Skip to main content

Abstract

A group of eight patients with severe depression lasting 6 years or longer were treated with anterior capsulotomy and followed prospectively. Stereotactic surgery was used to produce radiofrequency lesions in the anterior limbs of both internal capsules. For all patients, there are follow-up data for at least 24 months. At 24-to-36 months postoperatively, four patients were either not-depressed or mildly depressed; one was mildly-to-moderately depressed; one was moderately-to-severely depressed; and only one remained severely depressed. One patient developed a progressive vascular dementia with parkinsonism caused by autopsy-proven arteriolosclerosis.
Treatment-resistant depression occurs in 50%–60% of depression patients.1 Of these, a small but unknown percentage will remain unresponsive to all available interventions, including psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and ECT. For this small group of patients, limbic surgery is one of the few treatment options that remain. The surgical targets that are utilized vary across institutions and involve lesions produced bilaterally in the anterior limb of the internal capsule (anterior capsulotomy), the supragenual anterior cingulate gyrus and cingulum (anterior cingulotomy), and the subgenual anterior cingulate gyrus and subcortical orbitofrontal white matter (subcaudate tractotomy).2,3 The combination of bilateral cingulotomy and subcaudate tractotomy is known as limbic leucotomy.4

Methods

In 1998, the Vancouver Limbic Surgery Group (VLSG) was formed as a clinical program to offer surgical treatment for refractory depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Bilateral anterior capsulotomy (BAC) was selected as the target after reviewing the available literature and the benefit that two British Columbian patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) had had from this procedure done at another center. In 2000, the first patient underwent BAC. This report details the experience of the Vancouver Limbic Surgery Group with BAC for intractable depression and reports on the eight patients, all of whom have been followed for at least 24 months.
The proposed limbic surgery protocol was reviewed and approved by the Department of Psychiatry, the Division of Neurosurgery University of British Columbia, and the Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre’s Medical Advisory Board and Ethics Committees. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1 and Table 2. All patients must have had persistent, unremitting, severe depression for 5 consecutive years and have failed multiple medication trials that must include a tricyclic antidepressant and a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. Each medication must have been taken at the maximum or close to the maximum dose for at least 6 to 8 weeks. Each patient must also have been treated with at least two courses of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), one of which must have utilized a bilateral electrode placement.
TABLE 1. Inclusion Criteria for BAC (all criteria must be met)
1DSM-IV major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder, depressed.
2Age 18 years or older
3Duration of illness >5 years.
4Beck Depression Inventory scores ≥25 and Geriatric Depression Scale score ≥20.
5Global Assessment of Functioning scale ≤50.
6Psychotherapy and biological treatments have been tried for at least 5 years without appreciable benefit.
7The patient is competent to make decisions.
8The patient gives written informed consent.
9The patient agrees to participate in the preoperative evaluation program and postoperative rehabilitation program.
10The referring psychiatrist accepts responsibility for the postoperative long-term management of the patient.
TABLE 2. Exclusion Criteria
1Age <18 years.
2Comorbid current or lifetime Axis I diagnosis, such as an organic mental disorder, delusional disorder, substance abuse disorder, or alcoholism.
3Comorbid Cluster B personality disorder.
4Comorbid Axis III diagnosis with brain pathology, such as a dementing disorder, atrophy, or tumor.
All patients go through a complex entry procedure that takes at least 3 to 6 months to complete because of the logistics of arranging all the required acceptance and competence adjudication interviews. As of July 2005, all patients screened for surgery are advised about the option of Deep Brain Stimulation, which will likely become an approved intervention once the initial studies have been replicated.5,6 Once accepted, the patient undergoes a preoperative work-up consisting of a neurological examination, neuropsychological testing, MR imaging, SPECT scanning, and the completion of additional assessment instruments, including the Beck Depression Inventory,7 the Geriatric Depression Scale,8 and the Global Assessment of Functioning.9
Postoperatively, the patient is maintained on the same medication as preoperatively, with no changes, for at least 6 months. Thereafter, medications are gradually withdrawn as tolerated or adjusted as needed by patients’ treating community psychiatrists. Patients are seen in follow-up at 2 months, 6 months, 18 months, 2 years, and, logistics permitting, annually, biennially, or triennially, thereafter by TAH, with the intention that all patients will be followed for 10 years. At each follow-up, appropriate rating scales are completed. Neuropsychological testing is repeated at 2 months and at 1 year, with the option of repeat testing at 2 years if impairments are demonstrated at 1 year. The neuropsychological and behavioral domains and the tests utilized to probe these domains are listed in Table 3. The comparison data for both the 2-month and 12-month testing are the findings of the pre-surgical test performance. A change (either improved or worse) in any given neuropsychological domain is identified if there is a difference of 2 or more scaled-score points between pre-surgical and post-surgical test performance. A change (either improved or worse) in behavioral domains is identified if there is a difference of 10-or-more T-score points between pre-surgical and post-surgical self-/other rating.
TABLE 3. Neuropsychological and Behavioral Domains and the Tests Utilized to Probe These
DomainNeuropsychological Tests
AttentionWAIS Digit Span, Mental Arithmetic,Corsi blocks
Mental speedTrails A, Stroop Words/Colors, WAIS Digit Symbol
Verbal memoryRey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
Visual memoryRey Ostereith Complex Figure
Phonemic fluencyControlled Oral Word-Association Test
Semantic fluencyAnimal Category Fluency Test
AbstractionWAIS Similarities
Executive functioningWisconsin Card-Sorting Test, Trails B; Stroop Interference; Tinkertoy Test
Visuomotor constructionRey Ostereith Complex Figure-Copy, WAIS Block Design
MotorFinger-Tapping Test, Grooved Pegboard Test
Behavioral rating: self and familyFrontal Systems Behavior Scale
MRI is repeated at 2 months and at 1 year. Outcome is assessed with the Global Clinical Categories of Bridges and Bartlett10 (Table 4).
TABLE 4. Global Clinical Categories
Grade 1Recovered: no symptoms and no treatment required; normal social functioning
Grade 2Well: mild residual symptoms, little or no interference with daily life, medication may still be needed
Grade 3Improved: but still significant symptoms remain, which interfere with the patient’s life
Grade 4Unchanged
Grade 5Worse
Bilateral anterior capsulotomy is done by stereotactic surgery. The procedure has been previously described.11,12 Bilateral radiofrequency lesions are produced in the anterior limb of the internal capsule (Figure 1). The mean diameters of the resultant ellipsoid lesion measure 4.8 mm (range: 4–6) × 4.4 mm (range: 2–7) × 14.2 mm (range: 11–16) on the left and 5.8 mm (range: 4–8) × 5.1mm (range: 3–8) × 14.8 mm (range: 13–16) on the right.
FIGURE 1. T1 MRI in Axial and Coronal Planes
Arrowheads indicate the bilateral radiofrequency lesions in the anterior limbs of the internal capsules.

Results

The demographics, BDI, GAF, and GCC scores of seven patients are summarized in Table 5. Severity of depression was categorized, based on the BDI and GDS score (Table 6).13 All patients had been experiencing their current depressive episode for at least 6 years (mean: 8; range: 6–10 years). Three patients (#2, #6, and #7) had had an episode of hypomania in the past. One patient (#3) had her first-ever hypomanic episode, which was possibly provoked by fluoxetine, in the fifth post-operative year. Thus, three patients had underlying major depressive disorder, and four had underlying bipolar II disorder.
TABLE 5. Demographics, BDI, GAF, and GCC Scores of Seven Patients
Patient 1234678
Age 46214837573851
Sex FFFFFFF
GCC IIIIIIVIIIIIII
Duration of current episode, years 869710108
Number of preoperative hospitalizations 37>205>10>20>10
Number of postoperative hospitalizations 0000001
PreoperativeBDI/GDS31/2935/2534/2443/3030/2732/2630/25
 GAF50105030503545
PostoperativeBDI/GDS28/2537/2312/1742/2823/2118/2220/19
2 mo.BDI/GDS31/275/72/235/2822/1729/1721/20
 GAF50656040605055
6 mo.BDI/GDS23/236/65/121/2114/1739/2418/21
 GAF50656540653555
9 mo.BDI/GDS21/212/31/123/199/730/2328/24
 GAF60707040705055
12 mo.BDI/GDS21/187/144/418/1815/1235/2525/23
 GAF60807040705055
18 mo.BDI/GDS22/240/00/125/1714/1326/1917/20
 GAF60807040756055
24 mo.BDI/GDS  1/320/1924/1410/417/16
 GAF  7540757060
36 mo.BDI/GDS19/201/3 33/2312/13  
 GAF6590 5075  
48 mo.BDI/GDS   33/26   
 GAF   40   
60 mo.BDI/GDS  2/2    
 GAF  90    
72 mo.BDI/GDS21/227/71/040/22   
 GAF60909060   
84 mo.BDI/GDS17/19      
 GAF70      
BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; GAF: Global Assessment of Functioning; GCC: Global Clinical Categories; GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale.
TABLE 6. Severity of Depression
Beck Depression Inventory(BDI)13Geriatric Depression Inventory (GDS)13
0–9: normal range0–9: normal
10–15: minimal depression10–19: mild depression
16–19: mild-to-moderate depression20–30: severe depression
20–29: moderate-to-severe depression 
30–63: severe depression 
Patient #5 is not included in the detailed analysis and comparison. He developed postoperative akinetic mutism, from which he improved after 1 month. His course was then confounded by the emergence of dementia with parkinsonism, which precluded obtaining reliable follow-up data about his depression or his subjective state because of his failing cognitive-intellectual capacities. He died 2 years post-surgery from renal failure. At autopsy, he was found to have extensive arteriolosclerosis secondary to his 40-year history of hypertension and responsible for his development of vascular dementia with parkinsonism.14
Six of the remaining seven patients are improved, as compared with their condition before surgery, and are conservatively classified as GCC III-or-better. Patient #4 is classified as GCC-V because of fatigue that was worse post-surgery than pre-surgery. However, with the exception of reactive depression for several weeks in Year 3 in response to marital distress and again in Years 5 and 6 in response to separation, her dysphoria related to depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation have been, by her own account, meaningfully attenuated by surgery. All patients, including Patient #4, had an improvement in functioning captured in a rise in GAF scores. All patients are living independently in the community. Compared with pre-surgical levels, only Patient #8 has needed hospitalization because of worsened depression. She required a 2.5-week hospitalization, during which she was diagnosed with and treated for new-onset hypothyroidism.
Preoperatively, all patients were classified as having severe depression by BDI (≥30) and GDS scores (≥20). All seven patients, including Patient #4, demonstrated lessening of depression-severity during the course of follow-up (Table 5). At 24 to 36 months, where follow-up data are available for all patients, BDI and GDS scores demonstrate that 5 (72%) of 7 patients’ depression had been reduced below moderate-to-severe in intensity. Four patients (57%) were either not-depressed or mildly depressed; one was mildly-to-moderately depressed; and one was moderately-to-severely depressed; and only one remained severely depressed (Table 5). Using the criterion of a 50%-or-greater reduction in BDI score as a measure of response, four of the eight patients (50%) were Responders at 24-to-36 months post-BAC. This outcome analysis includes the patient with vascular dementia and parkinsonism.
TABLE 7. Complications
Transient (immediate and up to 7 months)
• Postoperative confusion lasting up to 14 days [2]
• Visual pseudohallucinations [1]
• Increased appetite [1]
• Decreased motivation [1]
• Decreased smell and taste [1]
• Increased libido [1]
• Fatigue [2]
• Subjective emotional blunting [2]
• Difficulty formulating higher-order thoughts and ideas [1]
Persistent (greater than 1 year)
• Fatigue [1]
• Difficulty formulating higher-order thoughts and ideas [1]
• Decline in neuropsychological capacities:
 Visuoconstruction [1]
 Semantic memory [2]
 Attention [1]a
 Mental speed [1]a
 Recent verbal memory [1]a
 Problem-solving [1]a
[N patients experiencing complication].
Older age may be a risk factor for neuropsychological complications.
a
Same patient.
Complications are summarized in Table 7. Six patients had neuropsychological tests administered before surgery and at 2 months and 12 months post-surgery. One patient (#7) had her second round of neuropsychological testing delayed and done at 24 months because of the logistics of arranging testing in Vancouver. At 2 months post-BAC, the vast majority of neuropsychological domains were either unchanged or improved. The more important long-term neuropsychological outcomes showed a similar pattern. Patient #3 had a significant decline in visuoconstruction. Her visual memory demonstrated a nonsignificant deterioration, but had already been testing in the impaired range before the surgery. Two patients demonstrated a deterioration in semantic fluency. The combination of Attention, Mental Speed, and Executive Functioning domains that are at risk were only compromised in one patient (#6). She also demonstrated a decline in Recent Verbal Memory. Review of her BAC lesions showed no difference in placement or lesion volumes. She was, however, the oldest patient (57 years), raising the possibility that age may constitute a vulnerability factor for neuropsychological compromise. One other patient showed an isolated deficit, in Problem-Solving, at 12 months.
Long-term frontal psychobehavioral changes were only present in Patient #4. At 12 months, but not at 2 months, both she and her family endorsed executive problems, whereas her family, but not herself, identified apathy. These delayed psychobehavioral disturbances were attributable to the confounding effects of her fatigue, as her measured executive functions at 2 and 12 months were unchanged or improved.

Discussion

Since 2000, eight individuals with severe depressive illness of at least 6 years’ duration have undergone BAC. All of them have been followed for at least 24 months. All patients experienced relief, to some degree, from their previously-unremitting depressive illness. In four patients, depression was either completely remitted or persisted in a mild form. The most striking single benefit from BAC was the reduction or abolition of suicidal ideation, an effect experienced by all patients. Suicidal ideation resolved within the first 1-to-2 weeks after surgery in four patients, reported as the acute effects of surgery began to subside. In Patient #4, suicidal ideation abated at 2 months post-surgery, whereas, in Patients #1 and #6, the loss of suicidal ideation was delayed until 6 months post-surgery. The resolution of suicidal ideation has been explored with patients in the immediate post-operative period and at their follow-up assessments. Absent or abated suicidal ideation has not been due to an inability to formulate suicidal ideation because of blunted cognitive capacities. Patients were all clear-thinking when assessed and were fully aware of their predicaments and their choices. They explained that self-injurious ideation simply no longer surfaced as a problem-solving strategy to deal with the unbearable and unrelenting subjective distress of depression. Abated suicidal ideation thus reflected a reduction in sadness: a “tristolytic” effect (tristis: sadness; lysis: destruction of) and has been the best single phenomenological marker of improvement post-BAC. Attenuation or abolition of suicidal ideation has remained a robust effect over the course of follow-up. When present, suicidal ideation has been minor relative to pre-BAC intensity, and either reactive to significant psychosocial stress or, in the case of two patients, returning with pre-BAC severity when they relapsed into depression.
The time-to-optimal remission of depression post-BAC varied between 2 and 9 months. The gradual lessening of the depression syndrome over 2-to-9 months contrasts to the relatively rapid tristolysis and abated suicidal ideation in most patients. Tristolysis, which was immediate in half of the patients, may be accounted for on the basis of a biological process acutely interrupted by surgery. Other biological and psychological mechanisms likely account for the remission of the depression syndrome. Depressive illness is often accompanied by demoralization, which shows phenomenology that overlaps with depression. Demoralization is, at its core, a traumatized self, filled with a sense of personal failure and ineffectiveness, the result of frustration at persisting and intrusive symptoms, the inability to find relief, the loss of hope that things will ever be different, and the loneliness of the experience.15,16 After BAC, the demoralization reverses because the patient has had symptomatic relief from the previously-unrelenting internal distress of depression. Anterograde and retrograde transneuronal degeneration provides an alternative or co-occurring biological explanation that may account for the improvement over time. In this process, neurons that are connected synaptically to form specific circuits undergo sequential cell-death due to loss of neurotrophic support, excitotoxic cell-death, or other factors.1720 This is a time-dependent process and may ultimately lead to loss of the neuronal circuitry that is critical for sustaining the depression syndrome.
Only one patient (Patient #3) has been able to discontinue psychiatric medications. All other patients have required medication. Patient #2 tried to discontinue her medications at 9 months, but relapsed into a mild depression 2 months later. She has remained on medications ever since. In two patients, residual depression at 18 months and 36 months post-BAC clearly improved when antidepressants were added to mood-stabilizers. The need to continue antidepressant medications indicates that BAC, despite its benefits, does not abolish the psychobiological disturbance that underlies the depressive illness.
The emotional effect of BAC appears to have selectively attenuated sadness associated with depressive illness. BAC has not prevented three patients from experiencing bereavement reactions in response to important deaths. BAC has also not interfered with the capacity to experience other emotions, such as pleasure, anxiety, and anger. This pattern of preserved reactive sadness suggests that BAC selectively interferes with sadness linked to the putative and primary limbic psychobiological disturbance of the depressive syndrome, a bottom-up effect, but not reactive sadness in response to psychosocial loss, a top-down effect.21
Our experience with BAC for depression is limited to eight patients, and our results should therefore be interpreted with appropriate caution. Moreover, we are working with the extreme end of the depressive spectrum. These patients’ psychobiology may be very different from most other patients, whose depressive illness responds to treatment. With these caveats in mind, our results to-date are nonetheless equal to or better than those reported for other surgical procedures for depression (Table 8).
TABLE 8. Limbic Surgery Outcomes
ProcedureFollow-UpCriterionStudyPercentage Obtaining Benefit/Responders
Subcaudate tractotomy222412–30 monthsGCC I and IIRetrospective34%–68%
Cingulotomy25mean of 30 months≥50% reduction in BDI scoreProspective21%
Orbitomedial leucotomy26mean of 14.4 yearsGOM I and IIRetrospective30%–73%
Deep brain stimulation: BA25612 months≥50% reduction in Ham-D-17Prospective55%
GCC: Global Clinical Categories; GOM: Global Outcome Measure; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; Ham-D-17: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item.

Conclusion

One patient, a 75-year-old man, had a poor outcome. His postoperative course was complicated by progressive dementia and parkinsonism secondary to hypertensive small vessel disease. Because of our experience with this particular patient, BAC will no longer be offered to anyone over 60 years of age because of the risk of initially undetectable but later emergent neuropathologies associated with aging that will result in an adverse outcome when combined with BAC. For the remaining seven patients, BAC has been life-saving and has provided sustained benefit, with alleviation of depression and suicidal ideation and an improvement in quality of life that, for some, has been dramatic. All patients, including the 75-year-old patient, had relief of intense suicidal ideation that had been a daily part of their mental state for the preceding several years.
In carefully selected and screened patients, BAC is a treatment option for severe, intractable, and life-threatening depressive illness. For patients under 60 years of age, BAC has had few significant persistent side effects. Fatigue is the one exception, seen in one patient. Long-term neuropsychological capacities and frontal psychobehavioral functioning are mostly unaffected or improved. Most, if not all patients will still need antidepressant medication. In our small cohort, benefit was often already present in the first few days after surgery. BAC appeared to rapidly reduce the intensity of subjective distress, an effect that was best reflected in the remission of suicidal ideation. Improvement continued over the subsequent 2 to 9 months. This current report is preliminary and provides encouraging data about the effectiveness and safety of BAC in patients under 60 years of age.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Justice Barbara Fisher, who served on the screening committee from its inception in 1998 until her appointment to the Supreme Court of British Columbia in November 2004.
None of the authors have any financial or conflict-of-interest disclosures.

References

1.
Fava M: Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 53:649–659
2.
Greenberg BD, Price LH, Rauch SL, et al.: Neurosurgery for intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression: critical issues. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2003; 14:199–212
3.
Cosgrove GR, Rauch SL: Psychosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1995; 6:167–176
4.
Kelly D, Richardson A, Mitchell-Heggs N, et al.: Stereotactic limbic leucotomy: a preliminary report on forty patients. Br J Psychiatry 1973; 123:141–148
5.
Mayberg HS, Lozano AM, Voon V, et al.: Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron 2005; 45:651–660
6.
Lozano AM, Mayberg HS, Giacobbe P, et al.: Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 64:461–467
7.
Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al.: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4:561–571
8.
Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, et al.: Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1982-1983; 17:37–49
9.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Revised. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000
10.
Bridges PK, Bartlett JR, Hale AS, et al.: Psychosurgery: stereotactic subcaudate tractomy: an indispensable treatment. Br J Psychiatry 1994; 165:599–611, discussion 612–613
11.
Honey CR, Nugent RA: A prospective randomized comparison of CT and MRI pre-operative localization for pallidotomy. Can J Neurol Sci 2000; 27:236–240
12.
Hurwitz TA, Mandat T, Forster B, et al.: Tract identification by novel MRI signal changes following stereotactic anterior capsulotomy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2006; 84:228–235
13.
Spreen O, Strauss E: A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary, 2nd Edition. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998
14.
Sibon I, Tison F: Vascular parkinsonism. Curr Opin Neurol 2004; 17:49–54
15.
de Figueiredo JM: Depression and demoralization: phenomenologic differences and research perspectives. Compr Psychiatry 1993; 34:308–311
16.
Clarke DM, Kissane DW: Demoralization: its phenomenology and importance. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2002; 36:733–742
17.
Cowan W: Anterograde and retrograde transneuronal degeneration in the central and peripheral nervous system, in Contemporary Research Methods in Neuroanatomy. Edited by, Nauta WJ, Ebbesson SOE. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1970, pp 217–251
18.
Stefanis L, Burke RE: Transneuronal degeneration in substantia nigra pars reticulata following striatal excitotoxic injury in adult rat: time-course, distribution, and morphology of cell death. Neuroscience 1996; 74:997–1008
19.
DeGiorgio LA, Dibinis C, Milner TA, et al.: Histological and temporal characteristics of nigral transneuronal degeneration after striatal injury. Brain Res 1998; 795:1–9
20.
Ginsberg SD, Martin LJ: Axonal transection in adult rat brain induces transsynaptic apoptosis and persistent atrophy of target neurons. J Neurotrauma 2002; 19:99–109
21.
Ochsner KN, Ray RR, Hughes B, et al: Bottom-up and top-down processes in emotion generation: common and distinct neural mechanisms. Psychol Sci 2009; 20:1322–1331
22.
Malhi GS, Bartlett JR: Depression: a role for neurosurgery? Br J Neurosurg 2000; 14:415–422, discussion 423
23.
Hodgkiss AD, Malizia AL, Bartlett JR, et al.: Outcome after the psychosurgical operation of stereotactic subcaudate tractotomy, 1979-1991. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1995; 7:230–234
24.
Göktepe EO, Young LB, Bridges PK: A further review of the results of sterotactic subcaudate tractotomy. Br J Psychiatry 1975; 126:270–280
25.
Shields DC, Asaad W, Eskandar EN, et al.: Prospective assessment of stereotactic ablative surgery for intractable major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 64:449–454
26.
Sachdev PS, Sachdev J: Long-term outcome of neurosurgery for the treatment of resistant depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2005; 17:478–485

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Pages: 176 - 182
PubMed: 22772665

History

Received: 15 August 2011
Revision received: 17 December 2011
Accepted: 26 December 2011
Published online: 1 April 2012
Published in print: Spring 2012

Authors

Details

Trevor A. Hurwitz, MBChB, MRCP, FRCPC
From the Department of Psychiatry (TAH, JA, CG, RH), Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery (CH), Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (JM, NB), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Forstrom-Jackson, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PT).
Christopher R. Honey, M.D., D.Phil., FRCSC
From the Department of Psychiatry (TAH, JA, CG, RH), Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery (CH), Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (JM, NB), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Forstrom-Jackson, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PT).
Judy Allen, M.D., FRCPC
From the Department of Psychiatry (TAH, JA, CG, RH), Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery (CH), Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (JM, NB), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Forstrom-Jackson, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PT).
Caroline Gosselin, M.D., FRCPC
From the Department of Psychiatry (TAH, JA, CG, RH), Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery (CH), Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (JM, NB), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Forstrom-Jackson, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PT).
Robert Hewko, M.D., FRCPC
From the Department of Psychiatry (TAH, JA, CG, RH), Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery (CH), Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (JM, NB), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Forstrom-Jackson, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PT).
Jeff Martzke, Ph.D., RPsych
From the Department of Psychiatry (TAH, JA, CG, RH), Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery (CH), Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (JM, NB), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Forstrom-Jackson, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PT).
Nicholas Bogod, Ph.D., RPsych
From the Department of Psychiatry (TAH, JA, CG, RH), Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery (CH), Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (JM, NB), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Forstrom-Jackson, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PT).
Patricia Taylor, B.A., LLB
From the Department of Psychiatry (TAH, JA, CG, RH), Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery (CH), Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (JM, NB), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Forstrom-Jackson, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PT).

Notes

Address correspondence to Trevor Hurwitz, Dept. of Psychiatry, UBC Hospital, Vancouver, B.C., Canada; e-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share