present sample, the scale documented adequate internal consistency (alpha=0.78) and good convergent validity with the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (FOCI) as well as with the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ).
b
The PDSQ is a validated measure commonly used in clinical settings for psychiatric symptom screening (6). The number of OCD symptoms endorsed was summed to determine a score between 0 and 7, with a cutoff of 1 indicating the need for further clinical assessment (e.g., a “positive screen”).
c
The FOCI comprises 20 “yes” or “no” items and five symptom severity items and is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (7). The FOCI yields two subscales (i.e., symptom presence and symptom severity). A symptom presence is indicated from a checklist score that ranges between 0 and 20, with a score of 20 indicating the greatest number of symptoms. The symptom severity score is calculated by summing the five severity questions. Athletes were considered clinical on the FOCI if the symptom severity score was 8 or higher (unpublished 1994 data from W.K. Goodman).

Discussion

Self-report on the FOCI suggests that OCD may be as common as 5.2% among college athletes, more than doubling expected rates (2.3%). Symptoms caused moderate to severe distress. Despite self-reported symptoms lasting more than half a decade, no athletes who screened positive for OCD had been diagnosed, and few received psychological treatment. All-conference athletes had lower OCD and obsessive-compulsive symptom rates compared with other college athletes, suggesting a negative association with performance. Although interviews confirming diagnoses were unavailable, the validity of this study’s findings is supported via comparability with expected population rates of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, OCD onset, and symptom types. Physicians should remain vigilant for OCD in athletes given its association with distress and its treatment potential.

References

1.
Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Mackinnon A, et al: The mental health of Australian elite athletes. J Sci Med Sport 2015; 18:255–261
2.
Schaal K, Tafflet M, Nassif H, et al: Psychological balance in high level athletes: gender-based differences and sport-specific patterns. PLoS One 2011; 6:e19007
3.
Hughes L, Leavey G: Setting the bar: athletes and vulnerability to mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 2012; 200:95–96
4.
Reardon CL, Factor RM: Sport psychiatry: a systematic review of diagnosis and medical treatment of mental illness in athletes. Sports Med 2010; 40:961–980
5.
Ruscio AM, Stein DJ, Chiu WT, et al: The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Mol Psychiatry 2010; 15:53–63
6.
Zimmerman M, Mattia JI: A self-report scale to help make psychiatric diagnoses: the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58:787–794
7.
Storch EA, Kaufman DA, Bagner D, et al: Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: development, reliability, and validity. J Clin Psychol 2007; 63:851–859
8.
Stewart SE, Stack DE, Wilhelm S: Severe obsessive-compulsive disorder with and without body dysmorphic disorder: clinical correlates and implications. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2008; 20:33–38

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 595 - 597
PubMed: 28565946

History

Accepted: January 2017
Published online: 1 June 2017
Published in print: June 01, 2017

Keywords

  1. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
  2. Other Patient Groups/Issues
  3. OCD
  4. College Athletes
  5. NCAA

Authors

Details

Lisa Cromer, Ph.D. [email protected]
From the Departments of Nursing and of Psychology, University of Tulsa, and the University of Tulsa Institute of Trauma, Adversity, and Injustice, Tulsa, Okla.; the Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada; and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Emily Kaier, M.A.
From the Departments of Nursing and of Psychology, University of Tulsa, and the University of Tulsa Institute of Trauma, Adversity, and Injustice, Tulsa, Okla.; the Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada; and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Joanne Davis, Ph.D.
From the Departments of Nursing and of Psychology, University of Tulsa, and the University of Tulsa Institute of Trauma, Adversity, and Injustice, Tulsa, Okla.; the Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada; and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Kathleen Stunk, A.P.R.N., C.N.S.
From the Departments of Nursing and of Psychology, University of Tulsa, and the University of Tulsa Institute of Trauma, Adversity, and Injustice, Tulsa, Okla.; the Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada; and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
S. Evelyn Stewart, M.D.
From the Departments of Nursing and of Psychology, University of Tulsa, and the University of Tulsa Institute of Trauma, Adversity, and Injustice, Tulsa, Okla.; the Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada; and Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Cromer ([email protected]).

Funding Information

Dr. Stewart has received research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, the British Columbia Provincial Health Services Authority, the International OCD Foundation, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and the Anxiety and Depression Association of America. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share